Product Communities

It would be really helpful to be able to add in the constraints of the form fields in form fill activity. I am trying to clear out a certain field on records if it is populated from a previous form fill but not from a new form fill and is therefore no longer relevant, and there is not a way to do that since the data value change does not always happen for this. 

Our daily work requires the functionality to duplicate a proof in Workfront Proof in the same way as we were able to do in Proof HQ. It's a very important feature for our graphic designers to be able to duplicate the proof following our client's comments, so that they the client can't access our internal comments.

Description - The Gantt Chart option to view in Quarters is for calendar year quarters. Would like to be able to tell the system what our Fiscal Year quarters are and have that as an option in the Gantt Chart.Why is this feature important to you - The Quarterly view is useless to us, because it causes too much confusion to those viewing reports who are accustomed to fiscal year quarters rather than calendar year quarters.How would you like the feature to work - Add an option to view by Fiscal Year quarter or have the current "Quarter" option use a company's Fiscal Year quarters instead of defaulting to calendar quarters.Current Behaviour - The "Quarter" option in the "Fit All" dropdown on a Gantt Chart defaults to Calendar Year quarters. There is no option to view Gantt charts by Fiscal Year quarters.

System Admins can customize the project header to show 5 fields per layout template. A number of default fields (editable and non-editable) are drop-down options but Project Sponsor is not an option. The editable fields Project Owner, Status, Percent Complete, and Assignments can be added to the headers in layout templates but not Project Sponsor. For our company, Project Owner and Project Sponsor are both important project points of contacts for users since Project Owner equals the Project Manager and Project Sponsor equals the Client Services Contact on the project. I would like the Project Sponsor editable field to be a drop-down option to use for one of the 5 fields in the project header of layout templates.

Description - Our users would like the ability to add all their comments onto a proof rather than posting them individually to reduce multiple notifications.Why is this feature important to you - Our users have recently installed Workfront Teams App and all the comments come through as a proofing notification, and there is no way to change the settings for proofing notifications in the app. How would you like the feature to work - Ability to add multiple comments and mark-up before posting them, one notification goes out with all changes required plus the ability to change the Teams App notifications for proofingCurrent Behaviour - Comments have to be posted one-by-one in Proofing, which can generate a huge amount of notifications, although this can be reduced in email it does impact notifications that go through to the Teams App 

Description - Since the production for fast release (24.2 - February 15, 2024) it is possible to customize which columns are available for users in specific new Home widgets using layout templates. This is also possible for custom fields. Unfortunately in the column title the field name, but not the label is displayed. Why is this feature important to you - As we are using an internal name for the field name to have better possibilities to distinguish between similar fields, this new feature is not usable for us.How would you like the feature to work - Use the label / display name for custom fields as column titleCurrent Behavior - field name is shown

Description - For widgets on the home screen it is possible to change the amount / number of shown items. Unfortunately this setting is not remembered and switches back to the default value when leaving and going back to the home screen.Why is this feature important to you - Because it's always an annoying click.How should it work - Save the setting to e.g. a cookiecurrent behaviour - setting is not saved / remembered

Description - many of my plan users would like to be able to see the task number when inside of a task. This could be in the Overview area or in the Header field of the task. It would be good if there was an option to turn on or off via a Layout template.Why is this feature important to you - when creating tasks for project schedules it can be difficult to know exactly where a task is located in the project plan when switching back and forth from the task description view and project view or even clicking on a task link from Home. This is especially troublesome because when going to the project's task view (project schedule) the page always loads to the top of the project schedule.How would you like the feature to work - I would like for there to be an option to turn this feature on and off in the Task Header field within the user Layout template.Current Behavior - cannot add task number to Task Header field from Layout template or anywhere in the Task Overview.

Currently, the only way to control the date that a task can start is to have an enforced predecessor that is not marked complete until the day before you'd like it to start. We'd like to have the option to prevent a task from being started until a certain date, regardless of predecessor status. This could be accomplished via task constraint or a separate setting.

Description -Why is this feature important to you - Customer would like to perform the bulk update of metadata related to documents. For eg Asset OwnerHow would you like the feature to work -  There should option available in document based report to bulk edit the required fileds.Current Behavior - Project based report has edit option however document based report don't have that. Is there any roadmap to bring this feature in upcoming releases?

Description -Idea#1Why is this feature important to you - To prevent people logging time to a closed task or projects that are 100% complete and improve project data quality for resource management  How would you like the feature to work -Create a functionality to prevent people from logging time to a closed task/100% complete task in Workfront.Create a functionality to prevent people from logging time to a complete project in Workfront.Create a functionality to prevent people from logging time to a unassigned tasks or project in Workfront.. Current Behaviour -resources can log time against closed task, projects and unassigned task  Idea#2Why is this feature important to you - Improve project data quality and time management  How would you like the feature to work Create a functionality to prevent people from assigning resources to a Parent task in Workfront.Create a functionality to auto-populate percentage complete for each task based on the time lo

It would be great if I were able to tag a user or team when adding a comment/update while approving a request in the new home page. At the moment, I have to click into the request to its updates page, and then I'm able to add the necessary tags. To smooth out the process, I'd love to be able to tag someone without needing to leave the home page. Screenshot below of the comment box I'm talking about. Right now I seem to only be able to put in plain text - if I type the "@" symbol, the usual list of users/teams does not appear.  

Description - Since the launch of the new UX any archived activities are shown by default - we have a lot of archived activities often with similar names for different iterations that we keep for data or code retention. Would it be possible to ensure archived tests are hidden by default to make it simpler to see which are the recent/relevant activities?We can go in and filter out Archived tests, but this setting is not persistent and so becomes cumbersome having to do it each time I view a list of activities. 

Description - Have the duration populate off of entered start/end date instead of putting a start date and then putting a duration for an end date when you have a specific end date.Why is this feature important to you -  I have specific start and end date(s), in order to put the exact end date I need I end up having to guess the duration for it to populate in the system.How would you like the feature to work -  I would like to put the start date in as 2/26/2024 and then put the end date as 3/1/2024 and the system automatically populate the duration of 5 days.  This is a simple example where it's easy to know the duration between a Monday through Friday but when you are looking over the span of weeks/months having to populate the duration for it to have a specific end date I always have to guess the duration for the specific end date I need.Current Behaviour - you put in the start date and the duration and it populates an end date.

For those customers which use IP GeoIntelligence and the Digitial Envoy monthly feed, would it be possible to expand upon the dimensions available?  Checking the Digitial Envoy website, there is a new indicator (for identifying if an ip address is residential or buisnes) available with their feed and this is something our marketing folks are very interested in.  Also, would zip+4 be available versus just the 5 digit zip?

Description - Option to change the size at which things in project documents are viewed. Why is this feature important to you - I would like to be able to tell what an image looks like without having to click on it.How would you like the feature to work - Just like it does on Windows when you're in a folder with images and you click on "view" and have the options "small, medium, large, extra large."Current Behaviour - No options available that I am aware of. 

When working with delegations it is very difficult to see what has been delegated to you in the new home experience, you have to know the name of the task/request that has been delegated to you to see it.  This feature is important as it is used in the "current" home screen experience but has not be transferred over to the New home experience. As this feature is used by people who are going on annual leave and delegating work items over to other people they need a seamless view of the new work they have been given. It is not best practise to have to switch you home view just to see your delegated work items.  In the My work, My tasks, My Requests widgets there should be a filter on there for "Delegated to me" & "Delegated by me" This would allow users to easily see these work items as they would in the "current" home experience.  In the current behaviour there is no such filter in the New home experience, users have to switch back to the "current" home

Description - We are working on uploading or data transferof  Adobe Analytics reports to Tableau. For this purpose we are using json response of the report in which the column headers ( i.e., visits, Page views etc.) and row field values ( eg., Page url's) are missing. Without these values and headers the report which we are getting from the json response is meaningless.Why is this feature important to you - For data uploadsHow would you like the feature to work - We are expecting all the fields and column headers to be present in the json response.Current Behaviour - missing Column headers and row field values

Team and I are supporting a privacy project and ask was to see what data is going out to what vendors. A support ticket was opened.  We limited the request down to just data feeds in not getting a reply. Ticket was escalated and engineering followed up with "From our back-end we don't record the headers per data feed ID.Best thing to do would be to have an admin review these feeds from Analytics UI -> Admin -> Data Feed to get this information" We know the data is available through the UI, but a programmatic way to get all this data is needed.  

Description - Currently, there is no way to manage the component curation of multiple Virtual Report Suites at a timeWhy is this feature important to you - If a company has multiple VRS for each geographical market, it is impossible to curate all the VRS in one go hence it is time consuming and cumbersome 

Description -We want to have secondary identity to stitch multiple dataset.Exdata set 1 > identity 1, identity 2, identity 3data set 2 > identity 1data set 3 > identity 2use case - we want create segment in CJA where segment created with data set 3 applied in data set 2 should show results.we are looking to integrate data set 2 and data set 3 using dataset 1 as a pivot and get results. Why is this feature important to you -With wasting data engineering teams time we want to accomplish the stitching within the tool  How would you like the feature to work -seamlessly  Current Behaviour -One identity used to stitch the data 

Description - my team and myself have trouble at times telling if something is a subtask or sub-sub task with the single main task caret and then just the simple indent of subtasksWhy is this feature important to you - easier visibility of what is a subtask and what main task it belongs toHow would you like the feature to work - something similar to a bulleted/numbered/lettered list.  If it's a main single task, have nothing, when it becomes a main task with sub task(s), have the main task be a caret and bullet and then the subtask be a different kind of bullet/symbolCurrent Behaviour - single caret on the main task and then small spacing that something is indented when a sub task.

Currently the only way to pull any reports on a deactivated user is in the filters. Prompts do not 'see' a deactivated user. This creates a real issue for reassigning work when someone is suddenly gone from the company or when pulling hours reports for time periods where a user previously was at the company. If there were a checkbox that said "Include Deactivated Users" or something along those lines, that would be perfect! If you like this idea, there is a very similar one that could also be voted on: https://support.workfront.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/360001215374-Predictive-Text-For-Deactivated-Users-in-prompts

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Make button order in Author UI consistent Use-case: Our users want to work quickly in AEM. However, the inconsistent button order of the menu bar slows them down. We got a number of complaints by our authors regarding the Author instance UI: Authors are irritated by the changing order of buttons throughout the DAM and Sites. Current/Experienced Behavior: Each content type (image, video, pdf, webpage, CF) changes the order to some degree. Our authors understand that different asset types may have different options, but the position of the buttons changes too much for them. Improved/Expected Behavior: Our users work mostly with Sites and expect the DAM button to be at the same location, which is hardly the case. See screenshots. We would move the options that are available to all types in front and the specific ones at the end. That should ease their situation. Either this comes by default, or our admins can configure the ord

I attach user custom forms for the user account that have information that they might not want others to see e.g. calculations of efficiency ratings so if we could set it to private that only the user can see forms attached to themselves and only administrators can deal with it on reports.