Build better products with our product team
I'd like to propose that Adobe Target have similar reporting capabilities as Adobe Analytics has when it comes to administrative reports. The reason for this is really so we can audit and maintain records of the Target implementation and usage.License usage logsEnriching the Target admin API requestsAdding the Target activity used when querying a Target audienceAdding the location (url) of the Target activity when querying the Target activity
Description - When using multiple audiences in an AB Test, QA URLs do not work unless you also qualify for the audience. This makes validation prior to launch in some cases impossible. Audience qualification should not be required for simply validating the experience response from Target.Why is this feature important to you - It is not always possible to organically qualify for an audienceHow would you like the feature to work - This should work like any other QA URL...regardless of audience qualification, a QA url should force you into the expected experience and return the appropriate response.Current Behaviour - AB Tests with multiple audiences require you to also qualify for the audience in order to use QA URLs
When client's have an SSO portal that only allows individuals to log into WF via a link on their portal, there are some notification complications. If that user receives a notification with a link to the object in WF, and they click the link, they will get an error message because the native link in WF does not have the information appended to it that would inform the SSO portal on where to send the user. This is regardless of whether or not the user is logged into WF. This is a complicated scenario but a very real scenario. So, it basically devalues the communication coming out of WF.The fix would be the ability to do deep linking. In other words, in the notifications area the option to add a suffix or prefix to the native url that is being sent out via the notification. I think this warrants additional discussion with more technically savvy individuals, which I can facilitate as needed.
Currently when we put a date in the Actual Completion Date field the system marks the issue as "Closed" and I've been told there's no way to change this. However, we have resolution of an Issue set up to show as "Resolved". So when we utilize the Mark As Done feature it marks the issue as "Resolved" as it's supposed to. There's a difference between Closed and Resolved. It would be nice if the system recognized both features and they both resorted to the same resolution type. It's confusing and requires a learning curve to teach users.
It is great to see how many API calls there are over the 7 days period from the UI and which API user is making X amount of calls. However, it would be great to take it a step further and have more real time reporting. I have several engineers reach out to me saying their calls are taking forever to make it to Marketo. It would be nice to see a list of running API jobs (Similar to the Campaign Queue) to understand why it is taking so long and the other jobs that are running concurrently.
Currently the Change the Default From Email and From Label an Admin-only function. It'd be great if, as an Admin, I could set these as defaults for my whole instance and all users (one step further would be to make them conditional to the channel tags). Alternatively, have a way for individual users to set this for themselves as default other than their details in ‘My account’? This will prevent some mistakes and save effort of having to update the values on each new email created.
Smartsheet has some great automated notification capabilities that I think Workfront could benefit from. For example, being able to set up an automated notification to selected individuals when new issues are added to a specific project (not globally). Or when the status of an issue within a specific project changes, automatically notify the person who entered in the issue. The global notifications are really hard to manage when a wide variety of teams are using the same instance so any project or request-specific capabilities would be fantastic!
Description -Please add the ability to search "resource changes" in the edit library screen. At the moment it is possible to search "resources upstream" but not the "resource changes" which seems odd as it is the changes you are work on and therefore most interested in 🙂Why is this feature important to you -Improved workflow/easy of use: We often have a lot of changes in a library. Without the search functionality it's difficult to find things.How would you like the feature to work -Add a search box at the top of the resource changes list.Current Behaviour -One can only search "resources upstream" but not "resource changes" in the edit library screen
When creating a layout templates, allow the Backlog page to be hidden in the navigation panel and also the Hide/unhide button for the Backlog list on the Kanban view. This will enable access control for agile team members who don't need access to the backlog.
When on the proof detail page in WF view, the name showing should reflect the file name of the proof for the specific version that is selected in the version drop-down menu at the moment.
Description - Requesting for a new Metric to be added, which will give the number of Days a user visited a Page / Feature in a specific time period.Why is this feature important to you - Since the past few months, we have been getting a lot of asks on the Day frequency for users to a construct, which is not available in Omniture currently. With multiple new features being added to Flipkart, this has become a critical metric for us, to monitor the stickiness of users.How would you like the feature to work - For the overall platform or any specific page, we can get Visits or Visitors. 'Days' as a metric will give us the count of the number of Days in a date range that the user visited.Current Behaviour - There is no metric which will tell us the number of Days a user visited on the platform or a particular construct. A lot of analyses are blocked due to this.
There are some reviewers like Regulatory who need to make dozens of comments and have offline collaboration on a routed PDF before adding comments to the proof.While they like PHQ (Workfront Proof) by-and-large, in our old system it was more efficient to download the PDF, collaborate and make comments, and upload it via Adobe's FDF file functionality (where offline comments can be merged with a shared online proof).So whereas in our old system they could upload the final comments via FDF in 15 minutes, it takes an hour to completely retype and re-markup online. That's costing us valuable time and money.
To ease the assignment of people to still unassigned tasks, wouldn't it be fantastic to see in a pop-up which Jobrole is linked to the unassigned task at the moment that you hover over the task?
It would be helpful if you could make a Parent task with several Child tasks recur as a set instead of just one task recurring at a time.
This box doesn't seem to do anything. If it's just for the end user to manually input the number of hours that should be paid as overtime, then we would like the ability to hide this field. Our Payroll department determines how many hours on the timesheet should be qualified for overtime pay - not the user. This is because there are specific rules around calculating overtime that user's don't necessarily know.
Description -For the Adobe Audience Manager Business Practitioner Adobe Certified Expert Exam Guide Exam number: AD0-E453. Are there any specific topic resources available for free to me?Why is this feature important to you -Due to get booked in from work & sit the exam January next year. I am also looking at once I've passed the above, to sit the Master exam for AAM. How much of a knowledge jump up is this? I believe there are just 2x AAM exams ? Any advice/help would be great! Thanks,Amelia
When going into the Edit Task window there is not much space to operate within the window. The lack of a horizontal scroll bar makes it tough to work in as well. I would love to see the ability to use this window with more real estate.
Adobe Campaign Manager Classic V7 8889Use case Description :Lack of adequate documentation on API/JS framework within ACMBusiness Value :Reduce the learning curve for our campaign developers with right level of documentation
User is requesting the ability to Subscribe to their requests with the 'Requests I've Submitted' tab, rather than having to open up each request and subscribe.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - Product Price in Order Confirmation / Recommendations in Email DesignerHow would you like the feature to work - Flexibility for formatting/ ability to do some calculations on available personalization fields (similar to https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/target/using/recommendations/recommendations-design/customizing-a-template.html?lang=en#customize-a-design-using-velocity)Current Behavior - 1. Product price (through custom resource fields) which is stored and already rounded to 2 decimal places is displayed with 12 decimal places and there is no way to fix that. 2. data-nl-* attributes and their usage is not documented. Would need the flexibility to change/ manipulate these in Email Designer source code.
Workfront timesheet starts on Sunday. Our workweek starts on Monday.In order to sync up our timesheets with our pay periods, we have the timesheet start on Monday.This creates a grayed out box for the first Sunday (WF's start of week) and then creates a second week that has a Sunday where we can enter hours but the rest of the days are grayed out.This really confuses people.
It would be great if there were record count fields for each object and custom form that we could use to display in views of any sort (e.g. reports, lists, etc). This would also allow us to use these in the creation of calculated fields (objects) and columns (reports).Examples:- Total tasks / total projects = x- Total record count for projects / total record count including custom form A = x
DescriptionTypically, we want to compare the latest version of a rule/element to the live version. It is very rare that we want to compare to the previously saved version which is likely to be a minor tweak/save point.Why is this feature important to you?This simple enhancement would save timeHow would you like the feature to work?Default to live revision vs. latest revision. For example, if the current revision is 10, and the live revision is 6, default to revision 6 (live) vs. revision 10 (latest)Current Behaviour?Defaults to latest revision -1 vs. latest revision . For example, if the current revision is 10, and the live revision is 6, if currently defaults to revision 9 vs. revision 10(latest)
Currently, when you edit a global approval process that is already in use, your changes affect all objects throughout the system that are already associated with it. If you add a new approver to the current stage on an approval process that has already started on an object, the process for that object resets and the approvers have to start over. This makes it difficult to maintain updates to global approval paths without affected objects that are in progress. For example, I have a case where a team leader has been promoted to another department. I now have to remove him from an approval path, and add his successor, however there are close to 80 items that have already entered the approval path, and which will now be reset for all the previous approvers to have to 're-approve' the item. My work around is to create a new approval path, and link the queue topic to the new approval path so that any new items are linked to the new path, but it would be nice to be able to govern whether you want all objects to be reset, or not.
Many entities are using Google vs Outlook as their email / calendar solution. It would be helpful to have the ability to connect Workfront to Google.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
