Product Communities

When using a Full Processing data source type, you have to manually click "Complete Processing" for each file upload. It would be very useful to optionally automate this process, so we could for instance complete processing of the given data on a daily or hourly basis. The challenge from Adobe's point of view regards processing data for 'open visit', i.e. populating variables in the middle of a user's visit; but just as the "Complete Processing" functionality deals with this problem, so should a scheduled processing completion occur.

Hi All,After working with non -Analytics people and showing them Adobe reports I realized that they need to really dig in to understand report metrics. They are overwhelmed by stacked segments and metrics.What I was thinking, why dont we create labels by combining segments and Metrics. This idea came to me after seeing that we can rename Legends in WS graphs to simpler ones.Imagine this as the modular switches we use at homes. When a switch is fixed we see screws gaps and boxes. These bare screws are like the segments and metric that we stack on each other. Then we put a cover on them to give a clean look. This cover would be the new label that I am suggesting. In the background everything remains same.Example:Current structure : Multiple segments and metrics that make it confusing.(cant show any data due to privacy)Suggested Labels:I am suggesting that is it possible that we just select a metric and a segment or segments and then right click. There can be an option Create Label > E

Column heading in Workspace should be freezed once user clicks on it so that it becomes easier to click on 'I' and 'settings' icon. Right now, sometimes its so difficult to click on these icons if there are multiple columns and due to which full column items are not visible.For example, in below case its very difficult to click on 'settings' and 'I' icon, however slow I hover on the column.

Issue: An analytics user needs to be an Adobe Analytics Product Admin in Adobe Admin console in order to map variables in Adobe Mobile Services. We have multiple analysts and developers who want to do the mapping but I don't want to make every an Adobe Analytics Admin giving them full range over our entire analytics platform. The permission group "Mobile App Admin" should be enough except it doesn't include being able to edit mappings. Makes no sense.What I've tested:I've concluded that even though I give someone access to every available permission in our Adobe Analytics profile, that user still cannot map eVars, Props, or events in Adobe Mobile services without being an Adobe Analytics product admin. There is a default Adobe product profile called "Mobile App Admin" which still only gives a user read only access. I need developers and analysts able to map variables that they have setup in Adobe Analytics report suites without having to give them admin access to the entire product sku

Hi, If we have a list of specific IP address to upload to Bot rules we should not need to define an IP range. Current state we need to provide 3 fields: BOT NAMEIP BEGINIP END BOT NAMEIP BEGINIP ENDbot  104.236.195.72104.236.195.72104.236.195.72 Ideally, we should just need 2 fields: BOT NAMEIPBOT NAMEIPbot  104.236.195.72104.236.195.72 Thanks Incident: #170328-000293

When a user opens a shared project in Analysis Workspace and would like to leverage somebody’s segment with a few amendments, they have to build a segment from scratch as there is no option to open it in the Segment Builder to apply desired changes and save it with a new name.Please add an option Save As (open in Segment Builder) for the segments that are in shared projects.

When scheduling a workspace to be sent via CSV, it would be great if we had the option to 'include hidden tables'.  We have some large projects that we use for dashboarding and analysis but would also like to leverage the CSVs.  It annoying to have to either 1) unhide all tables or 2) manage two projects (one with unhidden tables)thanks,Mike

The additions of maps to Analysis Workspace has been a nice evolution, but most US businesses will find that the volume of activity is highly correlated to population size.  It would be really valuable to have population context available by default within Adobe analytics so that users may quickly analyze which regions over or under index on performance in relation to population.  This would make the map tool and geographic dimensions significantly more valuable.

Current Issue:Right now, users may add custom descriptions to eVar & prop dimensions, however users cannot add custom descriptions to Adobe standard "out of the box" variables or classification dimensions. This inhibits user enablement as it may cause confusion to users who do not understand what certain dimensions are intended for. See screenshots for what I mean: Proposed Idea/Solution: The proposed idea would be to enable Admins the ability to add custom descriptions to out-of-the-box standard Adobe variables (such as Product variable) and also to attributes that are built from classification columns.Benefit/reason for request:This will help enable users to understand what the definition/description for every dimension, and will promote user adoption, especially for customized Adobe implementations. Our Adobe implementation does not leverage the "Adobe tag". Rather, we use a proprietary tagging solution, and so a lot of the standard Adobe variables are not applicable to our acco

Currently the only way to rank dimensions by metric is to sort them (example: page URL's by Visits). But what about when you want rankings for a certain metric to persist, even after you've sorted by a different metric? (Similar to the Rank function in Excel). This is particularly important in web analysis from a page performance and path optimization perspective as it's possible to create participation/contribution metrics but extremely difficult to track changes in rank leaders over time. The fix for this would be to add a simple rank function in the metric container.

Hi,if I got the exact same linkIDs in my (sub)navigation, Activity Map shows the same values and rank, but it would be better if there was a warning sign for those duplicates.RegardsStefanie

Could we please introduce additional preset date range selectors in Data Warehouse?  Currently, we don't have any options between 7 and 30 days (14 & 21 days would be great).  And the custom date range doesn't include a rolling data range feature.  This causes problems for regularly scheduled reports.

There is a need to have a view only of all the variables and processing/channel rules in analytics. Currently, unless you are an admin, you cannot see which variables are activated for your report suites, when they expire or any of the processing rules that assign values to variables. This can be limiting if you are trying to decipher some of the reporting (especially if things are not quite adding up).Don't want admin rights to change things – but would like the right to view things.

Currently Admin Console gives the perception that granting permissions by product profile is a scalable way to grant permissions, with AND logic, and reinforced here: Enterprise Help | Manage product permissions in the Admin Console. After talking with Adobe client care, this is false. Not only can product profile permissions conflict with each other, in an OR logic fashion, but there is no way to know how product profiles will interact with each other except through trial and error (per Adobe Client Care Incident: 190204-000614). For example, in trying to combine a product profile with a single report suite in it with a product profile granting access to an array of data feeds utilities, the user does not get access to the single report suite such that it can be used in combination with the data feeds permissions. This was confirmed by ACC.Solution proposed:- Create product wide AND or OR logic for product permissions and document it, ideally AND logic

We are heavy Alert Users.The challenge: We want *relevant alerts*. Adobe's Anomaly detection system is ok, but 95% of the *Hourly Alerts* it spits out are completely irrelevant as traffic simply oscillates too much from one hour to the next, AND because Adobe seems to take only the last 24 hours into account when looking for Anomalies. So we had to deactivate all our Hourly Alerts.1. However, Daily Alerts are too late for something really critical, so Adobe needs to either improve the Hourly Alert logic, or offer something in between, like _3-hour-periods or 6-hour-periods_ which don't jump up and down all the time like hourly data.2. Alerts should be configurable to fire only "only if a value is _HIGHER/LOWER_ than expected" (and a certain Significance Level. We don't care so much if the Conversion Rate of Google Shopping is greater than expected, we want to be ALERTED when it goes DOWN because then we have to take immediate action.

Hello, When using A4T integration in Target for my activities, I can see in Target reports AND in Analytics reports which experience is the control experience for any given activity.  But after speaking with Analytics support, it is not possible to retreive that information from Report Builder. So, make possible to get information about which experience for any given Target activity (with A4T integration) is the Control experience. That would greatly help on subsequential calculations based on that output.

The Analytics Data Feed is only available over SFTP to port 22.  It would be more convenient if the user could specify other ports.

It would be incredibly helpful to add a few columns to the Request Manager display.  I would most like to see Report Suite ID or Name.  And Date Range would also be very helpful.

The link generated from "Get Project Link" in Workspace directs you to the legacy analytics login. This should direct you through Marketing Cloud login instead.

As an analytics admin, I only want to maintain a single set of user permissions and user groups.  Currently we have to maintain our user groups and permissions and a seperate list for emailing.  Publishing Lists & Email Users options should include as default lists the ability to select groups defined in the user management area.  You could then send a report or an email to all the users defined in this group instead of having to build a seperate publishing list that replicates these admin groups.

In the old billing section, were we could see server call usage, there was a breakdown of your server call usage based on the call/function type, s.t function vs s.tl function.This breakdown was useful in knowing why server call usage grew over a specific period. The new Server Call Usage area doesn't have this breakdown (not to mention not having a monthly breakdown, but that idea has already been raised I'd like to be able to trend server call usage reports by month )Please bring this functionality back.Thanks

With the push to remove complexity out of tagging, reporting and analysis I would like to see eVar support inside of the real time reports and API.For those of us that want to use the realtime reports we are forced to leverage props. But we do not want to use both props and evars for the same data (too confusing for end users!).I propose that the support for evars works exactly how the prop support works. Whatever data is on the hit should be available in real-time and we leave persistence of data to reporting and analysis workspace.

In the old admin system, you could easily en masse transfer all segments, calculated metrics dashboards etc from one your to another. This was particularly helpful when deleting a user from the system (for example if a person left the company and they were a heavy AA user, i'd transfer their segments, calculated metrics dashboards etc to my account so they wouldn't be deleted).I raised this with customer support and they said it is no longer possible, so my idea is to bring this feature back.Thanks.

We have a few marketing partners requests this integration: https://support.google.com/searchads/answer/7669521?hl=en&ref_topic=7670432Would love to see this built out in Data Connectors for easier setup and management.

I have an abandonment fallout path I need to create where visitors start Checkout Start>go to any page(s) BUT Thank You>start Checkout Start again>then Thank You page.  The trick is that I can't just put the Checkout start twice because there needs to be at least one page in between them (rather than a reload).Rather than create a sequential segment and drop into the checkpoint, it would be great to be able to have a condition of NOT as a stand alone in addition to Eventual Path and Next Hit.  That way we could create Checkout Start>NOT-Thank You>Checkout Start>Thank YouAlso it would be great to have a Next Visit condition as well.  It would have to be available only if the Visitor option is selected.  An example would be Checkout Start>NOT-Thank You>Next Visit-Checkout Start>Thank YouIt's certainly different than the NOT condition, but would be useful for helping to understand multi-visit situations.