Product Communities

Description - On a single calendar, you can only add 15 filters/advanced filters and having the option to add more or have an unlimited number of filters would be beneficial.  Why is this feature important to you - We base our calendars off of dates that are in our form(s)  and also by reserved dates projects for dates that are reserved for emails, social posts, slots on websites, etc. Since we are limited on how many filters, we are having to look at doing multiple calendars, which isn't ideal.  How would you like the feature to work - To up the number of filters that you can add to a calendar. Adding in 10-15 more color options, which would then add 10-15 more options to add more advanced items to a calendar.  Current Behaviour - Currently you are limited to only adding 15 filter/advanced filters to a calendar.

This would allow a user to upload a document such as a PDF invoice to be linked to an expense helping to maintain accurate records, as well as allow Finance use expenses as legitimate places to start invoice payments. We will also use this as part of an integration with Open Invoice where the creation of an expense with a linked PDF will create an Open Invoice entry.

In some cases the option "export as portrait/ landscape" would be great! Especially the Page Summary Report looks awful if you do an export. Landscape export would be a great feature! Please promote!

Description - Need audit logs which gives details on when (timestamp) and how many times a profile entered journey and how the profile flows between the steps/conditions/events in the journey.   Why is this feature important to you – To understand profiles flow in Live journey. Scenario : Expecting 100/100 profiles should receive email in a journey, but only 90/100 received ( Live report /global report gives a generic information of the journey results). How to know the exact 10 profiles which got dropped in the journey and what step caused the drop?   How would you like the feature to work - Test mode gives log information. In the same way audit logs should be avialble for the journey for all profiles which are entering the journey.   Current Behaviour – There is no logs available in live journey.

Description - We have integrated Adobe Target with our website using JSON offers.  This works well for us and it is frustrating to find that we cannot use the same approach for Automated Personalization activities.   Why is this feature important to you - We do not want the extra complexity of having to manage different types of activities in different ways.  This is acting as a barrier to our company adopting the the Automated Personalization feature.   How would you like the feature to work - Enable us to use JSON offers in Automated Personalization activities   Current Behaviour - You cannot use JSON offers in Automated Personalization activities

Description - To have a general error setup mechanisn where we can setup the users who should be notified in case of error. Why is this feature important to you - We can create custom action/activity at every stage in AJO journey design. But, it will be repetitive 'in case of error' configuration setup at every step in a journey.  There should be a general Admin setup available which notifies whenever there's an error.   How would you like the feature to work - 1) Create an option in Administration - Error Management. 2) Provide option to setup users who should be notified in case of error in a journey or campaign 3) Trigger email notification when systems runs into error. 4) Can provide OOTB email template or user can configure it.   Current Behaviour - Select option - 'In case of error' for each activity in a journey and define action to be taken.   Thanks, Jyoti

We are an in house creative agency and we have a variety of print vendors. We give vendors requester accounts to facilitate proof delivery. They can deliver proofs into our system and we simply move them to the corresponding existing job in Workfront.What is unfortunate is not being able to hide "All Requests" from requesters. I don't understand the intention of this tab but the result for me, as an administrator, is that it's confusing and people have access to view requests that they should not see. In the Classic environment I'm able to move it to a tab, which is at least something. In the New Experience I'm not able to hide it.Why would I ever want requesters to have access to all requests?

On webapps, the storage activity does not allow you to exclude fields, by default it just updates all data submitted from the front end forms, the way to get around this is to use javascript on both front end (to assign field data to variables) then on back end to manually handle updating the fields you wish to have control over for.   It would be very beneficial for an enhacement to be made to this activity, which allows the developer to uncheck fields to be excluded.

Description - Adobe Campaign Classic should be a open source and an easily available software for beginners to learn and implement what they are studying from the Adobe Solution Partner Portal. I tried various ways to get it installed for the hands on to clear the Business Practitioner Certification exam, but no luck as the questions asked are scenario based, you wont be able to crack them if you dont have the hands on to the software. Why is this feature important to you - This will help me and other users to download use and learn how the look and feel of the tool works.How would you like the feature to work - The software and other required applications to be downloaded from Adobe Website, a tutorial to be made to get it installed and then we can implement the trainings there and then while learning.Current Behaviour - N/A

Description - Allow Analytics to auto-provision read-only access to new users, similar to AEM. Why is this feature important to you - We're expanding our use of Analytics and have a large number of users interested in gaining access. How would you like the feature to work - The first time a user logs into the web UI via SSO, Analytics creates their account with read-only access so they can begin looking at the data. Current Behaviour - Analytics does not provide basic access so all new user requests have to be manually set up.

Description - Global change to the project owner field for *all* projects from one project owner to another project owner while someone is out of the office (or when someone has permanently left the team, etc.) with the ability to switch ownership of all projects to another project owner as needed (when someone returns from vacation or when a new employee transitions into a role, for example).    Why is this feature important to you - Right now the workaround POs are using is to copy other POs on all tickets to give them visibility into the work which means out of control emails that are not helpful or useful 95% of the time.    How would you like the feature to work - I'd like project owners to be able to flip a switch to assign projects they own to another project owner and we'd like the ability to turn it off when we don't need to assign projects to others. Any project owner should have the ability to do this for any other PO to account for someone leaving the t

A user with a Plan license should be able to have past projects show up in search results. Currently a user with a Plan license only receives projects that have been shared with them in their search results. When setting up a new project, a user with a Plan license needs to have access to all past projects to be able to reference those for new project setup and etc. All past projects should be available to a user with a Plan license and should show in search results for a user with a Plan license. Even if the user with a Plan license is not able to access the old projects, they should still show up in the search results so the user can then request access. 

My team and I receive email notifications regularly. A digestible email with Upcoming Due Tasks. I generally take a quick look to make sure I'm on the right track with my projects, however, my eye goes to the most irrelevant information first. In bold, black letters I see the date that the task was created, entered by and the priority, followed by who it's assigned to and the name of the Project. I believe this information could be better organized and designed. I would recommend beginning with the project name and due date in bold black type. Everything could be in a lighter coloured below. Bottom line, the most relevant information for myself are the project name and due date. If I could scan for these two things quickly the email would be most helpful. Thanks!

Out of office replies in updates:Would be amazing if this could be integrated with Microsoft Office and pull directly from our out of office there?

Currently, we are able to create email templates to customize Reminder Notifications, but this same customization isn't available for Event Notifications.    We would like to customize our notification emails, but most of our users work off of Event Notifications exclusively, so being able to customize Reminder Notifications is not helpful. Ideally, we would be able to customize both the subject line and the email content with both out-of-the-box Workfront fields and custom fields. Many of our stakeholder request this because they need additional/immediate context for the task they have been assigned to, and they do not find the default email content helpful. 

Would like to see outbound platform level webhooks - particularly when a program is created or when an Email program is scheduled

Description - Why is this feature important to you - We are a global institution with using Workfront with users all over, and Projects are bound to specific regions and require specific Schedules to be set. We tap in to the Scheduling to enable some automated jobs through Fusion that uses the Schedule to identify Start/Completion dates. Currently when a Project is created by any team member, we are unable to mandate the selection of one of our available schedules. Given that this is an out-of-the-box predefined input, it would be great if we could customize our instance to define which of those fields are mandatory/optional.   How would you like the feature to work - When a team member creates a new project, they are required to complete the Project Settings > Schedule input field (or any other field defined as required) before proceeding.   Current Behaviour - There is no way to enforce the selection of a Schedule (or any other field out-of-the-box) through instance cus

Description - Why is this feature important to you - Because currently, there is no way for an admin to manage these types of filters. Furthermore, no one, not even an admin can see other user's filters. How would you like the feature to work - Add a section in the Setup>Interface area for Balancer, Utilization, and Planner filters. Current Behaviour - There is no current behavior. Everyone's filters are completely siloed and unreachable.

Description - Workfront currently doesn't support Hebrew. as it's a Right to Left language - the proof tools including scanning or reading the text are encoding the character incorrectly.  Why is this feature important to you - we work with this language (IL) and this prevents us from using several proof tools.  How would you like the feature to work - support Hebrew.  Current Behaviour -The proof tools including scanning or reading the text are encoding the character incorrectly.   

Make scorecards available elsewhere in the system. Such as provide the ability to attach multiple scorecards to a project, portfolio, etc. We do not use the scorecard for business case, instead we use it to audit our projects on a weekly basis to give the PM a score on how well they are complying with our PMO methodology/requirements. There are many other uses I can think of, however only have that one business case scorecard to work with. Although the UI could use some improvements, overall the business case score card functionality is pretty good and seems like it could be relatively easy to copy/paste it for use in other areas!

Description - Currently if an issue form is inactivated in the set up the form still remains active on the queue topics of a project. This leads users to continue using that form and creating entries with that form that shouldn't be used.  Why is this feature important to you - this creates a huge governance and system clean up issue. The form was deactivated for a reason, thus it should be not usable on projects if it is part of the queue topic!  How would you like the feature to work - I open on this one, but ideally the user should get an error message when trying to create the issue saying this form is deactivated and contact a system administrator for a solution. 

Currently, if a channel is hidden, its statuses are still selectable in program status picklists, which can lead to major bloating since all channel statuses are now shown in picklists instead of only the relevant channel. It would be nice if these statuses behaved the same way as archived lists - technically hidden from the dropdown but possible to populate by typing in the exact name (for historical reporting, etc).

Being able to use conditional formatting, specifically background/row colors, is very useful in reports. I want to be able to use this for GROUPINGS in a report so I can visually separate the groupings in reports where we have repeated groupings (like different groupings for different teams that may have more than 1 grouping). I don't want the rows within the grouping all a color because that can get busy, but really wish I can add background color to the grouping rows themselves.

Description - There is no way to report on the dates specified in user Schedules. Why is this feature important to you - It would be helpful to have proactive views of the dates identified in Schedules to support advanced, aggregate planned. For example, plotting Schedule dates in a calendar report would help cross-reference when news items should be published. How would you like the feature to work - Much like a Time Off report, allow a report or calendar to list dates in a Schedule. Current Behaviour - As discussed in this Question, workarounds are duplicative and labor-intensive. For any admin with more than a handful of Schedules, workarounds are likely not worth the work.

Description - Make the Boards functionality available for use in Sandbox so we can conduct better configuration testing. Boards is only available in Preview which means all testing must be built and complete in 5 business days before the environment refreshes.    Why is this feature important to you - Would like the option to build out a new system configuration to better leverage Boards. We need the the ability to test over a longer period of time vs the time frame provided for us in Preview.    How would you like the feature to work - same functionality as preview, just in Sandbox.   Current Behaviour - No access to Boards in Sandbox, only preview and production.