By default, proof will NOT display slides marked as "Hidden" in PowerPoint. There are times however when we still want to view and comment on those slides. Having a toggle to opt to view them or hide them would be ideal.
It would be great to be able to add a template task to multiple parent tasks at once, instead of only being able to add to one parent task at a time. That way if there is one task series that I want to go within each month in my project, I can easily add it to every month's parent task at once instead of having to keep re-entering the template and individually adding those tasks in.
While being able to empty the proof trash is good so as to save space in our environment, it's rather scary because we all know that the day you empty all the trash is the one day you will need to restore one. It would be ideal if you were able to select specific proofs to empty from the trash. And, be able to sort by date added. We would use it be sorting by date, the selecting all, but then unselect the ones from the past week or so. Even better, if you could select by date range and empty ones that were older than say 7, 14 or 30 days.
It would be beneficial to have the "All Tasks" selection option at the top of templates/projects so users do not have to scroll all the way to the bottom to select that option.
I'd like to be able to correct any project data after Completion.Sometimes my Planners need to correct some things that were made by mistake. Now if we want to do so that will impact the Project Actual Completion date which is very far from being ideal for sometimes a really stupid but annoying mistake and impacts our figures very seriously.If I (as an admin) could do that without impacting the completion date, would be great. An alternative solution could be if I (again as an Admin) could override the Actual Completion Date after the project closure manually.
We have a custom form field called "suppliers" and it contains hundreds of choices. Certain suppliers have special requirements that the people working on these projects need to know about. It would be so nice if we had the ability to flag certain suppliers within the custom form so that, when selected, that field stands out as different from other selections - such as turning red, having a flag, etc. to alert the workers to view another document.
Some users need the "changes required" decision type to be available when creating a proof and some of our users need that decision type to NOT be an option.We want a way to limit what decision types are available, whether it's an automated workflow setting, group setting, or personal setting.
When contouring resource allocation day to day in the Resource Scheduler, we should not only be able to see how many hours have been allocated per role (this is also addressed in another Idea post), but also, when removing hours from a day, the tool should automatically distribute the remaining hours across the duration of the task. This would speed up the process and not require us to perform unnecessary math.
If there are 2+ users assigned to a single task, and the task is set to simple with a different allocation of hours between the resources (example below), there is no way to see how many hours are allocated to one person vs. the other if I am the resource working on the task. I suggest adding a feature so that each resource can clearly see their allocated time. Example: Resource 1: Assigned 1 planned hour Resource 2: Assigned 2 planned hours How do these two resources know the amount of time allocated to each person? Along the same lines, when using the contouring feature of the scheduling tool, how is the resource able to see the # of hours allocated on day 1 vs day #, etc.? I don't see a way a resource is able to see this either.
When converting an issue/request to a task or object we can currently keep the issue open and resolvable by the object or delete the issue. The following additional options would be useful.Do not make the issue resolvable to the object AND keep the issue open (so multiple objects can be converted from one issue) OR Allow multiple resolvable objects so the issue is only resolved when all resolvable objects are completeDo not make the issue resolvable to the object AND close the issue (but do not delete for reporting purposes)
Dashboard Print MUST BE IMPROVED. Not possible to print the complete details.Else, we miss data & info EVERYTIME.
Hello Team, Currently we're seeing the republished state notification in different property where the republished library not exist. So its better to show the notification where it belongs to. For example. Look at the below screenshot. The republished library AppD belongs to different property but I can able to see the republished notification in above property where AppD Fixes library not exist at all. Looks like its a Launch UI bug - but if it's not considered while implementation so sharing the post as an IDEA.
It would be really useful to be able to report the Planned, Budgeted, And Actual hours booked per project by Job Role/Resource by Month (allocation date) . Currently i have to run a resource estimate report and/or a Finance report and compare. This is difficult because a) these reports do not have the same reporting attributes and b) it makes it difficult to track to plan.
What is the benefit for limiting "severity" classifications to Issues? If the field exists at the issue level, what is the harm in exposing it at the task or project level? I'd like to see this available or the severity field does nothing since we work mostly in tasks & projects.
We use Workfront to manage mailings. Ideally I would like the planned completion date to show the date the letters drop in the mail to our members; however, it shows the day after the letter mails because we wait on print details. This results in incorrect information to our requesters and the condition shows as late
I know that frame.io has an integration with adobe premiere pro so that you can upload proofs from the premier pro platform and comments from proof show up in premiere pro. It would be extremely helpful if there was a similar integration for workfront proof.
We have a Field that is a multi select checkbox field, sorted in a specific way on the custom form. When run in a report, the report pulls in that information in multiple different ways, not the way we have it planned in the form. WorkFront has told me this is just how that field works however, for our company, we need it displayed in a certain way to reduce confusion and errors when reading the column within the report.
If we could include more verbose meta data in published libraries, no matter how old they are, that would be very helpful. I had a customer recently and with them, reverse engineer all their Launch rules after the previous Launch “owner” left their company. It took almost 2 months to trace down rule creators and email ghosts to figure out where everything came from. I know we have the ability to Audit Events but its very clunky to jump to a different site section to review all this information.
Hey guys, for websites we have the awesome ability to set up a data element in Launch and call _satellite.getVar to get the value of that data element, as described on Launch object reference. We are using this with constant data elements from the core extension to provide some config values to our websites (as described here). Awesome! Now we would like to do the same thing with our apps. Is there any equivalent way of getting the value of a constant data element configured in Launch via the SDK in apps? This would be a killer use case for us and safe us a lot of headache with our agencies. Best,Frederik
Please make the field width for Available Report Suites and "selected report suites" wider on the Classification - Create FTP Account screen as our our report suite names are cut off and can't tell which one is the staging vs production one. Example below of it being cut off:
Would be great to see the ability to specify the relevant permissions at the Workspace custom template level to give specific users the ability to edit that Workspace custom template.
When you change the name of a document and then upload a new document on the blue bar of the document you change the name of: It will not keep the name of the document you edit the name for. It keeps the initial name. For example: If I change the name of a document from "ABC123" to "ABC768" and then upload a new document on top of it -blue bar- Under ProofHQ drop-down where you see the versions it will show you "ABC123" Not "ABC768" Please see attached image for reference.
We would like to see the name of each file under Document Details> All Versions. Please see attached image for reference.
It'd be great too have the functionality of reporting on how many comments were made in a proof. We want to see a report with the number of comments made in a proof. It'd be great to also report on how many documents are stored in the documents tab. Please see image for reference.
Need the ability to rename categories for our requesters different from what we call those categories in our reporting for internal purposes (because sometime corporate lingo doesn't mean anything to our customer). Would resolve if we have two labels for field titles: one that the end-users sees when they make requests, and one used for the back-end label for admins who have to order and organize the many fields.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
