I would love to see more Marketo support for custom business days. The ability to set up a calendar with days of the week where cadences would be paused and support for wait steps that wait "business days" or end on "business days" instead of only the option to end on M-F would be excellent. This would be a great feature to roll into some of the existing ideas for holiday support (which I thought I remembered in the past, but I can't find any documentation on existing functionality now).
I like the auto-align feature but wish I could turn it off at will. I want to be able to lock a scenario layout so it can't be moved around. Some of my layouts get very complex and when the system decides it is going to move things around it wreaks havoc and I have to reposition every module. Thanks!
This may apply to other types of modules, but the Search module is the one where it is most prevalent to me.I would like to see the search module interface changed to be easier to work with in environments where there are a lot of custom fields. Instead of it loading every custom field in the system as part of the Search Criteria and Outputs, have it only load the system fields by default. Then have a place where you can provide an ID of the custom custom forms whose custom fields you want to be included as well. Or you could have a list of checkboxes with the custom forms listed and let them be selected that way. personally, i like the idea of just making me provide the ID rather than having to store that whole list of custom forms in the module. This could cut down on the size that the module adds to your blueprint because the list of custom forms is inherently always going to be smaller than the list of custom fields in the system. More so if you just make the end user provide an ID rather than giving a list because then you aren't having to store either list in the module. This would also make using the modules easier. Particularly in environments where you have a lot of custom fields. When configuring these modules right now, you pretty much have to use the Find feature of the browser or something similar to efficiently get to the fields you want to use. If only the fields from the forms you're interested in are displayed, it is much easier to just scroll through them.It would also help you be aware of what all fields are on the particular form(s) you're working on.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Use-case: AEM is sending duplicate content to the third party applications like smartling when the page is submitted for the translation which has Experience fragment referred in it. Example: Let's assume, we have a page where experience fragment component is used. The moment experience fragment is added on the page, 'text' property gets created at node level and all the experience fragment content will be stored at page level as well which is not required. Current/Experienced Behavior: 'text' property gets created at node level and all the experience fragment content will be stored at page level as well which is not required. Improved/Expected Behavior: 'text' property should be removed Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.12 Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Steps to reproduce: 1. Create Experience fragment add test component. 2. Create Page and add 'Experience Fragment' component. 3. Edit component & Refer experience component path and Save dialog. 4. Verify the experience fragment node property at content level where you can see unused 'text' property. Code package (if applicable):
Description - Parse JSON values into their own table rows in the network requests view, so that the values within the JSON can be more easily inspected/verified in downloaded Excel files.Why is this feature important to you - Verifying values within the JSON is very important to verify correct tracking, instead of seeing the long JSON string.How would you like the feature to work - The debugger automatically parses JSON values into their own (nested) rows in the network requests table.Current Behaviour - JSON values are one long string value, so in the downloaded Excel file, it is difficult to read the individual values properly without additional manual parsing.
See screenshot below and case 00318010
When there are a lot of items in a scenario's queue due to a user trigging the scenario multiple times there should be a way to customize the view of the queue list. If the scenario has actually stopped I have the opportunity to compare the details of each item in the queue and remove duplicates, but finding those duplicates is difficult when I need to go into each one.In the instance on 6/27/2022 where event subscriptions were delayed I had people trying to trigger events multiple times so I went into Fusion and turned a couple scenarios off so that I would have a chance to review those queues when the delay was over. Once scenario had 56 issues to be converted to projects by Fusion, but the scenario's queue had 93 items listed due to users triggering the scenario multiple times. Finding those duplicate IDs was a challenge, if I could create a view that showed the New State: ID in a column, dups would be easier to identify
We are looking for a way to see additional project details in the Programs area of Workfront. We are thinking that the Task and Issue Summary Tab would be a great option to add to the Program>Projects area . If the functionality was available within the Program we could quickly click the box next to the project> open summary>send an update, see overview details, possibly see custom form details,,ect..
I'd like to be able to "attach" a project to a general update that I might be making from the Portfolio updates area. Right now you only can go into an individual project it seems to make an "update" which will show up on the porfolio updates, but if making an update from the porfolio, it would be nice to be able to attach the appropriate project(s).
Add ability to put the approvers name to the root folder as well as send only one notification. Also, on this same root folder to be able to add an update, instead of doing it on a single document to add an update.
I would like to enter ongoing sustainment tasks that are operational in nature to Workfront but not have them tied to a project. Since by definition a project is a temporary endeavor with a start date and an end date. This continuous task is done at a certain cadence so how do I accomplish this goal?
I am using a lot the activity map on the website to understand the user journey and which feature is the more clicked.But there is no equivalent for apps. We have to implement custom events and it can cost a lot of hits.Can we get a kind of activity map for apps ? Regards
We need more options of the layout within a Dashboard and how the Reports are laid out. These current ridged layouts don't always allow me to build out a dashboard the best way for the usage.Allowing more of a grid layout that we can then drag and drop our reports on that we can Snap to a grid.This would allow for more flexibility of the reports showing on the layout that better suits the function of the Dashboard. For example i may want a small chart to the far left but the report next to it should span aprox 2 columns to allow for the most information to be shown. I may also then want a report or image under that that spans the whole area.Then 2 reports side by side underneath.
You should be able to "Cancel" a task without removing the predecessors or needing them to be completed. It's not only cumbersome when trying to batch cancel, it also seems illogical because if you need to make them active again, you don't have the context that was initially surrounding them.
have created a Task Report where I have grouped the results by Status. I would like the order of these statuses to be:- New- In Progress- Complete- On Hold- CancelledAs these are all default statuses, it is not possible to edit their KEY to put them in a different order. The only viable workaround would be to create new custom statuses and custom keys (as they are ordered alphabetically by their keys). I wish I could order the statuses in any way I want, and creating new custom statuses would cause too much trouble an re-work, it is simply not worth.
Need:I'd like some better bot exclusion features at some point.Business case:Our company is pretty large, so we get hit with bots all the time. The only way we can exclude effectively is through segments, but they get massive and slow down data retrieval.Current solutions:-The current out-of-box bot removal only allows for exclusion by IP, which is not useful (since bots cycle IPs now).-The auto exclude bots misses pretty much all of the bots as well.-This means we need to use custom segments to exclude certain domain/city/browser combinations or various forms of entry page/domain/Operating systems in order to exclude these bots.Possible Suggestions:-Exclude visits where a hit occurs x amount of times a minute from the same domain?-Exclude visits where a hit occurs x times a minute from same cookie ID?I'd love other suggestions from the community on what else could be added
Description- New Enhancement on Adobe Target UIWhy is this feature important to you - Business team requirement, this filter enables team to differentiate their activities in target UIHow would you like the feature to work - The ability to search on a “team” / “set of team members” / “custom filter” is a business requirement that came up after a demo to the business stakeholders, when we mention a team name, individual name while creating activity (Under Other Metadata Option), can we have a filter showed in target UI beside activities what ever mentioned under other metadata option..Current Behaviour - There is no filter that specifies this user/team created the activity. This new enhancement will bring a better understanding to the business team to work on their own activities..
When bulk uploading Users using a Kickstarter template, I am unable to upload the Users' Managers because the template requires the Managers' IDs. We may already be uploading the Managers at the same time and won't have their WF Manager IDs but DO have their name and email address/user name. It would be very useful to be able to set up the User-Manager relationship during the bulk upload.
A simple toggle button on the timesheet page to enable/disable completed tasks/issues.
I would like to be able to tell the type of Offer (e.g. HTML Offer versus Experience Fragment) from the Modifications window. Right now when I view an activity in edit mode I can't tell if the author correctly set up the activity using an experience fragment with the name "My Offer" or if they are pointing to an HTML fragment with the name "My Offer".This is critical to increasing our throughput as authors who use HTML Offers need their code reviewed before activation and authors who use Experience Fragments do not.
The list of mobile devices for interactive proofs is woefully out of date. It would be great if an update is in the works. I understand that we can add custom sizes, but it seems like the list should have something more recent than an iPhone X.
Provide more Frequently used scenario templates in Fusion
I'd like to see a personal calendar in addition to the time off that can be used to mark time unavailable for projects, such as when a worker is attending a conference, a class or a team meeting. I'd like to see options to add categories for calendar items and notes so that reporting can be pulled.
Today, editable areas inside an email are copied into the text version of an email when building inside the Marketo UI. However, this is not always desired behavior. For example, if you have an editable area inside Marketo, you may have something like: <div class="mktoText" id="example" mktoName="Example Text Area"> I'm getting copied to the text version of this email! </div> However, there may be configuration reasons as to why you may both want to have an editable area and an ability to explicitly not copy that content into the text version of the email: <div class="mktoText" id="example" mktoName="Example Text Area" aria-hidden="${trueOrFalse}"> I may or may not need to be copied to the text version of this email! </div> If there was some way to explicitly mark that the content should not be copied—whether that's using an ARIA role (if hidden, then "hide" text by failing to copy), some custom attribute like mktoCopyToText, or something else—this would empower template developers to consolidate types of modules used, decreasing the level of effort to maintain complex templates.
Why is this feature important to you -Since this feature is only supported with Recommendation type activities we run a risk of having someone update criteria logic that is actually being used. Most of our recommendation activities (zones) do not use the 'recommendation' activity type. How would you like the feature to work -Like it does today when review the criteria logic used in recommendation type activities but for other activity types as well. One can click "i" icon on the criteria, then click on the Algorithm Usage tab to see that the criteria is in use. Current Behavior -The Algorithm Usage feature is currently only supported for Recommendations activities. It is not supported for A/B Test, Auto-Allocate, Auto-Target, and Experience Targeting (XT) activities that include recommendations as an offer.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
