For any email deployments that should be an automatic option to restrict the send to a certain number of emails. For example, if I have a list of 50,000, I may want to spread it over 2 or 5 hours. It would be nice to even allow for a waiting period: send 50% of the list, wait x number of hours, send the rest.
I would like the option for leads to unsubscribe with one click, rather than sending them to a form to fill out, and then unsubscribe. I’ve been told by support that there is not a way to do this. Does anyone know of a workaround? Or, is this something that others would also benefit from that I can request for an upcoming release? Thank you.
We've been looking for a way to look at open rates by lead owner. I'm not aware of any way to do this, but it could be valuable if a few different way.
Is there an easy way to create an email template that doesn't use any graphics and appears as if someone just sent it from Outlook? I'm not seeing any plain templates.
Just cloned a program as a test, been having lots of issues since August release. When I went to delete the program I got an error saying that the forms in the program are being used by the landing pages in the program. I know, I just created this program & now want to delete it.Please eliminate this error step & re-allow programs to be deleted as they were.
The search bars in Marketo are very helpful. They would be even more so if there were advanced search options similar to what Google has through out Marketo.Then narrow your results by... Smart List filter text Flow Step text Landing Page Content text Email Subject, Body texts
I'd like to be able to see the percentage of opens and/or click-throughs by day of the week. We have several campaigns that are trigger-based with emails being sent after an activity is performed. Currently I know I can select a specific day, but if we could see overall the rates based on the specific day it was sent, I think it could be helpful. I know that Google Analytics has this feature to some extent, and I could build it out by exporting to Excel, but a straightforward visual representation would be immensely helpful.
Add a same program drop down under 'Clone To:' for local assets when cloning them in a program. It is time consuming to have to find the same program when you clone.
I discovered an issue today pertaining to tag types.The tag value cannot be deleted unless you delete the entire tag type pertaining to the tag values. We have over 10 unused tag values that were created by mistake and in order for me to remove them I need to delete the main tag type. Not only cannot you not delete the tag value but if it's linked to any program you need to go into the program indivudally to update the value to the new one.I propose the ability to update multiple programs at once if there is a change in the tag values. I also think there should be a away to delete the tag values that have no porgrams tied to them. Additonally there needs to be better tag documentation on the community for advanced admins such as myself.
Sales Insight includes functionality to send a Marketo email to multiple records, which is great. However, we would like to limit who has access to this functionality based on role in Salesforce. It does not appear that this is possible (if it is, please let me know how). This is somewhat critical for us. Otherwise, anyone with a Salesforce login can send mass email.
It would be great to have a working marketing calendar view. To see which emails are scheduled for which day with time and the amount of effect members. And even to subscribe people to it. It will also help to avoid several mailings on the same day.You can see scheduled batch campaigns, within a few clicks in the Campaign Inspector. However it does not show the date-time the batch is scheduled for. Also it's difficult to add recurring batches, but you don't want to see regular triggers.
It would be interesting to filter discussions by users' experience and questions regarding Marketo's partners.
I am getting this error, does anyone know what I am doing wrong?
I'd love to see some additional columns in the summary views such as date submitted and date closed - it would help when trying to look through the multitude of cases.Would also like to see category, sub cat and originator (occassionally our team members originate but have us on the CC)
We have a newsletter that goes out to different segments. Can we create a report that shows the links clicked in the newsletter by segments? Also see open rates, soft bounces by segments?
Support just confirmed to me that Marketo does not support conditional tags in templates. You can add them into emails through the designer and they work fine, so it's odd that you can't just have them in the template and not have to copy and paste every time.Given how Outlook renders HTML, conditional tags are very useful to ensure that emails look great across all email clients.
A flow step that sends the next cast of an engagement program for a specific lead. Useful if you're linking programs that have smart lists, so a lead doesn't have to wait until the next cast. I'm trying to expand the Engagement Program functionality of the "lead won't be sent the same email twice," but instead making it "lead won't be suggested a piece of content she/he has already downloaded." Background: We don't want to send a nurture email about a piece of content if the lead has already downloaded that piece. Given resource download is our primary method of lead capture, a lead has already downloaded AT LEAST one piece of content manually from our site. We would also like to have multiple different emails promoting the same piece of content (use case: different chapters of the same big book of B2B marketing).How I was hoping to do this: Smart lists to record the leads who have already downloaded each piece of content. Separate program for each lead nurturing email. Smart list filter = leads who are NOT in the "already downloaded this content" smart list. Engagement program stream linking the appropriate program for each weekly cast. The problem I'm encountering (as is Jason B in this discussion) is that if someone has already downloaded the piece of content, they're just skipped for that cast. It doesn't jump to the next piece in the stream, they just run through the program and nothing happens for that cast. A "Request Next Cast" flow step would solve this problem.Best,Edward UnthankMarketing Operations SpecialistYesler
Before the most recent release, proofs would use the advanced assignments from the default of PHQ. Now it will only use the default under WF, settings, review and approve, and you can only pick one default role for everyone added to a proof. I would like to see these advance assignments be chosen by the user and not one overall default. Our designers have to flip each person from Reviewer/Approver to just Reviewer if that was their previous designation in PHQ. (most of our VIP's are reviewers only so they don't hold up a time line) The VIP's are on the proof so they know what is happening and can add their 2 cents in if they want.-- I hear you saying just make them a report for that, but they are more "see picture, do picture" kind of people.
Is it possible to be given advance warning that the name of a country will be changing in front end reporting?This would help analysts, and data engineers prepare for data coming in under a new country name (which breaks any looks ups).
Migrated from Alpha--UX Flow of this page needs a little tweeking so the user knows where they are at all times and what they’ve completed. Leave rule components where they are when creating conditions (events, actions, etc) so the user knows where they are at all times. Just expand and close the window.
I'd like the ability to use a template to generate projects with dynamic durations based on urgency. The way it would work:Create Project from TemplateSet Complete Date (deadline)Set Start DateTask Durations are proportionately reduced based on the available days between the start and end datesThis would allow us to maintain a single template for all projects of a certain type that we can compress when we have an urgent version of that project.
It would be great if we could make the input field for the Evar/Prop string wider so you could see more characters. This would save time as it would reduce the number of times a user would have to spend moving the cursor further to the right and help make it easier to spot typos that are off screen when a user opens up the Set Variables component of a particular rule.
It seems like when you simply sort a column alphabetically in a report or view, you should see A displayed values before B values, etc. However, I’ve been told many items are actually sorted by the database value not the displayed value. For example, "Job Role" is sorted by the underlying value of "ROLE". Evidently this is consistent with other sorting, such as Status columns (which sort on the value and not the display name). When I sort, I expect the sort to be based on what I’m seeing not what is hidden.
I think it would be very handy to be able to "freeze" the top line in a project similar to how you freeze a row in Excel, so you can always understand to what the data in the column pertains at a glance, without having to scroll up/down to see what that date represents (as an example).
These two core rule types do not function differently. Also, these rules do not work without turning on the regex even when i'm not using any regex to match the url.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
