Product Communities

I think it would be great if we had a baseline feature at a task level. Meaning, a task level field and a button that allows an individual to capture a baseline for ALL tasks. This will allow our teams to be able to see at a report level every time a project's "Due On" date changes and by how much. So, I would imagine this being a button that when hit the "baseline date" would be locked on what the current "Due On" date is. After someone clicks the button and the baseline date per task is locked, and then they can change the due date. Overall, this would be an easy way to monitor if our projects are slipping and by how much. Please inquiry for clarification.

Some fields that we have with selections longer than the available viewing space in the drop-down menus make it impossible to differentiate selections from one another. Also, File Uploader here won't let me load images (tried JPEG and PNG formats).

For each Launch library display the user name next to each key status like:Submitted by John Smith (27 Aug 2020, 19:23 UTC)Rejected by Veronika Angel (27 Aug 2020, 19:30 UTC)Submitted by John Smith (27 Aug 2020, 21:51 UTC)Approved by Veronika Angel (27 Aug 2020, 22:41 UTC)Published by Alex Green (29 Aug 2020, 11:06 UTC)

I am seeking to automatically receive notifications when documents are uploaded on completed/closed projects WITHOUT having the user tag another user when this occurs.

The option to sync the scheduler / team view to the synced calendar to show meetings and events. This will prove invaluable in managing a person's workload. Often a person may have a full day of work, but what the scheduler / team view does not show is that they also may have 2–3 hours of meetings that day. Showing these meetings will portray a person's day in much more detail and make resource management far more transparent as a result.

Currently documents saved in folder structures under specific tasks seem to be copied into the main project level folder, and are just dropped in loosely. This causes confusion and leaves a stream of loose documents at main project level when they are saved neatly and organised at the task level at which they were saved. If we don't need them at main project level, can we prevent them being automatically copied into this level?

We would like to increase the security of our processes by encrypting our Customer Attributes files before they go through SFTP to reach the Adobe servers.This would be a very useful way to ensure compliance at the customer end to prevent it being inspected or tampered with before it leaves our infrastructure.The key to be used to decrypt should be part of the config of the customer attributes profile.BTwiz​

It's great that workload balancer allows you to increase the total number of hours on a task. However, this should trigger an alert or notification in the project view so others are aware of the change to total planned hours

Currently a reviewer cannot be included in multiple Proof Workflow stages. One of our biggest agency clients and multiple internal agency client services leads requests the following:Allow Proof reviewer(s) to be included in more than one Workflow stage.Example: The client Brand Manager may want to preview a proof before they send that proof to the rest of the team. This same person needs to moderate, clarify, apply actions to all comments, and make a final decision (at the last stage of the review).

Increase Display Limit in Resource Planner while in the project view.Appears to be limited to about 300

We would like the preview window for ProofHQ attachments to display a preview of a PDF document as well as an image file. That way our team members don't have to download the PDF to see the attachment.

When comparing revisions it is often the current live version that you want to compare to.  However, there is no easy way to see which revision is the one that is currently published to the live environment. Please could you consider introducing some kind of visual indicator of the current published version in the compare revisions screen drop down menu?  

The Launch developers want to understand when the extension was updated last time. Add the release date next to the extension version in the extensions list.

Add new actions to the Launch Core extension to write and delete cookies.  

Currently there are no additional steps when editing activity that is live than one that is inactive. In this way any edits to a live test are set to live by saving the changes. At the same time there is no indication that this is a live test while on the edit screen. Both combine to a high risk of introducing updates directly to a live test. I would recommend two updates. First, all edits get reviewed before set to active. In the case of experiences that are already live the best action would be to have any update to an activity move the experience back to inactive along with a prompt explaining the move. This allows an opportunity for review updates before setting those live. Second, include the status of an experience in all edit screens. This will allow for a visual indication on if this test is currently either active or inactive. 

Hi,Many of my users are frustrated with Timesheet management and they would like the ability to sort their projects in their timesheets by various criteria. They also want the ability to granularly select which projects should appear in their Timesheet, even with initial auto-population at weeks start. There appears to be a default ascending alpha-numeric sort but it does not seem to extend past a few characters of the project name prefix, i.e. WF should recognize the project name prefix 156589 as a higher number than 61303 but it sees it as a lower value.Thanks,Steve

Hello,  I would like to suggest truly including all emails in the primary emails table.  I have been building a variety of reports using the API data however when I attempt to pull results on A/B emails from Marketo those type of emails are missing.  While I can find them in other email related API tables I use the primary email tables as the source of my reporting for best accuracy.   Thank you.

HiBest to allow user to register maximum 24 hours for one day in Timesheet.Or give functionality via Set Up.MvhKundan.

It would be great to be able to assign a timesheet profile when manually generating a timesheet from the "New Timesheet" button in the Timesheets section. Currently when you create a timesheet, it isn't assigned to a timesheet profile, and there is no way to manually assign a timesheet profile to these newly generated timesheets. (Note: uploader tool keeps rejecting my attachment but this function can be found in Timesheets > All Timesheets > New Timesheet)

Workfront advocates for Inherited Permissions for pretty much everything else. Why not between a document and proof? Our use case is this: The creative agency with a Review license uploads the document and tags the project owner to review it. The project owner has a Work or Plan license and generates the proof, and shares the proof with others as Reviewers & Approvers. However, the creative agency who uploaded the document does NOT get ANY proof activity. They must rely on a document update from the project owner. However, as much as we have trained project owners to send a document update to the agency this often gets missed because they assume the agency can see all proof activity. Please help!

I recently configured a form which had a requirement to have multiple fields on different rows in one form section. The fields on the same row all had the same display logic which i had to manually input for each field. It would be great if display logic from one field once defined could be copied to any other field. Either that or some way of grouping fields, like you can with a form section but without the section title and spacing, would achieve the same result provided you can apply the logic to the section the fields are in.

Please allow reviewer to appear in proof reports and on home page. Currently Proof reports just allows review / approver to show up.

Integrate with the newly release Google Hangouts Chat to push work objects and task lists back and forth.

It's great that you can get from the "edit library" screen into a rule/element to compare revisions.  However, it is frustrating that when you close the rule/element you lose the context and get kicked out to the element/rules list rather than back to the edit library page. How it currently works:Edit Library > view rule > compare revision > *close* compare revision > *close* rule > rule list page 😞 How it should work:Edit Library > view rule > compare revision > *close* compare revision > *close* rule > Edit Library 🙂 Please can you consider changing the work flow to remember the context in which the rule was accessed so you are returned to the appropriate place? - when looking at a lot of rules this would really make a difference!

Presently if a Group admin adds a new user to Workfront, they cannot see or add the "Manager " proofing permission to the the new user's profile. But if a System admin adds a new user the "Manager" proofing permission is automatically added to the user. Can we have the same function for Group admins. But we would like the ability to update the proofing permission to a "Supervisor" or "Administrator" to still only be a Sys admin permission.