Product Communities

Request queues should be independent of projects. Queues play such a huge part of the overall system that having it buried amongst the projects presents a risk and a liability to usability. It is very easy to delete a queue by accident which will greatly affect the instance. If queues were an option similar to templates, it will give system admins greater control

We have established processes for Approvals in our organization - both at the project and the task level (example: the end-result of a task needs to be approved by a manager prior to the team member moving on to the next task). Right now the Approvals associated with Projects or Tasks can be edited, removed, re-created by the Owner of a project. We'd like the option to lock that, so that the project leads can't even edit who does the approvals - they must happen. Additionally, they can delete Approvals that have already occurred. We'd like this to be disabled, so that the Approval can sit within the project's history.

From the Workfront Project / Documents view, you can easily see when documents are linked from Box. Clicking on that Box link allows you to collaborate on word documents in Box and benefit from the tool's cloud versioning. However, if you navigate to a document's details page, the Box icon disappears and the document is able to be downloaded directly, rather than taking you to Box where it "lives." This has caused a lot of confusion, especially when you are tagged to review a document, receive an email that gives you a link to "See it in Workfront" and it directs you to the Document Details page (which doesn't have the Box icon/link). Many reviewers have uploaded new document versions with changes thinking there is no source file in Box to review.

We'd like to be able to create a report based on users tagged in updates/notes. For example, if someone tags me or my team in an update, I'd like to have a report on my dashboard where I can see and address each one. Since we cannot customize the in-app system notifications, simply tagging a user in an update is no guarantee that they will actually see it. Our workers have hundreds of updates flooding in each day, so for the most part the entire notification system has become useless for this purpose. Although our workers each have the email notification setting turned on for when they/their team is tagged, those emails don't always come through, making it a spotty system at best and not reliable for ensuring each tagged update is addressed. With a report filtered by who was tagged in any given update/note, my team can trust that they're not missing anything important. Bonus points if there can be a way to "dismiss" updates that don't require a response (

In the previous Requests page there was the option to see your recently completed requests. This has been removed from the new view. I utilized the view frequently to review the completed work. It would be helpful be able to create custom filters like you can everywhere else in WF.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We were advised to only create 5 smart crops since there will be performance implications if there are more. THere's no limit in the UI but what Adobe said, we should not exceed 5  Use-case: Our organization needs a lot of smart crops since the assets in DAM are being used on different channels. Having a limit of 5 will make it difficult for us to support our customers;' needs Current/Experienced Behavior: Only 5 smart crops are requested to be created Improved/Expected Behavior: The system should have more capacity to accommodate more smart crops  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): ACS Customer-name/Organization name: N/A Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

When tasks are assigned - a notification is sent to the user - in Classic the notification included the project name - however in NWE - the task assignment is listed but it does not include a link to the project in the notification - so the user has to click inside the project to see the referenced task and to discern which project it belongs to - please add project name at minimum for issues and tasks assigned to users.

We use MktoForms2 on our site to embed Marketo forms into our site. We have some antispam features built into our site that prevent a form submission, such as reCaptcha from google, some honeypot fields, and other field validations.   However I've realized that all of this can be bypassed easily by a spammer if the spammer issues their own commands to the MktoForms2 JS API.   For example the following code could be used: MktoForms2.loadForm( baseUrl, munchkinId, formId ); MktoForms2.whenReady( function( form ) { form.addHiddenFields( { test : 'test' } ); form.submit(); }); The hidden fields could contain any valid marketo field name, and this would submit directly to Marketo bypassing any antispam in use on our site. The page this is executed on doesn't even need to have a form on it already, it just needs the MktoForms2 JS API to be loaded.   A possible solution for this would be for a token to be generated server-side that must be then sent along with the form submis

It would be very helpful if Regular Expressions were supported in Filters/Advanced Filters.  The value of the filter function is severely reduced without RegEx support.To continue on the same train of thought, it would be great if it were possible to save filters once they've been updated on bookmarked reports.  I find myself re-bookmarking reports after adding an extra filter parameter or two. If I miss re-bookmarking, then I need to re-add the new filter parameters next time I view the report.Thanks for your consideration of my input!

Right now, there are 4 different user roles within Target (Observer, Editor, Publisher, and Approver). The only role that can both create and change the state of activities within Target is the Approver role.  However, with that role, the user is able to make changes to the Administration part of the UI, which can impact the setup for all users and can potentially cause problems.  We have some users that we would want to be able to create and change the state of Target activities, but not make changes within the Administration section.  At this point, we are not able to do that with the current roles. It would be helpful to have it set up in one of the following approaches:Create a new user role that would be a combination of Editor and PublishersCreate a new user role that would be an Approver-Lite that removes the ability to see the Administration sectionEnable a user to have multiple current roles per workspace/property 

Cannot add swim lane rows to an agile storyboard, please consider adding this functionality. This image is what I would like to be able to replicate. Thank you!

We would like to have number formatted custom fields that allow numbers that start with a zero. Currently, the custom form will save any number entered but will delete the zero from the field once its saved. We are using this form to store codes that often start with a zero and it's important that it stays as-is for our metadata. Reverting to text is not ideal, because we do want it to kick out any attempts to store letters. Can the number formatting be changed to allow leading zeros?

The current system is able to manage two things: people within projects and roles of users.However, it is not possible to define a concrete project organization including users and their specific role in the project.We would like to have an option to depict the project team setup including the peoples role within a project.

Description - It would be helpful to have more information that can be provided when a feed fails. We are seeing a File Parsing Failed error.  Did it happen on specific line? row? format issue? Any additional information would have saved our team a lot of time when trying to trouble shoot the error.  Why is this feature important to you -  it will save on the time it takes our technical resources in trouble shooting error that are presentedHow would you like the feature to work -Current Behaviour - generic error without any detail

I would like to have existing approval processes visible based on groups, similar to group-based statuses.

Recently I came across an instance where I was covering for a colleague (she did not have any pending approvals out so she did not designate her approvals to me) and I had to send a document approval to her client. She returned before the approval was sent from the client and I never received a notification of the approval, yet I was the one who set it.I called customer support and found that if the Project Ownership had changed back to my colleague before the approval was sent and if I was not the Document Owner (I was not, our designers upload the files, we review and then if no errors we assign to the client for approvals), then the expected behavior is that I would not be notified of the approval.This is odd to me, as I feel whoever sets the approval should be notified. Design does not care about approvals (in our case) and if the approval came in during the night time and transition from me covering my colleague vs. not this could have definitely gone unnoticed and caused a delay

デフォルトプログラム内に設置しているメール配信用のバッチキャンペーンをカレンダーへ表示できるようにしていただきたいです。   よろしくお願いします。

It is quite often when one or few line items have to be filtered off from the table. Creating a search filter manually takes time. It will a great time saver if it is possible to create a filter by selecting the line items, right click and add them to the filter as the search criteria. Scenario 1: There are 35 dimension items in the table and only few of them should be filtered off. The user selects those few lines, right click and selects add to filter as exclude that creates a filter "does not equal X AND does not equal Y AND etc." Scenario 2: There are 35 dimension items in the table  and only 9 should be displayed for the report/ analysis. The user selects those lines, right click and selects add to filter as include that creates a filter "equals X AND equal Y AND etc." 

Description - Show a tooltip in Bullet visualisations to report the value of that bullet.Why is this feature important to you - It is impossible to see the value that a bullet reports. Comparing it to the axis is impractical when reporting small values or values of high precision. Also, other visualisations have such tooltips, so why not bullets too?How would you like the feature to work - When mouseover a bullet (green portion), show a tooltip reporting the value. Similar to the tooltip shown in bar charts.Current Behaviour - Nothing happens when you mouseover a bullet.

In the task view of a project, we would find it valuable to be able to select a task and log hours in the summary panel for another owner rather than opening the task up, navigating to the hours section, changing the owner there and then logging the hours

Entering hours in the flyout view is cluttered, needs design help from WF. See image below.

The "Close” button on the proof viewer is far too small. See pink circle.

Creating a segment that uses "starts with" rather than "equals" and having approximately 100 rules to set up this way on different dimensions, I'm really wishing I could change all of the "equals" at once!   

Currently when I deactivate a user, I have to remember to unenroll the user from new experience first, then deactivate. Otherwise when I go to the Setup Menu/ New Experience/Enrolled Users column, I can still see users that have been deactivated and the count displayed is inacurate on how many users are in the new experience.

Allow for termination of a resource through SSO to manage attrition and team changes in an automated manner.