Product Communities

Some of our project tasks are always assigned to the Project Owner, Project Sponsor, or Resource Manager. I'd love to have a solution that allows me to put a rule in my Project Templates for the Assignments field... something like "$$projectOwner" that would automatically assign that task to the project's owner each time I use that template.

We are in the process of migrating our appx 1.000 users to NWE. What we noticed is, that it would be easier to copy already configured NWE layout templates and adapt them instead of using the Classic Templates where we would need to add all the settings that are new in the NWE.According to our support engineer, the mapping between a classic layout template and the corresponding one in the NWE is done via the ID. So it would be a great feature if we could either manually map a specific NWE template to a Classic one (so users migrated would receive that NWE template) or manually set the ID on the NWE template to match whichever Classic template we would like.

It would be awesome if we could calculate the time difference between 2+ objects in a project. For example in my report I have the "converted issue entry date" and the "project actual start date", because these are two different object types and the issue likely sat idle for some time in the queue before a PM converted it to a project, I want to be able to see what that idle time was by calculating the difference between the project actual start date minus the converted issue entry date.

Instead of having to add a custom task reminder at an individual task level, allow it to be part of every project settings on default. Make this an email notification option to select in a user's profile to receive or not receive these notifications.

Would be beneficial if Workflow templates could be added more than once to a Workflow for instance.A default template where all options are setup so the user does not have to change any stage settings apart from the stage name, add some users to it and then choose the same template from the Add Template dropdown menu to add another stage.Currently this doesn't work and reports that the template has already been added to the proof, even when deleting the stage added by the template and trying to add it again causes the same error.So if you delete template stage from the workflow it should be removed from the proof.

The ability to prevent certain Users, User Groups or Teams from unlocking Proofing Stages would be helpful, we are forever correcting proofing workflow stages that have been unlocked but never relocked by the user causing the document to show in multiple reports and not just the correct report.Even educating users does not prevent this and this is what most of our time is spent doing.

I know that I can see which smart campaigns interact with a field under field management. But I'd like to see more detail, specifically on which campaigns entered a specific value in a field. In a complicated instance with many, many smart campaigns editing a particular field, it is difficult to track down what exactly is causing a specific edit to be made.   It would be awesome to have some sort of report (like the Campaign Activity report type) that allows filtering by flow steps and displays the campaigns that complete/have completed those flow steps.

Need the ability to change integration visibility based on group permissions so that all users do not see the entire list of Document integration links and only see the ones that apply to them.

By using this feature, we can download complete list of marketo form from our marketo instance.   Which should include:  Form Name (hyperlink marketo form link)  Used in Landing Page (hyperlink marketo Landing Page or non-marketo wepage link) Used in Program (Name, hyperlink program link) Field Used (Field used in form) This feature can help us manage instance and improve overall efficiency.

Ability to customize the Requests Template/Layout. For example, we'd like to add the name of the requester to the Header of requests. Or, we'd like to be able to include information from the form on the updates tab of the request layout. More flexibility on where you can place things within the layout of a submitted request.

Just like you can click on a layout template to see who is assigned to it, it would be great to do this for job roles for users AND to see easily if the job role is used in any project templates. When scrubbing job roles and templates, it's impossible to know easily if any roles aren't even in use so they can be deleted. Also helpful to know for revising project templates if you change a role for task(s) assignments, what templates use the old role so can be easily swapped to new role.

Similar to how a project cannot be marked complete unless all requests/tasks under it are not completed. it would be really helpful if we can apply same logic to stop users from closing programs unless all open projects are marked closed.

The development could be more easy if AC can support the npm packages and we can install and use it as we do in a NodeJS code.Using JavaScript is a great way to deal with may problems. But writing every code from scratch is tedious as well as error-prone. If we could use a trust-worthy package, we can save a weeks effort and a months maintenance.Currently we could add packages to configuration>javascript codes section only if the package is available as a single file like a min.js version. 

An Export Activities button in Target would be very helpful for me. I would use this feature to quickly download and share the activities on the site over to my risk/governance/compliance colleagues, who ask for this on a regular basis.

Having the ability for Text Mode Columns to be sorted by either ASC or DESC is a must, currently Text Mode Columns are not sortable, the querysort parameter doesn't work for Text Mode Columns.

We would like the ability to Automatically lock all active stages in a Workflow when a user who has the Email Alert of Decisions makes their decision on that proof.Current example is we have Project Managers and Stakeholders who are connected to different proof stages on a document, the Project Manager should be allowed to make the final decision, even if no user on the Stakeholder stage has made their decision causing the active Stakeholder stage to be locked.

Description - Replace First and Last Touch Marketing Channels (and their associated Marketing Channel Detail) fields with a single, generic Marketing Channel (and its associated Marketing Channel Detail) fieldWhy is this feature important to you -First and Last Touch Marketing Channels have been deprecated in Adobe Analytics, so there is no need to continue making that distinction in the user interface. Furthermore, for users who are familiar with the generic Marketing Channel dimension, showing First and Last Touch Marketing Channels in this UI is confusing.Also, the Help documentation also says that in the current interface, either First or Last Touch Marketing Channel can be selected for classification, since classifying one impacts the other too. So showing First and Last Touch Marketing Channel in the UI is redundant.How would you like the feature to work -Replace both First and Last Touch Marketing Channel (and their associated Marketing Channel

Description -While there is the option to download a single dimension into 50,000 rows in Analytics Workspace, downloading 50k rows including the breakdowns as it is shown in workspace would be ideal.Why is this feature important to you -This functionality used to be available using ad-hoc analysis and it was faster to report out to leadership.  Report builder and data warehouse do not have the same flexibility as Workspace so it's not possible to get the reporting needed using another tool.  How would you like the feature to work -Upon downloading a CSV in workspace, download 50,000 rows including the breakdowns as they are shown in workspace.Current Behaviour -Upon downloading a CSV in workspace, you can only download 400 rows including the breakdown.  Otherwise you can only download a single dimension and see 50k rows.

I have tried all the samples on the forum but still unable to merge / sharecol multiple columns into one for reporting.

I was recently asked to provide Workfront's Authentication requirements to our security team. I went to the setup page and was able to see some of them. However it doesn't show the requirement for length of password. That can be found by requiring someone to reset their password, then going to that setup page. But for admin knowledge it would be nice to have all the authentication requirements listed in one place. Even if we cant change them.

It would be so helpful if we get ease to edit dynamically generating html elements, in VEC itself. As we were trying to change color of CTA on popup, Since popup html is getting generated after click event, target modification are unable to find CTA until click event happens and shows error in modifications tab (Element not found).There are ways to edit dynamically generating elements with event based mbox call with help of adobe launch, but if possibly we get this ability to specify event in VEC itself and edit dynamic elements as easily as we edit different elements in VEC just by clicking on it would be great functionality.In short we would like to get option for specifying event in VEC itself and apply modifications after event happens. So that a non technical person would be able to setup complex things with ease and it would become more user friendly for them (For example : Change CTA color after click event happens)Thanks,Gauresh Kodag.

Currently the hasNotes feature of a Document Version reports notes that are added across all versions of a proof even if there is 3 versions.It would be good if there was also a way to check for notes added only to the current version and again report True/False.

It seems that the only way for the "Is Ready" flag to get turned on with a Kanban board is to physically drag an item out of the Backlog. If a developer clicks into something from the backlog and changes the status to "In Progress", the item disappears from the board. Please add a setting to default "Is Ready" to "Yes" for all incoming work to a Kanban team.

There has been a lot of confusion on my team about the purpose of the "Send Work Request" button within our Kanban Board. Developers expect to use this as a quick way to add tasks to the board, however this button was apparently built to create "personal tasks", so the work request never actually makes it to the board. Instead, it goes to a new project called "[Developer's Name]'s Tasks". This isn't helpful for us, as we would expect those requests to go to the project associated to the Kanban board. The ability to select a project when using this button would help clear up these issues.

While creating reports for our management-level sponsors to see hours spent across groups & teams for the projects they sponsor, we were surprised to find that unless they have Manage permissions on the project, Sponsors can only see Hours for their own teams (either within the Project navigation or on reports.) We then found there is no way to set up the project template or other permissions to grant Manage permissions to whoever the Project Sponsor is (in a dynamic way so we're not attempting to have the project template just contain a manual list of names of anyone who *might* be a project sponsor, which is a moving target.)We received the suggestion from Support that we could create an Access Level and check the admin access box for "Timesheets & hours", but this requires us to (a) give overly broad access to timesheets & hours for projects they are *not* sponsoring, and (b) maintain the (moving target, again) list of users who need to be assigned that acc