Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
What is the main difference between Optimize (New Update) and Condition activity in the orchestration in AJO ?We see experimentation in optimize which could have been achieved by percentage split earlier. And Similarly the Targeting Rule path could be created using data source condition.What is the significant difference between these options ?
I have ingested few records to AEP, and with all the required attributes satisfying the required segment qualification . Segment Condition -Include (edwGlobal Ultimate Parent number exists or edwGlobal Ultimate Parent number does not equal "" nor 0)and ((Last name exists and Last name does not equal " nor ' nor 0)or (First name exists and First name does not equal " nor ' nor 0))and (Last Updated Date occurs in last 10 day(s) or AeplastUpdatedDate occurs in last 10 day(s))and email_conditions includes the audienceProfile Attributes - first name - test | Last name - User | address - eady@gmail.com | AEPLastUpdatedDate - 16-11-2025 |edwGlobal Ultimate Parent - exists |"BUT THE PROFILE IS NOT GETTING QUALIFIED"
Hi all,Some component folders under /apps/myproject/components aren’t getting deployed even though they exist in ui.apps/src/main/content/jcr_root/apps/myproject/components.Here’s my filter.xml:<workspaceFilter version="1.0"> <filter root="/apps/myproject"/> <filter root="/content/myproject"/> </workspaceFilter>I rebuilt (mvn clean install) and redeployed to local + Cloud, but still missing those folders.Could this be due to how filter.xml handles subpaths or exclusions?Do I need to explicitly include those component paths or adjust filters to fix it?
Hello All! I'm working on a project to place content into our email using java script and content blocks. I created the content block with the script and place the <script> in the head of my email. When I test it with both the "send test" and actual sending of the email to myself the email is blank. The content block loads in the deployment screen. It does not load in the preview screen when you are in the editor.Can some one help? I might be setting up the content block wrong.
Hello, We need to update the source dataflow schedule time. I’m attempting this using AEP Flows API calls. For the request body, I’m using: [{"op": "replace","path": "/scheduleParams/startTime","value": "1762482630000"}] However, this approach isn’t working—I’m receiving a 412 Precondition Failed error. I am passing the flow ID and the If-Match (etag) header as required. Could you please assist me in resolving this issue?
Is it possible to hide Workfront Project/Task Updates Tab for certain set of Users
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to search for images in the “Pick Image” window on the image component As of now, when an author tries to select an image using the “browse for image” option in components or page properties, they need to drill through the entire AEM directory and hunt for the image they want with truncated file names and tiny thumbnails. Could we have the ability to search for an image using file names or descriptions? Use-case: Image Search in “Pick Image” Dialog Currently, when authors select an image in AEM through the “Browse for Image” option (in components or page properties), they must manually navigate through the entire directory structure. This process is inefficient and error-prone, especially when dealing with large repositories, truncated file names, or small thumbnail previews. By adding a search capability within the “Pick Image” dialog, authors could quickly locate assets by file name, description, or metadata. This
Every month, we will celebrate a community member who goes above and beyond to share knowledge, help peers, and make our AEP Community thrive. 🏆 This month's Contributor of the Month: @devyendar Please join us in congratulating Devyender! 👏 💬 Drop your messages of appreciation below! (Want to be featured next month? Stay active — answer questions, share tips, and participate in AMAs!)
We’re continually inspired by how you use Adobe Analytics to drive impact. Your experience can help others make confident, informed decisions, and we’d love to hear from you! If you’ve used Adobe Analytics, please take a few minutes to share your thoughts in a peer review on G2 or TrustRadius — or both! As a thank-you, you’ll have the option to receive a $25 gift card. (Just a quick note: reviews should be unique to each site.) 👉 Leave your G2 review here👉 Leave your TrustRadius review here Thank you for being such an engaged and thoughtful part of our community — your voice truly makes a difference! Questions? Reach out anytime at dxpeerreview@adobe.com. Warm regards, The Adobe DX Peer Review Team
There is no easy way to know if someone has deleted a scenario and who deleted the scenario ...or a way to restore it back. There is also no easy way to run a report or even copy/paste the scenario names into a spreadsheet to try and compare against. This is an urgent need, because someone could really mess things up the way the product works currently.
Are there any other ways except for Monitoring ?
Hi All,Was there a change to how to pull in Workload Balancer views into dashboards or am I just doing something wrong? Previously, I would go to the WLB, set up any filters I wanted (and share them), and then hit the "shareable link" icon to get a link that I could paste into a dashboard. The dashboard displayed a pared down version of the WLB, without an icon for filters, no nav links across the top, etc. (see Fig 1 "normal") but now when I do the same thing I get a lot of clutter (see Fig 2 "current"). Am I doing something wrong or was there a process change? Thank you in advance.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Today if we select multiple pages in sites and then click edit, only one page will open in a new tab for authors to edit the page. We wanted the behaviour where, if an author selects multiple pages and click edit, all of them should open up in new tabs. Use-case: ease of authoring Current/Experienced Behavior: Today if we select multiple pages in sites and then click edit, only one page will open in a new tab for authors to edit the page. Improved/Expected Behavior: it should open multiple aem pages in multiple browser tabs Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5 SP 20 Customer-name/Organization name: Dyson Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
We are facing a editorial challenge when users are creating emails in the email designer. This is regarding the use of email fragments. We have created many different fragments as design elements/modules, and in all of this fragments we are using variables to control how the fragment should look like. F ex we use variables to choose between pre defines background colors, we use variables to set the alignment of the content (can vary from mobile to desktop), we have different styling of CTAs etc. Today this settings needs to be done before the fragment is broken, and the content can be edited. The challenge is after the fragment is broken we cant change the variable settings from the interface.But there is a work around, and this is not user friendly. From the code editor we can access the fragment code, and by finding the right place in the code we can manually change the chosen value of the variable. And this is reflected in the template when we save the change.It would be very helpfu
lets say i have primaryemailid as an attribute in the profile. i want to make an upsert or overwrite on that dataset. but before i do that, i want to trace which dataset contributed to that attribute in profile store. how do i find that dataset ?
DescriptionDynamic text visualization would allow the inclusion of dynamic fields (dimensions, metrics, segments, or date ranges) directly within text elements. This enables text to automatically update based on the context of the analysis, making dashboards and reports more interactive and informative. Why is this feature important to youProvides greater flexibility in storytelling with data.Reduces manual effort of updating static text when filters or date ranges change.Enhances clarity by showing contextual information.Improves user experience by making text responsive to analysis changes. How would you like the feature to workText visualization should support placeholders that can be linked to dimensions, metrics, or filters.When a user changes a filter (e.g., date range), the metrics displayed should automatically refresh to reflect the new values.Ideally, users can select fields from a menu or insert them via a formula-like syntax.Example: {{ date.range }} there we
Hi all we are excited to share that #3 of our popular Adobe Target Engineering Webinar is now open for registration. Just following this link for all details and registration form: https://bit.ly/45oIX2p The objective of this "Back2School" webinar is to provide you a look under the hood to discover what our Adobe Target Engineering team is working on. You will also have the unique opportunity to ask questions or to send us your question beforehand by registering. Agenda is likely to highlight exciting insights and best practices around: Target & Single Page Applications (SPA) Recommendations (over 15 algorithms, model training, collaborative filtering, Jaccard Similarity...) To be defineda Q&A (submit your questions via registration) Get skilled-up and trained for this "Back2School" period and register now! Finally, get all your nerdy questions answered live from our friendly & geeky Adobe Target engineers!
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Ability to delete workflow packages before maintenance task configuration is requested Use-case: A large number of unnecessary workflow packages used before setting maintenance tasks remain in the PROD environment, and some functions are unavailable due to timeouts. In addition, there is a significant impact on the performance of Timeline display.Specifically,・In order to display Timeline, the retention period of workflow archives must be set to one day.・Due to timeouts, the launch function cannot be used effectively, putting a heavy burden on authoring operations and scheduling. Current/Experienced Behavior: How to delete past workflow packages is not disclosed. In addition, there is no official tool or knowledge. Improved/Expected Behavior: Provide tools or publish knowledge to remove remaining workflow packages that cannot currently be removed Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):
Register Now: https://adobe.ly/48222Yo Session Details Discover the brand-new AEM Assets landing page—a redesigned, narrative-driven entry point that brings together key capabilities, user journeys, and strategic features of AEM Assets in one place. This session will walk you through how the new landing page serves as a one-stop destination for exploring AEM Assets features, contributing updates, and keeping the experience relevant for all users. In this session, you’ll learn: How to use the new landing page as a unified hub for AEM Assets capabilities How you can contribute to enhancing and enriching this page How to report bugs or missing elements to ensure the page stays accurate and up to date Session Schedule Wednesday, December 3, 2025 | 8 am PST OR 5 pm CET OR 9.30 pm IST Speaker(s) Anuj Kapoor – Adobe, Senior Lead, Content Experience, AEM Assets Don’t forget to register yourself for this upcoming session using the registration link shared above.
Welcome Back to the Adobe Workfront Customer Newsletter! In this Issue: What’s new in Adobe Workfront (Q4 2025): redesigned “My Requests” widget, role-based Workload Balancer, and Planning enhancements with drag-and-drop and inline edits Adobe Workfront Planning (Q4 2025): improved request forms, connected record editing, and refreshed UI for better usability Adobe Workfront Fusion Release Activity Overview (Q4 2025): performance, connector, and monitoring improvements for smoother automation [AMA] The Wizard’s Workshop: Demystifying Textmode & EXISTS in Workfront: RSVP now, post your questions in advance, and join the live discussion on October 26 New Blueprint Released: Baseline Dashboard: Track project trends, compare planned vs. actual results, and identify bottlenecks with this new dashboard template Training Updates: New videos on proof management, requests, logging hours, lessons learned, and navigation in Enhanced
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Remove Content Fragment jcr:title from being included for translation by default when using option "Enable Model Fields for Translation" Use-case: For translation rules for CF I don't want to maintain rules in the translation_rules.xml file, instead I want to give just the creator of the CF Model the chance to define which fields should considered for translation by setting the field "translatable". With current situation creator of CF Model does in fact have NO full control as jcr:title is always translated (creating costs for translation that I do not want to pay. Hence feature is useless as I need to maintain my translation rules manually. Current/Experienced Behavior: Even if I use the option "Enable Content Model Fields for Translation" to use the Translatable field of the Content Fragment Model in order to control which fields should be translated, the jcr:title of the CF is in by default. I can not exclude it and the
Is there anyway to include a 'documents' section to a task custom form? ie so the person completing the form can upload a document in the form rather than using the task's document section.
AJO guardrails of engaging customers upto 90days once they enter in the journey. Is there any hack or work around if customer needs to be engaged for longer period of time ?I m trying to think of converting read audience based journey into trigger based journey so event attributes can be accessed for personalization. However the some of the conditions in audience goes beyond 90 days of their initial event trigger.
Hi all, We have a live journey which is triggered by a unitary event, and inmeditaley after is followed by a condition activity that checks a couple of profile attributes (to serve as a filter) to only allow Friends&Family profiles to continue the journey. The issue here is that we're getting HTTP 429 error in the condition, resulting in a big number of profiles being discarded. Do you have any suggestion/explanation on how to resolve this? Here's the condition used (fictional): (#{ExperiencePlatform.ProfileFieldGroup.profile.customerId} == 'Test-xxx') or(#{ExperiencePlatform.ProfileFieldGroup.profile.customerId} == 'Test-yyy')
Hi Adobe Community, I have 2 audience - audience A and audience B. Audience A is just a normal campaign audience. However, in audience B, we don't want to send any messages to people that were a part of audience A in the last 30 days. We can't just put "exclude audience A" in our criteria for audience B because it will just exclude people that weren't a part of audience A today but we want anyone that was a part of audience A at all in the last 30 days so even if they were in the audience 25 days ago and dropped out of the audience 10 days ago, we still want to exclude them. Anyone have any ideas on how to do this in AEP. Thanks, Nick
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
