Product Communities

Within Adobe Launch, we can have several users go in and contribute in the creation of rules, data elements, custom code in the extensions (like Adobe Analytics).  Can we add in the name of the person who made the changes in each version.  currently - we know when the last version was saved, but we do not know who made the change.  This will help when we need more information on why something was changed. 

In DTM, there are two images used in the Status column  - a check or a clock with a blue circle - that let me easily know if an item has been modified since its last push to production. This Status image is used across the board on rules, data elements and tools in DTM.In Launch, this concept does not seem to exist.I really like and utilize this feature in DTM. Could this feature please be applied to Launch too?

Hi Team,There is no way to know which user made latest changes to "resources" while we create a development build. Please add a "Modified By" field as wellWould request your team to add it.Best ,

Would be nice to be able to see who made changes / see a history of rule and data element changes for auditing purposes.

We are in the process of migrating from DTM to Adobe Launch.  One of the features that we have noticed that is missing that is critical for auditing purpose is to know who published and when.  Within both tools, it tells exactly when the last code update was released.  In Adobe DTM, it does show who was the publisher, but in Adobe Launch this feature was not there. Could we please add in Adobe Launch the ability to see who published each change?

I would like to be able to have templates for new portfolios where certain projects that are always needed when a new porfolio is created would automatically get created as well. This way they don't always have to be requested and converted and they wouldn't get missed/forgotten.

Hi,Currently it is not possible to create a segment to select all impressions for a certain Target Activity. Reason: The Activity Impressions metric cannot be used in the segment builder.Consequence: you select all visits/pages of a visitor who was in a certain activity, which is not the same as selecting only the impressions of a an activity. Use case example: on the homepage we have 2 activities, one for prospects and one for customers. When the homepage is loaded, either a visitor is recognized as prospect of customer and sees one version (=activity) of the homepage. We want to introduce a data quality check that checks whether someone is not in both activities. This means we need to be able to create a segment based on the activity impressions.Kind regards,Sarah

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: When using property predicates in the search rail, it shouldn't matter what listOrder they are assigned and that listOrder shouldn't change how the query. Currently, some listOrders make the query search on every property and other listOrders correctly searches for the term on the property it points to. Obviously the location of the search facet in the search rail should not change the query. For example, a listOrder of 35 gives this query: xpath: /jcr:root/content/dam//element(*, dam:Asset)[(jcr:contains(jcr:content/metadata/@nord.row.item.brand, 'nike'))] and searches for "nike" in the jcr:content/metadata/nord.row.item.brand metadata field. However, change the listOrder of the search facet to 36 and the query changes to: xpath: /jcr:root/content/dam//element(*, dam:Asset)[(jcr:contains(., 'nike'))]  and search on ALL metadata fields for "nike." This is obviously a bug, but the support team told me to open an enhancemen

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: The rich text editor clears content out if pasting content in while a table is present in the RTE. Use-case: Improve user experience when building Adaptive Forms Current/Experienced Behavior: Steps to reproduce: 1. Create adaptive form.2. Add "Text" component.3. Click the pencil icon to change the bar to the edit bar.4. Click the maximize icon to access the full wysiwyg editor.5. Add a table with some data.6. Paste some information into any part of the component. The result I get is the table is removed. However, by clicking the undo button, the table appears again with the pasted content. It is almost like something extra is running after the paste that triggers the removal of the table and the editor sees that as another step that was taken by the user. Improved/Expected Behavior: Pasting content should not remove existing content Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.9

We recently explored some email builder tools (e.g. Dyspatch) and found that the AMP email feature is really powerful and makes it much easier to engage with our customers. However, the AMP feature doesn't seem to exist in Marketo yet.    We've talked with many professionals and most of them envision that AMP will be the future as it potentially brings more engaging experience to customers and helps improve engagement rate. It'd be really awesome if Marketo could enable this feature with a third-party platform in the future.

The proofHQ settings has no way to batch user settings which makes it nearly impossible to manage system level settings for which kinds of proofs users get when you have many users.

It would be great if we could have a checkbox option that would allow certain users, usually the final reviewer/approver or original requestor to approve the final, clean, approved proof/file. Currently, you only have the option to disable this feature completely.We'd like to automate the ability to deliver final, hi-res files to the requestor, but not have them download files that haven't gone through the review process.

LOVE the ability to add images/screenshots to Updates, but it would be great to then have the option (checkbox?) to also sync the image file to the Documents Tab.Our design team just wrote their update back to our production team and attached the image file requested there. The next step in the process is to have our PM team send to the submitter for review - what needs to happen now is our PM has to download the image locally and upload to the Documents tab - would be great if the designer had the option to already do this, however it is not needed at all times especially where someone is using a screenshot as an illustrative point.

Currently in the New Workfront Experience there is no place for request and review users to see updates they have been tagged in and documents they need to approve in one place. In Workfront Classic, request and review users have a tab in the global navigation bar called My Updates. This is where they go to see their pending document approvals and recent updates they've been tagged in. They have the ability to approve or reject documents from this page AND they have the ability to reply to updates from this page. They can also see which projects the approvals and updates are associated with. I'm very concerned that this is not currently a feature in the NWE. I've considered workarounds, but something like a dashboard is not going to be clean and organized, and users won't have the ability to reply to updates or approve documents from a dashboard. When it comes to Home, at least for request and review level users, they can only see document approvals from this page which only applies to

Add Grouping/Filter/Sort options to the Approvals Dashboard Users have requested to group proofs requiring their approval by Project, Project OwnerFilters to filter out ‚Äòlocked’ proofs, proofs for ‚Äòcompleted/cancelled/deleted’ projectsSort options by date

System updates send notifications in the same way that comments do.Some users are replying to the system updates. If a user has "Show System Updates" unchecked, they will not find that comment in the feed.

We recently attempted to use the Cumulative Sum function in Adobe and discovered it basically doesn't work.the idea would be update the Cumulative Sum function to dynamically adjust to the report that end user is reporting.so if the dimension in the table are based on Day, then the cumulative function would just sum what is in the table.  Similarly to how the Column Sum function works.the order should should adjust for however the table is sorted - so if we sort by day, then the Column Cumulative Sum would sort by day.  If the table was sorted by visitors then the Column Cumulative Sum would sort by Visitorsthis should also work acrossDayeVarssPropsSegmentsas long as all of the appropriate details are available in the table I'm working in Workspace.

I was just notified today via a support ticket that you can no longer set a default Sort Order in a custom view. I have no idea why this option would be removed and I think it needs to be put back ASAP.

Please increase the SAML certificate expiration to 5 years. This duration is widely excepted.

Once users are added, we would like the search capability to look up a user in the "Users" area. This will eliminate scrolling through 200+ users to find the user you are looking for.

It would benefit our Project Managers if there was a notification enabled for expenses so they could review them straight away and raise questions in a timely manner before the expenses are paid.

PROBLEM: Tasks that are assumed to be on time do not show any % complete until done if assigned users do not provide any input, even on Auto Complete mode.SOLUTION: A new Task Tracking Mode: "Assume On Time (by Date)".https://one.workfront.com/s/document-item?bundleId=the-new-workfront-experience&topicId=Content%2FManage_work%2FTasks%2FTask_information%2Ftask-tracking-mode.htmlThis mode would update the percent complete automatically based on the duration of the task. Example: a 3 day task on day 2 would be automatically assumed to be 1/3 complete (33%). All planned hours would be assumed 1/3 done, etc. Manually changing the % would default the task back to "User Must Update".

We've consolidated all threads related to setting default options into this thread, including:All settings:  https://forums.adobe.com/ideas/10122Report suite: https://forums.adobe.com/ideas/10194Default metrics: https://forums.adobe.com/ideas/10528Freeform settings: https://forums.adobe.com/ideas/9151Color palette:  https://forums.adobe.com/ideas/10666Anomaly detection on/off: the start of this thread___Original ask for Anomaly detection on/off:It's fantastic to have gotten anomaly detection in Workspace in today's release. One point of feedback however would be that the function should be off by default when adding a new metric, with an option to turn it on.The reason we believe this is, workspace is used by a variety of end users throughout our organization (from technical to non-technical). For some of the non-technical users seeing an exclamation mark or anomaly has the potential to cause confusion and spurious concern. We therefore believe that having the default as off, would all

Currently, when using a team Kanban board, the column labels/titles are based off of task statuses. However, we manage our Issues in the Kanban board and would benefit from having issue statuses represent the column labels/titles so it's easier to know the status of the issue when viewing the board directly.

Trivial quality-of-life request: currently, when editing a form field's label in HTML inside the Forms 2.0 editor, the focus in the form editor goes back to the field in question after updating the label.   This behavior does not occur if the user is editing visibility rules; rather, once an update has been made, focus returns to the very top of the form. Could this please be updated to act the same way as label changes? This can be rather annoying on longer and more complex forms.