Build better products with our product team
We would like our users with project Contribute permission to also have access to the bulk Edit option that appears when selecting multiple tasks in a project. These users can still edit some task settings (such as assignments), and it would be ideal if they did not have to make these changes one-by-one. The settings that they do not have permission to change could be deactivated on the Edit Tasks modal. Currently, users with Contribute permission do not see the Edit option in the project toolbar.
Description - In CJA, persistence setting should always be shown, even when not set ("none" or something similar) Why is this feature important to you - We teach users to use the information available for components. It's confusing to them when there's nothing shown for persistence . How would you like the feature to work - When set, show value (as it currently does). When not set, show "none" or something similar. Current Behaviour - Nothing is displayed for persistence as shown here
Hi Adobe, Is there a future plan to allow the integrated AI tool to work across all features - I am particularly interested in it being available for Scenario Planner Thank You Emma
I would like the Slack integration to work more similarly to the Outlook integration. This would have the option to add a Request and for the list of Request Queue's in our instance to display and be chosen from. This would then display the Custom Forms attached to the queue and a Request can be submitted more similarly to the submission within Workfront.This would make submitting Requests more streamlined for users who are only using the system to submit Requests and give other users another way to action their work.
Description - Why is this feature important to you - There are times where some options are mutually exclusive but users tend to select the ALL How would you like the feature to work - Add an option in the Form Fields to not allow the ALL optionto show up. By default it should show Current Behaviour - Since introduced it is on by default on the checkbox parameter type
A checkbox for "ALL" appears by default on custom forms when using the checkbox feature. It happens after a certain number of choices are listed. We don't want our clients to be able to click ALL as it will prevent the client from really thinking through what they need. We don't want our clients to be able to click ALL just because it's faster.
Description -Why is this feature important to you -We want to dynamically update disableThirdPartyCalls & disableThirdPartyCookies according to conditions.Same goes with "disableIDSyncs". We want to update it dynamically using Data Element.How would you like the feature to work -It would be great if we can have a way to dynamically update disableThirdPartyCalls & disableThirdPartyCookies using Data Element dynamically according to conditions instead of direct enable/disable.Dynamic update instead of direct enable/disable using Data Element would be a great thing to add.Current Behaviour -For variables: disableThirdPartyCalls & disableThirdPartyCookies - In WebSDK, we can enable/disable from "Use third-party cookies" setting within Identity section of Web SDK extension.Same goes with disableIDSyncs in WebSDK, we use toggle button "Third Party ID Sync".
Dear Adobe Workfront Innovation Team,I would like to propose a feature that would enhance efficiency and accuracy in Workfront: the ability to create a “Favorites” list for users and teams within task assignments and tagging functions.DescriptionIn many workflows, users frequently collaborate with the same individuals or teams. However, Workfront currently requires searching through the full user directory every time a task needs to be assigned or a colleague is tagged. This can lead to misclicks, slowdowns, and inefficiencies, especially when users have similar names. To streamline this process, I propose a "Favorites" List that allows users to mark colleagues or teams they work with most often for quick access in assignments and tagging.Why is this feature important to you?This feature is crucial for improving workflow efficiency, accuracy, and user experience:Saves Time – Reduces time spent searching for frequently assigned users.Minimizes Errors – Prevents misassignments caused by selecting the wrong person with a similar name.Enhances Productivity – Allows users to focus on work rather than repetitive administrative steps.Improves Usability – Makes Workfront more intuitive and personalized for users with high-volume task assignments.How Would You Like the Feature to Work?Users can mark individuals or teams as Favorites from their profile, a dropdown menu, or the People section.When assigning tasks or tagging users, Favorite users appear first in search results or in a designated section at the top.The Favorites list is customizable—users can add or remove people based on changing workflows.This feature could be an optional toggle for users who prefer to keep the full directory view.Current BehaviorCurrently, Workfront requires users to manually search for individuals each time they assign a task or tag a person in comments. This leads to:Increased time spent scrolling/searching for the right user.Risk of selecting the wrong person, especially when names are similar.A less personalized and efficient workflow experience for users with recurring assignments.By implementing a Favorites feature, Workfront can enhance efficiency, reduce errors, and improve overall user experience—helping teams stay focused and productive.I appreciate your time and consideration, and I look forward to your feedback!Best regards,Mirella B
DescriptionWhen using the "Update a Record & Attach a Custom Form" module in Fusion, descriptive text fields appear as editable fields in the interface, even though they cannot actually be modified. This is misleading, as descriptive fields are intended to be static and only serve as instructional labels. Their presence in the module creates unnecessary noise and can cause confusion for users who might assume they are modifiable. Why is this feature important to youDescriptive fields are meant to provide guidance and context within custom forms, not to store data. Showing them as editable fields in Fusion is misleading and could result in users spending time trying to modify them, only to realize that the changes do not take effect. This clutters the UI, making it harder to focus on relevant, actionable fields. Removing them from the update module would improve clarity and streamline the user experience. How would you like the feature to workFusion should recognize descriptive text fields as static and exclude them from appearing in the "Update a Record & Attach a Custom Form" module. Since these fields cannot be modified, they should not be displayed alongside other editable form fields. This would reduce UI clutter and prevent confusion for users working with Fusion automation. Current BehaviorCurrently, Fusion displays descriptive text fields as if they were editable when a custom form is attached via the "Update a Record & Attach a Custom Form" module. However, even though they appear in the UI, they cannot actually be modified. The only way to change these fields is by manually editing the custom form via Setup > Custom Forms. Their presence in the module is unnecessary and can be misleading.
Description - I want to filter out all the rules and Data elements which I have worked on, so that it is easy to publish those changes(only my changes) or may be add " add all changes done by me" section while building library. Why is this feature important to you - Lot of developers and different teams work simultaneously and building library is tideous as I need to pick rule by rule before adding it to libraryHow would you like the feature to work - Should be able to add filter option on top ( filter by developer, build stage( dev,stage,prod), etc)Current Behaviour - No such filter. There is only way to sort it.
Description - Ability to update tasks from the project task page that allows previous updates to be stored as historical dataWhy is this feature important to you - It will allow project managers to add updates to tasks actively while on Zoom calls. It's less clicks to just add updates from the project page vs having to click on a link then adding an update then returning to the project page to add updates to other tasks.How would you like the feature to work - We would like a field that allows tasks to be updated from the project page without losing previous updates when entering a new update (allows historical updates to still be displayed as it currently is if you click on the Task itself)Current Behaviour - Currently we have a open text field (titled: Last Note: Note Text) that links to the task updates page, we are only permitted to update this field by clicking on the task itself to enter the 'latest update'
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The "cq-msm-lockable" attribute is used to maintain inheritance when configuring MSM locks on page properties. When the inheritance is cancelled, the property-cq:propertyInheritanceCancelled - is added. However, this does not operate on deep properties. Use-case: Data about an event such as local time-zone, address of the event, etc is stored in jcr:content/metadata. We need to cancel inheritance of the page to update localized data. field level inheritance cannot be operated on deep properties. Current/Experienced Behavior: Cancel inheritance functionality does not work for deep properties. Improved/Expected Behavior: Leverage the cancel inheritance functionality for deep properties. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Version 6.5.10 Customer-name/Organization name: Rockwell Automation Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
We should be able to access the data we input in Smart Lists for programs and smart campaigns. Currently, once a smart campaign or program runs, it is difficult to view all data in a Smart List filter. For example, if I target 10 different states in a filter, I can only hover over the list of states. I could not copy the list without copying the entire program or Smart Campaign. It creates additional work to recreate an audience if we can't at least copy and paste the information. Cloning the program or smart campaign does not work for all use cases. In addition, using "member of program" does not provide accurate targeting in some cases. For example, if I want to emulate a campaign that happened 6 months ago, our database may have changed greatly since then. "Member of program" would not capture all contacts who would otherwise be eligible for the smart list in this case.
When a report is added to a project dashboard update the grouping (sum) column to the project's currency and not the system default currency. Example below. Why is this feature important to you - When a user is needing a sum of multiple currency fields on a project dashboard report it can be confusing to view the project currency and the system default currency conversion in one report. How would you like the feature to work - when a report is filtered to a project dashboard the grouping sum it will align to the project's selected currency Current Behavior - the report grouping is shown in the system's default currency. If the project's currency is different it will convert to the system default currency and convert the total.
On our website and in our apps, we have a lot more traffic on Weekdays than on Weekend days.For some flows/pages we have data alerts. But defining the level on which we want to be alerted is very difficult.If the level is too low, we won't be alerted if there is an issue on weekdays; if the level is too high, we'll get (unwanted) alerts on Weekend days. In the As Is situation you can (theoretically) add "Weekdays" in the definition on the alert.Eg. I had created an alert for specific pages: if the # of pageViews was 0 on Weekdays (only on Weekdays), I wanted to receive an alert.On Weekdays the alert works fine. But for each Saturday and Sunday I received an alert saying that the # of pageViews was 0, although this was NOT the case. It was very confusing. We had plans to create a lot more alerts, a very nice feature of AA, but because of the impossibility to differentiate the levels to test on between Weekdays and Weekend days, this feature looses a lot of its value (for us...).
Description - It would be great if the Text Field with Formatting had more standard formatting options available.Why is this feature important to you - Copy and Paste from standard apps do not transfer accurate formatting; in addition, sometimes there is a need to indent or outdent and that is not currently possible. Font size cannot be changed. How would you like the feature to work - More standard formatting options be available.Current Behaviour - Right now formatting options are very limited and do not seem to be standard.
I was speaking to our adobe workfront consultants and they seem to believe there is no way to add a comment with data in it. All we want to do is avoid having to copy from excel, paste in notepad, copy again, format it and then comment. I'd like to be able to simply copy from excel in its original format and it look like that when it is pasted into the updates/comments section. The closest I can get to that is a copy as image and then save the image and then upload the image to the comments. I would prefer it look like this. No formatting needed just simple, copy and paste. A1ABAIRPORTPOPULATION1ATL202DFW303MCO404RSW505LAX606JFK70
Description - Please add a field/claim for user's preferred names that can be populated with SCIM or OIDC/SAML. Why is this feature important to you - The current implementation requires a given name and family name. Accounts that are provisioned with SCIM reset any changes the user may make to their name field. We have employees who go by their middle name, or prefer a different name. We also have employees from cultures that don't have legal family names which causes issues with the current system that requires a family name. We are working around this by passing the user's preferred name as the given name and using anon-printable character as the family name, but the non-printable character is causing a bug that is preventing other fields from being modified. Rahul Yadav from Adobe support says that this is not a bug and everything is working as intended and is refusing to provide support at this point. It is unclear how using that character as a last name is causing issues saving other fields UNLESS THIS IS A BUG WHICH IT CLEARLY IS. How would you like the feature to work - A field would be created for "Preferred Name" or "Display Name" or similar that could be provisioned via SAML claims, via an OIDC token, through SCIM, or edited manually by a user. Current Behaviour - There is no way to automatically provision a user's preferred name without hitting other bugs in Adobe's systems.
When someone gets an update from workfront in their email they may add an attachment. Right now workfront ignores the attachment and you have no idea that there was an attachment. We need attachments from our clients, they are used to submitting attachments via helpdesk. Workaround: We built a flow in Azuqua (Azuqua doesn't handle attachments via gmail yet so it took some extra work but it works) that looks at every email coming in and sends them to workfront. This flow beats workfront by 2-40 minutes in processing the attachments before the update is posted to workfront.
It would be nice to have a template to create a program and all the projects within that program, as well as custom fields at the program level. This would be helpful for campaigns. We could remove the projects that are not applicable for the particular campaign. We could fill in the details for the campaign on the program level custom form. There is no capability to copy programs, so we aren't able to copy a similar program. It has to be all manually re-created.
Description - add option to change font colour in text in updates Why is this feature important to you - it would make it easier to selectively highlight important parts of the update How would you like the feature to work - at least basic selection of colours for the font, e.g. just like in reports, conditional formatting Current Behaviour - all black, only bold can be used as highlight
Description - Ability to map in non XDM compliant parquet files Why is this feature important to you - Source systems are not always producing parquet files which are xdm compliant How would you like the feature to work - Ability to map in parquet files from cloud based source connectors. Current Behaviour - No mapping option is present for parquet source files.
Description - When attempting to mark a Project Complete and there is an open issue or task, popup should at minimum list the task/issue stopping the project from being marked complete. Step better would be why the task/issue is not complete if due to missing approvals, bad dates, or anything else definable. Why is this feature important to you - Just wasted time trying to get close a project. First, all tasks were marked 100% and standard view does not include status so wasted time looking for a task not complete but 100%. Second, once the task was found I could not update the status because it was "Calculated by System", but all subtasks were complete and 100%. Waste more time looking through experience league for what could be stopping, try a number of suggestions with no results. Come to find out Planned start and end dates cannot be the same. Update dates to fixed because ASAP is not changing them. Still the parent task remains open. Thinking I have not found what is stopping the status update continue to waste time looking for more suggestions. Circle back to the dates and force time recalculation, things start working. Could have saved time if the popup notification just stated X task is not complete - Dates/Timeline error or message that is stopping the system. How would you like the feature to work - Keep the current popup when attempting to complete a project, but add details Current Behavior - Popup only states project cannot be marked complete with open tasks or issues.
Description - Once you perform a search, you no longer have the ability to adjust what you are searching. Meaning, if you have a typo in your search you have to completely back out of search and restart, rather than being able to click into the search bar again and adjust. Additionally, if you are searching for multiple different items with the same criteria/filters, you have to re-input the criteria/filters for each search, rather than just changing the text in the search bar. Why is this feature important to you - This was a functionality that used to exist and was stripped during new UI implementation. This is a big degradation and requires extra and not standard extra work during search. How would you like the feature to work - The same as the old search functionality - search bar remains visible and editable after performing the initial search Current Behaviour - Search bar disappears once you hit enter/click search
Description - When sending a file from Workfront to Assets, the folder path should be "sticky" so that the next time we send a file we don't need to start from the very beginning of the folder path.Why is this feature important to you - This would save many clicks, reduce frustration, and improve efficiency.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to the way it works in the Enhanced Connector. The location of the last file send is the default for the next file send.Current Behaviour - When the User is sending a file to Assets, the user has to start from the very beginning of the Assets folder structure...every time.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
