Build better products with our product team
Description - I would love to see consistency when I'm applying same choices from multi-select dropdown to an item listed in a report (e.g. task). Let's say dropdown has 3 options: 1,2,3. Depending on in which order they will be applied against task they may appear in random order: 1,3,2; 3,2,1; 3,1,2 etc. According to WF support randomness is per design. Why is this feature important to you - Consistency in listing items makes it easier to read field values How would you like the feature to work - Regardless of the order in which I select dropdown values, if I select the same values I would like to see them display consistently, as 1,2,3. Keep it consistent. Current Behaviour - randomness
Description - Our users would like to be able to 'lock' fields on projects and make them only editable by certain users. Right now there doesn't appear to be any functionality that accomplishes this. For example, the PM may want to 'lock' the Duration field so only specified users can update that field. Right now, anyone with Contribute or Manage access to the project is able to adjust those values. Or anyone with View access that has a Task level assignment. These permissions vary from project to project so we would like to be able to set these permissions on the object itself, and not as an Enterprise level rule. Why is this feature important to you - This is important for data integrity. Not all users should have access to edit all fields just because they have access to a project. How would you like the feature to work - I envision some type of 'lock' or 'share' button on the field that allows us to set permissions for that particular field. This would supersede any Project level permissions. Ie: User John has Contribute access to the Project but only has View access to the 'Duration' field.
Be able to generate timeline view in detail for the entire project. I want to be able to color code each task on the timeline. I want to be able to see subtasks within the larger task on the timeline. I want to be able to see milestones and a marker for today's date on the timeline. MS project has these functionalities.
Description - Our custom form fields were created 11 years ago and over the years things have changed and several field formats need to be changed, however, as of right now, there is not an easy way to change the format of a custom form fields without losing historical data (ex: changing a field from a drop down to a free text field)Why is this feature important to you - allows users to adapt new workflows or changes in workflows without losing historical dataHow would you like the feature to work - Allow field format to be changed without losing historical dataCurrent Behaviour - currently a form field format cannot be changed once it is created.
Hello, This is a feature request to add annotations in all trended displays in AA and CJA. Right now, I believe I can only see annotations in "line" charts. But I can see that it would be also valuable to see annotations in: combo displaysarea displaysbar displaysetc.Sorry if this is in the wrong spot. Will move this if needed.
Description - Tracking changes to the name and status of the projects that present what the changes was (old to new) and when it happened. Why is this feature important to you - Executives need reports on changes that happened to the project status, for example, how projects changed status during the past month, and from what status to what status. The purpose is to report changes that happened within the portfolio since last portfolio meeting: for example, how many projects went in progress, on hold, completed, etc., during the past 2-3 months. How would you like the feature to work - I would like to be able to track changes to the name , status, and some other attributes of the projects that are captured in custom fields. Journal entry field allows some of the tracking but it is not for all and not intuitive. Also, journal entry fields cannot be accessed through custom forms if I try to create custom fields based on them. Current Behaviour - Journal entry field allows some of the tracking but it is not for all and not intuitive. Also, journal entry fields cannot be accessed through custom forms if I try to create custom fields based on them. Also, while changes of status from in progress to completion and from entry to in progress can be tracked and demonstrated by creating reports Entry Date and Completion Date, there is no way to track other statuses a project goes through its lifecycle.
Due to the new timesheet UI, columns widths do not always fit ideally to the column content. As an example, the column width for Hour Type is fixed, but our hour types are of quite long names like "Remote working time - billable". As an consequence the hour type is not always completely visible and users use the wrong one due to missing information. Ideally the timesheet columns are dynamically adjustable by the user similar to other lists in Workfront (e.g. tasks, projects, etc.)
Description - In the Workfront mobile app, currently it is not possible to click on custom hyperlinks that have been created by users to allow them to open a new page and open the link in a new tab. When looking at the same item in the Workfront desktop view, the custom hyperlink is clickable and will open a new tab in the browser. On the app, the word 'link' simply appears but is not clickable and does not appear as a hyperlink Why is this feature important to you - Users would like to be able to access custom hyperlinks on the mobile app. Users advise this is basic functionality and without it, it does not entice staff to make use of the mobile app. How would you like the feature to work - The custom hyperlink should be saved as a clickable HTML link that will open a new tab to the hyperlink when clicked Custom hyperlink example: https://www.figma.com/proto/y6WcwPgnOp48koUHFlwVVe/Ford?page-id=2147%3A86&type=design&node-id=2147-2291&viewport=1694%2C-3446%2C1&t=dEf9Lb7vePF2ccF5-1&scaling=min-zoom&starting-point-node-id=2147%3A1949 Screenshot attached with a marker signifying where the hyperlink is
I understand that changing the timezone impacts how things are displayed. The issue is that the user marked 3 work days of PTO this week, and asked me to shift tasks off of those days. When I went to the Workload Balancer, it was not showing me that the user had taken three work days off PTO it only shows two. Then when you go to the users PTO page, it shows five. How am I supposed to capacity plan when im seeing three different values for a user’s PTO? Is the expected behavior that anyone doing resource balancing has to change the time zone of their laptop in order to see accurate data? When you're trying to manage the workload for dozens of resources, flipping timezones on your computer to 'check if anyone in india selected PTOs' on a daily basis IS RIDICULOUS. I'm okay with the display being slightly off b/c of the time difference. BUT THIS is actually missing to display accurately. I should see 3 days worth of PTO in the workload balancer, not TWO.
Description - allow System Administrators to change task statuses implicitly without restrictions based on the project's statusWhy is this feature important to you - as a System Administrator, cleanup is part of my every day job. While one could wish for users who mark their tasks as Cancelled before updating the project to Cancelled, this isn't always realistic. It would be great if I could just use a report of all tasks in New or In Progress status that are in a project of Cancelled and update them all in a couple of clicks.How would you like the feature to work - when a System Administrator is attempting to update the status of a task in a Cancelled project, either allow this change to happen without issue, or show a pop-up window first asking the user if this is what they'd like to do (for example, "A task's status cannot be modified for a project with a status of Cancelled. As a System Administrator, you can override this. Do you wish to proceed?" - this is similar to pop-ups in Smartsheet).Current Behaviour - currently, you have to take the project status out of Cancelled to be able to update the tasks' statuses. This creates many clicks and much manual effort, going into each Cancelled project first, as it cannot be done via a task report.
For projects where we bill the customer based on time and materials, our users usually setup custom billing rates for each job role within their projects. It works properly for task hours, but it doesn't work for issue hours or project hours. Our users often record a lot of hours in issues, and this results in creating incorrect billing records. This request is to make it possible to apply those custom job role billing rates for all hours within the project, not just tasks. Here is the documentation for the current behavior:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/workfront/using/manage-work/projects/project-finances/override-role-billing-rates-and-calculate-project-revenue
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We create a new page under /content/soucedcode/language-masters/en called home . Within this page, we will drag in an Experience Fragment Component with the XFPath. In this scenario, we have XFPath = /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/en/button/masterWhen we language or live copy pages, the XFPaths should be updated as expected, but it is not. Now let's continue with the scenario. Please note that we have the entire structure of the XF created - /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/en/button/master - /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/fr/button/master- /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/es/button/master - /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/ca/en/button/master - /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/ca/fr/button/master- /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/us/es/button/masterNow after when the new page is created in language-masters, we will start performing the language copy /content/soucedcode/language-masters/en/home TO->> - /content/soucedcode/language-masters/fr/home - /content/soucedcode/language-masters/es/homeWe expect the referenced experience fragments to change the references with the correct values below, and it looks like it works as expected from here: - /content/soucedcode/language-masters/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/fr/button/master - /content/soucedcode/language-masters/es/home == XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/es/button/masterOkay now we are going to roll out the language copies pages to the different countries. Since these language copies are actually live copies within the language folders, the roll out mechanism will work as expected. Target pages: - /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr- /content/sourcedcode/us/es(Expected Results)After the roll out, we expect that the experience fragments should have the XFPaths localized like the configurations below. In a perfect world the Live Copy and Language Copy mechanism should update the XFPaths as expected like what we see below:- /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/ca/fr/button/master- /content/sourcedcode/us/es/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/us/es/button/master(Actual Results)In actual results, we are seeing that the XFPaths are not localized, and is referencing to the language-masters paths: - /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/fr/button/master- /content/sourcedcode/us/es/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/es/button/master Use-case: We have pages created in language masters which has an experience fragment inside of it. The experience fragment is referencing to the experience fragments language-masters path. When we Roll Out or Language Copy pages, we expect the references to update to the non language-masters structure. Current/Experienced Behavior: (Actual Results)In actual results, we are seeing that the XFPaths are not localized after Roll Out or Language Copy executions. Look at this, this is still referencing to the language-masters paths: - /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/fr/button/master- /content/sourcedcode/us/es/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/es/button/master Improved/Expected Behavior: (Expected Results)After the Roll Out or Language Copy, we expect that the experience fragments should have the XFPaths localized like the configurations below. In a perfect world the Live Copy and Language Copy mechanism should update the XFPaths as expected like what we see below:- /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/ca/fr/button/master- /content/sourcedcode/us/es/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/us/es/button/master Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Latest AEMaaCS and AEM 6.5 SP Packs Customer-name/Organization name: NULL Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
It would be helpful if "pinned" projects/tasks could appear at the top if timesheet or there could be any sort of views, groupings, or filters added.
Currently, all feeds must be created through the UI. It takes a lot of man hours to create and validate a new feed. It would be a nice for Adobe to expose an API which we can manage our data feeds programmatically and automatically. Thanks
Description - Data Sets in AEP (expecially Prod sandbox) are extremely important assets. There should be a rigid process on its deletion, just like Report Suite in AA.Why is this feature important to you - I think no one wants to have its Data Set in Prod sandbox to be deleted easily.How would you like the feature to work - The deletion should involve Adobe tech support, as the final gate keeper.Current Behaviour - With the proper permission, admin can just delete Data Sets easily. Thanks.John
Certain types of requests (queue topics in some cases) require a document to be included in the request to pass initial assessment in traffic before being approved. The ability to force an attachment of some sort would stop the requester from submitting the request (like you do with required fields) without the attachment and save back and forth time for the request to be approved to begin work or be assigned out to a team.
The "Action Needed" daily digest email shows both already-completed actions and outstanding actions. It does not, however, state which action is what type (open or completed). The problem is that the wording - "Action Needed" - leads users to think that it won't include actions that have been already been completed, when in fact these are readily included in the digest. Please can this be fixed!
It would be a great addition to charts to have the ability to sort the Y axis groupings by ascending or descending order. Example: Currently, if we have a project report, grouped by program, with a bar chart showing Actual Costs, it will display the chart in alphabetical order of the program name. We should have the ability to sort the Actual Costs in Ascending or Descending order in charts, displaying the most expensive programs at the top and vice versa.
I saw that someone had this suggestion for Updates (which is great), but I would love to be able to edit the style of text in tasks, issues, project details and custom forms too. It would really help to break up big blocks of instructions and call attention to particularly important information. Caps and punctuation only go so far.
Specifically needed in agile but would be useful for all description fields
Description - When users copy tasks from an old project with assignments, if they don't choose to carry over the old projects permissions the task in the new project does not give any permissions at all. I would have expected this task to take on the task permissions set on the new project but WF support says this is not the intended behavior.Why is this feature important to you - Our PMs often copy sections of tasks from previous projects to save time, but they do not realize that the new task doesn't give any permissions. When the task assignees try to interact with the task they are met with no access errors.How would you like the feature to work - I would like any task copied from one project (if permission is not selected to copy with it) to take on the task permission set on the new project.Current Behaviour - Currently the task copies over but no permissions are given to the assignees for the task or project
Description - A Project owner gets a notification when a new document is added to their project. Apparently this type of notification does not exist when that document get a new VERSION added. This mean that the Project Owner needs to rely on the person adding the new Version to make a comment in th eupdates feed or some other manual communication to the them so they can stay updated on the activity. It would be nice if the Project owner could have the option to get notifications upon upload of a new Version as well.Why is this feature important to you - Important for communication to keep the flow of work moving.How would you like the feature to work - Just like the notificaiton for new documents being added to a project.Current Behaviour - There is no current behavior.
Description - I like the enhancement where we can now include native fields on the custom form. I would like to see the subject field be available as well. Why is this feature important to you - At my organization, users submit a request to activate their campaigns. Those requests are automatically converted to projects through Fusion. We actually would like the Subject field removed, but since that is not possible we would like to be able to use the subject field as the Program Name or Project Name. We also have a field on our custom form that asks you for your Program Name or Project Name, so it can be redundant to have both fields, so if the user enters their Program Name or Project Name in the subject field, it would be nice to have that automatically applied to our custom field.How would you like the feature to work - Similar to how the description field now works, where whatever the user types in the description field is also available in custom description field.Current Behaviour - Currently, users have to enter a subject line which is also usually the same information required on a custom field we have as well, so it can be redundant to have to copy and paste the subject line into the custom field on our form.
Description - I'd like the ability to sort my to-do list so I can stack my priority for the day. I'd still like the ability to sort by date if I have a date for a to-do ite. Also, it'd be nice to add notes to a to-do so I don't have to try and jam all the context into the title.Why is this feature important to you - I was a heavy user of "My Priority" in old home and haven't found anything that works as well. This might help, but it also seems like pretty easy functionality that most other to-do applicants have.How would you like the feature to work -Current Behaviour - To-do widget items aren't sortable. They're just in the order you enter them.
The ability to rearrange/reorganize my favorites would be nice. Currently, I would have to remove the favorite and then re-favorite it in order to get it to move up on the favorites list.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
