Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Is is possible to access the Title and Body of a push in a Custom Action? I can't find a kind of metadata of the push to use in CA Thanks.
When we use one click unsubscribe as channel, i see the below value is modified."idSpecific": { "Email": { "abce@hotmail.com": { "marketing": { "email": { "val": "n", "time": "2025-08-21T03:35:23.983335Z" } How do we modify this value to n to y. So that user can optin again. I tried landing page identity based email optout. but it is not updating the above value instead it created using identity value like the below. "CompKey": { "1234": { "marketing": { "email": { "val": "y", "time": "2025-08-28T02:41:55.421381Z" Please suggest
might be best explained with an example:Putting everything inside the component annotation works. When I tried using SlingServletFilter as suggested by Apache in their Sling Filter page (https://sling.apache.org/documentation/the-sling-engine/filters.html), the filter stop working. Any ideas? Thanks(service = Filter.class, property = { "sling.filter.scope=REQUEST", "sling.filter.pattern=^/content/myapp/sg/en/login.*", "service.ranking:Integer=101" }) /*@Component @SlingServletFilter( scope = {SlingServletFilterScope.REQUEST}, pattern = "^/content/myapp/sg/en/login.*" ) @ServiceRanking(101)*/
I have a XF field in my component with resource type as : cq/experience-fragments/editor/components/xffieldand i have given one property rootPath as /content/experience-fragments.Now when i type anything in this field it throws an error as failed to load next page If i give rootPath as /content/experience-fragments/myproject then this error doesnt show up. But i want to have rootPath as /content/experience-fragments only. Any solution to this?
I have custom index file created and added index rule for text property. if my search key match in href tag value present under the text value the result not display. i have tried to add href index rule also with value href.. But same issue matching result not display.my search key value:national my sample text value:<p><a id="back-to-forms-link" style="display: none;" href="/content/national.html" target="_self">Back to forms</a></p></ul></ul></p> my index rule: <textjcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"name="text"nodeScopeIndex="{Boolean}true"propertyIndex="{Boolean}true"type="String"useInSpellcheck="{Boolean}true"useInSuggest="{Boolean}false"/> <hrefjcr:primaryType="nt:unstructured"name="href"nodeScopeIndex="{Boolean}true"propertyIndex="{Boolean}true"type="String"useInSpellcheck="{Boolean}true"useInSuggest="{Boolean}false"/>
I have a use case where the Video component is allowed both directly on a page and as a slide inside the Core Components Carousel (v1) using editable templates.When I add the Video component directly to a page, I can assign a policy that enables embeddable options (e.g., YouTube, Marketo) via the template editor. When I add the Video component inside the Carousel (as a slide/panel), I do not see the option to assign or inherit the same policy for embeddable options. The Video dialog inside the Carousel does not show the "Embeddable" dropdown, even though the Video component is allowed as a child.Questions:1.How can I ensure that the Video component inside the Carousel inherits or references the same policy as the standalone Video component, so that embeddable options appear in the dialog?2. Is there a way to configure or map the Video policy for the Carousel’s panelcontainer in the template editor, or does this require manual changes in CRX/DE?3. If manual CRX/DE configuration is
Hi, I think it would be great if we have a multi-select option to select more than one tag value for a specific tag in the system. ex: Lets say i have a tag named Vertical and I would like to select more than one picklist value during the program creation step. Currently, we either have to select one or come up with a specific tag value that could accommodate this specific need as we are unable to select more than one value from the picklist. Thanks, vineela.
Hi, is it possible to create a custom action (a POST request to trigger a service that sends email via SMTP) that can then use a email template created in Adobe Journey Optimizer? For example, sending in the body of the request the email template itself? It sounds complex actually. Thanks
Hi,I created an Hours Report to collect hours from different projects and users. However, the report is not capturing all hours from the parent tasks. I need it to include hours registered in both child tasks and parent tasks, since many users log their time directly to parent tasks. Could you help me identify what might be missing in this report? Looking for your expertise and suggestion. Regards
We are considering using business rules and would love to talk with anyone who has had success in implementing them. What kind of business rules have you implemented? What level of effort is needed to implement and maintain? Any draw backs or lessons learned?
Hi, Could you please confirm my logic is correct? I have a Trigger + 2 filters in the Smart list of a Trigger Campaign. However, I want the filters to be with OR logic between them. Since the logic ANY/ALL/Advanced applies only to filters, not to triggers, is it correct to set up ANY as logic? I want either of those 2 conditions in the filters to be met when the trigger triggers, I don't want both filter requirements to be met at the same time. Thank you!
Hi All,a calculated custom field of mine is behaving like a bad boy. Can someone please help me with taming it? : )I have a form that is attached both to the Task and Issue objects.The form contains a calculated field (called ObjcodeDebugCombined) that is meant to flag up if certain settings on the Task/Issue record are not aligned to the expectations, i.e.:On a Task: the Task Constraint is not "Fixed Dates" OR the Duration Type is not "Simple"On an Issue: the Issue type is not "Request"Here's the calculation:IF(($$OBJCODE="TASK"&&({durationType}!="S"||{taskConstraint}!="FIXT"))||($$OBJCODE="OPTASK"&&{opTaskType}!="REQ"),"failed","") The problem is that this field is not recalculated when it should be. More precisely:When a Task/Issue record is created (with the custom form attached), the field is calculated correctly.When another custom field is updated on the Task/Issue record, it (ObjcodeDebugCombined) is recalculated properly.When a native field (e.g.
I have an existing lead field that contains the value for user Company Names, and with some company name ending in "Inc." we get an extra period at the end of the sentence where the token is placed.I want to set up a script token that can identify if the last character in the lead field string is a period and remove it. I've looked into substring a bit, but haven't found a working solution. Does anyone have any suggestions?
We have two systems, Salesforce and Marketo, which are synced.In Marketo, records are synced to Salesforce based on the email address.In Salesforce, records created from Marketo are matched using the Salesforce ID.We do not have duplicate management enabled in Salesforce.We want Marketo to check the email address instead of the Salesforce ID when creating or updating leads.The process should start with a Marketo landing page or form submission.If the email does not exist in Salesforce, a new Lead should be created.If the email already exists, the existing Salesforce Lead should be updated.Additionally, when a lead comes from Salesforce to Marketo, Marketo matches it using the Salesforce ID instead of the email address.Is there any solution or configuration that allows Marketo to match leads based on the email address rather than the Salesforce ID when syncing from Salesforce?
Workfront proof now opens in a new tab versus having the close window button and returning the project. Is this always going to happen or will this be fixed so you can return to the previous window with the close button?
Description - The Print Summary PDF download within Workfront’s Proofing tool creates a flat image of the proof with any comments and markups, and is used if the marked up proof needs to be circulated outside of the proofing tool itself. The reason the originally uploaded pdf with any markups made in the proofing tool needs to be extracted from Workfront, rather than viewed in the tool itself by the agencies making amends as a result of these mark ups, is the agencies often use other Adobe products and comparison tools which contain scripted (coded) elements to compare the original pdf to the marked up pdf, and amend original files where possible in a more automated way. Given Workfront is an Adobe product, it would be preferable to have a high quality Adobe PDF output which is compatible with other Adobe products to ensure consistency and ease of use. The rasterising of the marked up proof and addition of wide margins / summary page changes the structure of the file so much from
November 2022 This is a roadmap. It is not a promise. It is a snapshot of what we think we can deliver based on our priorities at this current moment . You should expect things to move around. New items will be added. Individual items will move closer and farther when development teams refine scope, update priorities, or otherwise learn that things did not take the exact amount of time that we estimated. We reserve the right to be smarter tomorrow than we are today. Most recent update: 2022-11-15
Is it possible to create a segment that evaluates something in the segment over a period of time that is not dependent on the filter in your workspace view? For example, If I want IP addresses excluded that had >1,000 visits over the last 12 months without an order in my workspace view that is filtered for today. In other words, I'm excluding those IPs today (filtered in my workspace view) that met the above criteria.
I run into this a lot and curious to see how others handle it. Even when the numbers are accurate, stakeholders will often question funnel drop-offs or channel attribution. It feels less about the math and more about how much confidence people have in the way the data is configured and/or presented.How do you deal with that? Do you show the rules and assumptions up front, compare against other tools, or do something else that helps build trust?Would love to hear what’s worked (or not worked) for your teams.
Hi,we developed one integration with Marketo Engage.By using the create email template API, we save the email templates in the folder with id=27 and type="Folder". To date, Folder - 27 is one system and default folder for all users.But in same cases we got the error: 711 - 27 Folder is not an email template folder. Why?Any help is welcomed.Thanks in advance
Hi Community,I'm facing an issue while trying to create a Customer AI instance in Adobe Experience Platform.**Service Instance Name:** `New_customer`**Error Message:**> "You currently have insufficient days of data, and we need more days of data. Please check the dataset to ensure it meets the service instance configuration or modify the eligible population/timeframe for the service instance."> *(Error code: VALIDATION-407 NOT_ENOUGH_HISTORICAL_EVENT_DATA)***Details:**- The service instance is enabled, but the last run status shows as "Failed."- I suspect the issue is related to the dataset not having enough historical event data.- I'm using [briefly describe the dataset, e.g., web events, purchase history, etc.].- The scoring frequency is set to [e.g., daily/weekly].**Questions:**1. How many days of historical data are typically required for Customer AI to run successfully?2. Is there a way to adjust the eligible population or timeframe to bypass this error?3. Are there best pra
We hear daily about how Ai is taking over the world, but let's see how many of us are using it so far! A simple Yes/No works, but bonus points if you want to share how you are using it, or plan to! Workfront Ai, Copilot, Adobe Assistant, ChatGPT, Gemini, custom agents?!
Description - When a project owner is reviewing a project and find a task marked as Complete Pending Approval and review to find the task needs to have more work done on it, but they are not one of the approvers, when they change the status of the task to either In Progress or New, the user assigned to the task gets no notification and the task does not show on their My Work. This is because the assigned user still has the checkmark of complete on the task. This makes the project owner take additional steps of having to tag the assigned person to let them know they have to click the "not done yet" or unassign the person and reassign them to the task. Why is this feature important to you - This causes confusion for the project owner and if they forget to tag the assigned user or do the unassign reassign steps the task will be delayed. How would you like the feature to work - When the status of a task is changed from Complete or Complete Pending Approval
Hello, We encountered an error while deploying the Single Page Application built on the Adobe I/O runtime. Please refer to the following error message: ✔ Built 4 action(s) for 'commerce/backend-ui/1'✔ Building web assets for 'commerce/backend-ui/1'✔ Deployed 5 action(s) for 'commerce/backend-ui/1'✖ Deploying web assets for 'commerce/backend-ui/1'› Error: Your socket connection to the server was not read from or written to within the timeout period. Idle connections will be › closed. If anyone else experiences this issue during deployment, please suggest
Can we set the format of a date field(standard or custom or Calc date field) to YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss.fffZ on a report using advanced text mode? I see only below field formats available under advanced options. The one I am looking for is not available by default. Can someone please advise on this?Currently we are trying this on a report the normal way, later we want to integrate AEM with Workfront to auto-populate this field from AEM. will there be any issue or impact later with this integration on this field formats? TIA!
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.