Product Communities

Many of my users would like to be able to have Decisions and Replies to my Comments as their default email alerts in a proof but they are forced to choose one or the other. We choose Decisions and then all comments have to be @ tagged again and again and people invariably forget to @ update someone, causing confusion.

Create template for Analysis work space for test results for A4T.  It should be able to calculate confidence across multiple metrics and can be easily duplicated to apply various segments.    Bring back the confidence intervals that were there in older versions of Target.  Pulling results for A4T tests in Target can be time consuming if you are looking at multiple metrics across multiple segments.        In the advanced functions for Analysis works space - it seems that it should be possible with T Scores and Z Scores already in the functions.   Since we sometimes use classifications in conjunction with metrics - not everything can be pulled in Target making additional work to input numbers in another worksheet to calculate confidence.

Current alert e-mail template does not contain any option to Analyze the alert in user specific project. The button link "Analyze Further" leads to a prefabricated project. Another option how to achieve this, could be to put a custom link to Alert notes. If the notes would be a part of template it could fit too.Or prepare the specific element in the e-mail template leading to the specific project in Workspace and assigned by URL at Alert definition page.

Use Case: Would like to be able to create segment in Adobe that shows the top 20% of users based on revenue. This "top spenders" segment could then be used in various reports to understand behavior such as what games they are purchasing on the digital stores, what content they are consuming, and what Marketing Channels were successful at bring them to the site.  Feature Request:Have the ability to create a segment to pull back a percentage of a dimension based on user-defined values or a range of user defined values. These segments could then be leveraged on any reports within Workspace to easily gain learnings based on the Top X% or the Bottom X% of any dimension for any reporting period. An idea would be to have functionality similar to Intelligent Alerts where you can define whether the metric(s) is "above or equals/below or equals" a user-defined percentage, along with the capability to drag and drop a dimension. 

Hi,    We have a fairly large instance and it'd be great to be able to receive automated reports on some items we find in admin. An example: I'd like to get a report of users who have not logged in for the last year. Another example: how many API requests have we had in the past 7 days?   Ideally, we'd be able to subscribe to receive this report regularly via email.   Adam

Hello, It would be great to be able to see any and every comment/update made from Task level and up when you go in under the Portfolio and updates, regardless of where you made the comment/update. Thank you!

Currently you are only able to send WF reports (from the WF interface) from the designated administrative email (In my company's case, it's a generic "Workfront Support" alias). I think team members would be more likely to look at these reports if they came directly from the user who scheduled the repeating delivery or sent the report (similar to a comment notification)

Idea: My proposed idea is to implement a global setting in the Salesforce section within Admin that allows you to delay the sync of campaign member for a designated number of minutes.  Why: I've often found myself at odds with the practicality of leaving on the Salesforce Campaign Sync feature in Marketo. It's super helpful in that it ensure proper alignment between our Marketo Programs & Salesforce Campaign. We can also easily sync period costs to total cost, saving time, effort, and improving data accuracy across systems. My main issue with leaving the program sync on, is that the sync operates too quickly and sends leads to Salesforce before they're considered "ready" from the operations perspective. I'm sure every business has their own standard of "ready" but in our case, we stamp the Lead Source, populate Lifecycle Stage, fill in some datastamp, and run some data append processes via webhook in market. Ideally we want all of these values populated bef

Currently, Adobe Launch allows 3 kinds of hosts: Akamai, managed by Adobe, and SFTP.For a CDN host, only Akamai and SFTP are viable options. (For SFTP, this assumes that the CDN replicates the scripts found in your SFTP destination.) So the only external CDN is really Akamai.Depending on one external CDN as a host is dangerous. If something happens at Akamai, it disables all Launch scripts hosted there. Also, clients may not necessarily want to use Akamai for whatever reasons.Idea: partner with other CDNs to allow hosting from them, e.g. Cloudflare.

Every prop and every classification of a prop has a corresponding 'exit' and 'entry' version of the prop.   This leads end users to be presented with far too many options which can be very confusing.For example, the below prop has 2 classifications; as a result the end user is present with 9 different options!Please can you consider changing the interface so that the entry and exit version do not show up at the top level? A possible solution would be to make entry and exit variables available from the chevron as the first level of drill down before reaching the items for a prop.leading to....

Use Case:Ability to create various shopper segments that look back for a user-defined period of time based on the number of purchases made.  For example, to have the ability to look atOne Time Shoppers (defined as users who placed 1 order in the past 12 months)Casual (defined as 2-5 orders placed in the past in 12 months)Frequent (defined as 6 - 10 orders placed in the past in 12 months)Super (defined as >10 orders placed in the past in 12 months) Feature Request:Ability to create a visitor segment that allows for creation of a container that can look back in time to a user-defined time frame.  The time frame defined in the segment should be given priority over the reporting period.  For example, if a report were ran for the last 2 full months (reporting period), and the One Time Shopper segment were applied, then segment should look back 12 months to determine if any of the traffic during the reporting period meets the segment criteria.

I use the debugger mostly for Analytics and it would be preferable for me if the new network requests loaded on the left (front) rather then the right (end).  I am mostly looking for the latest request and it is a pain to have to go to the bottom of the window and scroll to the right to see the newest request.    Maybe make the sort/load direction an option? If that is not possible, maybe the left/right scroll bar could be at the top of the window as opposed to the bottom?

We have many users who share a name and would like to be able to search and find users based on their email alias (sso Username) when tagging in an update.

Es wäre so schön wenn sich unter Catalina am Mac die Fenster auf verschiedengroßen Monitoren und iPad (Sidecar) automatisch anpassen könnten.

I find it annoying that the request automatically collapses if I leave the application for a moment. I'd like it to keep the state I've left it in, as long as the window remains open. 

I find the contrast too soft, specially when reading in the light mode. 

The UI for the date selector in Analysis Workspace has changed to result in more whitespace. On smaller screens, that means a lot of scrolling is needed when toggling the rolling date ranges.See this screenshot where the bottom part got cut off, requiring scrolling.Also, given the absence of a scrollbar, it's not immediately obvious that scrolling is needed.FYI my screen resolution is 1440x900.

With the new v1.8.4 there is a change which I really don't like. To understand  the change, first have a look at how it looks in the old v1.8.3: As you can see there are all the default variables easy to access. I understand that in most cases all the fields remain empty and it is a lot of place ... that might be the reason why the change was made in v1.8.4, see here:All the default variables are now hidden behind a simple checkbox - check it and see the additional fields as above. What's bad?There are 2 points that I don't like about thatIf you have the settings closed, you have no indication that you maybe have filled in some of the fields - so easy to forget about a single field that has a value. just had sort of nightmare while debugging an issue...the action remembers the setting of the view in the UI - good. but this setting is written in the final launch library code! it adds an additional string to the action with a boolean value for "showAdditionalSettings".Idea

Hi Community,we are a globally operating company that is present in multiple different countries and are currently facing issues with the way how currencies are setup and used in Workfront.Next to the default currency which is EUR in our case multiple other currencies are required like GPB US Dollar and more.Working with Portfolios we are able to set a seperat currency on different levels of the portfolio like i.e. within a program. All buget or currency based information is then based in for example US dollar as we need it. Unfortunately there is one area left. The area of Portfolio Opitimization is the only area where the default currency is pulled from the system. This has negative effect on our business as usual.Therefore we would like to raise the request to be able to setup a currency on portfolio level for the whole portfolio including Programs, Projects and Tasks without using a system default. This has to affect all areas of the portfolio including reports.Kind regards,

The annotation ability within proof is great but currently limited without the ability to add text over the proof image itself.It would be amazing to be able to add text over the top of a proof image as an annotation, the same way you can add the other elements such as a box or arrow, ie effectively a style of watermark - so may even be useful to be able to adjust opacity as a bonus, but definitely colour, font and size. Even at it's most basic such as you find in Paint would be great.The use I see for these is adding an identifier to the image, in my case a product name or description over the top of the image, or set of images as a visual aid, as opposed to the note itself. This is different from the current text tool that only select text within certain file types, which is not what I need.I've tried adding an image as an example but unfortunately it keeps failing...

Our business has requested for ability to mark/post an update on project/task level as “Urgent”? As we move away from emails, we’re finding that certain messages get lost in the sea of notifications. Is there a way to mark a particular update as “Urgent” or “High Priority” ?

Currently we only have the ability to use following for searching in the Assignment object:I feel we are missing 2 other search parameters in this list:assignedToHomeTeamMMassignedToTeamsMMThis functionality would be extremely beneficial for creating reports. A use case would be:The logged in user needs to see all assignments to users who are on their home team. ORThe logged in user needs to see all assignments to users who are on any of their teams.

this may be an extension of an old idea, but with the recent release of Program Member Custom Fields, it would be nice to add these as filters on reports. Specifically Email Activity reports (if not all others). Filtering the smart list by member data returns the lead, thus invalidating the report if attempting to only filter by Member Fields.   Example: I'm tagging a custom program member field "Is Customer" to see if, when the email was sent, that person was a customer or not. I'd like to pull a report of email activity where "Is Customer" is TRUE (and vice versa). However without a filter, I have to do it in the Smart List filter which pulls all emails sent to that person as long as the person was TRUE at any point, not point in time.   Bonus: All Group By to read these fields as well; much like Segmentation does today.

We have multiple custom forms referencing the same field attached to the same object (Project) that require a different input based on the form the workers are completing. What we noticed while building the configuration out is that if the same field is attached to multiple forms added to a single object, the data entered in one form replicates across all forms. If we want to avoid that, Support recommended we create separate fields for each form, which is going to cause the creation of multiple duplicate fields with weird field names and have reporting downstream effects (what field do we add to the report?) I would think the field can be used across multiple forms without having the information entered in one request form being entered in ALL forms with the same fields. This is really a huge issue that Workfront will need to resolve so we don't have to create multiple fields with the same information to prevent the duplication of user-entered data across all of our collective

Everything is always slow to load. Navigating DW, updating requests, pivoting views, all seem to take 3-5 or more seconds to updateWhen changing report suites, it’s frustrating that the entire report set up gets reset and must be redoneBeing able to include custom metrics built off segments would be very helpful. This is a big oneNot being able to use more than one segment per extract creates a lot of challenges when trying to get precise extractsThe search functionality for previous reports is very clunky. It’s not easy to use and it’s very tedious to find older reports. Advanced searching functionality would make things easier