Product Communities

Description - Add "otherTeamIDs" as Filter optionWhy is this feature important to you - Some of our reports need to be filtered to only show data from members who belong to a certain Team, which is not their home team. How would you like the feature to work - Similarly to the "otherGroupIDs" works; the only difference it would be for the Other Teams associated with a User's settings, rather than the Other Groups.Current Behaviour - Only "Home Team ID" is available as a filter in reporting, several attempts have been made via text mode but there's not an optimal solution. This new filter option would help solve for use cases like the one described below that I (currently) and AlDe (from 2018) are facing:"When attempting to create an hours report, there is no filter option to include only those who are assigned to a team, which may not be the home team. As a result, each individual name must be entered on the report as filter. In the future, if there are changes

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Strong and Em tags in multiline text in Content Fragments Use-case: editing multiline text in RTE components while meeting requirements for WCAG 2.0 Current/Experienced Behavior: b/i/u buttons create <b>,<i>,<u> tags which have no semantic meaning Improved/Expected Behavior: in order to convey meaning to users using assistive technology, we should be able to add <strong> and <em> instead of <b> and <i>. <u> on the other hand has little semantic value and will likely confuse users who will think it is a link. it should probably be removed or replaced with something with similar semantic meaning like  the <mark> element Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.4-6.5 Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Would like the following feature - Enable Priority Queue configuration in SCD agents for AEMaaCS. Use-case: We want to implement a priority queue for one of our tenant in a multi-tenant architecture for sites in AEMaaCS. While other sites may have multiple pages that are getting activated, one site needs to avoid delay in replication. Current/Experienced Behavior: No option to configure a priority queue in AEMaaCS. Improved/Expected Behavior: Option to configure a priority queue in AEMaaCS should be available. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS - Version - 2023.1 Customer-name/Organization name: TA Digital Screenshot (if applicable): N.A Code package (if applicable): N.A   @kautuk_sahni 

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The time is not displayed in the date (for example, PUBLISHD) of each node displayed on the Sites management screen. Therefore, the user cannot confirm when it was published. There is a way to customize the overlay, but I would like it to display the time as standard. Use-case: When creating a site, check when the node was published. The time is displayed on the Assets management screen, but it is not displayed on the Sites management screen. Current/Experienced Behavior: The format is "date". Improved/Expected Behavior: The format is "datetime". Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Release 2023.4.12142.20230526T152858Z Customer-name/Organization name: SCSK Corp. Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: I propose adobe to include an option to expand the entire parent node along with its child nodes with a single click. Because, sometimes it feels annoying to click "+" on each node to see the final child node(leaf node) if it has a multiple child nodes.   Although the idea sounds simple, but it would be useful sometimes when people in a hurry to check something.   Use-case:   Current/Experienced Behavior: For example - cq: dialog, we have to expand it node by node until we reach the child node. Improved/Expected Behavior: My idea - When I right click on a node - a new option called "Expand Entire Node" should be implemented such that once I click on it, it would show/expand it till the last child node. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): I think this feature is not present in any version of AEM it seems. Customer-name/Organization name: Adobe Experience Manager

Description - Assignees can delegate tasks to someone else in Workfront. Delegated tasks are visible to the original assignee and the delegated assignee via their Work Lists. However, the Project Owner does not have any visibility into delegated tasks from a project timeline or report view. Why is this feature important to you - Project Owners do not know when tasks are delegated so they may reassign or add a task to someone else. This can cause duplicate tasks assigned to the same delegated assignee (or two different assignees) and ultimately confusion and delays. How would you like the feature to work - I would like there to be a field or flag to show Project Owners and anyone else viewing the project tasks when a task has been delegated and to whom. Current Behaviour - There is no easy way for project participants to easily see when a project task is delegated. The only way to see if a project task is delegated and to whom takes multiple clicks.1. From the Project Tas

Currently, the Marketo/GoToWebinar integration only supports one-off live webinars: no simulive, on-demand, or recurring webinars. Can you please add support for recorded webinars with the Marketo/GoToWebinar integration? This single feature would take our webinar program to new heights. The ability to have recorded webinars collect registration information directly in Marketo at scale would be a game-changer. Please let me know, Scott

Currently, when you hover over a user's name, or start to @ mention them in an update, the preview text will show their user name plus their primary job role.  This causes confusion for most of our user base, who are expecting to see the user's job title instead of the job role. We get questions about this all the time. Not everyone updates their profile with a job title, so I think this feature could work by showing the user's job title if it exists, but then it can show the primary job role if the job title does not exist. 

Description - An exception is thrown and processing halts when using the WebSDK extension and there are two instances of the adobe_mc in the query string. Note:  this was reported in Support Case E-001008770, and even though it does not seem to be a Analytics-related problem I was asked to also enter it here.  For good measure, it was also reported in the Alloy extension github as issue #346.  Hopefully one of these will get it fixed. Why is this feature important to you - While there should not be two instances of the adobe_mc parameter in the query string when attempting to pass identity between domains, the WebSDK extension should deal with the situation better than throwing and exception and halting processing.  When this happens, no tracking occurs, no test propositions are returned, etc. How would you like the feature to work - When there are two instances of the same parameter, the results of a parse operation are returned as an array, not

Description - It would be great to have validations on custom forms. Like set up basic rules like triggering client side error while filling up info in the form for the text fields. For example to capture email ID to have @ and . in the text else generate the eror for correcting the format of the input field. Why is this feature important to you - It would help greatly in cllecting correct data in the forms. Validations are basic requiremenst to have some valuable data being collected in the any form.How would you like the feature to work - Just like Display logic, have a sset rule on fields to allow us set up validation rules.Current Behaviour - There is no such way to apply any kind of validation.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Dashboard to display total number of pages , Assets , users , users group , tags and ability to export the data in CSV format for individual AEM instance. Use-case: As a AEM admin i want to know how many assets , pages etc available in each AEM instance ( dev , qa , stage , prod) provisioned in my cloud environment and will be able to extract the data in csv format . Current/Experienced Behavior: No dashboard exist , need to run report or custom queries to get the data  Improved/Expected Behavior: Real time dashboard can help AEM admin to get this holistic view in one screen  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a cloud service  Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Brand Portal users to be able to update metadata property of uploaded assets in contribution folder Use-case: If user on  brand portal doesn't have access to AEM assets, he is not able to update the assets metadata for the assets that has been uploaded on Brand Portal Contribution folder and its not necessary that metadata should always be embedded and in some scenario there might be some purchased assets from other vendor and updating their metadata values on assets itself is not possible Current/Experienced Behavior: users on brand portal can't edit the metadata value as its read only Improved/Expected Behavior: Looking for improved feature to enable the edit of metadata only for New folder inside contribution folder on AEM brand Portal so that whenever user on brand portal upload the assets they can also modify/update the metadata value for the assets that they uploaded. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: "Most Recent Run Date"  and "Most Recent Run Status" columns on the Adobe Cloud Manager Content Set screen. Use-case: As the customers, we create a lot of content copy sets inside the Content Sets screen of Adobe CM. As the list of content sets increases and used over time, it is not easy to track what is the most recent date a given content set was run and it's status unless we go into "Copy Content Activity" screen.  Current/Experienced Behavior: No way to check when was a given content set ran and it's status unless it is checked in the "Copy Content Activity" screen. Improved/Expected Behavior: Adobe CM Content Copy screens users will be able to easily get the information on when a given content set was last ran and it's status during the most recent run. It would be even helpful, if these columns can be sorted ASC/DESC. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Adobe Cloud

There is no way to control for or enforce a custom word or character count within the various custom form text fields. While there are native character limits in the various fields available (https://experienceleague.adobe.com/docs/workfront/using/basics/update-work-items-view-updates/character-limits-in-fields.html?lang=en), none are customizable and each field has its own unique strengths and weaknesses. This functionality would be particularly valuable for the text field with formatting as we are using these forms to author content and the text often needs to fit within a predetermined amount of space within a report's template or on a webpage. We are using a Fusion integration to move the text from these text fields to AEM Assets, and need a way to flag to the creatives who are authoring the text within Workfront how many words they can author to control for publication errors before they submit their content. We've explored a lot of different options and are surpris

Description -Add a way to group related reports and visualizations. It could be as simple as a container box, like in the attached image. Other options, change background colors, change border colors, etc. Why is this feature important to you -We have a few 'snapshot' dashboards that have many summaries, and it would be great to be able to group and differentiate them. This way, you can glance at it, see the overall picture, and not go cross-eyed. We've been adding in text visualizations to give some separation but sometimes it just makes the report long instead of easy to scan. BTW, we don't rely on these for takeaways and/or alerts, but they are handy for quick glances and answering frequently occurring questions. Some of other dashboard would benefit from this as well, but those are typically more specific. How would you like the feature to work -Add a method to group, define, or visually separate two or more reports and/or visualizations. Select the items to gro

We have some additional enhancement requests we would like to have submitted. These have been identified as enhancements that can be made at the platform level to reduce risk through the development and production process:  Additional enhancements to be requested:  a. "Request Confirmation" is automatically applied when a new Delivery object is created. Currently a manual process  b. Idle automatic log-out • Currently, Adobe does not log you out after a period of no activity. Introducing an automatic log-out after a period of time can reduce risk. • Would recommend 10 minutes of no activity in a window be the default • When logging back in, it takes you to the home page, not the object you were in previously  c. Log or view of who has what activities open in the platform.  

Currently, when you set up an automated workflow on proofing, you have to assign a specific user to the workflow stage. We have over 500 possible reviewers and approvers, we do not want to tell the proof creator to select from 500 possible workflows. We want the workflow to instead base it on an object on the project, eg the sponsor, or a job role related to the project eg a creative director. So for example, stage 1, assign a $$project.sponsor (just thinking how $$USER.ID is used on reports) so it's like a wildcard and when the user selects this automated workflow, it picks on the name that's the project sponsor on the project.

Hi! I was very excited to create an automated workflow for my team, but we have hundreds of users that may be reviewing proofs depending on the projects, so it is not possible to choose one name in the template. Can it be set up so that instead of having to choose an individual, you can choose a role? For example, I want to have the Account Manager and Project Manager who are assigned to that project be the reviewers of the proof in the automated workflow - but because that changes for each project, I would need the template to assign based on role, rather than a specific person. There is another idea similar to this post, but it's from 4 years ago, so trying to reignite this effort.

Description - Add a breadcrumb of the object to the mentions widget on the new home. Functionality would be similar to mentions in the My Updates section. Why is this feature important to you - Allows users to click into the object related to the mention for more info/context without having to navigate away from the home page. How would you like the feature to work - Add a linked breadcrumb above the update to the object Current Behaviour - No breadcrumb or link to the object from the mentions widget on new home

Currently, secondary dimension breakdown for each primary dimension row  is set to 5 by default, if you need to see top 10 for each secondary dimension row, you have to manually set it in each secondary dimension row. It would be great to have a setting to change default breakdown row numbers to any up to 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 400.

It would be helpful to provide a way to configure the build profile to choose while configuring the CI/CD pipeline through cloud manager instance.  

Why is it so that the constraint "Program Status" allows statuses that don't belong to the channel of the program in question? Wouldn't it be much better if only the actual program status were displayed?Both the "Program Status was Changed" filter and trigger work this way btw:  

The list of items in the favorites menu can be unwieldy when you've hit the maximum number of allowed items. Instead of scrolling through the entire list it would be much more manageable if the topics had a carrot that could be closed like when viewing groupings in a report. Having it closed by default would prevent the endless scrolling trying to get to the section you need. This format would also make it easier to navigate if the maximum number of items is ever increased. 

Description - For Year-by-Year comparison of current and cumulative values we need a certain kind of visualization - see screenshots attached (Adobe Analytics - current state, Excel - how it should look like).Why is this feature important to you - Esp. for fiscal year reporting, but for continous continous monitoring of monthly KPI development (are we on target or not?).How would you like the feature to work - The possiblity to define metrics of a table to be bars or lines.Current Behaviour - Only one bar with multiple lines is possible in combo chart.

Description -I would love to be able to add a benchmark data point to a graph within Workfront. So that we can compare data to a target/threshold/etc. Why is this feature important to you -Data is often irrelevant without context. Currently it is difficult to convey that context in app when using a report's graph feature. How would you like the feature to work - When I'm setting the graph up I'd like to "plot on a secondary access" a line that is just like a benchmark number. So let's say I'm showing a bar chart of planned hrs per week, I'd like to say this line is the max it should be so we can see what weeks are above or below that line.  Current Behavior - Feature does not exist.