Build better products with our product team
How difficult would it be to have the Serialized Event ID increased from 20 characters to 32 characters or more?Current 128-bit GUIDs are typically 32 characters (alphanumeric) in length, and requiring the truncation and/or trimming of characters and dashes reduces the ability to effectively ensure uniqueness as well as trust in the reliability of the process. The use of these types of IDs is a business requirement in our organization because of other dependent systems behind our processes.I'm betting I'm not the only person who is being frustrated by this particular constraint. Hoping this is something Adobe can quickly take action to support.Thanks in advance!
This field would let me know if the statusUpdate was completed for a particular weekWould be useful in reports to show if the statusUpdate has been completed
A nice feature would be to allow for users to expand a breadcrumb trail and keep it expanded when navigating around... keep it sticky! This would mean users would not have to keep pressing the more option to view to see the same thing!
Description - It would be great if we can have multiple goal metrics (ex- success rate of 10 buttons individually instead of one single goal metrics which counts success if anyone clicked any of 10buttons) Why is this feature important to you - In the current scenario, we can only set one goal metrics per activity, however in many use-cases we would require adding multiple goal metrics per activity. How would you like the feature to work - Would like to have the option to add multiple goal metrics per activity and to allow playing with these metrics in the A4T report to get the insights from the reports. Current Behaviour - Currently we are allowed to set only one goal metric per activity.
Description - Is there a way to show all active users on a proof in Workfront similar to how Microsoft Onedrive let's you see other active users when sharing and working on Xcel, Word or PPT documents? OR can we build in a warning prior to uploading a new proof that someone is actively currently working in a proof prior to uploading a new proof. Why is this feature important to you - We are having issues where we don't know people are still working on a proof that they are not the primary decision maker or a decision maker at all, a new proof gets uploaded, they get locked out of the previous proof and we didn't make those changes. OR they get locked out in the middle of commenting unexpectedly. How would you like the feature to work - An icon at the top of the open proof with initials like MS Sharepoint/Onedrive shared documents so you know who is currently working on a proof. Also, a warning that pops up when you upload a new version that someone is currently active in the proof so you don't upload the new document. Current Behaviour - No way of knowing who is active and a new comes up and the active users gets kicked out and can't continue commenting because the previous version just locked with the upload of the new proof version.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Page Move rollout config should not only adjust links in referencing pages but also should re-publish them if editor does not decides against Use-case: For managing multinational and multilanguage websites with AEM, we use MSM with blueprint/livecopy to maintain it in a efficient way. Also, as we want to have also structure every time in sync, we are using Page Move Rollout configuration to ensure that also page moves are applied in the livecopies through the rollout. See chapter "To fully realize a page move ..." here: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/experience-manager-65/content/sites/administering/introduction/msm-best-practices.html?lang=en#structure-changes-and-rollouts Current/Experienced Behavior: Let me give you a most simple example: Imagine you have two pages, page A and page B. Page B has a link to page A. Both pages are rollout out to a livecopy and are published. Livecopy has page move and standard rollout config. Now, you move page A to some other structure in the blueprint (e.g. below page C). Doing that, the page move dialog provides option for adjustment and republishing of the referencing page - this is fine and works. To bring this changes to the connected livecopy, you roll out page A. With that, page A getss moved in the livecopy as well and the referencing page B is modified. But because page B was published before, you as an editor now have to manually re-publish this page!Imagine you have 10 livecopies or more connected and not just one page which links to the moved one (but maybe 100) => this is an ENORMOUS effort to do the manual re-publishing since you first have to gather all the referencing pages! To sum up: this is not Enterprise CMS like and does not match our expectations how a CMS should support editors work. Improved/Expected Behavior: If you have Page Move rollout config in place, the system should check if the page you roll out has a cq:LiveSyncConfig node with the property cq:moveTarget in the livecopy page (which indicates that blueprint page has been moved). If yes, system should bring up a dialog showing the referencing pages in the livecopy were user can decide if adjustment or re-publishing should occur similar to standard move dialog. With that the manual work not apply!And, I mean the system is currently adjusting the links - it knows that pages and touches them but it is NOT performing the other step about re-publishing. This is really disappointing! Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Customer-name/Organization name: Carl Zeiss AG Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - When using Week of Year as a dimension, I'd like the weeks to default to sorting in chronological order (the same behavior as week) Why is this feature important to you - I can't build out a dashboard for clients and break out by week number, which they'd prefer, if the table is sorted by metric value. How would you like the feature to work - when breaking out by time/date dimensions, such as week of year, the dimension items should be sorted in chronological order (not by metric order) Current Behaviour - the table is sorted by the value of the first metric, leading to week numbers being jumbled up.
The creator/owner of a segment should be able to share edit access to others (not just read-only access).We have teams of analysts that share responsibility for reporting. When one of them creates a segment, their teammates can't get access to subsequently edit that segment. Example: Some time after a segment is created, an issue is identified, or a request is made to update the segment definition. Within the team responsible for maintaining the reporting, currently *ONLY* the original author of the segment can make updates to it. If they're unavailable due to workload or they're out of the office, the request can't be transferred to another team member. The owner should be able to share edit access across their team so that a peer can pick up the work.
Feature Request Description: The current report suite data from Adobe Analytics is presented in a two-column tabular format, which includes the data type and its associated details. For instance, one row might display "Conversion Variable" alongside details such as "Conversion Variable 6. Status: Disabled". This format lacks complexity, making it challenging to parse individual attributes into separate columns without advanced Excel or Python skills.Importance of the Feature: Digital Marketing professionals, who are the primary users of Adobe Analytics, typically do not possess advanced technical skills in Excel or Python. Therefore, the current data format can be a significant barrier to effectively utilizing the analytics data.Suggested Improvement: To enhance usability, I recommend that the data in the second column be separated by a delimiter, allowing for easier parsing and manipulation of the data into distinct columns. This change would greatly facilitate the analysis and interpretation of the data for users without advanced technical expertise.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to synchronize CF updates to multiple Live copies from CF Edit UI Use-case: MSM for Content Fragments Current/Experienced Behavior: To synchronize changes to a live copies, we need to synchronize them one-by-one from References panel Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability to synchronize CF updates to multiple Live copies from CF Edit UI Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM July 2023 Cloud release Customer-name/Organization name: Abbott Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Description - Create a new user group setting to restrict users to create( read only ) segments and calculated metrics but able to change report suiteWhy is this feature important to you - Currently if an organisation has multi brands and we have multi report suites. We want certain users to have read only access to segments but at the same time able to change report suites. As of today there is no combination setting like thisHow would you like the feature to work - I would like to have a user group setting that would enable me to customize the settings as I need as aboveCurrent Behaviour - There is only restrictive setting which does not let users change report suites too
Description - Add Admin setting to prevent users from moving Tasks that have logged Hours tied to it. There already exist settings to prevent users to delete hours with logged hours here and here. We need to be able to configure a similar setting but with respect to the ability to move a task from one project to another with logged hours. Why is this feature important to you - Without this feature, users are able to move a Task with logged Hours from one Project to another and the Hours get stuck in a state where they stay with the original Project but are no longer tied to a Task. We leverage meta-data on Tasks when reporting on Hours so it's critical that all Hours are tied to a Task. How would you like the feature to work - Ideally this works similar to the settings that manages whether users can delete Tasks with logged Hours, except we want to prevent them from being able to move tasks with logged Hours. Current Behaviour - When a user attempts to move a Task that has Hours tied to it, they get a pop up that states that the Hours will stay with the Project but most users don't understand what that actually means or the downstream impact of that decision. In most cases, users are actually trying to just copy a Task and accidentally select the Move option instead, not realizing it until it is too late. This results in Hours that are no longer tied to any Task and are unable to be tied back to a Task without needed Adobe Workfront Engineering Support.
Description -Would like the ability to duplicate an expense entry (much like we have the duplicate function for tasks)Current Behaviour We have expenses that are exactly the same within projects but must be split into separate expense entries for each location. Some such expenses may have 10 locations. Right now we enter 10 different expenses.
Description - To get some order into dashboards, I sometimes use a Text visualization. Unfortunately its title must have at least one character text in itWhy is this feature important to you - Make dashboards more cleaned up without the need to add a character like "."How would you like the feature to work - Allow no text (see screenshots)Current Behaviour - When the "Text" is removed and confirmed, it snaps back to "Text" Select TextDelete text Meh!
Description - When attempting to access AEM assets through WF documents section, if an asset is not available, then it should show the appropriate HTTP code instead of generic 404Why is this feature important to you - It will speed up the debugging process and give feedback on why asset retrieval failed.How would you like the feature to work - When a user clicks on the preview of a document that is an AEM asset, and they are not authorised, they will encounter 401 error with appropriate error message. When a user clicks on the preview of a document that is an AEM asset, and the AEM instance is not functioning, it will show the 500 error.Current Behaviour - You just get the 404 error.
We need our activity-related smart lists to be able to differentiate between a call attempt and a call connect based on the value the salesperson enters in the Task Type field (e.g. "Call" for an attempt and "Call Connect" if an actual conversation occurs). Having "Type" available as a constraint in the Activity was Logged filter would enable us to do this.
Description - In a displays settings, have the ability to display individual data-point totals. For example, this will allow an analyst to display the totals for each bar in a chart (see image). In the display settings you could set the display to be in top, or inside the bar top. when the width of the chart is decreased, the totals will begin to show only every other bar, and eventually only the max/min as the display grows skinnier. can apply to vertical bars, horizontal bars, lines, and areas Why is this feature important to you - easier digestion of the data for leadership. I have seen in many cases they will hover over individual bars, but this would be easier if they were already displayed. How would you like the feature to work -See explanation above.Current Behaviour -you have to hover your cursor or just select max/min for lines.
Description - As a Fusion Developer, I would like the ability to manage my scenario versions.Why is this feature important to you - Currently, Fusion devs can only add notes per module and we can only view changes by reverting and comparing. It's very cumbersome.How would you like the feature to work - It can be very basic to start. It should allow developers to understand what has been modified, added, or removed between different versions of the blueprints. It should allow side-by-side diffs, inline diffs, historical comparisons, and notes. For notes, it should allow Commit Messages when making changes, a change log generation that is easier to read (right now we only have the history), As a bonus, issue tracking would also be great.Current Behavior - Currently, Fusion devs can only add notes per module and we can only view changes by reverting and comparing.
Description -Why is this feature important to you - The visuals in Workfront under the Gantt section are not visually easy to work with. Right now my team will use Microsoft project to get the visual and because it is easier to set up the project and then upload into Workfront. Why should we have Workfront if they are doing the Work in Microsoft? Also, Microsoft project works a lot like Excel when it comes to filling a series. For example: you have a user that is responsible for multiple tasks. Microsoft project lets you fill and copy down. Workfront makes you go into edit mode in order to do that. Just an extra step. My feedback: study Microsoft Project and look at the visuals that they created and how easy it is to quickly fill in names and other items.
I have a suggestion for a user experience enhancement to help Admins by giving them the ability to associate users to a Job Role from the Job Role setup page.It seems logical that you’d be able to create a new job role and want to immediately assign/remove people to that job role in the setup area, but currently, you can’t do that.As an Admin this could be a time saver and a quick reference to manage user assignments to the job role without having to click into individual user profiles for each change. Currently you can only add/remove/edit the Job Role itself. You can't manage the users associated with that Job Role from the Setup area.
Description - The feature request is to be able to split traffic evenly no matter how many experiences/variations you have. For example if you have 4 Target splits traffic 25/25/25/25. But if you have 6 Target doesn’t allow for decimal places and is effectively giving the control (or Experience A) 20% traffic and then splitting the rest evenly 16%. But really it should be 16.67% for all six (with technically one at 16.65%), but a difference of 0.02% is negligible unless we're talking about hundreds of millions of visitors, whereas a difference of 4% is much larger (20% control traffic - 16% other variations). So a rounding to 2 decimal points with a tweak to round to 100 for one experience is acceptable and done by other testing tools. Why is this feature important to you - Because if we want to split traffic evenly, which is standard practice, we should be able to, regardless of the amount of experiences/variations. How would you like the feature to work - Detailed above. Current Behaviour - Detailed above.
Would love to see Report Builder available for the Mac. Out of my last 3 jobs, I've only been able to use it once for this reason. Not willing to get a PC just for Report Builder, but it would be huge to begin using this tool once again.
Description - Allow Powerpoint Proofs to show speaker notesdWhy is this feature important to you - We work with a number of project using PowerPoints that need to be reviewed in the native format with speaker notes. WF doesn't currently have the ability to upload a PPT in its native format and be able to view the speaker notes. This is a critical ask for us, and I know others have asked for this as well.How would you like the feature to work - Make speaker notes visible in Powerpoint proofsCurrent Behaviour - Only slide view is shown
Description - Currently, the steps in which visualizations in the Analysis Workspace can be resized, are way too big. Sometimes, it would be amazing if e.g., a summary number can be resized a tad bit to make the title readable withou increasing the size to 25% or whatever it is. Vice versa, sometimes it would also be super to make these summary numbers smaller.Why is this feature important to you - For more dashboard flexibility and efficiency of used dashboard spaceHow would you like the feature to work - Just reduce the distance between the snap points to e.g. 5% stepsCurrent Behaviour - The component resizing typically ends up ina) crazy bigb) way too small
It would be very helpful to have the ability to create a "Preset" of a combination of filter view group settings. rather than changing all 3 per project when I navigate to a different project.
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
