Build better products with our product team
Description - Why is this feature important to you - This can help me in doing comprehensive analysis.How would you like the feature to work - It would be great if we can capture a list of report suites where a given segment is currently used.Current Behaviour - we can see the segments which have been created using a particular report suite but can't pull out list of report suites which have used a particular segment.
It would be nice to have function to limit number of program member. In case of having event with limited registration number, we have to always watch if program member (event registration) exceeds limit or not. Automatically limiting registration number is very comvenient.
Description - It would be so helpful if there was a way to quickly tag all users on a proof in a comment. Right now, you have to manually type out their names on each comment and sometimes, I have proofs with 10+ people on them and need to enter several comments for all of those people. Why is this feature important to you - It would help save time. How would you like the feature to work - Maybe if you type something like @2008903-users or something similar that can pop-up in a dropdown after that as an option, Workfront would auto-add all of the names on the current proof to the comment. I'm a UX Designer so always looking for ways to optimize my time! Current Behaviour - You have to manually type each person's name and then select it from the drop-down on each comment.
I want to be able to have the custom form before attach document and other default fields. I also want to make some of the default fields required for request submission.
Currently it's not possible to add an OR Condition to a Rule. The Conditions are automatically AND linked. I had some cases where it would be great to add two Condition and link them OR. By the moment I do it by Custom Code.
Was asked by the Customer Support team to contribute here, so we are!TLDR: Lack of ability to change Calendar or Board owners has incapacitated some workflows across our organization. Deactivated Calendar owners cause access errors, furthermore when at admin access level. Calendar entries are missing when copied. Calendar functionality is a key value prop for our organization. Forced to re-activate a terminated user so we can continue work. After days of troubleshooting, let me explain inability to transfer owners on objects has created a perfect storm, and a security concern. I tried to be as detailed as I can be so those reading can understand the rabbit hole we've fell into. From the beginning:Complaint comes in saying events are missing from an org-wide Calendar (that a recently deactivated admin had created / owned). Adobe Help articles recommend I copy the calendar, re-Share, and delete old calendar, but this created further issues.Here's a snippet of the support ticket:"Update.. I reactivated the user and then that (deleted) Calendar re-appeared automatically, even though I had deleted it. Maybe this is because the deactivated user was also the owner of the Calendar, and also had system admin access? I went and logged in as the re-activated user to try and Share ownership to myself but was not able to resolve this way. Reason being is the Calendar owner is not a value users can change. Any chance that someone could help change ownership of this calendar over to me?I’ve left the user re-activated with only a “Reviewer” access level so your support team and mine can still see the Calendar in question. I’d like to re-deactivate this user as soon as possible of course. To recap.. there are a few issues:1. Copying a Calendar that was created (and therefore owned by) a deactivated user who was previously a system admin may not copy “clicked-in” events properly. Any events manually entered into Calendar will not show up after it’s copied. Any user trying to copy the Calendar will get a generic value on left called “Calendar Events” with none of the “clicked-in” objects populated, whereas any values from existing objects, tasks, and tickets will populate as intended, causing confusion. 2. In instances where system admins create Calendars and then are deactivated (leave org). This can cause a security concern as the remaining admin must reactivate the departed user to retrieve the lost work, leaving access available to a terminated employee. This could be avoided by allowing admins (or users) to change ownership of Calendars after created, without having to copy them, and in turn lose events. (Also for Boards)3. Admins cannot restore deleted Calendars from Recycle Bin (for themselves or others). However Calendars created by admins that are deleted will still show up for the other admins, and their Shared users. One admin believes it’s deleted, but the other admin and users still have access to the “deleted” calendar."Unfortunately the issue persists. Not sure what the big issue with changing ownership of an object is? In a time of economic turbulence, layoffs are more common, meaning ownership changes are frequent. Sadly, the issue has adversely affected the approval rating of Workfront with colleagues.
Description - Users with access level restrictions that don't allow them to access documents in Workfront (upload/download) should not be allowed to download pictures that are attached to updates (at minimum). Ideally they shouldn't be able to add pictures to updates at all as well.Why is this feature important to you - We have users with restricted access to documents. I cannot enable pictures in updates for entire population because of that group, because we consider pictures to be documents. Which I don't believe it's crazy given Workfront is largely used in Marketing and pictures are commonly shared assets. How would you like the feature to work - Users with restricted access to documents shouldn't be able to download pictures attached to updates (at minimum). Ideally they also cannot attach any pictures to updates themselvesCurrent Behaviour - despite restricted access to documents users can upload pictures to updates and download them if someone else has shared them this way. From our perspective this is a gap in Workfront system design. Pictures are documents.
Our team would like to be able to see object level data of the object that is identified in our Typehead fields from submitters. For Example: If a submitter tags a project in our typehead field, we want to see what that Project's current status is in Workfront. Essentially the business case here is if the tagged project is still in progress our team should not be working on this new request. This acts as a check for us while removing the manual look up in the system.
I've had clients that would have liked to reference a unique reference number for Portfolios and Programs. However, Portfolios and Programs do not get a reference number like a Project or Issue gets upon creation.
Description - It would be helpful to have the ability to create a segment that could compare the values of two different traits and qualify a customer based on if the values match.Why is this feature important to you - the rub with AAM traits is obviously the number of possible data values for some traits--and having to build those out. Think date values or could be SKUs or anything else that has a lot of values.eg. let's pretend I work for an airline and I want to compare the values of traits 'next flight destination' to 'customer's home airport' in order to discern if the Customer's next flight is departing from their home airport or returning to their home airport. How would you like the feature to work - just need to add the option to reference an existing trait name , an operator of 'matches' 'does not match' and then the other trait name to compare to.Current Behaviour - this doesn't exist and I assume there is no development work happing on AAM but hopefully you can add this to AEP
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.