Hi there, I like the data delivers option via Data Warehouse delivery very much. Especially because you can get a native Tableau format. But I would like to get at least 12 months of data rolling. Currently there´s no option that meets our requirement. Currently available options A/B (see attached picture) A) If I choose option "A" the period is not rolling! B) "B" doesn´t provide at least 12 months. I mean it makes no sense to me. The advantage of using the Data Warehouse option is to generate data automatically to feed 3rd party systems (e.g. Tableau in a native format). No? So why not providing a rolling preset of at least 12 months??? Okay, I could use report builder (Excel plug in) instead. But then I will lose the Tableau export format!!! Simply put: I would like to get a preset that provides last 12 months rolling in a Tableau export format. Cheers, Juergen
Hi Adobe, It will be very helpful if there is a feature to select the traits we would like to include from third party data sets in marketplace while building a LAL model. Current features only allow to exclude the traits with a maximum of 500 trait exclusion. With thousands of traits in each dataset, it makes it extremely difficult to arrive at the traits we are interested to use, by using exclusion method. Also it will be nice if we can see the total count of traits selected while building the model for additional validations. Thanks
It would be very helpful to be able to use an Approval Process for a Document Approval, that allows using Groups/Teams as recipients, for instances when the "Review & Approval" tool is overkill.
It would be great if we can get some analytics on each Launch property. I found myself asking these questions from time to time:- What are the Rules and Data Elements in production library that have not been fired or used for a long time.- What rules that are causing JS errors occasionally-How many Rules and Data Element in each property, and breakdown by their types-Who are the most active users in each property-Publishing frequency of each property...... With these data, we can keep each property clean and optimized, and just better governance overall. Best of all, these data will be available as a report suite in Analysis Workspace.
When you are working from a storyboard, you have to navigate to the task or issue page to make updates, view additional details, etc.I think it would be great if we could open the task or issue as a floating (pop-out) window so that we can stay in one place to get work done. JIRA and many other agile products do this and it is a nice UX.
Currently, if the creator of a custom form is removed from their home group, the custom form continues to be shared with the group, but the creator loses their access despite still showing up as the owner and having sharing access. Solution would be to have the creator continue to have access.
We'd like to be able to report on how long it takes for proofs to be approved within stages. This would be particularly helpful for us to see where we can be more efficient in proofing workflows with the various groups/stakeholders.
When creating a custom form, the user's Group is automatically added to the form's permission and the form creator cannot remove this group from the permission set. This is problematic when trying to comply with CCI requirements. By default, only the form creator should be added to the permissions.
why can't you pull in a custom form into a report with all its fields and pull in multiple to produce a report? why can you pull in section breaks of a custom form into a report? Reports can't just be tabular they need to have an aesthetic and be able to show groups of information.
Can we have a new metric "Monthly returning visitors" that take into account visitors with 2 or more visits in the same month ?
It would be great to see the team agile view (Kanban or Scrum) in a report or dashboard. We think the user experience of navigating to people/teams is confusing for users to find a high level visual status of the work that is planned.
During the most recent WF update, the last name of the person tagged has been removed. You can see the last name while searching but once the contact is selected the last name is removed from view. It doesnt show back up until after you have submitted the notification. Since you can not add or edit a notification once its submitted if by chance you selected the wrong one your only option is to delete. We have several users internal workers and clients with common names and its helpful to be able to verify the correct person was selected before submitting.
Hi team,Is it possible to directly go to the last page in the reports. Its difficult to navigate to page with last row of data without knowing which is the last page, for eg if my last row of data is at page 22 then how do I figure it out.
The internet standard for required fields in a form is to have a red * Next to the field to indicate what form objects are required. In Workfront forms these are bolded. This requires an additional unnecessary training step by our team to inform users that Bolded items are required. Could we have the developers change the bold to *?
HiI would like to propose one improvement to the use of comments in Adobe Document Cloud.Paste active links (url to sites or other documents uploaded to document cloud) on comments of pdf files shared on Document Cloud.This functionality would be very useful.
When you enter text into the email body/message field when setting up delivery on a report, this message is attached as a .htm attachment instead of showing in the email body itself. This is not a good user experience and the message could very easily be missed. It would make more sense and be far more effective if the message appears in the body of the email.
As system admins, we see everyone's templates within the instance. Can we unshare any only see our groups?
I would like to request for an ability to add comments when responding to a Project Approval request.
The mbox cookie uses a pipe delimiter as follows:mbox=PC#e03088f9e8cb4e07a5ad1103f49a0b58.17_0#1646387508|session#aef29d047d614042a63ffbdb82b87c06#1583144568; Some customers have firewalls that block the pipe character in the mbox cookie and requires that the character is encoded.
The Resources we use are in 3 different locations/ time zones, and all have a slightly different Schedule from one another.The system requires that we set to a Default Schedule, which isn't always accurate when reviewing the Resource Management schedule.Can the DEFAULT be removed and base it on just the Schedule the user has been assigned to?
A real pain point is having ALL prior projects, etc. be impacted by a change in a used Custom Form. In the event that a custom form is updated (due to changing business needs), then we're required to add in a NEW custom form (i.e. version 2). In a practical example, if I need to add ONE piece of information to a form, then in order for me to 1) not lost historical data; 2) have a satisfactory form on project moving forward, I must add them both the project template--thereby impacting all "net new" projects. I would expect that simply making the edit on a custom form would "time stamp" the edit so ONLY those projects moving forward would be impacted with the new information.
I think it would be great if we could export meta-description from Target activity Goals & Settings section. We currently export a list of live activities to use it in our dashboard showing test live but it would be great if we could export also meta-description showing what the test is about.
It would be ideal to have the ability to create roles in Target similar to Analytics. We have a number of specific needs with regard to custom roles, right down to specifying the ability to make changes on the individual Experiences, Targeting, Goals & Settings. For instance, we need these roles:Approver Only - Cannot create or edit an activity, only observe and approve (e.g. start, stop)Analyst - Can observe and only edit the Goals & Settings Plus we'd need to specify these abilities by subdomain and url (regx style). So some roles would only apply to parts of the site. I know about Properties, but dev time is rare enough. Adding more code to the page is and expense, cumbersome, and we don't have Premium. Being able to create these roles and others would help Target fit better with many teams.
As a worker I want the actual start date of a task with the constraint of finish-start to bump to current time when I complete a predecessor task ahead of the planned schedule. Given I finish my consultation call ahead of schedule, I want my next design task to fall within my standard SLA window of 10 days instead of sticking to the plan and still due 15 days from now despite the fact that I finished my consultation early. This should be an option to turn on/off at the system level, knowing that not all schedules work this way. But this would reduce the PM time to manually move the start date of the next task to today to match the duration I originally intended despite the fact that I finished ahead of schedule. Related to:https://experience.workfront.com/s/idea/0870z000000XhugAAC/detail
Some of our Account Teams need the ability to export the gantt view to Excel in order to make some modifications.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
