Product Communities

DICK'S Golf & GG Internal Display March - June Digital 2020This is a perfect example of why I miss having the X in the corner of a proof to close out. If I had that I could jump between proofs.With beta test I am having to use back button to get out of proof and it is a pain to keep getting to next proof.

Ability for a user to delete a project/task/comment ONLY if the user created a project/task/comment.

When exporting to excel date fields will bring in a timestamp and hour fields will bring in the word "hours" - regardless of how this is programmed to display in Workfront. Idea: Allow option for this type of data to be included or not included in reporting.

When you click on the "New Task" button on the home screen, the information you can add there is very limited. After you add the new task, you can click on the task, or go to the "requests I've submitted," and add more info. Eventually you can get to an "Edit" button where there is even more options to edit. It would be great if there were more editing options available up front when creating the new task or request from the home screen.

We have users that would like to see all of their tasks in the home screen in a Agile, Kanban board style. This would make each task/request appear as an Agile card, containing the basic information for them to work on.

We'd love to have the ability to view the data from custom forms attached to requests, from the Home page. The Home page used to have an "Edit Custom Form" link where you could at least see the custom form data. That link was removed in the last release and we can no longer access the custom form data on our requests from the home page, thus requiring us to go into each request and click on multiple tabs to get to the info we need to complete the work.

It would be real helpful to be able to add notes / text to each column / image request in the Experience Cloud Debugger. This way, when we click through a journey and send image requests with each click, we can note what we did to generate each request. Then using the wonderfully helpful Download feature, we could get that packaged up in 1 neat file and pass along. C'mon, PLEASE!!!!!

The Transfer File step in a workflow can be configured to optionally delete a source file after transferring the file when the protocol is SFTP or Amazon S3.This option is not available when the protocol is "File(s) present on the Adobe Campaign server".If I am developing a new workflow or am troubleshooting an existing workflow, I may want to run the workflow on the same file several times.  It is inconvenient to have to upload the file to the Campaign server each time I run the workflow because the Transfer File step automatically deletes the file.Please add a "Delete the source files after transfer" option for the "File(s) present on the Adobe Campaign server" protocol so that the workflow author can turn this option on and off as needed.

It would be great if we could add issues to a task from the right side task summary panel in the New Workfront Experience.

Kanban cards should be able to have the % completion removed from the card to avoid confusion!

When a task is assigned to multiple people, that task appears in each users HOME screen. However, from the home screen view, there is no indicator as to whether the other users are done with their portion of the task or not. It would be helpful if the users could see who was done with their part from the home screen, and not have to drop into the task object to see this information.This type of functionality is VERY helpful for the "workers" that are using WF to have work assigned to them, but DO NOT do their work in workfront. For example, our graphic design team. They get assignments to build assets through WF, so an aggregate location like the HOME screen is ideal for them to see all the work they need to do.

Linking Production Launch code to DTM is really helpful and a thoughtful feature. One less hassle to handle.If there is a possibility to enhance the linking functionality, we recommend to build the same linking functionality to Staging environment in Launch and DTM as we have it in production.This way, clients do not need to go through the hassle of deploying Launch embed code in their development environments for this migration. It would be an extra consistent approach to production, if we have the linking capability for 1 matching DTM and Launch testing environment. E.g. DTM Staging. Then, when the clients are ready to totally use the Launch embed code, we could deploy it to all environments including dev, staging and production.Meanwhile, as we currently do not have this feature, we use Fiddler, Charles, or Requestly to replace the DTM staging environment code with Launch embed code for testing. just FYI.Hope this helps. Thanks so much

Would like to have the flexibility to create a layout where I can ensure the issue reference number is displayed on the Top Right area of the issue information, just like issue %complete, issue assignment, status and planned completion are displayed.

Currently, we have a Dimension in the left & metric in the right if we want to interchange then it takes around 5 to 8 min for 1 freeform & normally every dashboard have 3 to 4 freeform for analysis & if it's a big project then it might increase to 7 or 8.Suggestion - Adding a button to interchange dimension with metric or metric with the dimension will save around 20 min for each workspace.

UPDATE:Turns out that the time is editable. But it's hidden by a failed user interface design. See https://experienceleaguecommunities.adobe.com/t5/Adobe-Analytics-Ideas/Don-t-hide-user-actionable-visual-elements-e-g-in-Scheduled/idi-p/355327 Feature request: allow the user to set the time when he wants to receive a Scheduled Project's report. When scheduling a project, the user cannot set the time for the project's delivery. Instead, it will be sent at the time that the schedule has been last saved. For example, if I setup a Scheduled Project at 2:50pm, the subsequent reports will always be sent at 2:50pm. But that is not the ideal time to receive this reports. This is a ridiculous workflow because it demands that the user be at his computer, setting up the Scheduled Project, at the time that he expects to receive the reports later on.

Please add a column to show Priority of activities on the Activities List page itself, while also allowing sorting on this. This will save a lot of time while setting the priority of an activity where currently we have to maintain a list of all activities in an Excel sheet, and looking up the list to ensure new activity is not going to impact/clash with an existing activity. Regards,Rajneesh  

When I click into a report from a dashboard, it would be AMAZING if there were a breadcrumb trail allowing me to easily go back to the dashboard when I'm done editing the report.Since the NWE changes the URL between /edit and /detail each time you edit a report, just clicking the back button on my browser isn't a viable solution. I didn't see any other Ideas for this, but if one exists already please let me know!

As an admin of a mature Marketo Org, it would be extremely helpful to be able to specify what time zone date fields are adhering to when creating lists or global administration campaigns.  They can adhere to the instance-wide setting unless you specifically manually change it.  I know I can change my personal user timezone, but date fields in lists and campaigns still adhere to the instance-wide timezone setting.  It makes it difficult, if not impossible, to filter on date fields for time zones that are not the same as your instance setting. As a use case: we're creating a local data mart of Marketo data, and when we pull it using API, it's in GMT/ZULU format.  It's not possible to compare this exported list of people against Marketo's GUI without changing the instance-wide timezone to match. Alternatively, allow us to perform date calculations.

If I've zoomed in to see the gantt by week, i lose that granularity when I export the gantt - even if I select export 'what i see' . (I have the "Zoom To" set to "Project Duration".) I've been told by WF Support that this is 'working as designed'. Their current algorithm is: A) If displayed date range occupies less space than available paper width, gantt chart exports as-is without any change. B) If displayed date range occupies more space than available paper width, gantt chart tries to zoom out enough to fit the displayed date range. This currently results in zoom level changes. Please modify to also export as is for option B.

I would like the ability to manually lock a project from additional updates on a project by project basis. We need the ability to add time and supporting documents to a project for a period of time after the Project Manager "completes" the project. But want to lock it from additional updates after a desired period of time (say 2 weeks).Currently, it is locked at status completion or not at all.

(Cheers to @Matthew Fellows for reminding me about this one!)When using the "Send Sample" functionality directly from an email template to test code, several switches happen which actually break the email:There's a doctype switch which occurs on the email itself: the email will go from <!doctype html> to <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" "w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">Any meta tags or variables defined in the template are removed.Any parent container tags for mktoModules are removed. That is to say, if you have an email module defined as  <table class="mktoModule" [...]><tr><td></td></tr></table> it will only render everything from the table row onwards.This results in the email usually going lopsided and looking bad. While the recommended solution here is usually to create a test email, this is very confusing for email template developers who don't have a ton of Marketo experience. Can this behavior be chan

I would like to be able to annotate line and bar graphs in Analysis Workspace. I would like to be able to select which lines would be involved in the annotation and whether it is static or rolling based on the date if a date is involved.

On the document tab, the 3 view available are 'standard','thumbnail' and 'list'.The Workfront functionality is that the 'standard' view is the default for the documents tab.This idea is to have the 'view' remain to what the user had the last time the user was on the Documents tab. On the Task & Issues Tab on a Project, the view chosen by user remains the same as a user navigates to other Projects.Also note, the List view provides the same type of view that is displayed on all other screens throughout Workfront and that is why we need it to stick on that view. Documents doesn't display "Filter", "View" and "Grouping" dropdowns by default but all other screens do.

Enable system admin to unshare with a specific user multiple projects, tasks, etc. Today if 100 projects were shared with a user, you can not unshare the 100 projects at once, you have to unshare one by one by one by one by one by one by one.. .until done for a specific user.

Be able to load data into WF as object types to pull into type ahead fields in custom formsbe able to use a field twiceadd user license as a type of object type for type ahead fieldmuch better ways to make the form look and feel cleaner like an excel sheet