Recorded (simulated live) webinars from #GoToWebinar currently do not integrate with MKTO because the Launchpoint integration between GoToWebinar and Marketo does not utilize version 2 of the GoToWebinar API and v2 is required for recorded (simulated live) webinars.Recorded webinars are super beneficial for reusing content and/or having the same webinar run at different times so more people can attend. I need Marketo to be able to pull attendee data from GTW so that they can get into our follow-up programs.
Be able to color code the Gantt chart of a project list to show phases of the project. To reduce real estate, clients frequently request to see a Gantt chart of all their projects with them colored by project phase (i.e. Discover, Creative Development, Review, Launch). Solution Idea: In MS Project, there is a view in the specific project where you can assign which tasks will be on the Gantt line and what color they should be. This then rolls up to any portfolio reporting you do. This might also work with Milestone Paths if they are attached to the Parent Tasks.
This is only a small technical idea for a specific use case, but can be very annoying. If you switch the recurrence off on a recurring batch campaign, but need to restart it again after a while (or activate it after an instance copy), the first date the campaign is set to run is still set to the first time it was set to run originally, so you manually have to update that start date to a date in the future. It would be really helpful if Marketo can reset to the first possible future date the campaign can run at the originally scheduled time of day.
Description -I am wondering what the ETA is for having feature parity of viewing reports in Target to look at Targeted vs. Control for the main primary metric for an Auto-Target test when we select Analytics as the reporting source.Why is this feature important to you - This is a big issue for us b/c often we are selecting a Target metric (like clicks) as the optimization goal for the Auto-Target test and we can’t easily replicate that in analytics.The Target report for the Primary goal (optimization goal) when we select analytics as the reporting source - it does not give us the rolled up view of Targeted vs. Control like when we use Target as the reporting source.How would you like the feature to work - Would like to view Targeted vs. Control rolled up view in Target reports when we select Analytics as the reporting source. Current Behaviour -
Hi Adobe,It will be great to have some year over year comparison visualizations option available in Adobe Analytics Workspace as shown in the below image. This will help users/execs better understand and compare the trends over the same time previous years. Currently we are having to extract Adobe data in to BI tools like Domo or Tableau to build such charts.Thanks,Srujana- https://rnd.aspencore.com/eetimes-redesign-adtest/
When downloading a proof summary or choosing to print a proof summary the file naming convention is general and does not readily identify the file. When choosing the print option the file is named Workfront Proof.When choosing to download PDF print summary the file is name with the proof reference ID that cannot be search in Workfront.I would like to explore the possibility to have the proof document name with version number to easily identify the proof in the file name without having to manually name the file. Additionally it would be helpful to provide a Workfront document URL in the footer that will direct reviewers back to the actual proof in Workfront.
When using Program Tokens in an email subject line MSI will show {{my.Subject Line}} instead of the actual value of the token. That defeats the purpose of using tokens.
Would like to customize Project Details - add a field that will display on the opening page of the project:
Issue: the date picker is literally translated from English. M | T | W | T | F | S | S. Chinese Traditional is translated correctly (i.e. M = letter M or T = letter T); however, this is not localised; so users in Taiwan do not recognise what the letters M | T | W | T | F | S | S refer to in their local language Chinese Traditional other than the literal letters.Solution: translate the date picker so the abbreviated days apply to the local market, or don't translate them.
Issue: we receive a number of requests in the US, EMEA and APAC regarding the ability to assess how many hours are worked in the office vs. remotely.Potential solution: implement a checkbox in the comments functionality to allow users to toggle an office or remote option. There could be a setting in the Timesheet Profile to make the selection of this mandatory.
Issue: Some EMEA markets have to follow legislation that restricts working overtime without a formal agreement.Solution: option in the Timesheet Profile to limit the number of hours a user can enter per day (i.e. 8 hours per day or 10 hours per day).
Issue: Some EMEA markets have to follow legislation that restricts working weekends without a formal agreement.Solution A: general option to disable users in a Timesheet Profile to enter time on a weekend.Solution B: option in the user profile to disable weekend working (i.e. not able to enter hours on a Saturday or Sunday).
Add the Filter on this Page function that is on the project tab to the issues tab,‚
In Bizible, we should be able to configure what URL parameter Bizible looks to for the Campaign of the touchpoint to improve reporting. Currently, Bizible only looks for utm_campaign, but many organizations use other URL parameters to track this information. Having this in place would vastly improve breaking down Bizible data by the Campaign dimension and create a less confusing experience for end users.
Can we have "calendar events" show in workspace?
Hello, What if we could see a clean and simple counter for a scheduled email send or newsletter? Thanks!
This is a bit puzzling, when submitting a simple request to the queue I put in subject, description, add file and scroll....................... because there is some ridiculous amount of white space, just to find submti button at the end. this happens regardless where the form is submitted: via requests page, emebedded form etc.Poor UX
I recently learned that adding a user to a Proof only gives them access to see the Proof and not the document. This means that if you create a file and send a Proof to your client to review and approve. After they make their decision, they have no way of getting back to that document unless they have saved the email and the Proof hasn't been achieved.My stakeholders were very confused (and so was I) when they went to the Project and there were zero Documents attached. I soon learned that sharing a Proof only shares the Proof and regretfully had to tell my 500+ users that they need to do "double work" and "share twice"
Suggestion:Allow the user to select or group Proof records in Workfront (in the Documents section) and launch Proof Viewer. Inside Proof Viewer, the user has the option to navigate through all the selected proof records without having to exit the Viewer. The user can review, comment, or make decisions.Benefit:Speeds up the workflow for reviewers/approvers who have a large volume to get through
Currently, if we have an outside partner on a project they can't see any documents we upload unless we manually add them to each doc via the sharing tool. If you're on the project, you should be able to see the documents - even if you're not on the main team using WF.
Much like how you can see documents added to tasks at the project level, we need this ability at a Portfolio level. There should be an option where the documents can ladder up to the Portfolio, where files added to tasks or projects can be seen at the Portfolio level. Documents just need to ladder up - or at least have the option to enable or disable this ability. We've found ourselves with a significant amount of orphaned files, and at our organization is being seen as a large limitation of the platform. Please help us!
Description -Currently, the content fragment model editor does not contain a radio data type.Why is this feature important to you -Most of the time content fragment contains some data like selecting gender. for this kind of work, we have to use the dropwon data type.for refrennce,I have written one blog for a similar kind of feature just to add color picker data type.https://blogs.perficient.com/2020/10/20/adding-a-color-picker-to-the-aem-content-fragment-model-editor/
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: A feature that can allow users to select and complete multiple inbox items. Use-case: Different assets in AEM DAM are getting submitted through workflow for librarian to review and publishing activity. Right now, Approver has to select single item in inbox and complete it. This process needs to be repeated for each workflow item in inbox Current/Experienced Behavior: Right now, We can select and complete single approval workflow item from AEM inbox. Improved/Expected Behavior: Allowing users to select multiple workflow items (same workflow process with different payloads) and complete(Approve) them one go instead selecting each item and completing it Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5 Customer-name/Organization name: Hershey Screenshot (if applicable): NA Code package (if applicable): NA
As an admin, I would like the ability to set a retention policy and have proofs and documents deleted. At a minimum, a way to bulk delete would work as well. Proofs take up a large amount of storage and with legal document retention rules, it would be helpful to have an easy way to delete unneeded large 'files'.
I would like for the project team (Plan and Wok licenses) not to be able to delete the reports and dashboards that have been configured in the Layout Template (left navigation panel) for them.Ref to case 4111981206
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
