Product Communities

I think web SDK streaming data  should also be shown as a source under system view in Sources section of AEP UI. This will give a complete picture of all data in sources. Currently web SDK is not included in system view.   

Description -Allow for segmentation by specific combinations of dimensions and metrics. Why is this feature important to you -This allows for deeper analysis based on specific visitor behaviour, for example, segment visitors who viewed a specific product page 5 times. How would you like the feature to work -Example:A visitor can visit many pages, e.g. A, B, C, etc. I want to segment only those visitors who visited Page A but had only <= 2 Page View of Page A in their visitor lifetime. I.e.Jack: viewed Page A 1 time in his lifetime —> include in the segmentJill: viewed Page A 2 times in her lifetime –> include in the segmentDonald: viewed Page A 3 times in his lifetime –> don’t include in the segment Current Behaviour -The above is not possible. Segmentation can be done by a dimension or a metric, but not a combination of dimensions and metrics. E.g. in the above example, the Page View condition will match based on all page views from the visitor, not jus

More and more organisations are working with self-managing teams. Each individual in this team needs to be able to allocate their planned hours to days in the upcoming week. Therefore, Workers need to be able to allocate their own planned hours either on the Workload Balancer, or on a project/task level.

Hello! Our social team uses Hootsuite for a variety of reasons that WF can't replicate (reporting, literally publishing to channels, etc.) but it causes redundant work. We have a social calendar in WF and have the publish task due date in our social projects as the date it's publishing via Hootsuite, but it's redundant work. But need to have in WF for visibility into how social is fitting in with our related projects. I'm seeking votes for a Hootsuite WF connector! I'd like a way where we can have tasks we choose (like our publish task) can integrate with Hootsuite, so we only need to 'schedule' in Hootsuite once, via WF and it update in Hootsuite.

I would love if this community had a mobile app. Would make it so easy to stay up to date on product discussions & questions vs. logging in each time.  (I did search the Apple App Store and couldn’t find one - but if there IS one I missed send it my way!) (on a sidenote - when I try and login via my phone browser it always blocks “sign in” and instead prompts me to create an account - so the only fix I’ve found is logging into a Marketo instance on my phone first, then going to community home … not sure if this is something anyone else has come across.) 

The inline issue settings that allows for + Adding More Issues at the bottom on the Issues list to become visible or not behaves different when a project gets created from a template Vs when a template gets attached to a project.When a project is made using a template, the system will use any setting in the saved in the template. That includes anything that a template can hold, from the name to the tasks, to the inline issue setting. If a project is created from scratch, it will use a set of default list of settings instead. Once a project is created, a template can be added to that project, but it will only add to areas that can hold more - additional tasks, assignments, hours, and so on. It will not change anything that is already in place, like the project name or the inline issues setting. There is not currently a way to toggle the inline issue creation in the defaults for projects

I would like to be able to add attachments to forms.I would like to be able to attach photos, drawings, etc. to the form so that subsequent negotiations, such as quotations, can proceed more smoothly. Marketo's customer support form allows for attachments, so I'm sure you understand the need for this.   フォームに添付ファイルを追加できるようにしてほしいです。 写真や図面など添付できた方が見積もりなど、その後の商談がスムーズに進むと思います。   マルケトのカスタマーサポート用フォームには添付ファイルができるようになっているので必要性は把握しているのではないでしょうか。

As an Admin, from Users Tab, we can sort & export the users' list, but generally this list gets bigger and bigger which takes more time to search for a specific user. It will be great to have a "Quick Find" box,  similar to the one that already exists to search in a List or Smart List 

It is mind boggling that the chart and matrix views of a report do not allow you to sort by the grand total! These chart & matrix views should allow you to define a sort order. For the chart, you should be able to sort by the total, or the label (ascending or descending) or a value that isn't displayed on the chart. For the Matrix view, you should be able to sort both dimensions. Either by the label, or the total.

I've recently discovered when using calcualted data expressions, such as WORKMINUTESDIFF, in text mode reporting or in calculated fields, the calculation references the instance's default schedule rather than the schedule associated with the project you're reporting on (or the project that the task/issue you're report on is in).Example:This formula in a calculated field was using the default scheduleWORKMINUTESDIFF(Project.Converted Issue Entry Date,Actual Completion Date)In order to account for the time zone and holidays of a project for one of our EU teams, I have to include the schedule ID as part of the formula in this way:WORKMINUTESDIFF(Project.Converted Issue Entry Date,Actual Completion Date,"61858bd400325ef77ff7f86977d0b5ae")

Ability to have an overview pop up in various areas (example within projects) so that admins could set instructions tailored to their specific company. This could be listed under an "i" in sections to provide more guidance to users.

Currently, if a Manager with Proof access opens up a workflow of an existing proof but is not the Owner or the Delegated Owner, she/he can still attempt to “Add a new Proof / Version” and go through the entire upload process but would be ultimately unsuccessful in generating the proof. The system should remove the ability to upload new document/version if the user is not the owner or delegate owner.

When viewing the green status buttons for the recipients on a proof (S, O, C, D), they are all automatically turned green for everyone if one person makes a decision, instead of showing who actually commented, etc. This happens when the setting "only one decision required". I would like the green status buttons to accurately reflect what each individual did instead of collectively applying one status to everyone. The example below shows all users made a comment when in fact only one did. This is misleading.

We would like the ability to disable or hide/remove breadcrumbs from Requesters, possibly as an option in layout templates. Often requestors who are not familiar with breadcrumbs get lost by clicking on it and landing on a page they are not familiar with.

PREVIEW TESTING - Filter Issue with 22.1 Release Bulk Assignment tool - When a manager has the resource planning filtered to their group, and clicks the Bulk Assignment tool, the list of the projects in the list has nothing to do with the group selected. It just has a random lists of projects in there. I still think this results in a confusing and unappealing user experience. We have a department that uses Workfront completely differently than the rest of the company. I don’t want to ever see their projects in there. I think that this list should either be blank with a drop down of all projects, or filtered to match the filtered list in "unassigned projects" . Otherwise what we see is very confusing, especially for brand new resource managers. I strongly believe that Workfront should change this ‚Äì it isn’t benefiting the user at all the way it is currently setup.

It's hard to navigate from a document folder back to the list all project folders and/or the list of documents not in a folder. The "Project Folders" name doesn't appear clickable, so users don't know how to get back to the screen they started on. The words "Project Folders" need to look like a clickable link like the other folder names.

Within Proof, when viewing the Workflow screen, the scroll bar is only displayed if you know exactly where to hover your mouse or use your mouse wheel. People are not able to easily see that there are more people and/or stages in the Workflow unless they specifically know to scroll. Always displaying the scroll bar would automatically let people know to scroll for more information.

Currently, there is no detail view for billing record custom forms. It is only available in edit mode. This has some blocking results:If the billing record is set to "Billed" there is no way to see the custom form/fieldsIt is not possible to give users a "View" permission on sections of the custom field

We use PMCFs extensively - primarily for capturing utm parameters at the program level.  Unfortunately, we're limited as to how we can use these values.  It would be ideal if PMCFs could be included as filters/triggers in smart lists; and could be synced to RCE to use in the program membership reports.

Several of our key stakeholders want detailed smart list subscriptions for reporting (ie. exactly who clicked on which link in an email) - it would be great if we could give them a user role where they could access analytics & marketing activities, but within marketing activities ONLY be able to create a smart list & then create a list subscription for the smart list. This would save our MOPs team so much time in daily "reporting" - especially for emails with 6-8 tracked links. They could then produce their own reporting vs. requesting from MOPs each time. 

Currently, you cannot place a task on hold if the enforced predecessor is not met. We need the ability to do so as the predecessor may still be a valid task. I shouldnt have to remove the enforcement to put the task on hold.

When working in a project timeline, if we open the task to edit its information, once complete it brings you back to the beginning of the timeline. This can get very time-consuming when working in projects with long-list of tasks. It causes us to then search for the task we were working on in the timeline in order to continue. When updating a timeline that requires many changes this is a huge nuisance. If you inline edit a task or open it but make no changes it will leave you right at the location you were working. It doesn't make sense that it would behave differently if you do make a change. Engineering is saying this is the intended behavior. I am not sure in what instance a user would want to be brought back to the beginning of the timeline if they are working on edits in a later section.I'm requesting that the same logic be added to return you to the location of the task you opened, after making an update.

Today, if you wanted to see what Smart Campaigns are idle or inactive via API, you would need to query activities for the Smart Campaign being referenced and work backwards. This makes ongoing performance maintenance for the good of the platform onerous.   By comparison, if one could pull something like the last timestamp someone ran through a trigger campaign or the last time a batch campaign processed more than 0 records, finding what Smart Campaigns need to be deactivated/flagged for review/etc. becomes more straightforward. Often the 6 months inactivity notification is insufficient for larger instances, and more proactive checking via API would alleviate problems for those more complex instances.

Description:An API to invoke that pulls in all activities for a given mbox name that match activity audience/refinement rules similarly to how target-global-mbox does, without the need to specify them individually.When target-global-mbox gets called, all activities that are scoped to target-global-mbox get evaluated and returned.The request is to have this functionality extended to any mbox name, which can be programmatically invoked. Why is this feature important to you:This functionality would allow for much better handling of complex situations (ex. data layer dependency, event-driven experiences, behavioral re-targeting)Ex. A targeted experience is shown to the user in target-global-mboxThe above activity then calls [new API] and any activities that want to deploy based on the first experience meeting certain criteria can then be returned and executed. How would you like the feature to work:Similar to getOffers, but instead of specifically listing how many different activ

Description - Increase the number of combined audiences you are able to create in Adobe Target.Why is this feature important to you - we use a lot of combined audiences from different sources and 20 is the maximum that is allowed. How would you like the feature to work - Be able to create an unlimited amount of combined audiences Current Behaviour - 20 is the max number of combined audiences allowed