Product Communities

As the subject says, it would be really useful to have the ability to query against the Company endpoint, by UpdatedAt. This would reduce the number of calls required to validate changes, and extract the data for reporting needs.

Description - A better summary for each certification, with every part needed to study explained Why is this feature important to you - I want to get certifications and t's difficult to beginHow would you like the feature to work - GoodCurrent Behaviour - There is not really a good for study certification system @alnavarg @heku_ @_manoj_kumar_  @yansu  @3176980 

Description - Feature that will allow you to see all products with more than x number of categories.Why is this feature important to you - It would simplify the catalog management process we currently use.How would you like the feature to work - There should be an option in the UI to configure a collection based on the number of values in the categoryId so I can ask Target the following: "Show me all products with 5 or more categories"Current Behaviour - Nothing like this currently exists. Mihnea Docea  "Committed to Excellence" |  Technical Support Engineer  |  Adobe  |  1 (800) 685-2950 #3 #2 #3 |  docea@adobe.com

Recently we migrated assets from one instance to another. Although we could redirect landing pages, we could not redirect all of the PDFs that were hosted in one instance. I feel that it would be a great tool to redirect assets like the LP redirection page.

hi, We have accidently connected a Salesforce sandbox instance to Marketo and it is now NOT possible to rollback.   If there is any rollback steps or help to disconnect Salesforce from Marketo it will be very helpful. Talked to Marketo support and they are saying we need to get a new instance, but that comes with a caveat of lot of issues.   Any Suggestions/product features that can help us to resolve this unwanted Salesforce integration? Help appreciated.   thanks -Sree   Getting a new instance will cause these problems which is not desirable at all. 1. Lead Database records, field-level data, and activity history are not copied2. CRM configuration is reset.3. Users are not copied.4. CRM Field Mappings are removed except for standard mappings and must be set during the Field Mapping Stage of CRM sync initialization.5. RCA (Advanced Report Builder), SEO, ABM (Target Account Manager), and Web Personalization information is not copied. These settings would need to be

Description Ability to Combine Audience Library audiences with activity-only audiences and attributes   Why is this feature important to you We have default audiences that we use to help gate campaigns to their proper areas. Because these are part of the audience library, we have an explosion of 1 off audiences   How would you like the feature to work When Combining Audiences for an activity, it would we great to be able to select from the audience library, activity-only library or create a new container with custom attribute and combine them all together.   Current Behaviour You can combine audiences from the library OR create an activity-only audience customized by Target attributes

I often have figures with complex labels, often with long-winded names based on variables I have no control over.For example, in this chart (screenshot below), the main metric is Revenue, but there are filters for marketing tactic and a note on the non-standard attribution model (it can get worse than this!). The figure labels in the legend are concatenated from all elements. But the chart is already titled with what it's showing, so I edit all the legend labels to remove the redundant factors for simplicity and clarity. E.g.,  Revenue [Marketing Tag Tactic: SEM] (U Shaped | 90 Days) --> SEM Changing the metric, model, or filters causes the labels to reset to the full names, so you have to edit them all again - it's very tedious, especially when the UI response is slow, like it is today.Can we have a master legend configurator in the chart settings that allows you to choose which component elements to include or omit in the figure labels? E.g. [ ] Metric[ ] Attri

Description -It would be beneficial when converting an issue/request from a request queue to be able to adjust the start date right away along with the duration. Why is this feature important to you - Our maintenance queue takes in 200-300 requests per month and one project manager (me) is assigned to make sure that work moves along in a timely manner.  The resource pool contains 10-15 people to draw from so we can't assign the request out.    The start date is tied to the start date of the project which will always need to be manually edited unless it happens to come in on the first day of the project. How would you like the feature to work - When converting the request queue item to a task, bringing up the date range boxes as fillable would be beneficial.  At the end of our project period, the potential to make an error assigning to the wrong month is higher because the date defaults to the start of the active project.  The only way I've figured out

I would like to be able to retrieve the custom form values (parameterValues), given a custom form section (categoryParameter) name or ID.  Currently, the API allows for Custom Form Names to be retrieved from a given Custom Form using the following api call:/proj/[projectID]/search?fields=objectCategories:category:categoryParameters:parameterGroup There is also an, unsupported, api call that allows for a "data dump" of all values in a given custom form, using the following api call:/proj/[projectID]/search?fields=*,parameterValues I would think that the "parameterValues" object would need to be added to the "parameterGroup" object.{ "data": { "ID": "", "name": "", "objCode": "PROJ", "objectCategories": [ { "ID": "", "objCode": "OBJCAT", "category": { "ID": "", "name": "", "objCode": "CTGY", "ca

Description - When you are in reporting it gives you the option to display currency or number fields with a $1,234.00, but when you actually run your reports or views, it will show CAD1,234.00. There should be an option, even in the Project Preferences, to set a symbol that can be used so it can match what options are available. Why is this feature important to you - It is cleaner looking and more efficient.

As an integration developer, I would like to include Marketo data in various large-scale big data projects. However, there is no reliable way to pull a list of all lead records in Marketo. Marketo's own response to the question historically has been to determine the oldest part of an instance and run rolling 30-day exports of records. This is resource-intensive from both Marketo and the end-user side.   The more reliable option in such cases is to make a Smart LIst that contains all records, then reference that Smart List ID in the bulk export. That requires that marketers set up a Smart List ahead of time—but it makes little sense when there is already a Smart List that does this (consistently ID 1014 across instances).  However, the system-generated Smart Lists cannot be referenced with this export.   Would it be possible to update behavior so either System Smart Lists are compatible with Bulk Lead Extracts or supplemental additions solve the problem of pulli

Description-Multiple request would be linked to one project.  This way all requests that have been worked can be tracked but multiple projects do not have to be opened for similar requests that may come from different departments or different timeframes.   Why is this feature important to you - Shows accurate representation of requests received and work completed through reports.How would you like the feature to work - Current request and project linkage would allow for multiple requests to be tied to a project.Current Behaviour - Only 1 request can be tied to one project.  If an additional request for similar work within the scope of the project is received that request has to be made a separate project or closed.

Description - It would be beneficial to have a Text-mode option when adding custom fields to a card on a Kanban board.Why is this feature important to you - There are many project-level fields which would be beneficial to include on a card, which are not available in the existing list of Task fields (when adding fields to a card). For example, I would like to include the Project Owner Name, however only Project Owner ID is available in the list. Similarly, I would like to include the Portfolio Name, however only Portfolio ID is available in the list.How would you like the feature to work - Include a Text-mode button within the Cards section of the Configure menu. This button would open a Text-mode window where the user could edit the fields being included on the card. In my above examples, I would be able to reference project:owner:name and project:portfolio:name. This could function similarly to the Board Intake filters which already have this functionality (a Text-Mode option when cr

When setting up a custom object, you can only link it to a field that is visible to users or to the Marketo Id of either the person or the company. As for integrations it adds a level of complexity to maintain a repository of the unique Marketo Ids as mapped to the externalCompanyId it is a bit strange that this other unique field for the Company Object cannot be selected as a link field. Using a field that is visible to users as a link field introduced the possibility of user error in tasks like list uploads to mess up the data and lose the connection between your CO records and their Company record. For use via the API it would be a great help to be able to use the externalCompanyId as link field.

Description - The new filter experience does not close once a selection is made, like the legacy filters, views, and grouping do.  Why is this feature important to you - It's impractical for this box to stay open and to have to manually close it, when we are used to the better functionality that exists in the legacy experience.  How would you like the feature to work -  Close after selection is made and for this to be fixed prior to Views and Grouping being rolled out.  

Description - Many modern project management tools have real-time editing to allow for synchronous collaboration. The asynchronous nature of Workfront makes it more clunky to use compared to other tools on the market. Real-time editing would all for more streamlined and efficient project and workflow management.Why is this feature important to you -  Real-time editing would all for more streamlined and efficient project and workflow management.How would you like the feature to work - real-time editing to allow for synchronous collaboration.Current Behaviour - No such real-time editing in Project and workflow management.

Description - Allow for the addition and/or removal of columns in a view without requiring the creation of a static view.Allow for the addition and/or removal of columns in a view without requiring the creation of a static view. This would add efficiency to the project management process. This feature should allow for the modified view to be reverted to the original or saved for everyone.Why is this feature important to you - This will remove the dependency of creating static view each time.How would you like the feature to work - Allow for the addition and/or removal of columns in a view without requiring the creation of a static view. Allow for the addition and/or removal of columns in a view without requiring the creation of a static view. This would add efficiency to the project management process. This feature should allow for the modified view to be reverted to the original or saved for everyone.Current Behaviour - We need to create each time a static view.

Description - Upon selecting a project table column, enable the selection of an optional value to filter for.Current state of creating and saving a static filter in order to restrict view values is cumbersome and unintuitive when compared with the flexibility of active filtering enabled in other project management tools (Excel, MS Lists, Notion, Clickup, etc.). Being able to actively filter for desired column values would increase efficiency. This feature should allow for a temporary filter to be reset to the standard or saved.How would you like the feature to work - Upon selecting a project table column, the selection of an optional value to filter for should be enabled.Current Behaviour - Current state of creating and saving a static filter in order to restrict view values is cumbersome and unintuitive when compared with the flexibility of active filtering enabled in other project management tools (Excel, MS Lists, Notion, Clickup, etc.)

Description - add the ability for notifications to be sent when issues or tasks are approved, irrespective of task/issue status (ex: from “New – pending approval”, to “New”). Why is this feature important to you - our users rely on automations, especially notifications, to let them know when work is ready for them, and we use approvals throughout the project lifecycle, which are milestone points after which work can then start. It would be good to be able to not have to go manually ("refresh feed") for this one instance, and instead still get push notifications.How would you like the feature to work - enable the option to have notifications be turned on for instance or group level, for all status changes related to approvals, not just for "resolved" statuses.Current Behaviour -Currently, the available notification can only be sent if the status is set to resolved (similar to from "resolved - pending approval" to "resolved"). If an approval pathway is kicked off at another tas

DescriptionThe personal time off feature on Workfront is confusing from a design aspect and continually causes problems with teams trying to mark time off if they have a partial day off. The time off section says [Name] will be gone:✔ All dayFrom __ __To __ __ If you uncheck all day, then the system asks for your working hours. This is where it gets confusing to users because it still looks like the system is asking for your time off since it shows like this: [Name] will be gone: □ All dayWorking Hours:From __ __To __ __ The "working hours" is in a lighter grey color and appears small, so your eye is drawn to the [Name] will be gone, so it looks like that person should fill out the time they are gone, not the time they are available and working. Why is this feature important to youThis feature is important because even after training folks and bringing this to their attention, it still continues to cause confusion. This makes it challenging to know how acc

Say you are looking at a Marketo LP in a browser at the URL:go.marketo.com/some-great-contentand you want to find that LP in your Marketo instance. It would be nice if you could enter the URL of a Marketo LP ("go.marketo.com/some-great-content" in this case) and Marketo would return the Marketo LP name and location so you could easily find it in your instance.

Even for savvy WF users, creating cross-project task predecessors doesn't exactly come naturally and aren't very easy to remember how to create. When you have campaigns or multi-project initiatives with related dates across projects using the same group of templates often, it's time-consuming to create cross-project predecessors every time in the projects after they're created -- would be a huge efficiency to be able to connect TEMPLATE tasks so that when projects are created with them, the cross-project predecessors are automatically embedded. Cross-project task predecessors are a great feature of WF, but I feel it's under-utilized bc they're hard to create and not able to be created in a more automated way. Having them in templates would be a game changer where you can specify connect X task in Y template with A task in B template.

Such a bummer to have to submit this as i was hoping this was already a thing. We have a group that has several stages of proofing for their projects, and we are trying to avoid the proof owners having to constantly type out a message each time they send a proof. It seems logical that if you can create an automated workflow, you'd be able to create a custom message to go along with it. Even to create, as another user suggested, an automated custom message for each stage of a Workflow, would be a huge time saver. If this is an easy thing for the WF devs to do and for the PM's to add to our roadmap, man that would be great. 🙏

Description - An enhancement to hide the filter or disable the options in the filter.Why is this feature important to you - To hide tasks that are not relevant to the clientsHow would you like the feature to work - As per the descriptionCurrent Behaviour - I created a filter for our clients where they won't see the tasks that we tagged as not applicable. It's working fine in the original setting but now with the new UI for filter and views, they can remove the check mark on the client filter and can already see the tasks that we tagged as not applicable.

Description - The "system updates" toggle should save by object. Why is this feature important to you - Some projects I do not want to see system updates and some I do. I have to swap it back and forth based on project/objectHow would you like the feature to work - when I toggle the "system updates" it should save in that position (on/off) for that object.Current Behavior - currently toggling it on/off for a single object toggles it for all objects for that user.