Product Communities

Description - Would like to be able pull a kanban board into a report and create a dashboard using that info.Why is this feature important to you - To more easily show what's going on with projects and tasks in the different flows.How would you like the feature to work - Select a board to pull report info from and then drill down info from there.Current Behaviour - Having to create by user and pulling that information, but that could pull in additional info from other boards.

I would like to be able to condense forms by section headers in the editor. This feature is important because editing large forms in time consuming and being able to condense sections that are not being currently edited reduces errors. In a instance that has been live for almost ten years Names and Labels of fields can be very different, not having to scroll as much in a form will help to find the field that is needed, especially when setting up logic.  This feature would be similar to how Custom Forms are displayed in project details where you can condense a one or all the forms.  The current behavior is you need to scroll through the form or use a find option on your web browser to find a field or section. 

Hi,it would be great to have prerender or selective batch processing option available for AI masks. The way the feature works at the moment is that you can choose between replacing masks or adding AI masks from a sample file when batch processing. I would like to just UPDATE the adjustments of prerendered AI maks. This would save a lot of time when editing galleries.This way you could render AI masks in advance and then just copy and paste the settings/finetune the adjustments for each indiviual AI mask. I.e. prerender all background AI masks, then just copy and paste the settings. At the moment the AI mask always need to be recalculated when batch processing and it is not very efficient.Thank you for considering this.Chistina 

Description -Task Share allows to grant View, Contribute or Manage access to Job Roles, Users, Teams, Groups via the Project Task but not via the Template Task.Currently our project settings indicate to grant Manage rights when an user is assigned to a Task; however if the user "volunteers" or is assigned by another user with less rights (i.e. Work instead of Plan license) then the user assigned to the task only receives Contribute instead of Manage rights regardless of the Project task access settings.In our instance, many times the users volunteer to work on a task and end up not having the proper access.All of our projects get a template attached; therefore if we could allow Manage rights to be granted to specific Job Roles for certain tasks in the Template tasks, this will eliminate this problem for us.This problem happens frequently (1-2 times a week), causing delays or incorrect information (i.e. task duration cannot be modified)

It would be great to be able to pull a report that looks at user login frequency by system login, project/program login, etc... not just number of times they logged into the system a month.

Description - We are unable to sort in ascending and descending order in text mode on the Proof Approval Report columns example: Document Name and Approval Creator ColumnsWhy is this feature important to you -  It helps to Sort column data as per needed Current Behaviour - unable to sort in ascending and descending order in text mode on the Proof Approval Report columns

Description - When the Project/Task status change Field tracking should start capturing the Data Why is this feature important to you - Helps to filter the unnecessary DataCurrent Behaviour - It is capturing all the records from the first entry 

Description - It can be helpful to determine how long a project (or task or issue) has been in a given status. The best example: On Hold. Why is this feature important to you - If we can flag how long a project has been on hold, we can promote cleanup activities.How would you like the feature to work - When configuring report filters, there would be an option to view the total amount of time the object has been in the status it's in right now. We would have the option to show this number by hours or days.Current Behaviour - Per the wonderful Skye Hansen, use a calculated field on all projects or build a journal entry report, both of which have complexities and flaws.

Having a native Workfront connector in Power BI, similar to what Wrike offers, would be highly beneficial. It would simplify the API connection process, eliminate the challenges of pagination and challenges with modifying Power Queries too. We are already using Power BI for reporting, but having such a connector would save time and effort.Reference video: Wrike Power BI Connector

Description - Adobe Experience Cloud Experience Platform Dynamic Data Collection Launch, by Adobe Tags minifies code when a library is built. That feature is super helpful for production environments, where site owners usually want to minimize the impact of loaded libraries. And that is great! Except for when you are actually trying to read the code afterwards. For example, minification turns my horrible, hacky, readable and commented code... into this horrible, hacky, unreadable and uncommented code: While the size advantage justifies the less readable code on production, practically every developer I've ever worked with complained about the minified code on any non-prod environment. If you just want to see what a piece of code does and why it won't work, minification does not help a lot. The usual solution is to remove the .min from the Launch library's file name, but that requires a) knowledge of the feature and b) some manual intervention, browser plugins, or other

We would like to see all fields in Workfront defined and mapped out for reporting and report building purposes.  i.e. clearly lay out what data fields are in Workfront.To facilitate report building discussions, to have available for onboarding, and to define field purposes. Similar to how there is a function within Forms, but for the entire Workfront database. There is nothing currently (I created a ticket in EL and this was confirmed). 

Description - WorkFront Proofing activity logs be able to download to a txt file or excel file.Why is this feature important to you - Review and additional entry of productivity of the users.How would you like the feature to work - Please give us an option to download the list of logs via txt file or excel file. The list of Proofing activity logs including its comments.Current Behaviour - view only as a report.

Description - Add Sample Size Calculator within Adobe Target interface And/Or add its link while setting up an AB test Why is this feature important to you - Currently Adobe Target users have to either bookmark or search for the link to Sample Size calculator (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/tools/calculator/testcalculator.html?lang=en ), a very crucial tool to estimate the number of days a test should be run. Also, as its not part of the interface, users use different calculators provided by other vendors. As this is not part of the workflow-interface, its easy to miss this step - specially for practitioners who are new to Experience Optimisation or those who do not know that Adobe Target provides its own Sample size calculator.  How would you like the feature to work - Adobe Target Product team should add the Sample Size calculator link to Adobe Target top nav. Would be great to have it added to first step of an AB test workflow as well.  Current Behaviour - W

Our creative internal and external agencies create GIFs for a lot of marketing activities as its a popular/effective format. At times for one project we create multiple GIFs - so if we create three options, the stakeholder would have to click on three separate links to review them today, We need to have to possibility to send multiple GIFs files to proofing at the same time, for reviwers to see all the different versions in a single proof, today we can upload different versions but that is a lot of manual work and waiting time for different versions to be created. 

Description - There should be a way to have project templates added based on selections in Custom Forms used in Request Queues.Why is this feature important to you - It would simplify or in some cases eliminate the need to select a project template upon converting, saving the extra step and therefore saving time.How would you like the feature to work - When building custom forms, allow some logic to tie in project templates to say, options selected in a drop down menu, similar to the display logic function.Example: Apply project template.... XXXX,   if Field XxXxX,   Option xxxx.   is Selected.  Also see mock up attached.Current Behaviour - No option to integrate Project Templates into Custom Forms currently

The ability to set predecessors for issues or cross objects like tasks. Being able to set a predecessor between issues for items such as "unplanned work". Would also be nice to create cross object predecessors such as a task being a predecessor for an issue to begin.

Description -  It's great that Adobe added data visualizations to our graphs a few years ago, but the way they display isn't very visually impactful...    It's a little flag that shows in the X-Axis, leaving the users to still try to identify where exactly that point lies on the graph.     Of course, users can hover to have a line show up for the annotation.. but that doesn't really work for PDFs.. and if there are a series of annotations you can only see one at a time... let's say you are reviewing the impact of a multi-site migration rollout, you might want to see each point where sites were migrated and the impact over time of all the sites together...   Having the ability to show a permanent visual indicator would allow everyone to see at a glance where the impacts are, and users can still check the annotation details one at a time.   Why is this feature important to you - Making the annotations more visible at a glance, and being able to see mul

Description - I would like to be able to set up an email alert to notify me when specific users log in. Why is this feature important to you - This could be used to enhance the users experience of the tool.  For instance, it would be very useful to know when a new user logs in or when one of our directors/executives access to the tool - allowing us to provide better support   (I know we could technically get this information from the logs but a proactive alert would be much simpler)  

Description - The condition builder in Fusion supports a very simplistic Boolean logic, allowing simple expressions such as (A && B) || (C && D).  This is functional under many circumstances, though forces a lot of duplication of checks on the UI side. The following is an example of a condition that would be problematic: ID = "foo" && (Error 1 = true || Error 2 = true || Error 3 = true || Error 4 = true) In the existing condition builder, it results in something that looks like this: (ID = "foo" && Error 1 = true) || (ID = "foo" && Error 2 = true) || (ID = "foo" && Error 3 = true) || (ID = "foo" && Error 4 = true) If we have to change the value of "foo", this creates a risk whereby a human may miss all instances of "foo".  (This risk increases with increasingly complex conditions.) The ask is to improve the condition builder to allow for full Boolean logic.  We have a similar versi

Description -The Adobe Workfront custom API module (or any other Workfront API module) is often used to query various API endpoints.  That module doesn't appear to have any built-in mechanisms for handling a retry when a 429 (API rate limit exceeded) occurs, though this is a fairly standard and common occurrence in high-volume systems.The existing way to handle this in a reasonable fashion is to:Make the API call with the custom API moduleSet an error handler from the moduleOn the error handler path:Sleep for some amount of timeRetry the API call with a second custom API module that's configured the same way as the firstSet a success handler on that "Resumes"Set an error handler on that second moduleOn that error handler path:Do the same as on the first, and continue nesting this for as many attempts as you want/needThis is super unwieldy and means that the module configuration is duplicated or triplicated, meaning future changes need to be done multiple times, which is risky due

It would be useful, as a system admin, if an existing group could be moved into a subgroup

Description - Workfront API responses do not appear to return any kind of awareness of rate limits/available query capacity, yet will error with a HTTP 429 status code when we exceed that rate limit.  Ideally, we should know from a prior query how much capacity remains so that we can tweak any sleep calls to maximize performance. Why is this feature important to you - APIs that return 429s typically inform as to rate limits and available query capacity (example: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-httpapi-ratelimit-headers-07.html).  This allows the caller to add an appropriate sleep so as to (1) avoid the 429 error entirely and (2) minimize the delays between each call to only that which is required. How would you like the feature to work - Open to many ideas, see above. Current Behaviour - The Workfront API don't appear to return any rate limit details.

Description - Person A is editing a scenario.  Person B starts editing that same scenario. Person A saves the scenario with changes.  Person B then saves the scenario with changes. Person A's changes are lost.  Person B was unaware that Person A was (1) actively editing and (2) had saved. This is a common problem with online tools.  Some suggested solutions including (1) tracking user activity and warning other editors that someone else is ALSO looking into the file and/or (2) warning a user that someone else has saved the scenario since the scenario was opened for editing and that changes might be overwritten and/or (3) allowing an editor to "lock" the scenario for a defined amount of time so they are the only ones that can edit. Why is this feature important to you - The "simultaneous overwrite problem" is real and has forced us to have to re-do work. How would you like the feature to work - Ideally, I'd like for a simultane

Description - All objCode/search queries support $$FIRST and $$LIMIT parameters for pagination.  However, these fail to account properly for lastUpdateDate_Sort=asc where an object may be updated DURING the execution of a scenario, hence the order of entries can be changed in between each separate page query. Example: Project 1 - lastUpdateDate=1Project 2 - lastUpdateDate=2Project 3 - lastUpdateDate=3Project 4 - lastUpdateDate=4 Make a query for $$FIRST=0 $$LIMIT=2 and we get: Project 1 - lastUpdateDate=1Project 2 - lastUpdateDate=2 Then, asynchronously, let's assume that Project 2 gets updated: Project 2 - lastUpdateDate=5 Now increment the $$FIRST counter based on the prior $$LIMIT and make a query for $$FIRST=2 $$LIMIT=2 and we get: Project 4 - lastUpdateDate=4Project 2 - lastUpdateDate=5 This means Project 3 has effectively been "dropped" from the pagination. It means we have no guaranteed way to ensure that long-running p

Description - Our Adobe PS team indicated that a best practice is to create two different teams -- Production and Development -- and copy scenarios between the two teams.  Each time we do such a copy, however, we end up needing to update a variety of items, including constants.  These constants CAN be stored in variables in the scenario itself, but it forces us to constantly update the scenario for these minor value differences between the two teams. What is requested is to have a list of "global variables" (think Team-linked environment variables) that can be references using a constant reference, independent of the scenario.  The idea would be something like this: Production Environment Variable: Standard Template ID = 1234567890Development Environment Variable: Standard Template ID = 0987654321 In the Scenario:{{TeamEnvironment.`Standard Template ID`} Why is this feature important to you - We've had a number of copy-related qual