It would be great if we could target report emails to users the report applies to rather than it going to an entire group/team/user list.Example - a project report showing projects that are overdue by 10 days or more, sent weekly but only to the owners of those projects and their managers.The recipient section of the recurring email menu would allow you to either select user fields that appear in the report or to add parameters in the same way you build reports.
For agile teams it is difficult to show future capacity/workload and predict when we will need extra resource. Instead of a list for the unallocated resource, it would be useful to show if there is capacity within the team to get these task completed. So if everyone in the team was allocated work to be at max capacity, is there enough resource to cover what needs to be achieved.
The "idea" is to stop counting API users towards the number of licensed users. Assume you have 25 users as baseline and you add a couple of connections, you cut your users in half pretty quickly. In addition, there are separate limits (quota, rate, concurrency) that are shared across all the API users anyway , so it's kind of double-penalizing the usage. Would be nice if this would be changed, so people do not have to go for an API gateway approach (although that comes with different benefits of course).
Markto Outlookアドインのセールスメールについて、受信者がセールスメール開封時にアラートを出しております。 ただし、送信者が送信済みメールを開封しても「セールスメール開封」のアクティビティが付いてしまうため、送信済みメールを確認できるよう自己表示を防ぐ方法、あるいはシステム改良頂ければと思います。 以下設定を組みましたが、結果自己表示は防げませんでした。 自己表示を防ぐ https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/marketo/using/product-docs/marketo-sales-connect/email/common-tracking-questions/preventing-self-views.html?lang=ja 送信済みのメールは確認する場合があるため、確認時の自己表示が防げるとアクティビティ精度が増すと思われます。 検討、ご対応の程お願いいたします。
We need the ability to use the Workload Balancer's features on Unassigned Work to placeholder-in allocations in order to judge what Workes might be the best fit.We use a pool system so sometimes we need to see how the allocations might work FIRST to find the best Worker fit.
Currently when viewing issue details, the overview details are automatically open and provide a lot of details that are not necessary for everyday users to view. Custom form details are typically more pertinent so it would be great if we had the ability to rearrange the order of the Issue details to put the Custom form details above the overview, or at the very least automatically collapse the Overview details so they arent expanded by default.
The idea is to separate the permissions between custom forms and custom fields, to allow people to create forms, but not create new fields.We hold the governance of new custom fields at a Global admin Level, which means we have to create all forms as well. This makes sure that our group admins in every agency and market in our global network do not end up creating 100s of duplicate fields (either in language or slightly different naming for the same data etc etc) in our single instance. As this would 1 make a mess of the system and 2 break global reporting. We need to be able to allow our group admins to only be able to create new custom forms, and not create new custom fields.
Description -When using Adobe Launch oob, you insert a script to your website that points to "assets.adobedtm.com".As it is possible to get CNAME from Adobe for Analytics and Target (which helps a lot with Cookie issues), Adobe should offer this for Launch, too.Why is this feature important to you -I think it is important, because many "browser privacy tools" may block the domain "assets.adobedtm.com", so the Tag Manager is not loaded for those visitors.I really appreciate that Launch offers a "self hosting" option, but it is struggle to get this done with internal IT (at least for me).How would you like the feature to work -Just like the CNAME program for Analytics/Target, it should work the same way (including a SSL certificate for the new CNAME).Current Behaviour -As I said above, the default Launch domain may be blocked as "browser privacy concerns" are rising. It would be a good alternative for "self hosting"
We recently ran into a issue where our salesforce instance was throwing in query errors when we try to add mkto leads to campaigns. The list size was over 500 leads. I tried syncing in 100 leads at a time and it went through no problem. I understand this to a salesforce issue and is a result of multiple processes/flows that are triggered during the sync. But, if only there was a way/option to send in leads in smaller batches within marketo. A way to automate this inside a flow maybe, let marketo know only to sync 100 at a time, then the next batch etc, till we resolve the issue with Salesforce?
A lot of our Users often use "Request More Access". When we click the Request Access name drop down, the box is so small it cuts off people's names. Any way to make the drop down box bigger so we see full names? Anyone else think this is a great idea? Thank you! Jay Schertzer
Currently, the only way to know that a project was copied from another project is that "Copy of xxx" appears in the Project Name. However, project names can easily (and will likely) be changed. It would be helpful for this piece of information to be written into another field or tracked in the project history.
機能強化リクエスト（RFE）のサマリー： Get logs more than one week from Cloud Manager ユースケース： When we receive Alert notification from Customer, We can retrace its past and survey it. 現在／過去のビヘイビアー： Within one week 改善済み／予想されるビヘイビアー: more than one week (for as long a time as possible) 環境の詳細（AEM バージョン／サービスパック、該当する場合はその他の詳細）： AEM as a Cloud Service 顧客名／組織名： スクリーンショット（該当する場合）： コードパッケージ（該当する場合）：
Currently to change the condition of a task while making an update, the user must be assigned to that task OR they need a view on the task list that shows Condition so they can change it on the task list.A user not assigned to the task, needing to use a view on the task list to change the condition poses 2 issues.they risk changing the condition on the wrong task since they are not making the change within the task itselfour uses still need to make a comment on the task if they are changing the condition, so it's a multi-step process to make the comment on one page and change the condition on another page, likely also needing to switch the view of the task list so they see a Condition columnI can see some companies not wanting users who aren't assigned to the task to be able to change the condition, so ideally this would be able to be turned on/off in setup.
Collapsed view of tasks on Kanban board does not offer enough information. Only shows task name. Issue - If you have several Search Results Banner tasks to design you will see a bunch of tasks that say Search Results Banner with no other information. You can’t tell which task goes with which project unless you add a bunch of information to the task name which clutters up the actual task. If you expand the card, the width of the card blows out the column (BUG previously mentioned). Right now, we have to add tons of information to the task name as a work around.
Hello, our users/requesters generally start drafting a request a week or two in advance. For them a big portion of the draft process is also uploading assets as they receive them. However, the current configuration automatically deletes draft documents after 24 hours. We're requesting that it document auto-deletion be extended to two weeks (best case scenario) or at minimum a week.
When the backlog is present on the kanban board, any filters applied to the kanban board should also affect the backlog column. It would be easier to find specific tasks/stories as well as see one person's workload if the backlog was affected by these filters. More filter options for the kanban board in general would also be helpful, like by project name, etc.
s.t() and s.tl() both support variable override which allow to set variables only for the call and keep the other variables as they were.For the moment is not possible to call "Send Beacon" with override variables.It's would be greate to (at least one):- add an action that "capture" all "Set Variables" to use it as override variables for the next tracking call- add an option for "Set Variables" to "buffer" variable and use it as override variable for the next tracking call- extend "Send Beacon" action settings UI to have the same UI as "Set Variables" for overwritten variablesSome times you need to compute variables based on page variables (like events) without update it.See also Adobe analytics extension - clear variables on bea... - Adobe Experience League Community - 402972
There is no visible indicator that a custom field is over the character limit. Ideally, the paragraph text field would operate the same way as the Report description field as you near the limit you see a red indicator at the bottom that counts the number of remaining characters available. Saving requestors time with submission.
Now you are unable to easily switch topic groups / queue topics when trying to submit a request. When you click on the topic group / queue topic, you are not shown the dropdown again. First you have to click the X to clear the current selection, then you can see the options again. This is confusing to users and not intuitive.
Most used link of all Home Page is PROJECT from Task. You have now hidden it under 3 dots with entire path from Portfolio to Task Great if you want to provide the entire path in breadcrumbs, but please make it fully visible. Appreciate same which is now available in Proofing..Hidden breadcrumbs is an oxymoron!
Per our stakeholders , it would be really helpful if they could see the parent task name of subtasks in the Workload Balancer. Especially for projects with a lot of tasks, and sections of the same few subtasks for multiple parent tasks (i.e. Review brief, Create asset, Upload Asset for 5 different parent tasks representing 5 different assets) - this gets really confusing in the Workload Balancer.
It would be great if the team information would be removed from a user when they are inactive. I did some tests and it doesn't look like historical data is messed up with the remove of the person from the team.
Would like to be able to customize what priorities are used for different queues. This should be controlled at the queue setup level or by groups the same way custom statuses are able to be organized. Our use case is: our design team uses an array of statuses (low, high, urgent, a custom status 'quick-turn') but our other teams only want to allow 1-2 priorities (normal and urgent). These priorities tie to our overall team's SLAs so it is hard to come up with different SLAs for all of the priority options just because Workfront only allows you to set them system wide.
Description - I'd like to be able to leave notes or descriptions on workflow canvases, perhaps an extra tab space on all activities to write notes for marketers? and then change the activity with an icon on the corner which shows notes are inside, perhaps even bring up a popup showing the notes or summary on highlight of the activity Icon. Also allow to add notes on canvases, see examples below. Current Behaviour - non
I would love to have planner functionality on a day level. I believe this can be achieved in 2 ways:drill down planner to 1 day view (1week on screen)add sum of hours visible in Workload balancer (at the top or at the bottom)Its a struggle to understand how many hours in total there are available in the team on a given day. For tasks that need to be handled urgently it is essential to quickly understand if the team at all has capacity and if yes which resource exactly. Latter is somehow handled by Workload balancer, but data contained there is nowhere in the system summarized per day. Its not even easily available via API, which could a workaround.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
