Solved

I'm using RTE with Coral UI Multifield, and I'm having an issue with it. It's working fine in local AEM 6.4.3 instance but it's throwing following error in another AEM 6.4.3 instance on saving dailog. The field dosen't support FoundationField#setName Anybody else having this issue?

Is there a way to make individual values in a drop down unavailable once it is selected?  Example:I have 1 drop down list with names (Black Widow, Captain America, Hawkeye, Hulk, Iron Man, Thor) set on global.This list shows up 5 times in 5 drop downs If 'Iron Man' is selected in the first drop down, it becomes unavailable in the following drop downsThis is just an simple example, and I know this could be done using a switch case, but in my actual requirement, I have roughly 100 items over 3 dozen drop downs, so that would not be something feasible. Is there something I can do? 

Hi, Our current project has AEM 6.1 in production with SAML authentication handler for user authentication. Also it has single site to serve for WEB, Mobile and Tablet (mobile responsive site). Currently client wants to move to OAuth. But during migration , want to keep both SAML as well as OAuth for same site. i.e. if user access page1 on WEB do SAML authentication while when page1 access via Mobile do OAuth. Please suggest whether its doable in AEM 6.1 if yes, any solution approach.

Hi, We’re trying to extract all tntIDs for users from Adobe. Once this information is received, we intend to append additional customer attributes data and upload to target to create custom audiences. Given this case, can someone advise on how to retrieve all tnt IDs? Regards,Sri

Hi folks, I was struggling for a while to figure out how to apply some sort of order (sort) for groupings. My objective was to be able to group a task report by Planned Completion Date, and then ensure that the grouping was displayed in a logical sequence when the report was run (e.g. the oldest Planned Completion Date in the first grouping). Here is the text mode snippet I used; however, you ALSO HAVE TO have the Planned Completion Date field as a column in your view, and it needs to be sorted (first, and ascending).group.0.groupdatesby=DYgroup.0.displayname=Duegroup.0.notime=falsegroup.0.valuefield=plannedCompletionDategroup.0.valueformat=atDateAsDayStringgroup.0.namekey=plannedCompletionDategroup.0.linkedname=direct Hope this helps others who have run into the same issue.Cheers.Nick

Hi - Is there a way to pull a list of Target users for my organization and how frequently they use the solution?

Hi I'd like to do the validation while saving content via inline editing. Could you please share if it'd be possible to do so and how? I'm using AEM 6.2 Thanks,Vijay

Hey Community, Was wondering if any one ran into this issue where one person is in one activity and is working on a few experience and another person who doesn't know the other person is in the same activity working.  The last person to save it keeps their work while the other loses their work that they did.  Anyone know a way of preventing this outside of just communication between the users?  I have not seen anything in Target that would let you know that someone is in an activity currently so it will prevent you from changing it from another user. (Almost like a checking in/checking out state, of the activity being used.)  Would save my team a lot of headaches in the future. Hope that was clear.Thanks.

Hi Experts, I was working on one activity that was already live and reporting suite was Adobe Analytics. I had to change the experience name from "A" to "B" which I did, after that I saw two experiences in analytics report(workspace) and their was the discrepancy in number which i thought will go after some time, but today when I checked I am only able to see the new experience. Please help me.

Hello, I'm looking for a way to run a multivariate test on a SPA page.  I know the VEC won't work for this situation, but has anyone else had luck with a different solution?

i have a technical question , you can address it when the time is right. in At.js versions 1.8 and before the tag use to include the name of the mbox = target-global-mbox by default. but for at.js 2.2 and above has removed the need to add target-global-mbox as a mbox variable. Would you know why

Hi Team, We are performing the A/B test on a page considering control as the winning version from last test, so the variation is as follows :- Control - Winner from last test Challenger - New design oneGoal metric - Increase signupsNow the above two variation has the same design(sticky CTA on top) pointing to two different URL's1. URL - is external link which we are tracking through UTM2. URL - internal link where we have the registration CTA by clicking on which it takes to registration page in different URLWe want to track the exit to registration page now in both the experiences

I'm a bit new to Target and trying to build some guideline docs.  Can anyone point me to a 'best practice' on when to choose a regional mbox over global mbox?  

While testing my personalization activity, I've created test mboxes and parameters using Adobe.target.trackEvent(). After doing this several times, I want to reduce the clutter (excess mboxes and parameters) that appears in my audience rule settings. How would I go about deleting the mboxes and passed parameters that I no longer require? Also, does there happen to be a limit on the number of mboxes that I can pass?

Hi All,I am using mboxOverride.browserIp for validating the geo location activity. Currently we are planing to upgrade the at.js version. In the new version 'mboxOverride.browserIp' is not supporting. Can any one help me on this?Thanks,Hariharan S

Hi All, I want to load custom contexthub store on basis of some condition and for that, I have used apply method while registering the storeCandidate. The issue here is that I am getting "no suitable store Implementation found for ...." if condition fails. Is there any way that I can prevent these error from coming ?Sample Code:- contextHub.Utils.storeCandidates.registerStoreCandidate("VariableName","contexthub.storeName",0,function(){return false};); Error message -- No suitable store implementation found for type: contexthub.storeName

Thousands of students are assigned to an specific admissions counselor. However, that counselor has left and we know how to reassign all of those students to a new counselor. What's the easiest way to search and replace a value in the Marketo database?

We have a secure account area for visitors signed up to our business, and within that interface we have multiple mboxes hosting BAU messages and various third party advertisements.  The content of these individual mboxes are managed by different teams who need access to publish only in those particular areas. Theoretically I don't see why we couldn't pass different at_property parameters at an mbox level rather than in the 'global' via targetPageParams(). We already use getOffer() and applyOffer() for those mboxes, so I figure we could pass this new param along with all others, and change the value according to the correct property. My concern is that this involves a single 'page' (this is an SPA) having multiple mboxes , and therefore Property tokens, associated with it. Would there be issues when configuring activities and attempting to set them live for these individual mboxes with bespoke permission levels? Does anyone have any experience with this use case

Hi, I am new to content fragments models and using the Adobe link https://docs.adobe.com/content/help/en/experience-manager-learn/getting-started-with-aem-headless/chapter-2.html I am creating the same however I am facing one issue that after performing step 5 - d from the above document I am not able to find the Cloud configuration option within the cloud services tab and there is only one option to select Cloud service configuration. Can someone please suggest what might be missing?Note:- Using AEM 6.3 version with latest SP installed. Also in the adobe documentation link given above there is one video on the page within which there are 2 properties shown within the Cloud Services tab but I am only able to see one. 

Good Morning. I am fairly new to Target and I just set up my first A/B test. The test goes to different web pages to see which takes the user deeper into our site. Its working fine for my Control page but the Conversion Rate is 0 on my test page although I have selected the element I chose for my conversion goal. I am not sure why this second page is not showing conversions on the report. Any thoughts? Thank you,

Hi Everyone, We are looking to talk to people for about 10 minutes about reviewing files (Proof HQ) in Workfront. We'd love to talk to you next week if you're available! Thank you! Elissa

Hi Experts, We have requirement to pull the report for downloaded assets on Asset Share common page. Are there any option to pull the data via Query for downloaded asset user wise? Thanks~S

When RTE plugin is added in a multifield in aem 6.4 with service pack 2 I am facing facing below issue when submitting dialog.But when added the same dialog in 6.4 without service pack it is working fine. Has anyone come across same issue? Is it because of service pack 2?

Apologies if this has been raised before - happy to be redirected to an answer. We are in the process of implementing Target. Part of the implementation is to add our offline (CRM) data to the product. We have successfully loaded our data to Customer Attributes and allocated an alias which is then mirrored into the SetCustomerID rule within our Launch environment. Whilst this has now been in in place for 7 days (so latency isnt an issue) we do not see any data being passed to our Analytics and when we have set up a Target Audience for specific identifiable users the users are not seeing the experience. Question 1 - Is there a debugger I can use to login to our site and see the Customer Attributes loaded? I can see the SetCustomerID output (below) but not the data being loaded personid.:id:######### (Our known customer id used in the load)as:1 Question2 - Does anyone have an idea why the data would not be being passed to Target and Analytics? 

Currently, we have the folder structure listed below. When I set up a permission group Group A with access to Company A, for this to work I have to include read access to the Team and Clients level folders. The issue I'm having is when a new folder for Company D is added to the Clients folder, Group A ends up having visibility into the newly added folder. Is there a way to avoid this? Team folder (top-level folder in files)ClientsCompany A Company BCompany CCompany D (Newly added folder)