Product Communities

It would be very helpful to have an interactive filter (magnifier) at top of report list on report screen rather than having to create a filter for every search term when looking for a specific report or key word

It would be helpful if we could attach emails to Updates because they would show the flow of the conversations. Having to add them under Documents loses the conversation thread.

First, I'm aware there's a "Completion Mode" for Project Settings that you can set to "Automatic" so that a Project's status changes to Complete when all tasks are done. But unfortunately, by default it is always "Manual" unless you apply a template (which we don't always use since projects vary sometimes)... It would be wonderful if we can set the default to ALL new projects to always be "Automatic". And not just upon Completion, but it would be great if a Project's status also automatically updates to "In Progress" as soon as a task on the project is started. I was told be a representative that this feature does not exist at all, so it would be great to have this setting. This would help so much to keep Projects current, since at the moment Admins have to manually change the project status when team members start on their tasks and they can't always do it immediately.

Currently, if SSO is enabled within Workfront Proof, system administrators lose the ability to log in as other users for troubleshooting and auditing. We would like to enbable SSO in Proof, but have not because of this downfall. Would like to see this enabled like it is within the Workfront interface.

Idea lab still has items from Classic that are no longer relevant. It also has lots of duplicate or near duplicate ideas. If you have 10 ideas that are the same with 300 points each vs. one idea with 3,000 points, that's a HUGE difference. Maybe create an Archive section for the old stuff or non-relevant stuff and then combine duplicates (and their points).Now there's an idea!That being said, when you have items that are delivered with only 20 points and then items not under consideration that have 500 points, it erodes the credibility of the vote system. People tend to give up on it knowing their idea won't get done even they garner a lot of votes.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: DAM Librarians want to be able to multi-select images with Smart tags, and click Manage Tags, to remove/edit Smart tags in bulk. Use-case: DAM Librarians want to be able to multi-select images with Smart tags, and click Manage Tags, to remove/edit Smart tags in bulk. Current/Experienced Behavior: Tags can only be edited on a single asset at a time via the UI. Improved/Expected Behavior: Tags can be removed/added to multiple assets when selected via UI as a multiselect. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.9+ Customer-name/Organization name: Humana Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

When I am working in a report in Classic WF, I am able to select a single item from the report (via the check box), select Edit , then jump to the bottom of the pop-up form and add a comment. Currently, I CAN NO LONGER do this in WF New Experience.In the New Experience, if I am working in a report and I select a single Item to edit, the outcome is NOT the same as before. I DO NOT have the option to add a comment any more.Please note that if I select more than 1 Item on the report (ie Bulk Edit), the pop-up box that displays is the Classic WF look / feel and the Comment box is available for use (at least for right now).Workfront Support provided the following response when I inquired why I no longer have the ability to do something that I used to.I was able to confirm that with the New Workfront Experience, the functionality of the Comment Section has been removed as overall there was very low usage and as the Comment section is to essentially post an update to the update stream, this c

All users, regardless of license type, should not be able to see each others requests (Requests > All Requests tab). I don't want even my Plan users to be able to see each others requests since some of our requests are sensitive. Anyone who has access to the project that a request queue's requests go to can see everyone's requests from those that have the same access to submit a request. Just because I need everyone to be able to SUBMIT a request doesn't mean I want them to SEE everyone's requests that have been submitted into that queue! WF, please change this!

It would be helpful to see a few metrics when looking at the backlog:Total Number of StoriesTotal number of estimated points (the only way to currently get this is to manually scroll through the backlog and add these up)Number of stories with no estimateNumber of stories marked "ready"I am sure there are more but these would be very helpful when managing the backlog.

It would be helpful if the Filter and View Options said the Actual Filter Name instead of Report Default because that tells the user nothing about the filter that is applied. Same for Review View.

I would like to see Filter/View/Group when I do a hover-over. This saves a lot of time whne there are lots of filters/views.

Hi There,We'd like to export all fields in Marketo that are mapped to Microsoft Dynamics fields. As there are currently no direct option in Marketo to export the full mapping of Marketo fields with Dynamics, could you help with investigating this possibility?

We would like to to see the "New request" screen match the "Preview" that can be viewed in the custom form builder. Currently, the New Request screen functions as a pop out and distorts how the form is viewed versus how it shows in Preview in the custom form builder. The current view shrinks down the width of the form which cuts off longer questions and causes some questions to appear side by side unintentionally. The current view shows the Request home page to the left of the form in the foreground which provides no additional functionality to the users and only takes away from allowing the form to appear larger.

After a project is marked Complete, an opportunity for the project sponsor to provide a rating (i.e. 5-star rating) on how the project went, would help project managers know when further review or a retrospective meeting is needed. This rating could be kept private and only viewable by certain roles or users.

When I choose a particular combination of filter view and group, I would like for it to stay that way PER project. I typically have multiple projects open in tabs at any given moment and when I change the selections in one tab, it changes all the project task list filter/view/group settings in the others upon refresh. It wold be very helpful for them to be set pre project rather than across the board.

The idea would be the same as with a task or issue. Everyone on the team is notified and then someone clicks 'work on it' and then make the decision.

Description:Add indicator that track and report on rule execution metricsCurrent Behavior: Currently when Launch rules get fired the tool does not keep track of number of times and duration. Why is this feature important to you?It will be valuable if the marketer have this data on the spot with in Launch, that will save time and add efficiency. How would you like the feature to work?The feature request is to add indicator that track and report on rule execution metrics, so the marketer can use the information to monitor and manage the tag performance.  

Would it be possible to include variables in the title of reports or dashboards? For example, a report title that shows:[$$USERID] 's current task listor a dashboard title showing[$$USER.homeTeamID] Project DashboardThanks!

Currently we have the ability to raise risks/issues at project level. But not all risks belong to project. Some risks can effect the entire program/portfolio. Is it possible to enhance program/portfolio view to have "Requests" option on the left pane?

It would be great if people can delegate their tasks during their time off as they can with approvals, so coverage is automatic.

We have a team of proofreaders that pick up work out of a queue. We also have situations were someone is out of the office and a team could back them up on proof approvals. If we could assign proof approvals to a team, rather than individual, this would be a big win.

It would be great to have the capability to add custom form on document at a template level.Typically document metadata is often custom, and adding the proper custom form manually to each document (even via batch update) is a cumbersome action.Ideally defining a project template should allow to also define the document template that will be related to this project.

Marketo's dynamic chat as of now records 4 types of activities in Marketo which is great. Apart from this the ability to natively configure sending of these and possibly more custom dynamic chat activities to the 3rd party web apps would be great since dynamic chat is added on a webpage via an iFrame, it becomes rather difficult to configure the custom DOM updates on the parent landing page that can trigger sending of the chat activities to the 3rd party apps. Of-course, exporting the activities using API from Marketo is one option, but it would be great if there could be a direct way to send the events w/o having to send / query from Marketo.

Ability to select the "Actual Month View" from within Workload Balancer, from first day of the month to the last day of the month. Currently you can select a 4 week block but often misses the first day/s or the last day/s. 6 week view is a workaround, and works, but if I want to restrict a date range of the full actual month I can't currently do it.

Sometimes a project custom form I want filtered in a task report isn't the first custom form in the project and I'm realizing that it's not pulling tasks from projects where that form isn't the top form. The only option right now is 'Project > Category ID' and no option for 'Categories' (similar to if you pull Assigned To in a task report it'll only show the primary task assignee, not all assignees and should use 'Assignment Users' instead.   So then you have task reports that only pull if form you're using in the report happens to be the first form used in the project, so when projects use other forms and this happens to not be first, it’s not including those tasks I want only because of this. WF says because it's two table jumps there is no way around this.