Build better products with our product team
Description - Currently when building many stages in Automated Proof Workflows and using the option "When previous stage deadline passes" to start the next stage, you have the option only to add days but not hours or minutes. There's a missing granularity for workflows that need to flow faster (e.g. in a day or a few hours), or when the same stage needs to be split into several stages due to the amount of users and start within 10 minutes between each other.Why is this feature important to you - We have workflows that have many users and stages and we need the stages to get activated automatically vs. how it's done now, when someone needs to manually activate each stage.How would you like the feature to work - to have minimum 10 minutes periods instead of 1 day to activate next stage.Current Behaviour - You only have the option to add days but not hours or minutes, or set specific time when the stages will be activated, which means the proofs need to be created at specific time only.
Idea is to have an Approval Path for incoming requests, and for approved requests to automatically update to "Approved" Status. For example, we set up a new request queue to build a Project Roadmap. These are potential projects that will be coming later in the year. We created a basic form to gather info for our VPs to review and make an informed decision to move forward. Workflow is as follows: Step 1: Request Received Step 2: “VP Approver” (Job Role) to Approve Request (via Approval Path)If Approved, Request should show as “Approved” If Rejected, Request should show as “Rejected” In testing, a new request comes in as "New - Pending Approval". However, when the request is approved, it changes the status to "New" vs "Approved". We need another field in the Approval Path to identify the status based on the parameters. (See Case #00411357)
Description - Previously when someone signed in as you and sent and update or made project changes or completed a task it showed the "Bob" Did this on behalf of "Priti"Why is this feature important to you - Other Admins may make mistakes in error (hopefully not on purpose) and it doesn't show who it was actually done by. Also, our admins cover each other on vacation and it looks like we were working on vacation. How would you like the feature to work - Bring back the previous way when someone signed in as you and sent and update or made project changes or completed a task it showed the "Bob" Did this on behalf of "Priti"Current Behaviour - Doesn't show who actually did the update or changes.
Description - It is a known issue that the Recommendations UI cannot be trusted. This is problematic. Why is this feature important to you - Without accurate data, troubleshooting and set-up is incredibly difficult.How would you like the feature to work - The counts and data should be accurate.Current Behaviour - It shows incorrect counts, it shows expired products, the data is mismatched. At a minimum, it should be made known that the UI is incorrect in the solution. Target can be used to put banners on websites, how about a banner on the catalog page that the data can't be trusted?
It would be really helpful if it would be possible to copy text from the proof. For example: During our production process we have to compare a lot of article numbers. Which you normally can easy copy from a pdf and paste into the tool for checking. But Workfront does not allow to copy text so we have to type it manually everytime. It would be really helpful if it would be possible to copy from the file directly as you can do it in every PDF.
There is no native integration between Marketo and Instagram. Marketo Engage should either provide a native integration or enhance the Facebook integration to also support Instagram requests.
How many times a trackAction is activated with an ID that is not registered or is entered incorrectly within the native app code.Taking into account that the development cycles for the deployment of applications within the different STORES (Android & IOS) can take months, these trackActions are dirtying the data and can sometimes increase the useless consumption of SERVER CALLS in your company.This can cause unwanted SERVER CALLS billing.Currently, the "CONTEXT DATA" data in the event we want can be modified through Adobe Launch, enriching the event from "Adobe Launch", but we cannot prevent a "SERVER CALL" from being executed even if we do not need it in our implementation. How would you like the function to work?Ideally, to avoid unwanted "SERVER CALLS", we would include an option in the "MOBILE CORE" where we could prevent the execution of a "trackAction" or a "trackState", conditioning based on its "action name" and/or contextData (in Adobe Launch UI). Current behaviorThere is no way to prevent a "SERVER CALL" from being consumed and counted, even if it is not controlled, or has been included by mistake within the source code of the mobile application through the "trackAction" / "trackState" events. There are some issues in the community regarding this that are quite old.This feature should be a "MUST" to better control the data that reaches the Report Suites, it would give a lot of flexibility and control over the data.
Description - Allow the Widget options on the homepage to be sticky, i.e., Collapsed vs Expanded, "Showing" number, etc.Why is this feature important to you - Most of my projects are long-term, so I like seeing all my project names without the tasks unless I'm working on that specific project.I change "Showing" from 25 to All and collapse all the projects so I only see the project names. This is better visually (not as overwhelming when I don't see all the tasks under the project) and helps me prioritize at a glance and recognize new projects that I might have a one-and-done task instead of multiple tasks.How would you like the feature to work - If I change "Showing" from 25 to All and expanded to collapsed, make those changes stick unless I change them again. Also, make the widget window resize automatically to fit the displayed content instead of leaving a big white space. Current Behaviour - The My Tasks widget defaults to "Showing" 25 and all projects are expanded and the widget window doesn't resize after I collapse them. I do this multiple times a day. Also, after changing "Showing" All, it doesn't give me the original options again, i.e., 25, 50, 100, All. Thanks for considering!
Currently in Setup -> Project Preferences -> Projects -> Custom Quarters, I am only able to specify 8 quarters. I would like the amount of quarters to be unlimited. Our instance has over 5 years of data, and if we do any trend reporting further back than 2 years, it shows "no value" for the quarter which is undesirable. We do have a custom calculated field for quarter, but it isn't perfect.
Description - Ability to create multiple versions of an interactive proof at one timeWhy is this feature important to you - timesaver for setup and proofing.How would you like the feature to work - we have a week’s worth of site homepages to proof. We’d like to set them up as versions 1 through 7 in one proof – 7 links – and have the proofers be able to flip from v1 through v7 to proof/comment on them all at once.Current Behaviour - set up 7 different proofs to the same workflows, proofers review 7 individual proofs.
Description - Ability to add a 'learn more' hyperlink to annotations that can take the user to a company-owned space.Why is this feature important to you - For release annotations, we could link to release details. For anomalies we could link to triage notes, etc.How would you like the feature to work - Link to a company-owned url outside of Adobe Analytics.Current Behavior - Does not exist
Description - Can we please add a search function to the "Reports" and "Dashboards" page? Currently I keep having to export them to then search in Excel. In addition to this, the user experience for moving Reports and Dashboards in to the folders is very painful.Why is this feature important to you - it is very inefficient, i keep creating a new report that i didn't need to, because another one that met the needs existed but i wasn't able to search properly, i can't find it. Also, the user experience for organizing and moving the reports/dashboards into folders, really sucks. I can't ever get the report to move into the folder, i have WAY too many to sort through to do this one at a time, especially when it seems like you have to click in one exact spot to be able to move those.How would you like the feature to work - put a magnifying glass/search section, like you have everywhere else. Current Behaviour - really poor user experience. I have to export then open the excel file to sort/filter/search and then go back to workfront.
Hi Team,I hope this message finds you well. I would like to propose an idea for a new feature that could enhance our document access management.Feature Proposal:The proposed feature would allow document access to be automatically managed in two steps:Initial Access: Grant public access to external users, allowing anyone with a public link to view the document.Automatic Change as per selected date: After a defined date or time automatically change the access settings to restrict visibility so that only specified users on the access list can view the document.Benefits:Enhanced Security: Ensures that sensitive documents are not permanently accessible to external users.Improved Workflow: Simplifies the process of managing document access by automating transitions.Time Efficiency: Reduces manual effort required to update access settings.I believe this feature could significantly benefit our team by allowing temporary public access while ensuring privacy and security after the designated period.I would love to hear your thoughts on this idea and discuss its feasibility for implementation. Please let me know if you need any additional information or clarification.Thank you for considering this suggestion. Best Regards,Saurabh Birwadkar
We would like to have a direct link between a Slack channel and the Workfront update feed of a project (and other work items).When sending a message in the Slack channel, an update is automatically posted on the related project in Workfront. This would work in both directions. When writing an Update in Workfront, the Slack channel gets updated.With this feature no important information will get lost in a Slack channel, but to be found where it is needed the most!
Currently, when you upgrade an extension, you get this notice:This has scared quite a few clients off of upgrading, because there really is NO going back. Especially for Adobe extensions, there is a strong need to be able to revert in case of issues (not to be snarky, but appMeasurement/VisitorID code updates have a history of finding major problems in the first month after release). Issues like Re: What are possible reasons why ClearVariable fails? make it clear why someone may want to move back. If you upgrade and you do see something break in staging during testing, you'd have no way to go back/compare/undo.
Description - We would like to have the ability to recalculate timeline when in a project MilestoneWhy is this feature important to you - this would save time on large projects. Often, we work in the milestone since WF is slow on big projects. It saves us time adding project tasks at a milestone level. How would you like the feature to work - add the recalculate timeline to the three dots on the milestoneCurrent Behaviour - it is time consuming since we add new tasks, predecessors and dates under the milestone, and everything sits for a long time in gray. We need to get the new dates, so we have to exit the milestone and recalculate timeline from the three dots at project level.
Current Behavior: When a proof is created and a custom proof message is used, by default it will be used for every version of that proof. Sometimes the custom message is very specific to the round of proof. When that message is sent out in additional versions it can cause confusion. By defaulting it between rounds users can forget to uncheck it when creating new versions. This has caused confusion with some of my groups.Proposed Behavior: Include a setting that would reset the use of a custom notification for additional rounds of a proof at an instance level. If active it would uncheck the “Add custom message” radio button at each additional round of proof. They can reselect it and add a new message if it is needed.
Description - Currently, you cannot change the dates of tasks within the Workload balancer, although there are tiles that can be moved from person to person.Why is this feature important to you - When a user is doing the activity of workload balancing, there are frequently times where lack of capacity forces work to change Start or End date. Being able to do that within the same exercise and assigning work to people would save so much time, reduce risk of incorrect input, and improve user experience/adoption.How would you like the feature to work - We would like for the bars tied to a task to be movable across the date columns.Current Behaviour - Currently bars can move up and down from person to person, but they cannot move left to right from day to day.
We finally got the planned dates to "stick" so now the calendar is usable (for me!) and not dependent on when people mark their tasks done. However, not being able to export or print the calendar is still a problem so I can't use it as my single point of truth. We need to be able to print in order to take notes and distribute more widely. I'm very bummed about this turn of events.
Description -Why is this feature important to you -Customer asked for it. How would you like the feature to work -Ability to report on active vs inactive session. Active session is where user was engaged with the website/app and inactive session is when user left the browser or app open and was not engaging with the web/app. Current Behaviour -Not available.
Description -Why is this feature important to you -The customer asked for it and useful while downloading reports in PDF format How would you like the feature to work -The ability to switch on labels in the charts which will display Data labels for each. Current Behavior - by default its hidden, one has to hover over it to see the data label
Ability to customize the table of content displayed in the public link. Currently it takes every panel/visualization names which makes it cluttered specially when the audience is usually executive. Please allow to edit this with-in CJA.
Description -Enable any URL to be added as pin on the layout template page.Current Behavior -Currently, from the layout template, we can only pin dashboards or standard pages also accessible trough the "Waffle Menu".Why is this feature important to you -This has introduced the need for admins to go in to every new user and manually pin a specific board to their home page.How would you like the feature to work -At the layout template page, allow users to enter a URL to the pins.
The new Update Variable action in the AEP Web SDK extension would be a lot more helpful if you could start with an existing XDM data element and update that, rather than having to start with an empty XDM object every time.In the scenario where you’ve got a lot of fields that you want to set on every event (e.g. domain, customer id, whatever), I’d want to start with an XDM object that’s already got all those fields populated, and then update that. Likewise, if I've got a lot of ecommerce events, I would want to start with an XDM object where the basic productListItems array is already defined, and then just update that with the relevant additional fields for the particular event (product view, basket add, etc)Currently, you have to start with an empty object in every rule, so you end up repeating a lot of work if you have rules that share a lot of fields.Another, perhaps better, option would be if you could just do the equivalent of the Merge Objects data element in rules. For example, if I've got some default 'global' fields that I want to set in every event, and I've got some standard ecommerce fields that are set on all ecommerce events, a simpler workflow would be:Create an XDM data element that contains all my global dimensions.Create an XDM data element that contains all my standard ecommerce fields.In my 'cart add' rule:Start with the 'global' XDM data elementMerge it with the 'ecommerce' data elementUpdate it with a few fields that are specific to the cart add (e.g. carts adds metric)Then I could just duplicate this rule for all my ecommerce events, and just tweak the final 'update' action depending on if its a product view, cart remove, etc. This would be much cleaner than the current situation where you eitherHave one XDM data element per rule, where you're repeatedly setting the same 'global' and 'ecommerce' XDM fields.Have layers of 'merge object' data elements, where you build up the object before putting it in the rule (e.g. global + ecommerce + cart add)Use the Update Variable action where, again, you're repeatedly setting the same XDM fields over different rules.
From time to time, we have one Fusion scenario call another Fusion scenario in order to centralize things like authentication token management. (An example of this is when we call NetSuite, where NetSuite requires a specialized token process that isn't supported out of the box by Fusion's credentials mechanism.) Adobe PS recommended we put the token generation/retrieval process be put in its own scenario, and then call that scenario in whichever scenarios we'll be doing further business logic (such as calling NetSuite for some specific API calls using that token gathered before).The issue we're finding is that Fusion sometimes returns an "Accepted" response rather than the intended webhook JSON. Basically, it looks like Fusion webhooks are not guaranteed to execute when called but may be queued under some loading conditions. Retrying isn't necessarily guaranteed to fix this, either.What's really needed is the ability to execute that dependent/child scenario _within_ the runtime of the parent scenario. That is, we should be able to avoid the "Accepted" error if we can directly execute a second Fusion scenario rather than having to call it via a webhook.So the ask is for some kind of Fusion module or other implementation to allow for temporarily suspending the current scenario, calling a specified scenario (and passing in appropriate parameters), having that second scenario return a response, and then start executing the original scenario using the response returned as a data point.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
Sorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
