Product ideas | Community
Skip to main content

Filter by idea status

10000 Ideas

KMartin-2New Participant

offer different filtering in the Projects list than the Portfolio list (return to previous functionality)New

Description -After the April 2023 update, my filter selections no longer stick in the area I'm working in.Previously: While on the Projects tab, I could select Filter A for that listing. When I clicked on my team's Portfolio tab, i could select to use Filter B. Whenever I moved in and out of projects or across tabs, Filter A would always be on Projects and Filter B on the portfolio until I changed themNow: I set Filter A on the Project tab. I move to the Portfolio tab and Filter A is set. I change it to Filter B. I move back to the Project tab. Filter B is now set. The previously selected filter does not "stick" This is important to me because as the manager of the team, nearly everyone puts me as the project sponsor on their projects. Unfortunately, all of these projects appear when using the "Projects I'm On" filter, even if I have no task assignments. So I created a filter to show only projects where I have actual task assignments. This is how I filter the Projects list. When I want to see projects across all of my team, i go to the Portfolio tab. I had that filtered to all Current projects. Previously, i could move between these tabs and the filtering I chose "stuck." Now they always have the same filtering and I have to go through multiple clicks to switch the filtering according to the context of the tab. I would very much like to return to previous filtering, where the Projects tab and the Portfolio tab could have different and separate filtering.

PrllnceNew Participant

After Effects Motion blur settingsNew

Problem Description:Currently, Adobe After Effects does not offer a built-in feature for setting global motion blur preferences that apply to all compositions within a project.This limitation can be quite cumbersome for users working on extensive projects, as they need to individually configure motion blur settings for each composition, which can be time-consuming and prone to inconsistencies.Suggested Solution:I kindly request that Adobe consider implementing a feature that allows users to set global motion blur preferences at the project level. This feature would enable users to define motion blur settings that apply universally to all compositions within the project. Here's how it could work:In the project settings or preferences, add a "Global Motion Blur Settings" section.Within this section, users should be able to set parameters such as motion blur on/off, shutter angle, and motion blur samples.These global settings would override the composition-level settings unless a composition-specific override is defined.By implementing this feature, Adobe After Effects could streamline the workflow for users working on large projects and maintain consistency in motion blur settings throughout the project. It would greatly enhance the user experience and productivity.I understand that implementing such changes might take time and resources, but I believe it would be a valuable addition to Adobe After Effects and positively impact the user community.Thank you for considering this enhancement request, and I look forward to any feedback or updates on the matter. Best regards,Prllnce

heathrollNew Participant

Kanban board intake column should be searchable by project nameNew

Description - When trying to find tasks in the intake column to move to the board, the search tool within the column only searches the task names. When I search for project names, I get no results. The problem is that our task names are generic (e.g., Web Page Live, Update Page, etc.) but our project names are unique (e.g., Fall 2023 Campaign) so we really need a way to search for project names to find associated tasks. I know there are ways to manually create cards on the board which allows search for project name, or use the board configurations to filter down the intake column for specific projects, but being able to use the search tool would make things much quicker and more efficient.Why is this feature important to you - Our department uses WF to manage numerous ongoing projects at any given time, however my team is usually only responsible for one task per project. The idea of using a Kanban board to visualize our tasks seems like an efficient way to monitor our work, but getting our tasks to the board is not easy or would result in a lot of added time and effort which reduces the overall efficiency of the board.How would you like the feature to work - I would configure my Kanban board to dynamically intake tasks assigned to my team; I would then use the search tool within the intake column and search for project names to bring up associated tasks; I would then drag a task onto the board when ready to be worked on.Current Behaviour - Our intake column is configured to display all open tasks assigned to my team which results in 100+ items. These are not searchable by project name so I have to manually sort through the list to find what I need, or create cards manually (obsoleting the intake column), or constantly adjust the intake column filter per individual project to find associated tasks. 

AndrewGr1
AndrewGr1New Participant

Make the quick filter usable for Assignment and Status columnNew

Description - After support's research, they indicated that the Assignments and Status column will be unpredictable when using the quick filter since it's not a sortable column. We use this column often as it's a better view for tasks with multiple assignees or when we want to see all tasks assigned to someone, not just the ones where they are the primary assignee. "My team has confirmed that the Tasks: Assignments and Status field is not sortable, which is required for quick filter searches. They recommend using the User column as I had suggested as well, feel free to keep both columns but keep in mind that the previous column you were using will be unpredictable with the quick filter searches. If you would like for us to make this field operable with the quick filter feature, I would recommend submitting this as a product enhancement via our Innovation Lab." Why is this feature important to you - So we aren't thinking we are seeing all the tasks associated with a name when using the quick filter since there is no warning that the Assignments and Status column doesn't always work with that feature.  How would you like the feature to work - Enable quick filter to be usable with Assignments and Status column Current Behaviour - Results are not consistent and won't always show every task that has the searched text. I was noticing that there were supposed to be 4 results one day, but when I quick filtered the name, it only showed two.

Jennifer_Dungan
Jennifer_DunganNew Participant

Serialization Length is overdue for an update - we need to support more than 20 charactersNew

Description 20 characters generally is no longer enough to serialize events against... System GUIDs are now generally 36 characters, but can be longer... transaction ids from Google Play Store are 24 characters (now, right now, the solution is to strip the gns or gpa designation at the beginning, and all the . and - characters which just gets us to 20; but how long will this solution last?).   20 characters may have been enough at one time, but times have changed and serialization needs to change with it.   Why is this feature important to you Being able to properly serialize against User GUIDs or full transaction ids, rather than risking those values starting with the same 20 characters and being ignored is important to anyone dealing with transactions or any sort of need to de-duplicate based on user ids (account registrations for instance)   How would you like the feature to work Serialization needs to allow more than 20 characters... while 36 would cover a lot of needs, there could be other scenarios where this isn't enough... increasing to 255 should cover most concerns and then some.   Current Behaviour Serialization is currently limited to 20 characters, anything passed above that is truncated and only the first 20 characters are used for serialization.. this poses a risk of multiple values matching in the first 20 characters (but diverging in the last half) being ignore by the system.