Product Communities

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Adobe Assets currently provides limited reporting capabilities for shared links. Admins lack visibility into which assets within specific folders were shared, how often, and whether those links were engaged with, clicks or downloads. This feature request proposes an enhanced Share Link Report that allows folder level targeting and includes detailed engagement metrics.  Use-case: As an admin, I want to:  Identify which assets in a specific folder were selected and shared via link.  See who created the share link.  Track whether the link was clicked.  Determine if the asset was downloaded via the share link.  This visibility is crucial for understanding asset engagement, optimizing content strategy, and ensuring proper usage and compliance.  Current/Experienced Behavior: The existing Share Link Report under Assets > Reports provides a basic overview of shared assets. It includes the asset name,

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Content picker in the New CF Editor allows only browsing assets, not sites/pages. Use-case: Our CF models contain CTAs linking to pages. Current/Experienced Behavior: Editor needs to manually find and copy and paste the correct link to a page. Improved/Expected Behavior: Editors should be able to use Sites Content Picker pupup to select a page Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS 2025.8.22171.20250828T220440Z Customer-name/Organization name: Assa Abloy Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Implement PSAs so that they can appear in all of the AEM UIs Use-case: The content operations team is looking to create a PSA or Alert bar/popup that would appear for all/some users on the platform when they log in. Current/Experienced Behavior: Adobe proposed this solution: https://adobe-consulting-services.github.io/acs-aem-commons/features/system-notifications/index.html Results research: I have researched and tried out the ACS Commons System Notifications in the past already. Those only work in the "old" AEM UI, not in the "new" CF Admin/Editor or Universal Editor. So any author directly going into those UIs would never see the notifications. And even authors accessing the old UI might be confused since it disappears on the new UIs. They might think only the old UI is affected by whatever the notification says. Improved/Expected Behavior: 1- it would stay up as long as we need it (if we posted a message about an o

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: AEMaaCS - CloudManager - Track disk usage  Use-case: Ensure that AEMaaCS clients are aware of their disk usage. Especially in times of performance issues, a transparently available monitoring of disk usage would help AEMaaCS projects to improve their setup. Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no disk usage monitoring available in AEMaaCS (in the CloudManager or elsewhere). Without Adobe Support input, a customer doesn't know this parameter. Alternatives via ACS AEM Commons reports are too time-consuming (XLSX work afterwards) or limited in scope (Asset reports only, no other content or full OS).   VW's Adobe Ultimate Support recommended I open a ticket here when they couldn't find a suitable functionality in AEMaaCS (E-001835519) Improved/Expected Behavior: In AEM 6.x Cloud Manager, such a feature already exists: https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-manager/content/using/monitori

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Introduce a visual indicator and count display for hidden components within containers, sections, and background elements in AEM’s page editor interface. Use-case: Content managers need to easily identify and manage hidden components on a page during editing. This visibility is crucial for maintaining content accuracy, avoiding duplication, and ensuring that hidden elements are not unintentionally overlooked. Current/Experienced Behavior: Hidden components are not clearly distinguishable in the AEM page editor. There is no count or visual cue indicating how many components are hidden within a container or section. Additionally, the content tree does not reflect hidden components, making it difficult to locate and manage them across different device views (desktop, tablet, mobile). Improved/Expected Behavior: Display the number of hidden components within each container, section, or background element directly in the edit mode. S

機能改善要求（RFE）概要： Show each item's path in the CF console list ユースケース： We live-copy the master CF to multiple paths. We need a way to find live-copy items other than the master item and to edit or unpublish items only in selected paths.  現在／体験した動作： Even after filtering, numerous items with the same title and identical folder names are shown, making it impossible to identify the item's path. We spend a lot of time each day managing CF. 改善／期待される動作： Show an item's path in the search results, or reveal the path when you hover over the item. 環境の詳細（AEM バージョン／サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細）： AEM as a Cloud Services 顧客名／組織名 - スクリーンショット（ある場合）   コードパッケージ（ある場合）  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Implement consistent error state styling and behavior for "aem-content" fields in Universal Editor, following the example of "text" fields Use-case: Required "aem-content" field validation in Universal Editor Current/Experienced Behavior: "aem-content" fields lack a red outline, a "red triangle with exclamation mark" icon on the right side of the input box and an aria-invalid="true" attribute. Improved/Expected Behavior: "aem-content" fields have a red outline, a "red triangle with exclamation mark" icon on the right side of the input box and an aria-invalid="true" attribute. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS v2025.8.21994.20250818T175115Z-250700 Universal Editor Service v20250828133131 Customer-name/Organization name: AVIS BUDGET CAR RENTAL LLC Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Display complete configuration values in Cloud Manager. There is no need to truncate the values with (...). Better to wrap at line endings (as is done on the keys). I want to be able to validate/share/document the configuration at one glance without having to open each individual variable.   Use-case: Sharing / Documenting Environment configuration Current/Experienced Behavior: Values of environment variables are truncated after n characters  Improved/Expected Behavior: Values are displayed in full and wrapped if table width exceeded Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Cloud Manager Sep. 22th 2025 Customer-name/Organization name: all Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable): n/a

  Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: When the number of configuration variables grows, it could help to order them  alphabetically to easily spot if sth. is missing. Also, when a setup contains of multiple modules, ordering would keep items clustered, when prefixed: LOGIN_BAR=..LOGIN_FOO=..WORKFLOW_XX=..WORKFLOW_YY=.. Use-case: Validate environment configuration  Current/Experienced Behavior: Variables are mixed randomly, variables with the same prefix are not clustered Improved/Expected Behavior: Variables are ordered by key.  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Cloud Manager Sep. 22 2025 Customer-name/Organization name: all Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable): n/a

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Keep Side Panel Functional After Page Selection Use-case: AEM Author GUI speed Current/Experienced Behavior: In Sites view, the side panel (Filters, Timeline, References, etc.) can only be used before selecting a page. Once a page is selected, the panel becomes not clickable/useable. Keeping it functional after selection would allow authors to filter, check references, or review details without deselecting the page. Improved/Expected Behavior: Side panel remains interactive after a page is selected Functions such as Filters, Timeline, and References are fully usable while a page is selected Applies in Sites view and similar contexts where the side panel is available Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Cloud Customer-name/Organization name: Sanitas Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable Side Panel in Image Component Dialog Use-case: AEM Author work speed Current/Experienced Behavior: When editing the Image component, the side panel for browsing and selecting DAM assets cannot be opened.  Improved/Expected Behavior: Allowing the side panel to be accessed without closing the dialog would make it easier to choose or replace images directly from the DAM. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Cloud Customer-name/Organization name: Sanitas Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary:   Use-case:   In AEM, a proper preview can be generated, but this functionality is missing in Content Hub.   Current/Experienced Behavior: Many assets are stored in ZIP file formats, but Content Hub currently displays them as blank folders or icons. Improved/Expected Behavior: need for a feature to generate previews for ZIP files automatically to avoid manual effort Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaaCS Customer-name/Organization name:   Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

To improve clarity for content editors in AEM, consider adding a visual indicator at the top of the page being edited to highlight that the page has been modified post-publication. This would help address the ambiguity that arises over time with the current "last published" and "last modified" dates shown in months in the page properties dropdown. This would make it easier to spot discrepancies—such as when the page was published on the 5th but last modified on the 23rd—without needing to dig into metadata. See screen capture attached.  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: In Cloud Manager, sort Pipelines alphabetically Use-case: In Cloud Manager, sort Pipelines alphabetically to more easily find the pipeline one wants to work on and also prevent from accidentally starting the wrong one (after all, they are usually called similarly, and sorting them top to bottom would make it more apparent, that e.g. lower envs are further up).Example00 - dev - Dispatcher01 - dev - Config 02 - dev - AEM 03 - stage - ...  Current/Experienced Behavior: Pipelines are order randomly  Improved/Expected Behavior: Pipelines are order alphabetically Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): latest CM Customer-name/Organization name: any Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable): n/a

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: In AEM, when creating a translation job via References -> select page, the dialog shows the checkbox “Select all subpages” at the bottom. Currently it’s pre-selected by default. This should be disabled. The checkbox should be unchecked. Use-case:   Current/Experienced Behavior: Checkbox “Select all subpages” is checked by default. Improved/Expected Behavior: Checkbox “Select all subpages” is unchecked by default. User can manually check it if they want to include subpages. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Cloud Customer-name/Organization name: Sanitas Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

機能改善要求（RFE）概要： Allow users to set the default editor for opening Content Fragments from Assets ユースケース： Editing Content Fragment 現在／体験した動作： The editing behavior for Content Fragments differs between the New Editor and the Legacy Editor.For example, in the New Editor, you cannot disable inheritance from the live copy source, and you cannot enter external links. However, when editing a Content Fragment from Assets, the New Editor always opens. And you always have to switch editors manually. 改善／期待される動作： Allow users to set which editor opens by default. 環境の詳細（AEM バージョン／サービスパック、もしあればその他の詳細）： AEM as a Cloud Service 顧客名／組織名   スクリーンショット（ある場合）   コードパッケージ（ある場合）  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Our accessibility audit shows WCAG 2.1 AA violations when using placeholders alongside ARIA labelling on Core Form Fields Use-case: Using Adobe Core Form Fields, with ootb configuration "Display help message as placeholder” Example:  on page https://www.sunstargum.com/gb-en/about-us/contact-us.html Current/Experienced Behavior: 1. **Accessible name vs description conflict**- Inputs with `placeholder` + `aria-describedby` or visible `<label>` lead to inconsistent accessible name computation. Placeholder either doesn’t get announced (e.g., JAWS, NVDA), or is dropped in favor of description text, making it unreliable :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}.- Relying on placeholder as label fails WCAG 2.1 AA: contrast (1.4.3), persistent visible labels (2.4.6, 3.3.2), Name, Role, Value (4.1.2) :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}.2. **Placeholder distractions**- Placeholder text disappears once typing starts—users lose he

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: In the participant step of workflow. Some use cases where we need to double confirm with warning message. to avoid human error. it is not supported out of the box. By adding another step to confirm it becoming a user experience nightmareMay be a checkbox to ask only for specific participant steps in a workflow  Use-case: For example: if approving or publishing we need to double confirm. we need to cancel a workflow and revert to previous version. if user chooses that as the next step by mistake it will revert it and loose the work. Current/Experienced Behavior: it takes the input and moves along.  Improved/Expected Behavior: it will would give popup and ask the author to confirm encase of a condition Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): aem cloud Customer-name/Organization name: jnj Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Automatic Redirects for URL Changes If a page’s URL changes while it is live (due to a title change, page move, or unpublication), could AEM automatically generate a redirect to the new location? Ideally, authors should also have the ability to specify which URL to redirect to (e.g., another page or a 404 page). Use-case: If a page’s URL changes while it is live (due to a title change, page move, or unpublication), could AEM automatically generate a redirect to the new location Current/Experienced Behavior: A page url is changed, we will have to manually use ACS Common Tools to add in a redirect url.  Improved/Expected Behavior: Have a list of all redirects If a page’s URL changes while it is live (due to a title change, page move, or unpublication), could AEM automatically generate a redirect to the new location.    Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): &n

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Bulk Page Movement Right now, AEM only supports moving one page at a time. This makes taxonomy updates and bulk redirects very time-consuming. Could AEM allow authors to select and move multiple pages simultaneously to streamline these workflows and move it to another location? Use-case: Currently, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) only allows authors to move one page at a time. This limitation makes it inefficient to perform large-scale site restructuring tasks—such as taxonomy updates, reorganization of content folders, or implementing bulk redirects—especially for enterprise-level websites with hundreds of pages. By introducing a Bulk Page Movement capability, authors could select and move multiple pages simultaneously within the AEM interface. This enhancement would streamline content management workflows, reduce manual effort, and minimize human error during site reorganizations. It would also improve overall authoring efficien

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable the ability to add custom fields to the Content Fragment GraphQL schema via code, SlingDataFetcher, or programmatic means, without requiring changes to the Content Fragment Model definition in AEM. Use-case: Developers and integrators need to expose computed, derived, or integration-specific fields in the Content Fragment GraphQL API for headless delivery, without modifying the underlying Content Fragment Model. Current/Experienced Behavior: The Content Fragment GraphQL schema is auto-generated from the Content Fragment Model and system fields. It is not possible to add custom fields via code, SlingDataFetcher, or other programmatic approaches. Business Impact  Limits flexibility for headless integrations, increases maintenance overhead, and requires model changes for every new field, which may not be feasible or desirable in large organizations or for computed/integration fields. Improved/Expected Behavior: Ability