Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Hey Team, is there a way to customize the "name" that comes out when you send a proof? It comes from a generic email address, we were hoping instead of our name it would just say "our company name Proofing" or something like that? Any ideas? thanks!
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add a confirmation pop-up asking “Are you sure you want to stop the execution of the pipeline?” when deploying through Cloud Manager. Use-case: When deploying a pipeline through Adobe Cloud Manager, users can accidentally click the “Stop Execution” button instead of “Resume” during the deployment process. If this happens, the pipeline stops immediately without any confirmation, forcing the user to restart the deployment from the beginning.Although the package is reused and some steps can be skipped, this still causes unnecessary delays and confusion, especially in production environments. Adding a confirmation pop-up (e.g., “Are you sure you want to stop the execution of the pipeline?”) would prevent accidental interruptions and help ensure smoother, safer deployments. Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently, when a pipeline is running in Adobe Cloud Manager, the “Stop Execution” button can be clicked at any time during the deplo
My current organization is transitioning from Meridian LMS to Adobe Learning Manager (ALM), while continuing to use Adobe Experience Manager (AEM). As an LMS Specialist, I’ve primarily worked with Meridian and have limited experience with Adobe products. I’ve now been tasked with integrating ALM with AEM, and I’m looking for documentation, guidance, or best practices to successfully achieve this integration.
I'm finding some bugs in split activty. First one, even when it says exclusion, it is not. I've to recheck it. But later, it feels like the schema isn't really added. When I come back to the split, if I press Previous, it shows me another shcema (The database one) And if i execute, it gives an error of missmatching schemas (X schema to '', empty). Anyone knows why is this happening? Thank you in advance!
Hello, Could someone tell me what happens when a sequence ID reaches its maximum value and that sequence is not cyclic?What can be done when this happens? Best regards,
in graphiql explorer, the query works normally: but in postman, I get this error:
I want to add Adobe ID users from SSO-configured domains.The reason for this is that we use Marketo and AEM at multiple locations globally, and although we use a common domain, some locations do not support SSO.Users in SSO-configured domains cannot be added using Adobe ID, so new users cannot use Marketo and AEM.
This is what i have setup so far in order to view AC Tool in AEM Cloud:path: /apps/cq/core/content/nav/tools/security/actoolpermission: allowprivileges: jcr:readBut when i click on this link: http://localhost:4502/mnt/overlay/netcentric/actool/content/overview.html/actool, it shows error of "Resource at '/mnt/overlay/netcentric/actool/content/overview.html/actool' not found: No resource found" I was wondering if there is any ACL permissions needed in order to view this page?
Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Combined asset upload and meta data import with spreadsheet (e.g. csv) in one step. Use-case: Mass uploading assets will be faster and easier when meta data can be added in one step. Current/Experienced Behavior: To mass upload assets and apply meta data, you need to upload the assets first, then click "Create" again to add meta data with the help of a spradsheet. Improved/Expected Behavior: Combined mass upload dialog where you can upload the meta data spreadsheet AND the files in one step, e.g. drag/drop the meta data spreadsheet, then the files. When the assets are in the asset bank, all meta data is already there, no additional steps needed. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM Assets Customer-name/Organization name: HBK Screenshot (if applicable): Code package (if applicable):
Struggling to get this to work. I'm hoping to get a View column to be used on the Templates page that displays the total Planned Hours in teach Template for a specific roleID. Is this possible?
I have created a custom property and added it to the file properties (Metadata Schema Form Editor)The custom property list was added to /libs/fmdita/config/metadataListThis made the list available in the Map Console > Advanced > File Properties dropdown.I selected each of the property from the dropdown and generated an output.However, this selection does not seem to have any impact on the metadata that is available in the output. The list is simply not picked up! Can you help me understand the behaviour? And also, help me with the any configuration that needs to be set to get the custom metadata tags propagated to the output?
My manager exported some utilization data from Planner. The actual hours for a particular user seemed low, and we realized it was because this user had logged hours for tasks to which she had not been assigned. We're trying to determine how widespread this issue might be.I built an hours report, and I first tried filtering where the owner ID does not equal the assigned to IDownerID=FIELD:task:assignedToID ownerID_Mod=neThis did pull records we're looking for, but it also pulled records where the person logging the hours was an assignee on the task but not the primary assignee.Is there a way to filter out the latter records? I tried experimenting with different variations of my filter (including using assignmentsListString and assignmentsUsersMM), all without success. Does anyone know how to filter on hours logged by non-assignees?
I am sending SMS text messages and need to adhere to quiet hours. I am having trouble building an expression in AJO that sends at 1 PM in the fans local time zone.
We’re implementing AEP for real-time API-based data flows. Our identity model uses a composite key, for example:compositeId = field1 + field2The primary real-time source only provides field1, while field2 exists in another source system that is ingested separately. Because AEP relies on the complete composite identity for stitching and unified profile creation, this leads to incomplete or fragmented profiles.We’re exploring the best architectural approach within AEP to handle scenarios where only part of a composite identity is available in real time.
Hi All, I am trying to set up universal editor in my local and usinig AEM Cloud Service SDK (aem-sdk-2025.9.22758.20250928T092442Z-250900) for local development.I have done below set upAEM - http running on port 4502AEM - https running on port 8443Local universal editor service running on port 8000Trusted the local certificate in the browser for self signed certificatesThe problem I am facing is,when I try to load AEM page running on https (port 8443) inside universal editor, it gives this error "Blocked autofocusing on a <input> element in a cross-origin subframe." I followed whats mentioned in this document - https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/developing/universal-editor/developer-overview?lang=en for same site cookie settings but it doesn't help and I continue getting the cross origin error. Has anyone come across the same issueThere is no Universal editor service related configuration available
We're implementing a new request process and need to close out a request queue. If I archive it will the active requests remain active? Thanks Justin
Description - (I am sure this has been asked many times, so I just wanted to revive the idea) We need an automatic "Previous Period" date range component that automatically creates a dynamic lookback window relative to the selected date range on the panel. Why is this feature important to you It is basically not practicable to have fixed previous date range components in place that only work until one changes the panel date range. Example Freeform table using the last 7 full days (Panel date range) vs the previous 7 days (custom date range in the workspace project). Now, someone decides to change the date range on the panel to "last 30 full days" Result the custom date range still displays only 7 days, the rest is 0 the comparability between panel date range and freeform table is completely useless this becomes even more obvious / erroneous if you are applying a summary change visualization on the two columns, not taking the same number of data points into consideration Ho
Hi, We are using a Salesforce Commerce experience with a non-Marketo form, which creates leads in Salesforce, which then sync over to Marketo. However, no Marketo web visit data is being collected, so I'm looking to use the Push Lead to Marketo endpoint to send the submission to Marketo and tie it to the web visit data being collected by Munchkin (already installed on the commerce site). How do I do this to avoid conflicts with the same lead being created in both systems?Can I just associate the lead that is initially created in SF with the munchkin cookie somehow? Thanks!
Hello there!I wanted to check if you have any recommended post-migration tests from your experience with Hyperforce transitions to help ensure everything continues to run smoothly. Thanks!
Hi,We are trying the generate the Google Oauth2 token using the GoogleCredentials which reads authentication details using the json provided below in AEM as a Cloud Service:- test.json file (placed user project core module- core/src/main/resources/test.json)Note: Actual values are replaced with test for security reasons.{"type": "test","project_id": "test","private_key_id": "test","private_key": "test","client_email": "test@gmail.com","client_id": "test","auth_uri": "https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth","token_uri": "https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token","auth_provider_x509_cert_url": "https://www.googleapis.com/oauth2/v1/certs","client_x509_cert_url": "test","universe_domain": "googleapis.com"} We have included all the dependencies as mentioned below for the google oauth2. <!-- https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.auth/google-auth-library-oauth2-http --><dependency> <groupId>com.google.auth</groupId> <artifactId&
I realize from https://experienceleague.adobe.com/en/docs/experience-manager-cloud-service/content/implementing/using-cloud-manager/custom-domain-names/introduction that creating a custom domain in Cloud Manager is not possible for the authoring environment.Does anyone have a suggestion on an alternate option if we preferred to have a 'Vanity URL' for access to our authoring environment?(ie: author.company.com vs author-p000000-e0000000.adobeaemcloud.com)I have tried DNS CNAME records to point to author-p000000-e0000000.adobeaemcloud.com, but that of course does not work...My only other thought was to have the CNAME record point to a local web instance, and create an http redirect from there, but I'm trying to avoid the multiple hoops.Any other ideas appreciated.Thank you.
Currently requestors can view their submitted requests in the Classic interface and then choose to copy their request allowing a new request to be edited and submitted as new. Our teams have many year/over year requests (i.e Open Enrollment, Events etc) so this prevents manual copying & pasting. I was informed the there is no official Adobe documentation confirming whether the Copy feature will be added to the New Workfront Experience in the future. Since this is a newly introduced feature, it may be considered for inclusion once the Classic interface is fully retired. I would love this feature to be included.
It might sound as a stupid question but, is there any way that can I track what visitors from Adobe Campaign did on the website without using UTMs? So far all I could get where the Campaign Dimensions, but I can't do much with those or maybe I'm doing something wrong.
When i try to delete the profile it gives me error in API [{"entityId": "GrCgAUFlhPLfJAIC","error": {"message": "There was a problem displaying the profiles. This profile has more than 2 cross-device identities and cannot be displayed.","statusCode": 422,"type": "http://ns.adobe.com/aep/errors/UPSDK-112010-422","title": "There was a problem displaying the profiles.","error-code": "UPSDK-112010-422","error-message": "There was a problem displaying the profiles. This profile has more than 2 cross-device identities and cannot be displayed.","status": 422}}]
In AEM as cloud.Up until Tuesday, October 28th, all our custom workflows, including those with dynamic participant steps, were functioning as expected. However, starting from October 31st, we noticed that these workflows are failing to complete at the user-input steps in both the DEV and QA environments. Interestingly, we did not observe any project-specific errors in the logs.It's worth noting that this issue is not occurring in our Stage and PROD environments, where all workflows are running smoothly. After some investigation, we found a disparity in the SDK versions being used across the environments. In DEV and QA, the SDK version is 2025.10.23122.20251023T134343Z, whereas in Stage and PROD, the SDK version is 2025.10.22943.20251009T135918Z. Moreover, replicating the issue locally with the SDK version 2025.10.23122.20251023T134343Z yielded the same problem.Please suggest any quick actions from our side.
Already have an account? Login
No account yet? Create an account
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.