Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
In ACC in the nms:recipient table there is auto-increment primary key (long type). However, our internal architecture requires a string(36) primary key to align with CDP and downstream integrations. Data has already been loaded before, and initial campaigns have populated related logs and references (all nms). Changing the nms primary key type in place (from long to string) would probably break references across other tables. The challenge is to resolve this issue without any data loss. Is it possible to update it in nms:recipient and all reference tables without destroying current database? If not - I was thinking about creating custom recipient data schema (with string PK) and defining new custom dedicated logs schemas and new target mapping and keeping existing data schemas for historical use. After that route new deliveries to new dimension. I've never used a custom solution, what things do I need to remember?
We would like to have the possibility to put conditions on a whole e-mail fragment, on the fragment it self. Meaning when creating a Fragment it would be nice to be able to create conditions on how the fragment should behave when been used. It could be conditions like, who should be able to see this Fragment and not bases on attributes. This can be done today but with coding it directly in the Fragment code. A interface to do this would be very helpful and create a new dimension to the use of Fragments. Yes this can be done inside the template when dragging the fragment in, and setting the condition on the container - but it we do this in the fragment itself this is then pre defined for all user that used this fragment - and is working directly out of the box when dropping the fragment into a template. This is really helpful if you are creating a library with pre defined Fragments with pre defined logic on the fragment. Then the end user can just use them without setting the right
What is the difference? 🙂
We’re in the process of migrating to the new Marketo email editor and running into several major challenges with Fragments. Wondering if others are experiencing the same issues: Extra/unwanted code showing up in live emails (not just in draft or preview).Editable text blocks only allow the first sentence to be updated.Images included in fragments are not linking properly and need to be re-attached.Content elements defined as editable are not actually editable in practice.Excessive spacing between modules, even when templates are structured cleanly.Rendering issues across Outlook, Gmail, and iPhone where spacing and formatting look broken.Has anyone else encountered these problems, and if so, have you found reliable solutions or workarounds?
How can I set up an Azure Blob storage connector using SAS method and renew credentials every 24 hours? I can do that manually in powershell, but then need to always do that manually. There has to be an easy way to configure that. I am just not sure where to look.
Hello Everyone Good morning!!! We have a usecase to create custom folder path while exporting from AEP to S3 bucket.The export folder path should be Year >> Month>>date. Is there any way we can extract Year, Month and date from "/%EXPORT_TIME%/" or "%DATETIME%"?Thanks in advance. ThanksSheejo Rapheal
Hi all,My first time posting and I hope someone can help.I've been uploading CSV's successfully for months; however, due to a change in data processing I had to make some user deletions (advised to remove them from the upload sheet and re-process the file). This was generally successful and no major issues; however, at some point a purge request was submitted separately to remove a user instead of removing the user from the CSV upload and this seems to have had a knock-on effect and now stopped any and all CSV files from going through.Error Message when trying to upload any CSV file "A CSV file is currently being processed. Please wait for the processing to complete before uploading a new file" The last time a file was uploaded successfully was 14th July and every previous upload shows a red triangle and the status of "History removed because of user purge request"Has anyone had any similar issues or know how to resolve this? Should I now purge all users in the "User Cleanup" grou
I know apps and libs are immutable. I know I can write in /content and /conf. But I'm unsure what other folders can be written into during deployment.Thanks!
Hello Team, In AEM as Cloud service, if logged in users(content-writer/editor) crosses a schedule users, then Cloud will provide multiple author instance?I know about publish instance. But, wanted to know about author instances in AEM as cloud Service setup. cc @arunpatidar @santoshsai @lukasz-m @briankasingli Thanks in advance
I'm using AEMasCloud, I have a specific group for authors(xyz-authors) where I have added workflow users to its group, Now, for its members, when they select a page I want to hide Manage publication option from sites console, also, hide Request publication and Request unpublication options from Page information tab. I have tried the below code. "set ACL for xyz-author \n deny crx:replicate on /content/xyz \nend","set ACL for xyz-author \n deny jcr:read on /libs/wcm/core/content/sites/jcr:content/actions/selection/managepublication \nend"It is not working.
Hi Everyone, The encryption keys in Adobe Experience Platform (AEP) have expired. We created new encryption keys with the same names as the expired ones and deleted the expired keys from AEP. Since then, our existing incremental data flows have started to fail.The public key has been shared with the team responsible for posting encrypted source files to Azure. We create data flows via API using these Azure source files, specifying the encryption details through the publicKeyId.We attempted to update the publicKeyId in the existing data flows using a PATCH request. Although the request returns a 200 OK response, the update does not appear to be applied correctly. When retrieving the dataflow details, both the old and new publicKeyId values are still visible.Could you please advise on the correct method to update the publicKeyId in existing data flows? Is it necessary to recreate all data flows using the new publicKeyId?Additionally, how long does it typically take for expired keys
profile_snapshot_export maintains the snapshot ids for last 10 days of snapshot. is it possible to query a specific record say based on ECID and find all the respective other fields values in each snapshot id over period of time ?
Has anyone tried MAP dataType for cased other than IdentityMap ? There is no example of data on adobe documentation. Usecase is ingested the ArrayOfObject data into MAP then create audience based on specific index on the ArrayOfObject. This is the sample data, which I want to try ingesting into MAP dataType[ { "date": "2024-12-29", "modelName": "PRP_TRIGGER_1Y_14DLAG", "model_score": "0.13705813884735107", }, { "date": "2025-03-15", "modelName": "PRP_60D_LAPS_1Y_REV1", "model_score": "0.65977203845977783", }]
lets says idenitymap in profileSnapshot has multiple ids. example below[uid -> "{(NULL,2910574950527,NULL)}",mid -> "{(NULL,43602939,NULL)}",gid -> "{(NULL,ef481128-3054-4846-b23c-8f7650ce025b,NULL)}",vid -> "{(NULL,cookie_id_ef481128-3054-4846-b23c-8f7650ce025b,NULL)}"]1) now if we query the select * from profileSnapshot we get one each row per profile having its own complete indeityMap.see the output in the attachment2) when we use select explode(idenitymap), * from profileSnapshot it would create 4 rows , one for each identity inside the idenitymapsee the output in the attachment3) how do i write a query where each seperate row for the same profile returned as single row instead of multiple row ?see the expected output in the attachment
Hi, We are creating an email templates using building blocks options and whilst drag and drop of structures, we couldn't add 1:1 and n:n columns in same container. Is there a limitation we need to know? Thanks, Kind regards,Kiran Buthpur
As of now, we can see the custom alerts possible through admin console. However, we dont see any option to create a custom alert using any one bounce. We need the column details like who is bounced back, reason for bounce, journey name, timestamp. Can we able to use custom alert option for the above requirement. if so, please share the step by step Navigate to the developer console.Add events to your project.When adding events, specify the type of events you're interested in. If you want notifications for events in AEP, choose platform notifications.Further, select the specific event types, such as failure or success.When we follow the above steps, i can see standard alert only. how do we create custom alert for a dataset which we created ourself.
Hi,I am working on to create content fragments with editable fields in our emails and observed that when we use any image url and url field in a fragment, AJO add an extra space character before and after the provided value.This extra space breaks the images and links in some of the email clients.Does someone know any workaround this issue?
Hi Community,I’ve noticed that in Adobe Target I can no longer select Adobe Analytics as the reporting source, whereas I used to be able to in the past. I can’t figure out what has changed or how to restore this option.Could you please help me understand how to fix this?Thanks in advance!
Description - Would love to see Adobe Journey Optimizer enhanced with an AI-based feature that detects and alerts on journey anomalies—such as sharp engagement drops, routing errors, or unexpected delays in customer progress.Why is this feature important to you - Improves real-time decision-making by flagging issues before they hurt the customer experience.Helps marketers optimize journeys proactively rather than reactively.Reduces manual effort in monitoring complex journeys across channels. How would you like the feature to work -This could be powered by Adobe Sensei and visualized through a heatmap or alerts dashboard, with potential tie-ins to Adobe Analytics and Workfront. Curious if others see value in this? Would this help your teams optimize journeys more efficiently?
DescriptionAdobe Journey Optimizer (AJO) currently provides a "Copy Technical Details" option in the UI that exposes key configuration parameters of a journey in JSON format. This includes important fields such as throttlingRatePerSec, entryConditions, and activity configuration. However, this JSON is only accessible manually via the user interface, and not available through any public API. Why is this feature important to youWe are building governance and automation processes to validate AJO journeys before and after publishing. One of our goals is to enforce configuration standards, such as ensuring that the throttlingRatePerSec is always set to a specific value (e.g., 500).Having API access to this technical JSON would allow us to implement:Automated pre-publication approval workflowsRegular audits of existing journeysCI/CD-like governance for journey configurationWithout programmatic access, we are forced to rely on manual inspection, which is time-consuming and error-prone.&n
Description -Currently, when we need to make changes to a published journey in AJO-such as updating content templates or making workflow adjustments-the only option is to stop the journey, duplicate it, edit the duplicate, and then publish it as a new version. This results in multiple versions of essentially the same journey and adds unnecessary steps to the update process.Why is this feature important to you -This feature would greatly improve workflow efficiency and organization. Having to duplicate journeys for every update, especially for routine changes like updating content templates, leads to a cluttered workspace, makes journey management more confusing, and increases the risk of errors. A simpler process would save time for teams and ensure a cleaner, more manageable environment.How would you like the feature to work -After stopping a published journey, I would like the ability to directly edit and re-publish the same journey-including making changes to content templates-witho
Current Behaviour - Currently there is strict rule when it comes to capping. If we set up capping ex. 5 mails i one month then 6 mails in that month would not be send. Why is this feature important to you - service companies (telco, banks) have churn campaigns. Often they would like to ignore message capping rule in order to retain customer How would you like the feature to work - simple checkbox with text - ignore capping rules in journey properties
Description -Why is this feature important to you - to quickly and easily see what has been sent to our customers and to continuously check and monitor it How would you like the feature to work -similar to the email channel, I can store a seedlist in the channel configuration Current Behaviour - it is not possible to do this in a simple way, we make do with including individual profiles in the segment which we then exclude from the contact rules, all very cumbersome
Description - Increase the maximum number of nodes allowed per journey Why is this feature important to you - for companies with multiple brands (including different sending domains) and complex journeys, this will allow journeys to be condensed into one true journey, allowing customers to flex brand in line with real-time behaviour whilst continuing the journey. We are also limited by the number of journeys allowed, this will reduce the number of journeys that we require whilst streamlining journey management. How would you like the feature to work - For the cap on number of nodes within journeys to be increased, to allow more sophisticated journeys and the encompassing of more channels. Current Behaviour - We are capped by the number of nodes and have to split out programmes across multiple journeys
We have in several occasions experienced that created content in a email templates disappears - and needs to be redone. This is extremely annoying and time consuming for the content producers. There are several theories what this happens, some from you at Adobe also. Like: there is several tabs open with the same template open, or there are several users working on the same Journey and/or email at the same time. To avoid this kind of situations where content actually disappears, we would like to have a features that lock the content to the user that has it open - and changes can not be done to the content by other than one user at the time. When open and try to change content when it is open already a warning message should appear and inform that this template/journey is blocked be user xxxxx. You can take over the editing role by overtaking the role. What we would like is basically a build in control feature that makes it possible for just one user to make changes at th
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
