Build better products with our product team
機能改善要求（RFE）概要： About the menu for text components As attached, only 5 icons are displayed at the top of the text component editing screen. If you display it in full screen, more icons will appear. With the current specifications, you cannot tell if there are multiple icons unless you use the full screen.Very difficult to understand. Request that all types of icons be displayed even if it is not full screen. ユースケース： menu for text components 現在／体験した動作： 改善／期待される動作： view all icon 環境の詳細（AEM バージョン／サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細）： 顧客名／組織名 スクリーンショット（ある場合） コードパッケージ（ある場合）
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Rework the Translation Projects in a way that also normal users (and not only administrators) can see the members which are also assigned to the project in the tile "Team". Use-case: As a user who starts translation projects, I want to see who else is member of the translation team. And, with which rights. Current/Experienced Behavior: Only member of administrators group can see all members in the "Team tile". The member itself are just seeing one member here - that's his account. System shows always "Team (1)" as title of the tile, which is wrong in this case. So, for the normal user this tile is completely USELESS (and shows actually wrong information in case there are more members). Improved/Expected Behavior: Tile "Team" in the Translation Project should show all members which are assigned to the team also for non-admin users! And, would be quite helpful if there would an hover effect on the avatar icon showing details of the person. With that you save the click to open the whole overview page. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Rework the functionality how settings, which user can adjust, are saved. The current way to do that with a cookie avoid an efficient way of working for editors if they are switching devices and or browsers. Use-case: As an editor, I configure my AEM UI to my needs so that I can work most efficiently. So, e.g. I set up the left pane to show always the content tree. If I use another browser or switch the device, I'm working with, those settings should be still effective. Current/Experienced Behavior: Setting are not kept as the are stored not in the user account in AEM but in a cookie (which by the way expires also at next day, I think) Improved/Expected Behavior: Make those settings persistent in the user account within AEM so that it is not necessary to set them up every time. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Develop graphql sorting feature Use-case: If I want to sort graphql results by a name/number field alphabetically, current graphql doesnt support. Current/Experienced Behavior: If I want to sort graphql results by a name/number field alphabetically, current graphql doesnt support. Improved/Expected Behavior: Graphql should support sorting features for text or number or dates fields Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): All Customer-name/Organization name: Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Idea Summary: The new Cloud Manager Content Fragment (CF) Editor does not support displaying custom field types such as ColorField, TextArea, and PathField, which were previously replaced in the classic editor. This lack of support significantly impacts users relying on these customizations for structured content authoring. We propose adding native support or a UI extensibility option to render these field types appropriately. Business Use Case: Organizations using AEM depend on custom field types to maintain structured content entry consistency. The inability to render these fields in the new CF Editor forces users to revert to the classic editor, limiting their ability to leverage new UI features. Providing native support for custom client-side renderers would enhance usability and encourage migration to the new UI. Current Behavior: The CF Editor does not recognize or display custom fields such as ColorField, TextArea, and PathField. Custom client-side renderers are ignored, making values stored in these fields inaccessible. Users must use the classic editor to maintain content integrity, reducing the adoption of the new UI. Expected Behavior: Support for rendering custom field types within the new CF Editor. The ability to register and reference custom client-side renderers for field visualization. Improved UI extensibility to maintain parity with the classic editor’s capabilities. Steps to Reproduce: Replace a single-line text field with a ColorField, TextArea, or PathField. Open the Content Fragment in the new CF Editor. Observe that the field does not render as expected. Open the same fragment in the classic editor and see the expected rendering. Impact & Benefits: Ensures a seamless transition from the classic editor to the new UI. Improves content authoring experience by maintaining structured field visualizations. Encourages adoption of the new CF Editor without sacrificing customization. We appreciate Adobe’s continued improvements and request consideration for this enhancement in a future release. Thank you for reviewing this proposal.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: a feature to let the user "pin" (save) a specific path on AUP as a starting point when choosing assets or content links within AUP. After pinning a location, next time the user has to browse to an asset or content element, the pinned location is used as a starting point. Use-case: when editing pages on elements such as: - content grids (articles, case studies) - content grids (people) - page configuration (selecting hero banner image, selecting featured image, selecting thumbnail) - configuring links (CTA buttons, text links etc.) Current/Experienced Behavior: Expanding the directory path from the starting point is very time consuming, and it needs to be done multiple times - Country branches are not sorted in a meaningful way, which makes it very difficult to find the needed folder in the directory tree Improved/Expected Behavior: Example scenario 1 (non-exhaustive of the use cases): In a content grid, the user clicks to add a new item. They click the folder icon which opens the content structure starting at the "EY Unified Site" level. The user finds the directory which they want to be the new starting point for adding content to content grids and they "pin" and save this directory location. Once this is enhanced, in content grid, when clicking the folder icon, it starts browsing from the saved (pinned) location. The user has the option to unpin the folder and pin a new one if needed. Example scenario 2 (non-exhaustive of the use cases): Similar thing happens in the Page Properties / Images tab, where the user defines the assets to be used as page thumbnail and featured image. The "Pick" and "Select image" links open a dialog window which starts at the pinned location for assets. Note : the pinned locations for assets and for content are different. The user can pin a location for each of the different use cases – for content fragments, for links, for images and for documents Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 2025.1.19149.20250116T154450Z Customer-name/Organization name: Aneesh.KM@gds.ey.com / Hans.vinje@nl.ey.com / EY / EY.COM Screenshot (if applicable): NA Code package (if applicable): NA
Description - Improve the speed of deleting projects Why is this feature important to you - Because the time of deleting projects takes a long time, the last one I deleted 6 copies takes 1 day to delete. How would you like the feature to work - The changes in our dashboard of projects will be fast in real time. Current Behaviour - It slow aprox 1 day.
Description - As the subject field is mandatory and Adobe does not provide the possibility to deactivate it, it would be good to be able to rename this field or modify the label Why is this feature important to you - The name subject is not enough for a briefing form and this name does not make sense for all briefings. This leads to misunderstandings. How would you like the feature to work - The best solution would be to be able to deactivate this field, the others would be to be able to rename it or at least setup a label / instructions for it. Current Behaviour - not possible
As an Admin I need to view User Profiles. After Viewing the User profile there is a frequent need to Logon As the user. There needs to be a link to clink and logon as the User on both the User Profile "Home Page" and also on the Left Nav Bar when the User Profile is edited.
There are many ways to log time and we use them all. We even add a task to every project called admin time logging for work concentrated to a specific project but not detailed in a task. We have recently restructured our work and we are going to have coordinators own the projects and keep them moving quickly and smoothly but likely the coordinators will not have tasks.If we could turn on a feature in the left nav so each project had this default option, we could avoid adding a generic task to the beginning of each project to log time. This also would be helpful for other roles as well as coordinators.Once a project is opened, the coordinator could click on the left nav and this weeks time sheet would appear for that project and could easily be completed without leaving to go to another location to log time. Similar to logging on a task or issue.Thanks!SuzyF
Not sure if this will go anywhere because there probably aren't enough people following this channel to vote it up to get he required votes, but worth a shot. Currently, when you use fusion to convert an issue to a project, the custom data doesn't come over. No biggie, you can then update the project with the info from the request. However, if you have 10 form you need 10 flows. And if each form has 100 fields, you must manually map each field from the request to the project. Now take this further and you want to change the name or add a field.. Yep. Update the flow. It would be AWESOME if we could either convert with a switch (include custom data) or have a sub-object that we could pull over for the custom data without mapping each item. If the key doesn't exist in the new project object, it is dropped. If it exists it gets mapped. Sounds similar to the "CONVERT ISSUE TO PROJECT" button in the user interface, no?
We would like the ability to select two parents on a workflow stage, both needing to be approved before going to the child of the two.
Description - A new parameter field type "table" to be added to the custom form with size selection (no. of rows, no.of columns) & field type selection (number cell, date cell, text cell) & color coding for cells Why is this feature important to you - It is important to obtain certain crucial information in the form of a table to go ahead with the work request How would you like the feature to work - Allow selection of a table with size, field type, color coding, aggregation Current Behaviour - No feature to add a table type parameter field to the custom form
We need the ability to create a group or folder for our Project Templates, similar to how groups are used for Proof Workflow Templates in Proof HQ. Currently, we have several templates we use and this would be beneficial for organization during request conversions.
Issue -The Layout Templates are a great way to tailor the user experience in the system. However, we use the system at an enterprise level with various tenants using the system using the Group setup. The problem is we have users that work with multiple groups in the system. The layout template assigned to them as part of their home group may not align when they are working on work objects from another group. For example, a User 1 in Group A may hide Business Case section of a project to meet their operational needs. However, User 1 may have to work on a project that is managed by Group B that uses Business Case. Because User 1's layout template hides Business Case, they cannot see the Business Case section in Group B's project. How would you like the feature to work -I would like layout templates differentiate between overall/default view of the system, and the context of the object they are looking at (portfolio, program, project, task, issue, team, etc.). This would probably involve defining the layout template at the group level so that all objects for that group inherit the layout. For example, if a user is part of Group A with a specific layout template that does not show Business Case, but they are viewing a Project that is linked to Group B where that group's layout template shows Business Case, then show the Business Case section.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - In. last 3/4 years of working with various use cases I have delt with, a very common use case I came across is creating segment using some date field where the audience building criteria is:date is before current timestampdate is after current timestamp For last 3/4 years, I have been handling this type of requests/requirementsusing data distiller Query Service Only ORhave an additional field "status" and requesting data source to derive and set the value or adding computed field mapping in the dataflow during ingestion All these options create an additional complexity. As users of AEP is mainly expected to be marketers, I think for this type of simple use cases, reaching out to IT team pushes the capability AEP in bad place - I have seen people raising eyebrows. There are so many features getting added in AEP every month. Can't we expect an enhancement in AEP Audience Builder UI to be able to do this using Audience Builder UI only? This will make it more powerful to position. With the existing capability of AEP, I am able to create the segment with the above criteria using PQL and API. But enabling the Current Timestamp as TIME option after the DIRECTION (BEFORE and AFTER) would be a great enhancement for AEP. How would you like the feature to work - Bring the Current Timestamp option after the DIRECTION (BEFORE and AFTER) in the Audience Builder UI.Current Behaviour - Currently there is no option in Audience Builder UI to select current timestamp when we select "BEFORE" or "AFTER" for a date/datetime field. Note: A question was raised and we discussed about the existing capability in this URL: https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/real-time-customer-data-platform/create-audience-where-profiles-having-an-active-subscription/m-p/730786?search=Audience%20Builder%20-%20RT-CDP#M1223 @davidross91 @pratheeparunraj
Description -Why is this feature important to you - Because fusion history is only available for 1 month, there are times we cannot determine the source or duration of a given issue. How would you like the feature to work - we would like an API that we can subscribe to from an external log monitoring tool. Current Behaviour -Fusion logs only contain 1 month of history.
Currently I can pull bot name as a dimension and bot pageviews as a metric in Analysis Workspace. And I can pull IP address or user agent in Data Warehouse. But I can't pull bot name or bot pageviews in Data Warehouse and I can't pull IP address or user agent in Analysis Workspace (at least out of the box) and breakdown bot name by IP. I would love the ability in either Workspace or Warehouse, (but ideally both), to be able to breakdown bot name by IP address/user agent, but right now there's not a great way to do that.Customer care confirmed this was the case.Here's a brief summary of our discussion for future references:You were looking to pull out bot reports in Data Warehouse. I informed you that its not possible as bots are excluded from the reporting. The Bot reports are only available in the Workspace and that too, separate from rest of the report suite data. Further, you wanted to enquire if its possible to pull out Bot Reports with IP Address or User Agent. Unfortunately, there is no reporting engine that will give us Bot data with IP Address or User Agent. I suggested to raise this in Experience League Community as a feature enhancement.
It's frustrating that I can't add a Task Status column to Project Templates. Our company relies on status to traffic projects between our creative and account staff. I want to pre-program tasks with certain statuses when the Template is opened into a project. Please make this change in the near future. Thank you.
Description -The Workfront Sharepoint Graph API connector should support “Sites.Selected” scope.Why is this feature important to you -Having a more restrictive scope should allow for granular control to Sharepoint sites and Sharepoint admins will be able to control access to sites exposed to Workfront more effectively.How would you like the feature to work -The Workfront Sharepoint connector should support the “Sites.Selected” scope (in addition to/instead of “Sites.ReadWriteAll”). The previous version of the Sharepoint connector (legacy) supported access to a subset of site collections. Current Behaviour -The Sharepoint connector currently allows access to all sites that the user has access to, with no way of restricting access to sites relevant to Workfront only. This is also a security risk because we are now forced to allow access to all sites, instead of limiting access to what is required.
As customers utilize newer features within GTW, the use case for this feature will grow and it would ideal for the integration with Marketo to support this.
Current state you can only filter stories on the Team Scum board (iteration) by team member. When there are numerous stories in an iteration across multiple projects, it is difficult to view and address during stand ups. The boards area has the ability to filter on different items, which project is an option. Unfortunately, the boards area does not offer a Scrum option. It would be great to add some of the filter options that board has in the Team Iteration section.
Description - The Job Role object appears to have the DATA_EXTENDABLE flag in the Workfront API. It would be very useful in the UI to allow custom forms/fields to exist on the Job Role object. Why is this feature important to you - Much of our organizational KPI metrics are based on Job Roles. As such, many of our Workfront reports use the Job Role as either a filter or a grouping depending on the report. To give some examples, our Job Roles can have different metrics like expected hours, anticipated performance goals, sustainability metrics, among other organizational-specific items. Right now, I have to pull Workfront reports out to Excel, and then cross-reference/VLOOKUP against my standard metric list before presenting the reports to leadership. A custom form/fields would allow me to display this data natively in a Workfront report/dashboard. How would you like the feature to work - Allow adding custom fields/forms to the Job Role object. Current Behavior - The modal for editing Job Role has only fixed fields, and does not allow custom fields.
Description - Make it easy to locate a particular folder using Graph API option in the documents section. Problem - When I search for a particular folder, it gives multiple results with the same name (making it difficult to go for the correct folder). In the example image below, I'm trying to search for 'Development' folder and there is no way for me identify the folder I'm looking for. Why is this feature important to you - I'm trying to introduce this option to Project Managers for them to use project documents effectively. How would you like the feature to work - Some way to indicate hierarchical name of the parent folder(s). Current Behaviour - No indication of hierarchical folder name(s).
Description - Be able to link the Object "Projects" into the Widget.Why is this feature important to you - We have many Users who utilize the Workfront Widget in Salesforce to submit Requests in Workfront that get routed to the appropriate Project. There is a Project Tab within the Widget that our Users have been asking to be able to use to streamline their work and reduce duplicative efforts.How would you like the feature to work - Link the Projects that were created outside of the Widget to the Widget.Current Behaviour - Unable to use the Project tab feature as Objects created outside of the Widget are unable to be linked to the Widget.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
