Product Communities

Currently Workfront provides only the option to revoke all API keys. The request for revoking a single API key results in revoking all keys and re-issuing them afterwards. This can be a quite complex procedure if Workfront is highly integrated with other business applications. To improve availability of API access and API key management in enterprises and enable granular security actions a better API key management is needed. A first step would be the option to revoke single API keys without impacting other API keys used.

It would be great to be able to have Task deadlines populate in Microsoft Team calendars.

Currently we are unable to add the specific end users planned hours for tasks in the home tab. We can show the tasks planned hours as a whole or the primary assignments hours for the task, not not the specific user who is viewing their home. If the assignments object was available as an object as a drop down option when editing the home tab in the layout templates, it wouldn't be an issue.

When converting a Request to a Task, having the ability to assign, set status, and select dates in the overlay/popup window as is done with converting to a Project.

In Salesforce Lightning, there is the standard object Opportunity Contact Role.  Standard fields from this object appear in the Opportunity information in Marketo, but it would be great to be able to sync custom fields as well.  Right now there is no way to do this in Marketo, and we're having to sync an entirely custom object to retrieve the relevant information.

It would be no nice and easy if we could get the activity QA URL from API instead of having to log-in to the UI to get it every time. 

We load Target through Launch and configured Launch to use different analytics report suites based on which environment it is (Dev/Stg/Prd).  For example, all analytics from the Dev environment goes into the Dev report suite.  It would be great if we can pass the report suite from Launch to Target so that the analytics can go into the report suite for that particular environment.  Right now you manually configure which report suite to use, so we have to change it from environment to environment and is very inconvenient.

Our developers do not like the excessive number of calls required for each regional mbox inside of our SPAs, however they like the added structure of regional mboxes for offers and personalized content. It would be nice to be able to return regional mbox content setup in the Form Composer via the global mbox. For example, a list of mbox names could be passed as parameters to the global mbox for a particular page/route. The global mbox could return the content for each of those mboxes listed in a single response instead of using multiple regional mbox calls. This should be an optional setting for the experience.

It would be beneficial when setting up a smart list subscription that we had an option to select the minimum number of leads required in order to trigger the list send for that day. This would be useful for exception reporting. For example, I created a smart list to catch all records who are missing a Country Value. Now usually in my database, 100% of the records have a country value, so I don't really care to get a subscription report reminding me that there are still only 0 leads in that report. I'd like to only be sent an email via subscription if that number is 1 or greater. is this possible?

I would like to add a frequency or limit on the Experience.So the Experience will stop after x times if there is no interaction on the Experience. So you can offer a new Experience for this person.

provide users the ability to choose if font substitution is okay, or if proof pages should be created as images to retain look/layout of fonts not in the system. Additionally, provide users the ability to add specific font families to their own accounts (to support proprietary fonts our clients might have, that we must work with quite often) Both scenarios above pertain to uploading PowerPoint files specifically. When font substitution occurs, layout gets all out-of-whack, such as words overlapping, line breaks strangely, words over graphics on the slides, etc.

It would be great if the Salesforce.com Campaign Name or ID could be included in the program performance report, or at the very least, in the program reports in the Revenue Explorer. Salesforce.com is our main record of truth, and often we have to reconcile campaign activity with program activity (we sync all of our programs over as SFDC Campaigns). Often, a program name gets changed, updated after the initial sync to Salesforce.com, and there is no way to do an easy match to find the existing Salesforce.com campaign.

Marketo should work on to add feature to compare two similar type of tokens in the smart campaigns as as of now if I have to do the cross token comparison I have to set up a webhook for this and calling the webhook increases the processing time as well as it adds a external dependency on webhook so now we have to work to make our webhook implementation optimised along with marketo implementation. Thanks 🙂

Currently, updates comments made to Documents do not roll up to the Parent Object (Task or Issue). Due to this, updates and comments can be missed.

For more complex segments, I sometimes need to create multiple rows of the same dimension and search criteria. Even when using "contains any of" and pipe delimiters. It would be handy if the workflow for segment creation would allow easy duplication of a dimension. For example, right click, duplicate this criteria. It would be important to preserve all of the settings, much like when duplicating a panel in Workspace.  Edit: I know it's possible to click CTRL + drag the dimension, but I've only learned that from a tip given by another user. I'd suggest facilitating this, again, much like as with panels in Workspace.

It would be great if the Program Level contained the Business Case functionality and/or the Optimizer functionality . Many of the Clients I work with will have a budget for their campaign or their program, and it would be valuable to roll up the project information to the program level and complete a business case for the overall campaign. Also, if the optimizer functionality was available at this level, then the user could enter their budget for the program and prioritize the projects underneath more effectively.

It would be great if there was an "undo Proof" function, so that if you accidentally click on generate proof you can quickly undo that function.

When a custom field (Parameter object) is made as a dropdown there could be several hundred possible values (Parameter Option object). Right now the only way to sort the dropdown values is through the UI (see image_001.png). It would be nice to add an API action to the Parameter object that would allow this same sorting to be called through the API like in the same matter approvals can be approved/rejected/callbacked (see image_002.png).

A lot of times we as analyst are asked to calculate an incremental value of a change to a user experience.  I know Adobe has Target which is kind of this ideas bread and butter but I think it would be amazing if Workspace could support the following idea for programs that we don't run through Targeta comparison of Actual data to a projected forecast of data based on an inflection point.I'm thinking a comparison tool that would allow an analyst to selected- metric - event or calculated metric- the base period start date --- say Jan 1 for example sake- the start of the campaign or ux change -- say Feb 15 for example- campaign end date ---  say March 15th for example or could also be set as 'on going', in which case the tool would use the end date of the panelupon execution the tool would create two segmentsone for Jan 1 to Feb 15 with actual data with a estimated 'forecast' (simply linear) spanning until March 15th&one for Jan 1 to March 15th with actual data& a line chart should

its impossible to plan all tasks in a project. why can't you submit requests tied to a project? in addition, you should be able to pull in task custom forms to send data as part of the work requests. otherwise a PM has to know of every task going on and make sure it gets in the project task tree. its impossible for a PM on large projects to know of all work going on but if people could issue requests and indicate it's part of the project, then all work would be captured and visible. Am I missing something?

Would love it if the global navigation bar and project summary/header area would stay put at the top when scrolling down the list of tasks. Sometimes I toggle between projects that are on the same timeline and I compare where I am with some of the same tasks, but I don't know which project is which because it scrolls away when I scroll down. I'm not sure if I put this under the right topic, but I figured Projects since that is where I notice I need that info the most. Thanks in advance for your consideration.

We are in the process of implementing Workfront to Jira. It would be great if we could maintain the Parent/Child task relationship from Workfront in Jira, This would be extreamly helpful in creating story with Tasks in JIra from the parent / child relationship in Workfront.I know this can be done manually and the integration continues to work, with is wonderful, but to not have to create the manual link would be very helpful.

Can we have the ability to edit assignment reports inline? We've been trying to switch over to assignment reports from task reports throughout our system since the assignment reports are more flexible and show more data, but the loss of inline edit ability really hampers the uptake of the new assignment reports.

I created a Task Based Report that displays all Users based on Tasks Assigned To that shows only one line item per Project, Grouped by Assigned To: Name. The issue is that, it only shows one instance of a Project, even when it's Assigned To more than one User on a single Task, due to the system only recognizing the Task Owner. As a work around, I am able to pull multiple instances of a Project by using unique Milestone Names paired with additional Tasks assigned with one User each, however, this is not ideal and results in more effort for the Report to work.The optimal solution would be for Workfront to recognize and populate a Report with Projects - including extra instances of Projects - for all Assigned To Users on a single Tasks, regardless of whether or not they are the Task Owner. Positive Votes for this would be greatly appreciated and thanks for your time.

We wanted to use the same concept of the automatic email notification that a user receives once a task or project has been completed. But in our case we wanted to create a new custom email and notification that is tied to a specific numbers of projects (Not system-wide) in order to include a link to a survey to collect feedback form our users. Currently, there isn't a way for us to implement this to a portion of projects or tasks and instead would result in our survey being sent out system-wide for all projects/task completions.