Workfront

I have created a request intake form in Workfront and I need to enable the public sharing for the form for the users who doesn't have access to workfront.Please help !

I have 2 users with the same access, home group, teams, layout template, etc and one can see the canvas dashboard we set on their layout template and one can't. What am I missing? 

Welcome to our Monthly Hot Topics Blog!   First things first – if you’ve seen our Hot Topics posts in the past, you may have noticed that this update is posted as a Blog instead of a Discussion.   Why did we do that? Our hope is to make our recurring updates and our series updates easier for you to find, AND to provide a way for any “non-Sys Admins” to receive notifications when we share upcoming events and hot topic posts.   How will this work? Each month we’re going to post a new Comment with all the latest events, news, and posts to (hopefully) make finding updates much easier.   To make sure you get the latest, you’ll want to subscribe (and make sure to encourage your Group Admins and Power Users to subscribe too). How do you do that? Click the 3 dots in the top right of this post. (It’s called the Kebab Menu! Just learned that today!)  Click Subscribe.  Then relax and wait for the notifications to come in every time we add a new comment to this

We have several large request queues that are not published.  We realized that the permissions functionality* varies slightly for the entered by user between non-published and published request queues, and we prefer the way it works on published queues. Is there anything I need to watch out for if I switch our queues to "Publish as Help Request Queue"?  Nothing else in the queue needs to change. Thanks for any advice! * detail --For published queues - the entered by user gets specified permissions based on project settingsFor non-published queues - the entered by user gets Manage permissions

Hello, I have a .csv file that feeds into my scenario and creates several new records in Salesforce. The output of the "Create new record in SF" is the ID for each newly created record.When I am testing this out:1 .csv file with 3 rows of data goes in.3 new records with ID numbers are created in Salesforce.I want the next step to be simply to create a new .csv, again with 3 rows, one for each contact and also showing the new ID number for each record. I cannot figure out where I am going wrong! The best I can get is creating 3 x csv files but I can't seem to combine them all into one place. Any help is much appreciated. Thanks CSV is parsed producing 3 bundles from the 3 rows in the file. 3 x SF records are created based on the data. Trying Array aggregator but 3 operations are still produced  I want to aggreagate the 3 operations and include some data (first name, last name) from the original csv file but additionally have the ID number from the SF module

Hello, I have a PUT Custom API module that shares a project with a user's manager once an issue is converted in the scenario.  However, I'm having trouble preserving the original, preset list of teams/users a project was shared with (from Project Template Sharing). Is there a way to preserve the existing information and simply add the manager to the 'shared with' list? Modules used:  Thank you for your insight! 

If any Workfront Admins are attending the PMI Global Summit 12/12 - 12/15, please advise. Would love to create some networking opportunities where there are any gaps in schedules and sessions during the run of the conference! https://pmiglobalsummit.gcs-web.com/

Ready to take your Workfront reports to the next level?  Watch how @skyehansen  & @nathanjo1 offered two perspectives on creating EXISTS statements that can make your reporting dreams come true.  During this workshop, they shared technical know-how and practical applications to show us how to use EXISTS statements to build smarter reports.  Did you miss the session? No worries! You'll find links to the workshop recording and slide decks with resources below:  Workshop recording  General Slide Deck PDF  Skye & Nathan’s presentation deck  Don't forget to sign up for their Ask Me Anything session in December.  [Workfront AMA] The Wizard’s Workshop: Demystifying Textmode & EXISTS in Workfront  And if you’re wondering about when to use EXISTS statements, we had some great analogies shared in the chat:  Think of Workfront as a hierarchy of relationships. I like to think about it like the game "Six Degrees of K

In Workfront, users have the ability to download the proofing tool, which displays all associated comments. Is it possible to upload a PDF that contains comments and have those pdf comments automatically populate within the proofing tool?

Hi everyone! Back at Summit in March, we heard about non-labor resources coming to Workfront. Has anyone seen any updates on this? It's a key thing for our team as we manage a large equipment inventory, and I'd love to streamline our systems. Thanks!

Hello!  I have Document Version report that filters by pending decisions and a specific active stage.  This was previously working fine, but now it is not removing the proofs where a decision has been made on the stage. As if its no longer considering that stage inactive. The stages are typically unlocked, though if no more decisions are required and its moved on to the next stage, it should still not be pulling in. What am I missing? Thank you! 

I have a document report which shows all files within a task folder called Final Files. However on occasions our team is creating subfolders and the report is not picking up any of the files that sit within those subfolders. The subfolder names are not consistent and therefore unable to pick up with an AND: for an additional folder name.I am currently using this text mode which works if the files are sitting directly under the Final Files:EXISTS:a:$$EXISTSMOD=EXISTSEXISTS:a:$$OBJCODE=DOCFLDEXISTS:a:documentID=FIELD:IDEXISTS:a:folder:name=Final FilesEXISTS:a:folder:name_Mod=eqprojectID=XXXXXXX Any help would be really appreciated.projectID_Mod=in

I got this message when trying to log onto my Workfront dashboard:Error 500-006The page isn't loading correctly. Please check your login and try again. If you continue to get this message, contact customer care and reference: EIM Instance Id 002e0042-b4f4-11f0-9e9b-ebb14ea46d7fDoes anyone have any idea how to resolve this?Thank you.

Hey Workfronters! It's me, Teddy, your unofficial (but very determined) Workfront mascot-in-training! I'm on a mission to earn my official Adobe Workfront sponsorship - one task, tip, and treat at a time. ❤️ This Halloween, I'm putting my best paw forward to show I've got what it takes to keep projects running smoothly --even with pumpkin lattes in hand and spooky deadlines lurking around every corner.  Now its your turn!Share below: Your favorite Workfront tip or trick that helps you slay your daily monsters (a.k.a. overdue tasks).Or your Workfront-themed Halloween costume idea - the more creative the better!Help Teddy prove that teamwork (and a little fluff) makes the dream work! 🐻✨ Stay pawsitive and keep your projects on track-or-treat! - Teddy the (Aspiring) Workfront Mascot @kurt_jones @cynthiaboon @lesliespier 

Hello, I currently have a subgroup within a main group. I would like to remove this subgroup from the list and turn it into a main group. Is there a way to do this?

Has anyone tried swapping review tasks for approvals for light users? The main issue I see with this workaround is that My Approvals in Home doesn't show due dates or bucket approvals by due today, past due, etc. which is critical for our heavy users who may have 10+ approvals in their queue if we moved review tasks to approvals. We could pull a report to show due dates, but then users wouldn't have the decision buttons in the same location as the due dates and we need the process to be as streamlined and straightforward as possibleIf you have other workarounds for having light users complete tasks/approvals, please let me know.  Background:We're trying to find solutions to the high cost of the new Workfront license structure for standard licenses since the majority of our roughly 100 users have worker licenses to mark done with their part on tasks with only 3 PMs. We were told our costs would roughly triple if we have the majority of our users move from worker lice