Product Communities

I was very excited about this feature, but I think it does not provide any value as is. There's never a scenario where I only need to breakdown the top 5 items, so I am stuck in the old method of manually breaking down each second level line item by the 3rd variable for anything beyond 5 items. It would be great if this could be increased to up to 25 at least. Ideally the breakdowns would be applied to the full table (including new values after it is built!) This may be a separate issue, but once I build a table and additional values populate, they are not broken down along with the rest of the table even if they move into the top 5 position. The manual maintenance lift on this is huge.

Allows user to sort by more than 3 columns within a report

Description -Currently when debugging is enabled all events are logged to the console which makes it very hard to see what is going on.   It would be great if there was a way to select which types of events were written to the console.  Often I just want to see the custom logs generated where I've used the _satellite.logger function in custom code. Why is this feature important to you -It would make debugging easier.   At the moment I find myself often resorting to using console.log because it is easier to see what is happening but this has it's own drawbacksHow would you like the feature to work -Maybe the _satellite.setDebug() function could be altered to take an additional optional parameter listing the categories of log that you want to write to the console?Current Behaviour -Everything gets written to the console

How can my company take action on those bot clicks/opens if we do not know which email addresses they are associated with? The latest releases has some limitations...

Right now for a "condition update" to be logged, the update in the updates tab cannot allow for any tagging of users.Instead of this criteria, it would be great if users could click a checkbox saying it was a condition update when they are posting the update to the update stream.

It would be very helpful to have an option to expand/collapse custom form contents by default with a setting in custom form editorThat way we could avoid some extra clicks for end users. See example below.

I have project templates set up with requests built-in so my end-users can submit requests to other teams by adding an issue within their project (ex: request for creative, for compliance review, events, print production, etc.). It's very handy for the teams that have a default assignment and no routing, but each team operates differently so some require that the requests be routed to their request queues. For the latter, those issues/requests essentially disappear from my end-user's project.I'd like the issues to still be viewable in the project from which the issue originated, even if they are routed to another. This will allow the user to see what has been submitted, whether it has been assigned or is in progress, and allows them to click into the issue. It will also help for coverage scenarios when a user goes OOO or someone else has to take the project over, because they can see all the requests submitted from that project and easily navigate to them.

Description -In order to improve end user experience on our site we have implemented image optimization. Here we use different dimensions of same image to fit as per different dimensions of the device that end users use like mobile, ipad, desktop. We use a picture tag to deliver these images so that the end browser will decide which is the best suitable image that suits the browser and downloads it. We are trying to replace image using AB testing feature in Adobe Target. Our picture tag looks like<picture><sourcemedia="(max-width:750px) and (min-width:320px)"srcset="/-/media/images/content/background/media-center/microsoft-alliance-partner-year.webp?la=en&ver=4&w=1&hash=9563B200569D110D40EE678A20F9D116"type="image/webp "><sourcemedia="(max-width:1024px) and (min-width:768px)"srcset="/-/media/images/content/background/media-center/microsoft-alliance-partner-year.webp?la=en&ver=4&w=320&hash=55421C596ED4BB5620E183BA6418D90D"type="image/webp

We can upload a large version of an icon on the Main Menu, and on the Login screen. It would be great if there was an option to upload a larger icon on the upper-left corner of Home.

Saw this Idea from two years ago- Figured maybe now you would have the ability to implement it.We have a token that references the Internal and External's email address associated to a Lead. We would like the ability to use the External's email token as the sender in our MSI template and have a message appear to come from the External associated to the Lead regardless of who is sending the message.

I recently set up the integration with Marketo and LinkedIn Lead Gen ads but we were not consistently getting the leads to appear in Marketo despite them clearly being in LinkedIn as submitted forms.  I spent 3 weeks in various support limbos all to find out a LinkedIn field was getting mapped to a Marketo field that was tied to a Salesforce field with a character limit. So instead of throwing an error somewhere I could see, it just wouldn't sync the leads. It took me 20 seconds to fix the problem, but it would be great if there was some sort of error log we could access this information in. It would save you hours of support tickets.   I regularly check the Notifications log and API error codes to see if there are high numbers, but if there was another place for developers and admins to go to debug issues without waiting for support ticket escalation that would be a huge help to both Marketo support and customers.

It's difficult to select the right template because it's cut off in the convert to project feature. The team has been converting without a template and then attaching after because they can search better by typing the name of the template.We use naming conventions to streamline work and know which team uses what but it's causing it challenging to convert.

Many approvers do not have tasks and work only from their approval list therefore it would be helpful if they could log their time at document level when they are reviewing and approving documents.proofs.

Hi!   I have a problem. I want to download a Smart List with names, but everytime I want to export a list, I only have the option to download it like a CSV file, which is not good because when I open Excel to see it, everything is disorganized. I want them to be a normal Excel document. What can I do?   Thank you!

Project burndown charts based off of effort estimates not hours. Workfront used to have them but they were only based off of hours. Having a project column that shows the effort complete of a task. This is a field that you update on the scrum board but is not a selectable column at the project level. Having a system that calculates project % complete based off of effort complete. For anyone using effort to estimate tasks and not task duration then the project % complete is never correct unless you have planned out every iteration for the entire project (which never happens). The ability to have a report (at task or project level) with a chart that allows completed effort (including tasks not yet complete) alongside actual hours assigned.

With the existing Data Warehouse Tableau export functionality, there are several limitations (e.g., length of time to export, gap in measures available, etc.).My proposal is to implement an Adobe Analytics Tableau Direct Connector. This will allow Adobe Analytics customers to increase agility with reporting and allow resources to be shifted from reporting to more time spent analyzing and recommending actions based on the data.

I'd like to see effective date ranges added for users in job roles. The goal would be to establish the timeframe in which a user is effectively acting in that job role with a clear end date for the system to establish when actual hours apply to job role A vs. job role B. The expectation is that this allow for more easily identifying the correct roles during a given period of time in order to maintain the history for actuals and reporting. We promote people. They go from DEVELOPER to SENIOR DEVELOPER but when it comes to Workfront my options are currently limited to a user having 1 role or multiple roles without the fine-tuning we need to under stand that between January and June they were a DEVELOPER and all hours should be attributed to that role. After June they were promoted and all future hours should go to SENIOR DEVELOPER. This should keep transactions tied to the correct job role regardless of whether a user recalculates the finance on their project. It's also a c

Currently, when you download a proof that is based off a link, the PDF file name is a super long URL. I'd love to be able to modify the name of the file name so that it is not a long URL. This would help identify easily what you've downloaded. See screenshot

Would love the ability to be able to add custom form field data to the Teams area when claiming a team tasks. This would help us to see key information about a project prior to opening the project brief. This would save on clicks and would help the traffic team prioritize work if there are special notes that a project needs to be worked on sooner than our template timelines.

We send out Smart List Subscriptions to Sales and would like an easy option to set a default set of fields rather than have to edit each smart list subscription separately. Strange that is doesn't even take the fields from the Smart List view that you set it from but a completely different set of fields.   

Description -In template rules for page delivery, add a note to the UI when multiple values can be accepted on different lines. In other Adobe products (e.g. Analytics processing rules), this is made clear in the UI. It is also made clear in the audience creation dropdowns. This makes it seem as though you can't do this in page delivery, otherwise you'd think the same message of 'Enter each value in new line' would be applied to the empty fieldWhy is this feature important to you -In Target, it looks like you can only have a series of AND rules or OR rules. By allowing multiple values in an AND rule, you're effectively adding in the option to use AND and OR. Currently, as it isn't common knowledge that you can add multiple values we have situations where we're deploying identical tests for slight variations in things like query parameter value and URL.How would you like the feature to work -Literally, just a note in the UI when you select an option from a dropdown to let you know if mu

A little formatting could go a long way to help me read the operator list. It's hard to pick out the individual operators due to each true operator having an opposite false operator.It's a quality of life change that will save me a few seconds in segment builder, and make me feel fuzzy inside.Couple of ideas:List the trues first and then the falses (I don't really like this as it might move a popular false operator lower down the listFormat the false operators differently so that they contrast to the true operators. That way I can more easily scan the list to find the type I'm after, then pick the true/false. 

Would like the option to hide the "help" button in the new experience. We have a robust Help and Support Queue that is managed by internal partners who then leverage Workfront Help and Support when needed. We would like the opportunity to hide the help button that goes to directly to Workfront, from most end users in order to drive usage of the help and support queue internally managed

Would be nice to be able to add another team member's calendar onto our own calendar view. Just like you would share your calendar in Outlook.

Please allow us to create a report which can show all the proofs in which you are a reviewer. There are many members of our executive team that would greatly benefit from this, as they are not assigned as Approvers but as Reviewers. They have nowhere to view the proofs they have been added to, so this would be very helpful to implement. All we would need is additional fields and inputs in the reporting area to be able to select "Reviewer" when creating a report. Thanks!