Product Communities

Currently comments in proofing documents are one-directional (from the proof to Workfront) and only for added comments. When a comment in the proof is deleted, it is not deleted from the document feed in Workfront. Also, when a user replies to a comment in the document feed, it is not posted to the proof. Both feeds need to speak to each other seamlessly.   In the case of deleted comments in the proof, users are confused when they see 2 comments in the proof, but 8 comments in the document feed. They worry that they're missing key feedback.

Our delivery team has every sku as a task in our instance and we want a way to bulk edit task durations. Right now we have to individually update durations as things change for the due date of those items. 

Would it be possible for Admins to designate certain fields in Project properties as required in order for Project Owners to create projects? Portfolio and Program are very important fields and Project Owners often forget to select them when creating projects. If we could require values in those fields then Project Owners would be forced to make selections when opening projects.

There are several Activity types that are not extracted using the Bulk Extract API. These are: 1. Create Task (create a task in SFDC) 2. Sync Person Update (in SFDC) If there are any errors when you're creating a Task in SFDC they are shown in the Activity log next to the Create Task Activity, the error is normally a response from SFDC. This is the only way to retrieve these errors in any automated way, however Marketo does not provide these in the extract which is very surprising.

Description - Allow the placement of the same field within different sections of a custom form Why is this feature important to you - Display logic can then be put around sections but multiple groups could then use the same field on one custom form How would you like the feature to work - The field will always populate with the same value, but it should be allowed to be placed within different sections of the same custom form. Display Logic would then need to apply based on the section that the field is in. Needs to allow ability to deterine later fields as today Current Behaviour - Can only put field on form once

When you have a large project schedule and a small computer screen, it is very difficult to read our project schedules. There is a lot of scrolling up and down to find logic/task relationships which makes the user experience very frustrating.I am requesting to addition of a "Full Screen Mode" when updating project schedules to allow for more of the schedule to be visible on one screen. This eliminates scrolling up and down and removes the frustration of the poor user experience.

Description -  The Daily Digest of Comments is not useful because it just indicates how many comments on each project.  And the only way to see more is to "See All Notifications" so its not really helping me determine which comments need action.  I want to see the actual comments in the digest.   Why is this feature important to you -It is less important that the email is short and more important that its useful.I want to determine if I need to take action on any of the comments without having to click into each project. How would you like the feature to work - Have the first sentence or two of each comment from that day be in the actual email. Current Behaviour - The email lists the top 5 projects and provides me with the number count on each project. Why would I care how many comments are on a project?

Hi guys, not sure if this is an idea or more a question: But are realtime dashboard available somewhere within AA? I'm not talking about the old "reports" where it was somehow possible but which will be discontinued anyway by end of 2023 but about workspaces. In simple: something that Google Analytics offers where I can see which users are currently on my website/page, from where they are etc.   Why is this feature important to you: to get an realtime overview what happens now, e.g. interesting for big events like Black Friday, etc. How would you like the feature to work: simple and quick 🙂 Current Behaviour: not possible

Description - A schedule can be created and holiday exceptions can be added, but it is very tedious to have to re-add the holidays per year. Also, each country or region may have their own holiday schedule. It would be helpful to have a Holiday Exception setting regardless of the schedule and have it automatically applied to the schedules and user time-off. The Holiday Exception input should provide a way to specify specific day(s) of the month or a rule (2nd Friday of month, etc.).   Why is this feature important to you - Updating schedules for company holidays is very tedious and repetitive   How would you like the feature to work - Add a new Holiday/Time-off setting that is restricted to admins and it should allow me to define the time off by selecting a country/city/region (I would select the level of granularity), and the day(s) or rules to specify the time off. This would then automatically apply to selected schedules.   Current Behaviour - I have to manually set

Hello, A project has been raised by BadSender company about setting email expiration date.see https://www.zerocarbon.email/argumentation/ to get more details. We want to be able to set an expiration date in our marketing emails if this project succeds.As we are using Adobe Campaign, we expect Adobe Campaign to integrate this functionality in a future version.ThanksBest regards,Antoine 

When using a flow filter, for example "add to list" we can 'add choice'.  You can add multiple choices on the filter for multiple actions, but  it only allows for one choice to be added per action.   It would be great if you could add multiple choices for one outcome, for example:   If visited webpage is X AND If UTM source is X Then  Add to list X

Currently, allowing global reporting can only be enabled in an instance's Default workspace. There are however use cases where this would be useful to allow in other workspaces (instead or as well). Taking it one step further, it would be good if a user could select which workspaces to include in a report, so multiple levels of cross-workspace reporting can be enabled.

Description: Tagging in proof comments requires 3 characters, but isn't inclusive of 2 character names like Qi. There's a workaround in the updates section of the project by typing in the notify box, but there is no workaround for 2 character names in the proofing tool. All users may not know what Qi's last name is within the proofing tool to search by her last name as another workaround option.  Why is this feature important to you: We're unable to tag a user in proofs at all, so she's missing important questions directed at her.  How would you like the feature to work - decrease the character requirement to 2 instead of 3 across all tagging features Current Behaviour: There is currently a 3 character minimum. Without 3 characters, we can't tag Qi or any other 2 character names within the proof. Tagging within updates is also difficult if you don't know the workaround and most people give up.

With the new interface, the breadcrumbs for the Images and Files are no longer there. It was much quicker, easier, and more intuitive to have the breadcrumbs as I'm navigating within folders and subfolders and viewing images and files. 

Description -When setting up a project from a request or by using a template, can you make the portfolio and program fields mandatory. Our users often forget to complete these fields.

Description - When a user deletes a task they are not alerted if the task has any documents attached. This results in documents getting deleted in error.   Why is this feature important to you - We store our documents on the task level for ease of use for all those assigned to the task. If the task gets deleted without the user knowing the document was attached, the document gets deleted to. Its very hard to locate the document in the recycle bin since its not listed in the documents section therefore much time is spent trying to determine what task the document was attached to so we can restore that task.   How would you like the feature to work - I would like there to be a popup that either alerts the user that there is a document attached and ask them to confirm deletion or give the option to delete the task but keep the document.   Current Behaviour - Currently no warning is given and the task/document are both deleted without the user knowing if there were any docu

Description - We have faced multiple times issue of data discrepancy because visitor count mismatch. So if visitor X enters activity on Sep 20, 2022 and perform any of goals on Sep 21, 2022 and you are checking report from Sep 21, 2022 you won't see that visitor count in report as user was qualified before but goals count will be there. This creates huge problem explaining to Client/BU. as report will look like: Visitor Conversion 0 1 Why is this feature important to you - it will help a lot to resolve issue of data mismatch How would you like the feature to work - it should be like Adobe Analytics product. So, whenever I pull report User X count should be there if its goals count is there. If visitor have qualified anytime for activity that should reflect in report not like now which considers first time entry only. Current Behaviour - as it is given in description above. @kimenw  @evidana @mihnead @shruti_premkumar @pablo_childe @surebee 

Right now you can export a custom form that is attached to a project as a PDF. That is a wonderful functionality, however it would also be amazing if we had the option to download as an Excel file. When it's exported as a PDF it seems to be in a row/column format already, so putting that into an Excel file right off the bat would be a huge time saver.

Description: Allow for adding custom fields onto the Hour object similar to issues, projects, etc.   Why is this feature important to you?  We run a lot of reports based on actual hours logged.  We continually run into reporting roadblocks because some hours are logged to tasks and others to issues (in our case requests).  When custom fields are on both the project object and issue object and I'm pulling an hour report, I want to pull the custom field for the item whether an issue or a project. And then show a CHART.   How would you like the feature to work:  Allow for custom fields on Hour objects.  Then I create a calculated custom field: if hour type = issue, then enter the issue's custom field "tier level" or if hour type=task, then enter the project's custom field "tier level".  Then an HOUR report & CHART could be generated to show the "tier level" of either the project or the issue.   Alternative?  Allow for AND and OR state

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add a button called “Upload Version” to create a new version from the Asset Preview itself Use-case: As an Approver, it is time-consuming to go back to the folder where the asset lives to upload a new version. Current/Experienced Behavior: User must go back to the folder structure to upload a new version. This creates confusion and users uploading to the incorrect folder.  Improved/Expected Behavior: User would be able to upload a version directly from the asset preview without having to navigate back to the folder structure, reducing time and improving user experience. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): 6.5 Service Pack 10 Customer-name/Organization name: 3M Adobe Managed Services Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Will you please consider changing the Brand Portal Share Link Expiration date or allowing admins to create a custom date for all assets. My users are complaining that they have to change it every time they use it to extend it further and one week is too short of a time frame. Use-case: My primary User's customers revisit old links and/or take longer that 2 weeks to gather the linked information. The primary users are also not happy about having to set a more appropriate future date every time they share a link. Current/Experienced Behavior: Linked items expires after one week (default) Improved/Expected Behavior: Linked items expires after one year (default) or enabling a default date set by the admin for our instance. We use 01-01-2049 for example. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable):   Customer-name/Organization name: Fluke Screenshot (if applicable):   Code packa

Documentation says: "You cannot edit the Admin and Standard User roles" and that is true. But I think a role that can't be edited - like "Standard User" - is borderline useless, and I'd love to be able to delete it. Or edit and rename it.   If you can't edit it, you should at least be able to delete it. And if you can't delete it, you should at least be able to edit it. 🙂

Description - Make task entry experience smooth (if possible as easy to use as MS Project)   Why is this feature important to you - Our Project Managers hate Workfront because: 1) It is not easy to navigate 'Tasks' page. Example: MS Project allows up, down, left, right navigation making it easy and faster to enter tasks. It also allows easy edit (unlike Workfront taking time to save and recalculate) 2) 'Free View' is functionality is desirable - This should allow hiding and adding columns without editing the view. 1 Free View for everyone, on all objects. 3) Reduce lag while saving a task after edit.   How would you like the feature to work - Better user experience resulting in adoption. Else, they flock on MS Project, Wrike, Monday.com making our life difficult in creating KPIs for leadership due to incomplete data, as like hate Workfront and are using MS Project.   Current Behaviour - Gives a feel of 90's tool. Slow, difficult to navigate and hard to understand.  

Description/Current Behavior - A user enters/selects prompt options on a report, report loads, user edits filter or edits the report (report settings), the report saves but goes back to the original report prompt screen which causes the user to re-enter (again) the prompt selections.   Why is this feature important to you - Retaining the user's prompt selections would save the user time and frustration from having to enter prompt info over and over again as building/editing reports and filters.   How would you like the feature to work - Retain the user's prompt data and when the report reloads with the edited filter or report, the prompts' selections are still applied.  

Description - Currently when configuring a new user (via Integration/Manual), when User Hour Type is not configured. The default setting will be enabling all the 200++ hour types we have in our instance.   Why is this feature important to you - This is important due we would like to ensure the correct users are using the correct hour type.   How would you like the feature to work - It would be great if the system admin level have to option to Disable (or Enable) hour type setting. Example: When a new user is set up, by default, no hour type will be assigned to the users.    Current Behaviour - When User Hour Type is not configured. The default setting will be enabling all the 200++ hour types we have in our instance.