Product Communities

Currently breaking down hours or expenses of certain categorisations against a project or task are challenging. Typically an integration needs to be put in place, to pull data aggregate it and write it back, this increases cost, latency and encourages data to be extracted and viewed from outhr solutions.  Have the ability to write a query such as the External look up field, as a value (not a selection), that is triggered to run an update as and when that custom data form is updated would significantly enhance reporting flexibility and deliver greater insights. 

Hi guys,in AEM it is possible to create technical accounts and use them for integrations:https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-learn/getting-started-with-aem-headless/authentication/service-credentialsWe would appreciate having the same opportunity in Workfront. These type of users have a clear advantage in terms of maintenance and security.Especially in conjuntion with the Workfront AEM Native Connector we are facing the issue that the user being used for the Fusion Workfront Module connection has to coexist in AEM. This coupling including the named disadvanteges in terms of maintenance and security are a risk for the production environment.As a workaround we are now forced to use the Fusion Authenticator module in order to work with technical accounts.

When editing an approval (task/project/issue) it would be nice to be able to reorder the stages rather than remove and add back in.

Description - The CJA Audit Log under Tools is a good feature, however, it is difficult to retrieve and analyze usage with a date range that spans more than one day. This is because only 200 rows of data are retrieved with each scroll and the Download feature does not asynchronously retrieve and download all data. Since all data for the date range must be manually scrolled/loaded into the UI before downloading, it is time consuming and difficult to analyze data offline for (as one example) a week date range which has more than 9,000 rows in our case. Why is this feature important to you - Needed to download and analyze data offline. For example, would be used to identify power users of the application so I know who to invite (of my 80 users) to a power users forum. How would you like the feature to work - After clicking download, the app should asynchronously download all data and make the file available when ready. Current Behaviour - Unfortunately, it only prepare

Description - A Project's Issue has Status options including "In Progress" and "Closed".Why is this feature important to you - Awareness of the Status is crucial to the project for User Group A but not crucial for User Group B.How would you like the feature to work - It is preferred that changing the current Status of an Issue can be allowed only by User Group A.Current Behavior - Any Contributor to the Project can change the Status of any Issue in the Project. After looking through this with Support, and no solution, maybe a possibility is creating a View for User group B, a view that does not show the Status.

Description -Why is this feature important to you -How would you like the feature to work -Current Behaviour -

Description - Increase Workfront object's (project, task, issue, program) title to be full screen width across top header and wrap so can see the full title without mouse hover over. Why is this feature important to you - The object's title field is by far the most vital piece of information on an object.  Our titles can be rather long when we have a prefix for the team, title/short description, year, and work type.  And because we prefix many names the same, when the screen is standard size, all you see is the prefix which is not enough.  Users must hover over the title and wait to see the full name. How would you like the feature to work - Workfront's object titles should span the full window length AND wrap if longer than window width so the full title can be seen without a mouse hover over.  The other header information such as percent complete, assignees, status, etc should be in a row UNDERNEATH the title.  This would also allow for more ro

DescriptionAllow us to create Access Levels that have the same benefit of an Administrator by granting them View access to all records across the instance, but allows us to limit their ability to modify, create, or delete records. Why is this feature important to youWe have a number of accounts that are designated as service accounts. To protect our data from being inadvertently modified or deleted, we have to create a custom view-only Access Level that allows the service account to read records but not modify, create, or delete records. This means we have to spend a lot of time ensuring these service accounts are shared on all the relevant records in our instance. It would save a lot of time and energy if we could create Access Levels that allow an account unlimited read access, but limited write/delete access. How would you like the feature to workEnable an option on the Access Level editor to grant "Admin View Access" which would allows accounts using that Access Level to view/read

This seems like a no brainer, as it adds no value to the Marketing team to see the GUID of all the synced Lookup fields from the Dynamics CRM integration with CRM.So, to see an actual value, well, it makes 100% difference in the product.

Description: The Awaiting my approval widget is ALMOST really useful. It would be even better IF it contained proof deadline information. Why is this feature important to you: Many of our users, especially Legal and Compliance rely on Workfront to conduct asset reviews. Part of their requirements are a means of prioritizing their work. In it's current state, this widget does not provide that ability. How would you like the feature to work: I would like an additional column to be populated in the middle of the widget with proof deadline information and for the proofs to be natively sorted in deadline order. This will help our proof decision makers prioritize their decisions.  Current Behaviour: It doesn't exist. It currently has the entry date with no explanation of what that date is, which is confusing to customers.  For what it's worth, I would also like to see a proofs I need to review Widget with the same access and prioritization functional for folks w

Similar to Teams and Slack (@channel, @3664304) , the ability to have @project  and the update goes to all the users on the project team.  Individually entering in users names is time consuming and people get missed quickly. 

Description -  Would like to be able to turn on and off different notification types for specific projects.  It would be great if we could manage it through Groups and have the notification settings apply to a project to which that group is assigned.  Group notification settings only work for the people in the Group, but we want them to apply to anyone who submits a request to a project queue.  Why is this feature important to you - People working the requests and tickets in the queue want to be able to make Update comments on submitted requests without the submitter getting notified. How would you like the feature to work - Similar to custom statuses set at the Group level, it would be great if we could have the notification settings for a Group apply to any project that is assigned to that Group regardless of whether or not the user is in the group.Current Behaviour - The only way to turn off or on notifications for this project would be for me to do it

Description - we would like to know how many attributes that have been ingested into AEP is actually in use for segment creation. Why is this feature important to you - it will let show the value of aep to our client and/or control the need of data ingestion How would you like the feature to work - we would like to consult the aggregated number of attributes that has been used in segment creation in one place in AEP. Additionally would be great to see the breakdown among the tables and  the breakdown among attributes activated into the destination and those that are not. Current Behaviour - we can access the segment one by one to extract this data, which is very time consuming

A new home workspace widget that displays specific reports or dashboards based upon setup by a system administrator, would allow users that primarily work from reports or view dashboards to more effectively use the home workspace.  There are several executives, financial analysts, and auditors that login to our Workfront environment primarily to run and view reports/dashboards.  It would be more user-friendly and easier to train these types of users if all of the reports or dashboards that they need could be viewed and run from a "My Reports" widget. Ideally system administrators could use specific folders or tags to indicate which reports should appear within the "My Reports" widget by role.  That way if an executive logged into Workfront they could see a targeted list of reports or dashboards.  This would also provide a larger list of reports, as there are only so many pins that can be added to the top menu. Today as a system administrator, I either have

Allow system administrators to customize where the Quick Actions direct the users within the My Projects widget.  System administrators would also need the ability to hide/remove certain quick actions that are not in use at their organization.  This feature would be extremely helpful in streamlining regular project updates for users, so that they could jump right to specific areas of their projects to make changes all from their home workspace. Today the Quick Actions only allow the user to "upload a file", "edit a project custom form", "add a new project update", or "add a new project task".  If a system administrator could modify or add quick actions, then a user could potentially open a status update form, add a risk to a project, or run a project report.

Currently if you delete a feed it remains in the feed list with the status deleted. I appreciate you can use the filters to filetr by active. However it would be good to be able to clean up the list with the ability to permanently remove from the feeds list.

Description - The new abilty for admins to add columns to select widgets on the homescreen helps customize the information that the user is seeing, without the user making the adjustments themselves. Currently, once the System Admin adds columns to the "My Projects" widget, users must manually go to their widget and toggle on the columns and reorder them in "views".  There is no way to bulk add additional columns to their widget. Why is this feature important to you - Adjusting what a select group of users sees on their home screen ensures that each user group is getting the right information they need to do their job. Our users love the new home and widgets, and customizing what they see helps improve training and user adoption.  How would you like the feature to work -It would be great if this could have the same functionality as assigning a view on a report, and it is automatically loaded for anyone with that layout template.  Please upvote (like) this

It is unreasonable that the Smart Assignments feature is a default and not optional.Resource Managers are unable to readily locate users with specific roles to assign to tasks. When assigning each batch of tasks, RMs must often type out the entire name of the user before the user is recognized by the system. In many cases, there are only a few users with the appropriate role who can be assigned to specific tasks—RMs are spending twice as much time pulling up the correct user and the lag for populating the assignment is inordinately long given the simplicity of the action. Smart Assignments needs to seek the role specific assignment first, with the ability to opt-in using AI for assigning.According to our resource managers, assigning has become troublesome and they have created the workaround of closing out the project they are setting up, refreshing, and then setting up assignments. Sometimes that helps and sometimes you need to spell out a full first and last name then wait up to 30 s

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: When moving an asset/folder via the Move action, we want this page to sort the folders alphabetically, instead of by creation date. The creation date sort is confusing to users as many do not know when a folder was created, making the desired folders difficult to find in the list. Use-case: Users should have the ability to sort while using the Move functionality Current/Experienced Behavior: Users can move asset but no feature to sort folders alphabetically it is last modified Improved/Expected Behavior: Users have ability to sort folders alphabetically  Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMAACS Customer-name/Organization name: Epsilon Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

 Is this "Refresh" button functional under any circumstance? IIRC there was an iteration of Marketo where you actually could refresh a personalized view of an email. Which was extremely helpful e.g. when you changed an email script and needed a refresh on the preview. Nowadays you have to redo all the steps that led to this preview. It would be great if that button were in fact functional.

Description - We would love to see calendar capabilities where you can go into a calendar and click on an item, then a summary would open up where you could take action on that item - like what happens in the old My Work/Home view where you could select Calendar then see all of your objects due each day, then click them to open a summary. Alternatively (or in addition) we would love to see that calendar functionality added into the new My Home experience or whatever work management capabilities are coming in the future.  Why is this feature important to you - We have many creatives and visual learners/workers who cannot work as efficiently through large lists of tasks. We benefit highly from seeing a calendar view with objects due. Being able to click into those items and take action (rather than how calendars currently function where you can just click the object then have to click a link to go to it and leave the calendar) would be super helpful. This functionality has alre

HiDescription - There’s a need at DNB Bank to allow publishing/adding Project to the company folder without have full admin access. Today only full admins can add projects to the company folder.Why is this feature important to you - Based on how the project structure has been made up using folder for different business areas there is a lot of over-head put on admins to just structure projects created by business practitioners.How would you like the feature to work - Allow non-admins to save projects into company folder and its sub-folders.Current Behaviour - Non admins cannot save projects into the company folder. RegardsMarcus

Hi Team, We have a requirement from a client, that they want to reuse the configured webinars on AEM or some other portals to avoid reauthoring the same structure on the website to drive traffic. Currently, there doesn't seem to be a way to expose this data using some API or if it is there, then I did not find any documentation.Thanks,Amogh

Currently, every time an expense is logged, the user must manually add the custom form (see image below). This additional step can often be overlooked, leading to inconsistencies and incomplete data entry.I suggest a feature within template settings that allows users to select a default custom form for expense logging. By doing so, the selected form should automatically be applied whenever a new expense is logged.Questions related to this topic:1) I have a custom form for Expenses. I can add it to... - Adobe Experience League Community - 5056692) I have created custom expense forms that I need to... - Adobe Experience League Community - 467492

Sometimes I have a need to copy an issue in order to create 2 or more issues because we allow our requestors to select multiple services within a single request, but each service is managed by a different team and therefore the issue needs to be split so we can assign different project owners. From within the Issue, I click copy to: Then I get this screen and select Copy Issue I submitted a support request because I noticed that the Issue Path on these copied issues was not copying over, and I was told that by using this copy method, it is just copying the info on the issue but it doesn't use the Path that you normally use, and this is a system generated field and there isn't a way to override it. If I want the Path to show, I would need to submit a new request rather than use the "copy to" feature.  My support tech recommended I submit this idea to the Innovation Lab.