Product Communities

Description - We should have the ability to choose to ignore the time of day for tasks  Why is this feature important to you - This causes issues on our schedule and forces us to use time of day when we have teams in different time zones. We only care that a task is due, started, or completed on a specific day the time does not matter. Every report and project view has to be adjusted in a specific way so time of day is not considered (task calculated fields) How would you like the feature to work - There should be a setting on the group level that allows us to ignore time of day  Current Behaviour - Workfront considers the time of day a task date is started and due which causes confusion for our team that does not use time constraints. 

Description - Modify the Config ID that's been set on the run of web SDK extension, based on a certain action of the user on page where a pageload /page refresh/ Navigation Why is this feature important to you - consider a scenario, where user provide a consent and a page load/ refresh doesn't happen. based on the consent of user if he enabled Analytics and disables personalization and Advertising opt In's. we need to send data using data streamA with service enabled only for analytics.user case 2: If  user opt out Analytics and opt In Adverting and Personalization , we need to send data using data streamB with service enabled for event forwarding and Target.  How would you like the feature to work - Providing a option to Developer to modify config ID in web SDK before send event. Current Behaviour - We are not able to change the config ID until a page reload / refresh / navigation takes place

Workfront Feature Request – Add comment counts to Unresolved, Unread, With Attachments and Current Page Only in the proof comment filter pane When filtering edits, there are currently comment counts under Actions but not under General I think it would be very useful to have comment counts in both sections If I knew how many unresolved comments still remain, I could figure I need to do XX number of edits per day to stay on track That would help avoid an unexpected last-minute scramble as the deadline approaches Also it doesn’t make any sense to me why the tick boxes under General are in two columns  

We have received a lot of feedback that our users find the integration between the Workfront and Outlook calendars limited because you have to manually move the tasks over. Our request is that tasks automatically show up on the outlook calendar on the date the task is due, as all day events.

Hi Team,I think it would be great if there is a way to export full library as excel or csv including names of rules and data elements used in the rule which we can later utilise as way to integrate with reporting suite products as a reference of documentation for library.This will help us to do hassle free documentation and will add value for business users who wants to see all the third party tags installed with launch on the production website.Please let us know if there is some plan for this to happen or it would be already achievable through the present iteration itself.

When I create a custom form, and I'm making a list of choices for a check box or radio button, once I've entered my options I can drag-n-drop to rearrange the list. I really would like that same drag-n-drop / rearrange ability on the report entry screen when I'm entering prompts.

At present, the user-defined campaign execution priority is only visible at the campaign level in the schedule tab, it'd be great if we could see the list of campaigns that have their execution priority overridden by the Marketo user along with the default/original and the overridden priority at one place, probably the best place to add this could be the campaign inspector within the Marketing Activities.  

Currently, duration can be only be averaged at the project level, so if you attempt to add a filter for a specific summary task or template task, the system does not generate a number. As a new version of reporting is likely coming out, can we considering adding this functionality in so that we can break down project timelines by summary tasks, at least, to understand how long specific tasks take, without having to leverage text mode.

Can we please get an option to sort cell contents by default alphabetically. For example, multi select fields will appear within the column cells in random order.

Please add Revenue Types to Issues.   We stopped issues at all already about 7 years ago, as we had the problem that every logged hour on an issue results in Planned Revenue on a Project. In fact not every issue can be billed, so we would need the option to set a Revenue Type like "not billable" as we are uses from Tasks.

In using the new Single Page App (SPA) Visual Experience Composer in a React JS environment, there have been instances where I've made a modification like a heading text change which has persisted past the view on which it was defined. This is less than ideal.Would love to see added functionality that would provide the option to clear any visual editor changes for each of the following scenarios:user navigates away from the view in which the Visual Experience Composer modification was applied;user navigates to a view where the page delivery criteria doesn't much that of the view the user navigated to.Experiment changes should be reapplied of the user navigates back to the view where the change has been made.

Description - the ability to automate turning requests to project with project templates    Why is this feature important to you - we have many teams that receive a LOT of requests every week in our org and as a planner, a lot of my job will centre around setting up projects for the various teams, despite not being a part of their team! I am the bottleneck in our Workfront instance. Being able to automatically convert a request to a project would save me hours of work every week and streamline our request process.     How would you like the feature to work - have the option to automate the request > project action based on templates set up in the system.   Current Behaviour - this option I don't believe is available based on posts in the Experience League community. Has to be done manually and means I'm a bottleneck for our request process. 

Description - Allow the ability to Grant Edit and/or View Access to Section Breaks on Custom forms based on Team, Groups, or Access levels.   Why is this feature important to you - This allows minor sections of custom forms that are needed for speciality teams to access and edit parts of a custom form that others cannot without having to create a whole new custom form.  Allowing all the data needed to be kept in one form (Location).     How would you like the feature to work - When placing a Section Break in a custom form allow either the ability to Grant access based on their access levels (how it is currently) or to grant Edit and/or View abilities based on a Team or Group assignment.   Current Behaviour - Section Breaks in custom forms only allow the ability to Grant access based on their access levels, of Edit, View or Admin only.

Description - Audit the usage of evars/props and events Why is this feature important to you - As an admin of adobe analytics I have reached capacity for evars/props and not quite yet events. I will need to repurpose some evars and prop to accommodate new business requirements. Without reaching out to our whole user base and relying on their feedback I would like to see the usage of these so I can determine if its still in use at all. Additionally when upgrading plugins and the values are different enough, I need to know how many of our users are impacted by such changes. How would you like the feature to work - A feature similar to checking user access logs could be created for custom dimensions and events Current Behaviour - this information cannot be currently attained.

Description - Why is this feature important to you - How would you like the feature to work - Current Behaviour - I work for a financial institution and we are heavily regulated. Each product release has to be documented including our testing and communications. It would be extremely helpful to have a Word document available for each release that we can download and customize for our use. Thanks.

Request: Provide a possibility to configure a data validation for custom fields. Benefit: Improve data quality in Workfront and execution execution.

Description -   Currently the column sum function is a very simple "add all the values together" calculation... and this is fine, for some uses. However, when trying to create things like weighted averages for stackable metrics like Visits or Unique Visitors, there is no proper options available to us.   See https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/adobe-analytics-questions/weighting-dimension-values-using-custom-metric/td-p/554102 for an example...    If you want to use the total visits or total unique visitors for the period in the math, it will always be inflated at this time.   Why is this feature important to you -   This will provide more controls to being able to use the data the way you need to. Since the column "totals" already show the de-duplicated values, we should be able to create within the same table a representation of that number.     How would you like the feature to work -   This could work in two ways,

For the SFDC integration, there is multi-batch queuing (MBQ) support to help mitigate the occurrence of sync backlog. This would also be very useful for the native MSD integration, potentially solving a lot of the backlog issues that Marketo clients with larger databases currently experience.   Could this be added to the roadmap please (if it's not already on it)?

Two ideas based on Custom Prompts below: 1) Prebuilder based on forms 2) sort options   Idea 1: When you build form fields, they become available as a picker for custom prompts. Within a report’s Custom Prompts Options window, a second section could be added where you can type the name of a form field you want to use as a prompt. See image example below.     The name and options are then prepopulated from the form field options. Note: BONUS would be to allow multi select if desired.     Idea 2: Allowing sorting of custom prompts and fields. Highlighted items below:     Bonus: In reports, add a header line item (can be turn on or off) that enable sorting the entire report from headers selections. Also, enable the ability to have the options within the cells be listed in alphabetical order vs random.    

Description - During the conversion or edit of a project, we'd like to be able to remove multiple custom forms at once to save time.   Why is this feature important to you - It would save our teams quite a bit of time with the volume of projects we convert and edit throughout the year.   How would you like the feature to work - Allow multiple forms to be selected before the user clicks "Remove" during the project conversion or editing process.   Current Behaviour - You need to select one, click remove, select the next, click remove, and so on.

Currently, the only way I know of to access reCAPTCHA info from form submissions is to use trigger/filter constraints. It'd be helpful, however, to allow reCAPTCHA info to be passed through as tokens so that they can be used in internal email notifications for new form submissions. Since we just recently implemented the reCAPTCHA on forms, we'd like to monitor the reCAPTCHA info before automatically blocking bot-like traffic to make sure it'll work as intended if we do.   I'm aware we can set up separate smart campaigns with their own triggers/constraints based on the reCAPTCHA info, but that'd result in duplicate smart campaigns to accomplish the same goal

When we create segment basis hit level it shows the other items also (which are present in the hit) For eg. In a single s.products was fired with values ";ABC;10;1,;XYZ;1;20". So there are 2 products purchased in a single hit ABC and XYZ.we classified ABC as Home category and XYZ as Electronics. Now if we create a Hit based segment with classification=Home, the report will show both Home and Electronics as the products associated with them where there in the same Hit. but our business users want to see the numbers from there perspective categories, which we are not able to achive with this hit based segments, which is creating lot of problems in reportings.

it comes as a great surprise to us that changing the Owner of a project does not automatically give that person manage access to the project.Seems kinda odd you'd want a view-only Owner of a project.So hoping to get some traction around making Manage the default, or perhaps an option in preferences so I don't remove someone else's preference for current behavior.

We need to have Workfront maintain the status of the request/issue after it is converted to a project and not change the status of the request back to "New". Currently, this is what happens in WF:Requestor submitted a request/issue to a reviewer for project executionThe status of the request changed to "New" The requestor approved the request for project execution and the status of the request turned "Approved" The customized queue that we built sends this approved request to the queue owner and he/she would change the status of the request to "Approved for Prioritization" (a customized status).However, when this request/issue is converted to Project object, the status changed to "New" for the request...we do not want that...we want it to keep its status at "Approved for Prioritization".

I think by adding read receipts to updates on a task or project level would be beneficial to Project Managers as well as others working within WF. It would allow the PM to see if their messages have been seen or read that way they can follow up when necessary.   Currently you don't really know if someone you assigned a task to or @mentioned in an update has seen your message unless they select work on (one of the biggest pain points for our team currently). Adding this feature would definitely help to alleviate that!   Thanks!