It would be of valuable use to some large organizations which are split into many Exp Cloud login companies to have an option to share WorkSpace projects and templates across Login Companies. An example of this would be as follows. 1. User A create a complex project in WorkSpace in login company A (Top level ORG)2. User A would like to share this project with User B in login company B (Same top level ORG, but different login company)3. User A now have to recreate the complex project in login company B, generating more work in Analytics. If anyone else thinks this would be of great value please vote up this Idea or comment on your use case below.
Good afternoon, Was discussing a current limitation of Adobe Audience Manager with our Adobe consultant, and she suggested raising a feature request with you (to then pass on to the product / engineering teams). Context:NOW TV is a digital TV streaming service (part of the Comcast family). Our users can pick and choose from a variety of content passes: CINEMA / ENTERTAINMENT / REALITY TV / KIDS / SPORTS – and are not tied to any contract. They can select monthly subscriptions and cancel them whenever they like.To make data processing and compute as efficient as possible, we store every user action within our service into our data lake as an event (with corresponding event timestamp) Challenge: Since we operate as a subscription business, a lot of things we do require us to use dates, e.g to know when a subscription expires, to calculate our customer lifetime value, tenure, etc.However, unlike Adobe Campaign, Audience Manager does not understand the concept of a date (or a timestamp). The impact for us is that we then have to create very complex logics to make the data work specifically for Audience Manager e.g instead of using the date a pass expires, every single day we have to calculate the number of days until a pass expires.We have more than 11.5 Millions of accounts in the UK alone, and this example is only one attribute out of dozens of customer attributes that we use that do require such date calculations. (We also operate across 6 EU countries)Adding support for date values would be extremely beneficial for us and speed up our release cycles. Ask: Could we add support for date values in Audience Manager as a roadmap candidate? (would benefit all subscription businesses, independent of vertical) Cheers, Robin
The drag & drop functionality on custom forms today is a PAIN. Since new fields are added to the bottom of a form, if you have many fields, it takes FOREVER to drag them to/near the top. If there was some kind of birds eye view of a form, that would be better.
It would be awesome to be able to create templates for custom form sections that are long or complex and need to be reused multiple times. USE CASE: We manually build out our product category and market/technology application taxonomies so that we get accurate tagging from users. We then use those taxonomies on multiple different forms, but have to rebuild them every time OR we have also tried creating a separate form with those (a kind of mock template) and build around them. The latter option is a pain because often times that tagging is at the bottom of the form and the drag and drop functionality is not great.
Hello, Could you please feed back to the engineer team that limiting the analysis for traits ( minimum population is 28,000 during the last two weeks)segments (minimum population is 70,000 during the last two weeks) is doing a deservice to the platform from a usability perspective by limiting the commercial scope of the functionality. We don’t need statistical significance to calculate the overlap between two populations and should be left to the user to decide what’s viable for them. I do appreciate a minimum for building a lookalike, where statistical models are being applied but not on overlapping. We have a large volume of niche websites and removing the overlap limitation would help tremendously monetise those websites better. Let me know if there is any way you can remove the minimums for both segments and traits. Thank youAdriana
It would be ideal to be able to tag the specific link(s) in each email as the CTA for the piece. This would be especially helpful when combined with more advanced reporting/deeper dives into email performance (Unsubscribe to CTA activity, etc.)
Looking to have consistency with colors in visualizations throughout a project. As of now, we can't manage consistency with across visualizations using the same data source - or across an entire project. Control over assigning colors in legends would be awesome. @jenla5 has asked that if this idea is desired, a post be created. Creating post. Thank you
When testing subtitles in Premiere CC Pro, I'm missing a feature. In a speech, the subtitle is usually continuous, meaning that one subtitle follows another. After the manuscript, markers are set in step 1. Then the subtitle is drawn over the length of the speech. And the individual subtitles are completed with +. The length of a new subtitle is always the same. Here I would imagine a function that fills the length to the next marker. Now you always have to extend the length manually with the mouse. Via shortcut or right mouse button would be a great help here.
There are many useful sync options that are available to SFDC CRM environments:But for MS Dynamics environments, there's just one: "Sync lead to Microsoft".The lack of these additional options really has our hands tied for including specific activity within our smart campaigns and flow steps - specifically "change owner", "create task" and "Delete lead". Please enhance the sync capabilities between Marketo and MS Dynamics.
In the AA general UI, Users can schedule reports to be sent to their emails. As reports are sent in a un-secured and un-encrypted manner, confidential reports / data can leak from those un-encrypted emails. So following is suggested: 1. Users may be prevented (by User Admin) to use scheduled reports via email. They can however download reports to their desktops locally.
One of the main uses of the Get Lead Changes endpoint for the REST API is to retrieve previous value data, often when some process has gone awry and values need to be reverted. In high-activity instances, there may be several things changing a data value, however—even if you attempt to constrain by using a generated static list for relevant changes, if a value changes multiple times, you wind up getting noise in your results to try to find the original data value change. Given that all Data Value Change activities will always have an associated Reason attribute, would it be possible to add a Reason filter when retrieving data? This would streamline the process of retrieving data for reversions.
I'd like to add another option to the Frequency menu that is called "one-time". This would deliver the report on the "starting on" date above and that's it. Right now to do this, you have to redo the Ending On date and scroll back upwards of a year. My main use case is sending a report at the end of a campaign where I want the "final" report to be delivered, but don't want to be sending it during the time in between. Related, one annoyance is when I have to scroll back through the year on the calendar. The bottom of the calendar seems fixed, while the top adjusts depending on how many weeks there are in a month. If it goes from 5 lines to 6, I have to move the mouse to scroll to the previous/next month rather than being able to quickly scroll through months.
Currently, it is far too easy to inadvertently enable or disable your MS Dynamics CRM sync. Yes, I speak from experience. And you will find that, having done so, it is highly likely that you will only discover the error after other business processes and stakeholders have been negatively affected. Not only is the control for this critical core function an unreasonably small icon on the tool bar tab, but clicking this control does not result in any confirmation/caution message indicating that the enabling or disabling of a vital system integration is in question. There is a very brief message that appears in the upper right hand corner that tells you that you have either turned it on or off but this could be seen as a very weak solution. Messages like that can easily be interpreted as confirming what you think you have done. I meant to re-enable my sync. I see that little message, it says the sync has been re-enabled. Close that message. We should see a clearer message about what we are about to do. In fact, this standard confirmation behavior exists for most other assets and elements within Marketo, including such trivial actions as deleting empty folders, or programs with no members/activity/assets, and smart lists with no filters and no usage. This situation is compounded by the fact that there is no Admin accessible data trail on this functionality or these events. There is no indication when the sync was established. When it was interrupted. When it was re-established, and by whom. There is no event entry created on the Admin Audit Trail when DCRM syncs are enabled or disabled. The aforementioned "small icon" control for this critical integration displays what could be classified as confusing language: Disable Sync - "Is the CRM sync disabled? Do I click the icon to disable it? Is it actually enabled? If so, why doesn't it say that?" Enable Sync - "That means it's 'Enabled', right?"I feel for any Marketo admin with dyslexia. Sync Disabled OR Disable Sync. Which is it? Add to this, that the little icon itself does not change at all regardless of the sync being Disable (meaning it is actually Enabled) or Enable (meaning it is actually... you know... or is it the other way around?). Why not report on connection "up" time, "down" time? Why not enable email notifications subscriptions for Sync Enable/Disable events? This area of Marketo is long overdue for a major overhaul. Not just everything above but the entire native sync with Dynamics. Come on Adobe, you're killing me.
We would love the option to hide the 'Project Condition' field from the Project screen since it tends to cause more confusion and concern than we think it should. While it can be useful to prompt Owners to take a deeper dive into a project, business partners outside of our department tend to panic when seeing their project is 'At Risk' or 'In Trouble.'
When downloading a Workspace to a PDF, if that process is taking too long, Workspace pops up a blue box that asks if you want an email sent when it's finished running. It isn't very obvious that you need to click anywhere. Can that be improved please?
In the scenario below, both visualizations are linked to the same source table. It would be ideal if the colors were set at the source table level so they matched the same variable across visualizations. This should apply to any visualization, so summary change and summary number would not all appear as the same color.I have a donut chart visualization showing all traffic sources, direct traffic is about 85% so you can't really see the details of the other channels. Below this I have another donut chart visualization showing all non-direct traffic sources, so you can see the full breakdown. Because colors are auto-allocated, I have the same color representing direct traffic in one viz and SEM in the other viz. This is not helpful and is quite confusing at a quick glance. If colors could be linked across visualizations, or manually allocated per viz, it would be much more executive dashboard friendly.
We have a bunch of active campaigns -- It would be great to remove a list of people from EVERY active flow, versus having to do it one-by-one.
There should be the ability to deactivate Teams & Roles no longer use in order to preserve historical data
We have opened a ticket with Workfront on this issue and they plan to fix it but cannot tell me when. If you have experienced this issue and find it as frustrating as I do, please add your comments so the WF Product Team can see how everyone feels about this.We have been establishing custom status lists for the many groups that are onboarding to our instance. I have 2 custom statuses: Closed - {do not use=closed} and {complete=Closed}These custom statuses are for different groups:Groups: XXX PMO (doesn't want to see complete. uses "do not use" as closed, having renamed the Closed status)XXX PMO Execute (here we want to see closed - labeled Closed)When doing a report to see what statuses are being used - the report label on chart bars or wedges says "do not use, closed" and we just want the "closed" to show up. We aren't sure why it is combining "do not use" and "closed" into a bar on the graph when they are from different groups and there is no data crossover between groups.When looking at the same report as a grouped list, the grouping header does not use the compound status labels, these appear only in charted report labels.
It would be great if the rule search feature in launch was case sensitive. Currently, we use abbreviations like "CC" in the rule names that have custom code in them. When you search that in Launch you get both that acronym and rules that contains words with "cc" in them. Example Rule Name: "Medicare Plans - Patient Plans Accordion" would come up if you inputted "CC" in the search box.
Manage issues in an Agile format versus current method of conversion into Tasks - reduces manipulation and time by 200%
Add the ability to export reports in CSV format
Idea: Have Rule / Condition / Access Context to display on the rule overview page to help with reviewing.Goal: Have more context and avoiding a step in clicking a page view when looking at rules.
Currently, any typeahead field that is added to a form for a specific type of object, such as an issue form, the field shows up in the report builder as an object rather than a field under the associated object (again, such as an issue object). For example:We created several typeahead fields on an issue/request form. Then we create an issue report and found all of the typeahead fields as separate objects with fields associated with them (name, ID). This makes it a poor user experience to have to sort through all the different types of objects. It's inconsistent with the overall structure of the report builder, and it clutters the referenceable objects. We would like to see the typeahead fields as fields nested under the original object instead of as a separate object.
There should be a way, in the WF settings for Slack, to filter out proof comments so you are only receiving messages from Workfront and not the proof tool. Additionally, you should be able to get notified of new proofs (like document approvals) in Slack so you can click on the proof and go directly to it. It would be even better if you could see a preview or thumbnail of the first page of the proof. On this notification, it would be good to see the title of the proof, the task name it's attached to, a description of the proof (another thing that should be added to the proof tool), the due date, your assignment (Reviewer, Reviewer & Approver, Approver, etc.), and who is requesting the proof from you.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
