Build better products with our product team
DescriptionWorkload Balancer information is currently exposed via the ASSGN:workPerDate and TASK:workPerDate fields. These fields truncate at 1,000 entries, with no ability to investigate further into those due to how the API's pagination works at the parent object level (ASSGN/TASK). What is needed is the ability to pull the workPerDate information via a separate object that supports pagination (ideally via a cursor rather than an offset).Why is this feature important to youWe bring Workfront information into Snowflake and link it to data from other systems, such as Salesforce, NetSuite, Workday, etc. Workload Balancer is an incredibly powerful tool that helps our project managers, and we need the per-resource/per-day assignment information in order to ensure our systems are synchronized properly for reporting purposes. Without exposing this information via a proper API object, there is no way to ensure information is accurate and not truncated.How would you like the feature to workMake the workPerDate more of a collection of a proper object, with that collection associated with an ASSGN and TASK, perhaps called something like "WORKITEM" or "WRKITM". An example of the object structure could be:IDobjCodecreationDate (date the object was first created)workDate (date the object references for the work to be done)lastUpdated (timestamp)lastUpdatedBy (user ID)parentObjCodeparentObjIDhoursSince these work items can change frequently, offset-based pagination ($$LIMIT/$$FIRST) really doesn't allow for pulling of all this information in a reasonable way. As such, it would be best to use cursor-based pagination so that repeated API calls to pull a set of information doesn't cause "gaps" -- that is, the paginated API has a "transactional" nature to it.Current BehaviourSee the ASSGN:workPerDate and TASK:workPerDate fields. The main issue is around pagination, with those fields each truncating at 1,000 entries max.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Interface to understand and manage permissions Use-case: It became very tough for the users to understand or manage the permissions in AEMasCS and was at least easy with legacy UI admin in AMS. Specially when it comes to fixing the access issues for authors and other business groups it's taking too much of time to go over the rules. Current/Experienced Behavior: Difficult to manage permissions. Improved/Expected Behavior: Easy to manage permissions. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMasCS Customer-name/Organization name: Bread financial Screenshot (if applicable): NA Code package (if applicable): NA
Description - See schedule exceptions when looking at a user's (or your own) time off calendarWhy is this feature important to you - It's confusing to users that they don't see our scheduled holidays when the look at their time off calendarHow would you like the feature to work - Days that are on the schedule as exceptions are also blocked out on users Time off calendars, perhaps in a different color than time offCurrent Behaviour - Both calendars live independently of each other, and as far as I can tell there is no way to see them in one place
Description - If an update / a comment is created using the checkbox Private to my company and a user is tagged, who is not assigned to the originators company, this user gets notified on this update. The user will also be able to read the update / note text in the notification email / notifications, but he/she is not able to see the update in the UI.This can be very confusion for the originator of the comment / update as well as the tagged user.Why is this feature important to you - To avoid any misunderstandings.How would you like the feature to work - There are multiple ways, how this could be handled.:- information in the update / comment editor, if the checkbox Private to my company is active and a person from a different company is tagged- denial of tagging users who are not assigned to the company as long as the checkbox is active- information in the update stream of tagged user, that there is an update, which was set to private- different functionality in the background -> User get's notified, but does not see the note text, or is able to ask the originator for permissions like it is possible on other objectsCurrent Behaviour - as described above
Description - right now, the Web SDK send event action shows a checkbox that can be selected to do a "collect" request and improve the overall data quality.It would be amazing if this could be based on an evaluated Data Element that can be leveraged to conditionally enable this feature (without going the way through the on before event send callback) Why is this feature important to you - Right now, the setting has to be done statically which is too rigid How would you like the feature to work - allow using a data element that evaluate to true/false to determine whether this feature shall be toggled Current Behaviour - "stupid" checkbox that has to be preconfigured
Description - View Project Schedule when Adding an Update from Quick ActionsWhy is this feature important to you - Being able to see the project schedule would make it easy on the project owner to send an update to those that are assigned to tasks. Our project owners are making revisions daily to their briefs and being able to see the schedule from this space would save them time from clicking into each brief to see who they need to send it to to make an update.How would you like the feature to work - Add a button in the "Add New Update" quick action pop up window to be able to see the schedule of tasksCurrent Behaviour - does not exist
If I have a PDF with comments in it, the comments are unable to be imported along with proof uploads. We often times receive files from our vendors or authors where they commented and we need to route the PDF and comments for internal review. It will be very helpful if the comments can be imported with the PDF during proof uploads.
Description - If an admin uses the Log in as function to login as a specific user, this action should not update the fields lastLoginDate and loginCount.Why is this feature important to you - We need a way to monitor, when a user really logged in to the system. Therefore the fields lastLoginDate and loginCount should be used. To test / double check specific system settings (e.g. object sharing) our admin team often uses the Log in as functionality. Unfortunately this updates the mentioned fields lastLoginDate and loginCount. As far as I found out, this update seems to only be done once a day. So, if you login as another user multiple times on the same day, the loginCount is not increased.How would you like the feature to work - As there is also an audit for login sessions under the endpoint AUDS, the fields in the USER entry should only be updated, if someone really logged into the account using the corresponding credentials.Current Behaviour - The fields lastLoginDate and loginCount are always updated, regardless of wether it was a "real" login or an impersonation by an admin.
As type-ahead fields are possible for certain types (e.g. users) we would need an option for multi-value fields here as well.E.g. if we define a project team setup in a custom for, we are not able to assign multiple users to one role.
My team has a need for being able to filter the Awaiting My Approval Widget. We have created a custom approval workflow in Proof, however there is no option to filter within this widget for different teams or groups, or different workflows, etc. This would enable us to manage our work better. It would also be advantageous to be able to approve or submit for Changes required by a checkbox within the widget. There are times that as a reviewer, I view many proofs in a day and it would be easier for me to manage if I can "mass approve" once I've viewed.
Description - Give Admins the ability to turn off the Contributor User Limit Reached emails that are auto generated.Why is this feature important to you - these emails are unnecessary since the user automatically moves from contributor to light user. We also have dashboard reporting in our instance to monitor this change and don't need additional emails.How would you like the feature to work - allow the admin to opt out of receiving contributor user limit reached emails.Current Behaviour - emails are auto generated for each admin user.
Description - Control custom reminder notification settings at a group level Why is this feature important to you - Reminder notifications are almost useless because each Department/Team/Group in Workfront has different needs for different reminders. How would you like the feature to work - It would be nice to say send request assignees for Team A a reminder when 3 days late and Team B a reminder when 1 day late, etc Current - each time you create a reminder, it is enabled/disabled globally
Description - I wish there was an option to move updates to a new copied job. Why is this feature important to you - It is nice to have the option if I have updates that remain pertinent to the new copied job.How would you like the feature to work - Just add an option for "Updates" to be copied over to a new job along with the many other options.Current Behaviour - Without the option to copy over updates, I am having to do more work to go back to the old job and copy old updates into the new job that are important to the work getting done.
Description - When creating an object using the API / Fusion, the API always creates the new entry as the API user. From a technical / auditing perspective this makes sense, but to use Fusion / the API as a tool to automate certain steps, it should be possible to create entries on behalf of a user.Why is this feature important to you - To have a clean workflow, the user who is triggering a certain API action / Fusion scenario, should also be the creator of the resulting database entries.How would you like the feature to work - As it is also possible to login as a user and create objects using the UI, this should also be possible using the API.Current Behaviour - Any API operations are done as the API user / Fusion connection user
Today, if a Marketo user is entering email addresses into their system, there is no sanitization of characters that may not be allowed by RFC 6530. While the majority of Unicode is technically valid for an email address, the standard itself notes:"The local parts of those addresses MAY be made up of any ASCII characters except the control characters that RFC 5321 prohibits, although some of them MUST be quoted as specified there."If we cross-reference this section of RFC 5321, you'll notice that it explicitly calls out that the specific characters noted are "control characters (US-ASCII 0-31 and 127; inclusive)". Likewise, any form of whitespace is explicitly excluded from the email spec: RFC 5321, Section 4.1.2 defines the syntax for mailbox, local-part, and domain, which excludes whitespace and RFC 5322, Section 3.2.3 details the allowed characters (atext) for atoms and dot-atoms, excluding whitespace. Recently, I was working with a client who had a record's email address formatted as "test@example.com " instead of "test@example.com", which lead to email delivery failures. However, there is no way to query whitespace characters (in this case, Narrow No-Break Space (U+202F)) in Marketo, so there is no way to find and correct this issue. In this case, it makes logical sense to strip all types of whitespace and control characters from the Email Address field. This prevents user error (which is common with email addresses in uploaded lists) and provides a better experience—while never violating any email standards. Could this please be implemented?
Adobe development team made a recent update to the documents tab, where the document counter on the Project level is now counting folders and assets on the root level only. Prior to this update, the counter reflected the number of actual documents. Our users found this update counter-intuitive. The “Document count” is no longer actually advising on how many documents there are. And we don’t see any value in knowing how many empty folders there are. We would like Adobe to revert this update back to its original behavior.
Description - Currently there is no way system admins can check who scheduled or cancelled Sandbox refreshWhy is this feature important to you - It will help system admins keep a track when & who had scheduled sandbox refresh. In case someone accidently cancels a refresh it will be easier to track for taking corrective actions.How would you like the feature to work - Tracking details can be available on UI or in Setup -> System -> Audit Logs sectionCurrent Behaviour - System admin don't have the ability to track these changes. We have to reach out to Adobe support team who check on backend
Current Situation: In Marketo, creating a Smart List that includes Salesforce (SFDC) campaigns requires entering the exact campaign names. This process can be tedious and prone to errors, especially when dealing with multiple campaigns.Proposed Enhancement: Introduce a simplified filtering option where users can specify criteria such as "contains," "starts with," "ends with," or "does not contain" when selecting SF campaigns in Smart Lists. For example, if a user wants to include all campaigns related to a specific product line, they could simply set the filter to "contains 'ABC'" instead of entering each campaign name individually.
Hello,/rest/v1/leads/submitForm.json submitting to this endpoint email with symbols "_ + -" etc... Makes sometimes timeout an entire request. I think it would be a good idea to implement an encoder on the Marketo side that converts and allows these symbols, or instantly fail validation. In any case, this feels like it is not handled as sometimes it returns "code": "604","message": "Request timed out"
Currently the calendar file token for events doesn't seem to allow meeting reminders. Meeting reminders on the calendar is important functionality that is currently missing and I think need to be added. Adding this would help improve event attendance. Can you add the ability to schedule the calendar reminder to pop up 15 minutes before the meeting occurrence?
Our Security team has flagged a vulnerability regarding the Marketo embed scripts for forms we use on our corporate website. They reference lacking support for sub-resource integrity checks. Their recommendation is to add an Integrity attribute, a cryptographic hash that matches the file. It would be very useful if Marketo could support Sub Resource Integration (SRI) checks.
We have been using GoTo Webinars for quite some time in our instance. I think it would be a good idea to have the option to integrate user interest ratings to be able to score our webinar audience based on GoTo insights. This would enable better management and customization of campaigns in Marketo based on not just the Attended and No Show but also on how well the people who attended interacted in the webinars.
Please consider making updates/improvements to the following web personalization interface issues No folder structureIt would be ideal to have the capability to organize WP campains into folders If you have multiple campaigns you could group them together using folders (by type, audiece, location, initiative, etc.). This will make things look cleaner in the campaigns interface, providing overall better organization, and an easier way to locate existing campaignsWeb Campaign names get cut off, there is no arrow to drag so you can see the full name, the only way is to hoverinconvenient especially when there is no folder structure, if the name could be expanded it would be a way of at least eyeballing what you are looking for No way to edit labelsagain another way to help eyeball what you are looking for but you can't edit the labels you create afterwards so if you made an error or your audience has changed there is no way to edit
Our team uses Mac devices and right now, the Marketo Sales Insights Email Add-in for Outlook (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/marketo/using/product-docs/marketo-sales-insight/msi-outlook-plugin/install-the-marketo-email-add-in-for-outlook-with-a-registration-code) is not supported on Mac devices. We would like to use this so our team can get the most from Sales Insights and further enhance our marketing and sales efforts. Would be great to see this add-in supported on Mac devices in the future.
If the account has a verified domain with DKIM and SPF (i.e. my.domain.com), that account should have the ability to turn off the dual DKIM signing for:dkim=pass header.i=@mktosender.com header.s=m1 and only sign fordkim=pass header.i=@my.domain.com header.s=myselectorname
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
