Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
I have a Project Report that pulls in the current task details (assignee name, task, and planned completion date) using the text mode below: displayname=Current Task Detailslistdelimiter=<p>listmethod=nested(tasks).liststextmode=truetype=iteratevalueexpression=IF({canStart}=true && {status}!='CPL' && {numberOfChildren}=0,CONCAT("•",{assignedTo}.{name},": ",{name},"- ",{plannedCompletionDate}))valueformat=HTMLwidth=270I would like the cell to highlight red if the current task due date has passed. I can get the text mode to work if the planned completion date of the project has passed using the code below, but not sure how to write the code to work for the current task's planned completion date. Can anyone help? styledef.case.0.comparison.icon=falsestyledef.case.0.comparison.leftmethod=plannedCompletionDatestyledef.case.0.comparison.lefttext=plannedCompletionDatestyledef.case.0.comparison.operator=ltestyledef.case.0.comparison.operatortype=datestyledef.c
Hi all, I am trying to understand Flow of Control in AEM - Front end to Middle layer to back end. Let us assume I have created a template T, components C1, C2 and C3.I created a page P using this template and configured all components.Front end is in Sightly and Back end is in Servlets, Sling Models and OSGI Services. How to understand the flow of control, say from a button on front end? I could look at the components code, but they were configured during page P creation. Appreciate all your replies. Thanks,RK.
We are encountering a recurring issue in our Adobe Campaign environment involving a persistent database cursor process that appears to be related to nlserver_web_xxx. Specifically, we are observing entries such as: Fetch 30 FROM cur2383 This cursor remains in an active state in the database and does not get released, even though there are no active campaigns or workflows running at the time. As a result, it is locking certain tables that are critical for our nightly data refresh processes. What is the purpose of this nlserver_web_xxx process and the associated cursor (e.g., cur2383)?Why does the cursor remain active and not get released automatically?
Hi all, I wanted to know if anyone has ever attempted to adjust the font size of text in report?
We want to cut down on the number of hits we're sending to AA but don't want to limit the tracking by geogrpahy. Ideally we'd be able to track some like 1 in 2 visits and if possible adjust that if we decide to only track every third visit. Think maybe we can use "Max Frequency" but not totally sure this would meet our needs. Any help and all creative ideas appriciated.
Take information from Workfront planning to pull into WKFT core reports
Taking the actual hours and then only planned hours from today forward.
Ability to templatize a Workfront Planning table and attach it to a project for easy asset tracking like they do in AirTable.
Librarian would like updates in AEM to synced back to WKFT to mitigate a disconnected communication experience.
Differentiate between user cost to role cost and ability to put a freelancer on any task and override with the freelancer cost.
Description - We would love to be able to freeze columns in a workfront report Why is this feature important to you - while teams need all columns, they want to be able to quickly view key columns that change priority quickly and easily How would you like the feature to work - be able to turn on and off freezing easily and adjust which column freezes Current Behaviour - we are aware of creating separate views, but freezing would work much better for the users
By @surebee and @vinayso With optimization programs becoming essential for businesses, a question we often see in consulting from clients is how they can improve their existing program. Improving your optimization program can be a daunting task, but it doesn’t have to be! The ideal state for an optimization program can look different based on your organization’s resources, testing objectives and KPIs - there is no one-size-fits-all approach. We’ll review different aspects of optimization programs and what we’ve seen helps to improve them. Assess current state The first step is to establish a ‘baseline’ where you will want to assess where you are currently in your program. Having a good understanding of your current state will reveal areas to improve to effectively scale your optimization program. Start by taking an inventory of your resources, testing workflows, and processes. Adobe technology stack Get a good understanding of the
Hi, I am seeing differences between email insights and email performance reports for the same set of emails i.e engagement programs and email programs. The opens and clicks specifically don't match for the same timeframe. Please advise.
Question for the hivemindWhat tools to do use to prep files (data transformation, standardization, etc) before loading a lead list into Marketo? I know a lot of people rely on Marketo smart campaigns to do data normalization but my concerns with that approach is that if there are spelling errors in the file then the data won't be normalized correctly which in some cases can and will cause sync issues between Marketo and SFDC. Goal is to try to clean up as much of the data before loading into Marketo to prevent this. Example scenario: Lead file from a conference or tradeshow may have fields below: First NameLast NameEmailCountryCompanyStateRoleTitleProduct of Interest Some fields like Country and State in your system need to align with dependent picklist values from CRM so for example United States needs to transform to US and have 50 valid state values that are also 2 letter codes(New Hampshire = NH). Other fields such as Role and
Hi there,I'm looking to run an auto-target test on a product landing page and wanted to check - could this have any impact on SEO?Thanks in advance!
Hi, I'm trying to setup a new publish instance in aws linux machine. I have setup the aem publish environment and trying to access via the hostname. So the Request flow is Dispatcher server -> ALB (Protocol port: 7000) -> AEM Publisher Server (App Instance running on 7000) I have setup all the dispatcher configurations and routing the traffic through renders to the ALB on port 7000 When i access the host url lets say aempublish.com it's going to aempublish.com:7000/content/we-retail.html where the page is not loading. If i manually remove the port and hit url the page loads fine. I have setup the proxy and rewrite rules as well but still facing the same issue. Checking the network the request is getting redirected twice with 302 status code1) aempublish.com -> aempublish.com/index.html2) aempublish.com/index.html -> aempublish.com:7000/content/we-retail.html Dispatcher.any /virtualhosts {"aempublish.com"}
Description - Block access at the proof level and only allow those listed to proofWhy is this feature important to you - we've had some requesters find their way from the Document section and interject before the asset is ready to share out.How would you like the feature to work - Allow access from the Workflow level for the versionCurrent Behaviour - Anyone with project/task access can navigate to a proof from the document section and start commenting. Once they are in a version (accidentally) they are added to the the Workflow in a new stage. We can set the Requester access level and restrict it for all but it would be nice to do it from a proof/version level especially during internal proofing before the asset is shared back to the Requester/stakeholder..
I have a task report to show all open (not cancelled, on-hold, or completed) tasks. we are looking to add requests to these tasks that another team would process. Once complete we want the tasks to show in our report to show that the task can be processed. is there a way to filter a task report to not show tasks with open (Status not set to "Completed" or "Cancelled") requests?
We currently have teams that create a strategy document that includes information for many teams. The Creative Team is requesting the teams make requests in WF with only Creative needs and not the whole strategy doc attached. The requestors provide screen snips of images and text describing their needs in the document. Not all information is relevant in the document for the Creative Team so we moved to custom fields in the Custom Issue/Request form. There is not a custom form field format to capture this information in the request. I opened WF support case #00390925 "Ability to copy/paste images and add to a custom form field" and was told the functionality doesn't exist and to enter an Idea. See attached examples that were also included in the WF case. The requestors would also like to add information in the custom form fields in a table format that is much easier to read, interpret and digest vs. adding fields for each row of a table. See attached doc with an example.
Hi Community, I want to see if anyone else is having the same problem as me. I attended last week's office hours for the new email editor and am exploring the use of fragments in our templates. When I create a fragment with a background color and add it to an email, the background color does not appear in the email. Is anyone else experiencing this issue or know how to fix it? Thanks!
Would love to hear how the two are working out for you. We're investigating the platform and will need to spin things up rather quickly if we decide to use it future forward.Thanks in advance for your feedback!Lauren
Hello. I'm trying to create a segment for new users to our site however it keeps pulling in existing users. This is the segment I am using, which I got from an Adobe tutorial. I'd like to see all new users within the last 30 days regardless of whether they have only visited once or more. Any help would be much appreciated.
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Publish all content fragment live copies in one go Use-case: Currently we are able to rollout a fragment 300+ Live copies but to publish the same fragment we have to go to all 300+ live copies and manually publish which makes impossible to do. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently we are able to rollout a fragment 300+ Live copies but to publish the same fragment we have to go to all 300+ live copies and manually publish which makes impossible to do. Improved/Expected Behavior: An option to publish content fragment similar to rollout. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMasCSAdobe Experience Manager 2024.9.17689.20240905T073330Z-240900 Customer-name/Organization name: Bread financial Screenshot (if applicable): NA Code package (if applicable): NA
Hi Team, We are launching a warm-up engagement program for new contacts before transitioning them to regular marketing. We will have 3 streams: Stream 1 - 5 emails: New contacts receive all 5 emails. If they click any, they move to Stream 2. ( if they open the email or no engagement then they dont move to next stream )Stream 2 - 2 emails: Contacts receive both emails. Clicking any moves them to Stream 3.( if they open the email or no engagement then they dont move to next stream )Stream 3 - 1 email: Contacts receive the email regardless of engagement. Exit criteria for regular marketing: Contacts who receive all 5 emails in Stream 1 without opening will be added to our suppression list ( and will be treated as a exclusion rule and they wont receive any regular marketing emails , requiring no action as we will create a static list which will be referenced in the suppression list )If a contact opens any email in Stream 1, they will be removed from the
Dear AEM Enthusiast,Seeing that AEM LTS doesnt support cr-explorerHow to create system user in AEM LTS/6.6 ?
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.