Build better products with our product team
Description - allow System Administrators to change task statuses implicitly without restrictions based on the project's statusWhy is this feature important to you - as a System Administrator, cleanup is part of my every day job. While one could wish for users who mark their tasks as Cancelled before updating the project to Cancelled, this isn't always realistic. It would be great if I could just use a report of all tasks in New or In Progress status that are in a project of Cancelled and update them all in a couple of clicks.How would you like the feature to work - when a System Administrator is attempting to update the status of a task in a Cancelled project, either allow this change to happen without issue, or show a pop-up window first asking the user if this is what they'd like to do (for example, "A task's status cannot be modified for a project with a status of Cancelled. As a System Administrator, you can override this. Do you wish to proceed?" - this is similar to pop-ups in Smartsheet).Current Behaviour - currently, you have to take the project status out of Cancelled to be able to update the tasks' statuses. This creates many clicks and much manual effort, going into each Cancelled project first, as it cannot be done via a task report.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We create a new page under /content/soucedcode/language-masters/en called home . Within this page, we will drag in an Experience Fragment Component with the XFPath. In this scenario, we have XFPath = /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/en/button/masterWhen we language or live copy pages, the XFPaths should be updated as expected, but it is not. Now let's continue with the scenario. Please note that we have the entire structure of the XF created - /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/en/button/master - /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/fr/button/master- /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/es/button/master - /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/ca/en/button/master - /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/ca/fr/button/master- /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/us/es/button/masterNow after when the new page is created in language-masters, we will start performing the language copy /content/soucedcode/language-masters/en/home TO->> - /content/soucedcode/language-masters/fr/home - /content/soucedcode/language-masters/es/homeWe expect the referenced experience fragments to change the references with the correct values below, and it looks like it works as expected from here: - /content/soucedcode/language-masters/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/fr/button/master - /content/soucedcode/language-masters/es/home == XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/es/button/masterOkay now we are going to roll out the language copies pages to the different countries. Since these language copies are actually live copies within the language folders, the roll out mechanism will work as expected. Target pages: - /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr- /content/sourcedcode/us/es(Expected Results)After the roll out, we expect that the experience fragments should have the XFPaths localized like the configurations below. In a perfect world the Live Copy and Language Copy mechanism should update the XFPaths as expected like what we see below:- /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/ca/fr/button/master- /content/sourcedcode/us/es/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/us/es/button/master(Actual Results)In actual results, we are seeing that the XFPaths are not localized, and is referencing to the language-masters paths: - /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/fr/button/master- /content/sourcedcode/us/es/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/es/button/master Use-case: We have pages created in language masters which has an experience fragment inside of it. The experience fragment is referencing to the experience fragments language-masters path. When we Roll Out or Language Copy pages, we expect the references to update to the non language-masters structure. Current/Experienced Behavior: (Actual Results)In actual results, we are seeing that the XFPaths are not localized after Roll Out or Language Copy executions. Look at this, this is still referencing to the language-masters paths: - /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/fr/button/master- /content/sourcedcode/us/es/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/language-masters/es/button/master Improved/Expected Behavior: (Expected Results)After the Roll Out or Language Copy, we expect that the experience fragments should have the XFPaths localized like the configurations below. In a perfect world the Live Copy and Language Copy mechanism should update the XFPaths as expected like what we see below:- /content/sourcedcode/ca/fr/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/ca/fr/button/master- /content/sourcedcode/us/es/home== XFPath: /content/soucedcode/experience-fragments/us/es/button/master Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Latest AEMaaCS and AEM 6.5 SP Packs Customer-name/Organization name: NULL Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Currently, all feeds must be created through the UI. It takes a lot of man hours to create and validate a new feed. It would be a nice for Adobe to expose an API which we can manage our data feeds programmatically and automatically. Thanks
Description - Data Sets in AEP (expecially Prod sandbox) are extremely important assets. There should be a rigid process on its deletion, just like Report Suite in AA.Why is this feature important to you - I think no one wants to have its Data Set in Prod sandbox to be deleted easily.How would you like the feature to work - The deletion should involve Adobe tech support, as the final gate keeper.Current Behaviour - With the proper permission, admin can just delete Data Sets easily. Thanks.John
Certain types of requests (queue topics in some cases) require a document to be included in the request to pass initial assessment in traffic before being approved. The ability to force an attachment of some sort would stop the requester from submitting the request (like you do with required fields) without the attachment and save back and forth time for the request to be approved to begin work or be assigned out to a team.
I saw that someone had this suggestion for Updates (which is great), but I would love to be able to edit the style of text in tasks, issues, project details and custom forms too. It would really help to break up big blocks of instructions and call attention to particularly important information. Caps and punctuation only go so far.
Description - When users copy tasks from an old project with assignments, if they don't choose to carry over the old projects permissions the task in the new project does not give any permissions at all. I would have expected this task to take on the task permissions set on the new project but WF support says this is not the intended behavior.Why is this feature important to you - Our PMs often copy sections of tasks from previous projects to save time, but they do not realize that the new task doesn't give any permissions. When the task assignees try to interact with the task they are met with no access errors.How would you like the feature to work - I would like any task copied from one project (if permission is not selected to copy with it) to take on the task permission set on the new project.Current Behaviour - Currently the task copies over but no permissions are given to the assignees for the task or project
Description - A Project owner gets a notification when a new document is added to their project. Apparently this type of notification does not exist when that document get a new VERSION added. This mean that the Project Owner needs to rely on the person adding the new Version to make a comment in th eupdates feed or some other manual communication to the them so they can stay updated on the activity. It would be nice if the Project owner could have the option to get notifications upon upload of a new Version as well.Why is this feature important to you - Important for communication to keep the flow of work moving.How would you like the feature to work - Just like the notificaiton for new documents being added to a project.Current Behaviour - There is no current behavior.
Description - I'd like the ability to sort my to-do list so I can stack my priority for the day. I'd still like the ability to sort by date if I have a date for a to-do ite. Also, it'd be nice to add notes to a to-do so I don't have to try and jam all the context into the title.Why is this feature important to you - I was a heavy user of "My Priority" in old home and haven't found anything that works as well. This might help, but it also seems like pretty easy functionality that most other to-do applicants have.How would you like the feature to work -Current Behaviour - To-do widget items aren't sortable. They're just in the order you enter them.
Have the "Sum of Sales Squared" available in A4T, since it is not available in Target when using A4T or have it still available for download from Target even if we use A4T. The download option isn't available from target when using A4T. I'd like to estimate the time to significance easier for revenue in Adobe Target Sample Size Calculator
Description - Scheduled Report attachment (html) that is sent via email does not show links as links in the report but it shows links as plain text. Why is this feature important to you - The attachment report in the email should show the data fields in the same format as the report shows it in Workfront. How would you like the feature to work - I would like links that are created by value expression in the reports show as links when the report is sent via email as attachment. Current Behaviour - Scheduled Report attachment (html) that is sent via email does not show links as links in the report but it shows links as plain text.
Description - Currently, Adobe can't support sending data to KMS-encrypted buckets. This is actually a requirement from our governance team and we needed to receive an exception just to proceed in the manner we do.Why is this feature important to you - KMS is useful for all S3 buckets, and Adobe's SDK should be able to support sending data in that matter.How would you like the feature to work - Support KMS encryption, assuming the role Adobe uses has that access.Current Behaviour - Feeds will fail
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
Sorry, we're still checking this file's contents to make sure it's safe to download. Please try again in a few minutes.
OKSorry, our virus scanner detected that this file isn't safe to download.
OK