Product Communities

Description - Fix how the "favorites" bar works Why is this feature important to you - It's bad UX and after 6 of those apps the menu gets truncated.  it's not really favorites since it keeps any app that has a module placed in the canvas How would you like the feature to work - If it's "all apps used in this scenario" Don't name it "favorites" If it's "favorites" Don't remove apps when not used in a scenario Same faves across all scenarios (ie, user-based) In either case App bar should be scrollable The + (add) should be always visible (currently it moves outside the viewport) The popup menu of the app's modules should be placed so the right edge is within the viewport   Current Behaviour - one icon per each app in scenario (whether connected or orphan) not "favorites" but specific to scenario re-generated when going into edit mode (apps that are not used in the scenario get removed) length of favorites bar grows with window width as apps fill bar the popup m

Take information from Workfront planning to pull into WKFT core reports

Taking the actual hours and then only planned hours from today forward.

Ability to templatize a Workfront Planning table and attach it to a project for easy asset tracking like they do in AirTable.

Librarian would like updates in AEM to synced back to WKFT to mitigate a disconnected communication experience.

Differentiate between user cost to role cost and ability to put a freelancer on any task and override with the freelancer cost.

Description - We would love to be able to freeze columns in a workfront report Why is this feature important to you - while teams need all columns, they want to be able to quickly view key columns that change priority quickly and easily How would you like the feature to work - be able to turn on and off freezing easily and adjust which column freezes Current Behaviour - we are aware of creating separate views, but freezing would work much better for the users

Description - Block access at the proof level and only allow those listed to proofWhy is this feature important to you - we've had some requesters find their way from the Document section and interject before the asset is ready to share out.How would you like the feature to work - Allow access from the Workflow level for the versionCurrent Behaviour - Anyone with project/task access can navigate to a proof from the document section and start commenting.  Once they are in a version (accidentally) they are added to the the Workflow in a new stage.  We can set the Requester access level and restrict it for all but it would be nice to do it from a proof/version level especially during internal proofing before the asset is shared back to the Requester/stakeholder..

We currently have teams that create a strategy document that includes information for many teams. The Creative Team is requesting the teams make requests in WF with only Creative needs and not the whole strategy doc attached. The requestors provide screen snips of images and text describing their needs in the document. Not all information is relevant in the document for the Creative Team so we moved to custom fields in the Custom Issue/Request form.  There is not a custom form field format to capture this information in the request. I opened WF support case #00390925 "Ability to copy/paste images and add to a custom form field" and was told the functionality doesn't exist and to enter an Idea. See attached examples that were also included in the WF case. The requestors would also like to add information in the custom form fields in a table format that is much easier to read, interpret and digest vs. adding fields for each row of a table. See attached doc with an example.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Publish all content fragment live copies in one go Use-case: Currently we are able to rollout a fragment 300+ Live copies but to publish the same fragment we have to go to all 300+ live copies and manually publish which makes impossible to do.  Current/Experienced Behavior: Currently we are able to rollout a fragment 300+ Live copies but to publish the same fragment we have to go to all 300+ live copies and manually publish which makes impossible to do.  Improved/Expected Behavior: An option to publish content fragment similar to rollout. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMasCSAdobe Experience Manager 2024.9.17689.20240905T073330Z-240900 Customer-name/Organization name: Bread financial Screenshot (if applicable): NA Code package (if applicable): NA

The idea here is to strengthen the impact and visibility of important announcements.  Administratively, there are many times that announcements really need to be marked as important and displayed with more emphasis to users.   Idea:  Add an "Important Announcements" section somewhere that would display important announcements that otherwise might get lost and overlooked.  This could be the home page or potentially somewhere up top to account for layouts that maybe don't use a home page landing area. Current Behavior:  Announcements are sent out via email and displayed in the announcements area which is great!  Let's build on that!Benefits of this idea: Adds value by displaying important messages up front to your users. Provides immediate impact through more visible messaging.Expiration date of important message display allows easy administrative management.Utilizes existing announcement setup to take advantage of targeted audi

Description - Why is this feature important to you -Business wants to understand the profile count for reporting in advance without actually triggering communications (Email/DM/SMS) but custom action can work as intended. This is mostly because of condition checks added in the journey and, to gauge the journey's behavior given the high volume.  How would you like the feature to work -1. Do not want this journey step events data going into the steps events schema as this is just a dry run. OR even if it writes it, expire the data after couple of hours. Given the high volume it is not ideal to write it (so toggle option to write or not would be good).2. Mock the Email/DM/SMS activity - Real communications must not be triggered except for test profiles.3. Produce a report to share with the business. Current Behavior -1. There is no dry run capability.2. Test Profiles option does not help much.

Description - A "week of year" dimension, that functions similarly to the "month of year" dimension item. "Month of year" allows for year-over-year comparisons at a monthly level and can produce a view where the user can see the raw numbers for current year and previous year along with the percent change between the two time frames.Why is this feature important to you - I would like to be able to do year-over-year comparisons at the week level where I can also see the percent change. How would you like the feature to work - In the same manner as the "month of year" dimension. The values could be 1-52 (sometimes 53) or even better, the month of year and week of the month, for example, "April week 1".Current Behaviour -In current state, I can only add a time period column, which allows me to see the raw metrics for each time frame but does not allow me to see the percent change.

We use programs as a container with projects as a sub-container for types of work/documentation. It would be nice to be able to copy projects to another program or copy a program all together with the ability to remove issues/tasks/documents.

Description - need a "Ready to Start" filter on the Teams Requests widgetWhy is this feature important to you - uses on Teams are starting tasks before they are ready and causing chaos! How would you like the feature to work - just like the filter on My Work widget Current Behavior - there is no filter on Teams Requests widget so users cannot exclude tasks that aren't ready

We would like to see the option to filter Team Requests by 'Ready to Start'. On the old Home, there was a link that took you to the team page where the 'Ready to Start' filter is available. However, there is no longer a direct link to this page and most users don't know how to access it otherwise. This feature is important because some users work off of the Team Requests list, and they can't work as efficiently if they are not able to quickly see which items are ready to start.

Description -Why is this feature important to you - Whenever we try to search any object we are getting the information about Project/Template/Documents associated with the object in the basic search area but the names of the object are getting cut off and not even readable. Even the hover text is also not available for those object.How would you like the feature to work - Whenever it is showing the object data, though the names are getting cut off we should atleast have the hover text option with the object name.  Current Behaviour - Now the text is getting cut off and there is no option to expand the right side column

Description - Unable to associate lookup dataset with multiple datasets within the same connection. Why is this feature important to you - It's such an important piece that is missing; if this is not given, I cannot make meaningful reports or spend more time creating my mapping in CJA.  How would you like the feature to work - Give the flexibility to associate lookup with multiple datasets.  Current Behaviour - While setting up connections, I am ingesting multiple event datasets, a profile dataset, and a lookup dataset in CJA. However, I can associate lookup with only one dataset. 

Description - There should be settings or options to NOT create Email only profile/account in Workfront and in the Proofing tool.Why is this feature important to you - As detailed in Current Behaviour, this feature should fix all these issues or provide easy solution or workarounds.How would you like the feature to work - Current Behaviour - In Proofing, If the email address does not belong to an existing Workfront user, Workfront will attempt to create an “External User” or “Guest” profile for them. This is creating duplicate accounts for the user which is causing :1. Users not able to access Proofs on which old account is there2. New proofs getting new account added3. We have to raise a Adobe support ticket to merge both accounts proofs and delete duplicate accounts. There is no way System Admins can fix this.4. No consistency of new account is Guest or old account becomes Guest, email ids crisscrossing5. Please refer Adobe Support Case Number 00438353 from Dell c

  First, the new business rule feature is extremely helpful as it greatly enhances the user experience and strengthens various processes tremendously.     Idea:  Allow for multiple business rules with the same object and operation (trigger)Current Behavior:  System will not allow multiple business rules on same object and trigger Benefits of this idea: Allows enterprises to create multiple simple rules instead of extremely large and complex formulasEnables quicker implementation with simpler testingMultiple administrative team usage - ability to separate business rules by different areas in an organization (limits risk from other teams impacting your rules)Description and title could be customized for each rule for ease of understanding, expansion and correctionsMove from potential large formula chaos to simplified manageable and searchable lists of rules _____________________________________________________________________&nb

Description - Approval flows are key functions that often support compliance standards or even legal requirements. Retention of the approval information is essential. Lack of retention has consequences that can devasting to a business if they are audited and found out of compliance.Why is this feature important to you - What is the point of an Approval flow function if there is no record of it? To reliably capture approvals, I now have to build a workaround, probably with a custom form.How would you like the feature to work - Retain the decision of an Approval flow indefinitely. Either retain the Approval flow, log the decision in Updates, or both. Bonus points if you give sys admins the ability to lock down the ability to remove Approvals from objects.Current Behaviour - If you associate an Approval with a request, then convert that request to a project, the Approval is removed from the request. There is no place where the outcome of that Approval flow is documented—not the Appro

Description - It would be nice when you copy a template it would also carry over the users that the template is shared with Why is this feature important to you - It's redundant work to add the users again when you're copying from a template How would you like the feature to work - Carry over the users the template is shared with Current Behavior - It does NOT carry over the users when you copy a proof workflow template 

We have around 20 groups. The statuses in these groups seems to have sorted themselves randomly. I set order on the main "system statuses" page, then I have to do the same thing 20 times. It would be very nice if the order could be pushed to the sub groups either on a one time basis or automatically.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Enhance AEM Desktop to detect new files from local cache and bulk upload new files within a downloaded folder Use-case: When creative users work on product creation. It is usually at a folder level, where they have multiple files within a folder. This complete folder would be treated as a single entity.The users work on multiple files within the folder, also creating new files. Users generally use save as feature on their creative Apps (  Applications for creating assets) to save/export to a particular format. The desktop app currently tracks only the existing files which are synced from AEM cloud to desktop. The newly added files even though are available on same hierarchy on their local cache is not displayed within the desktop App and the users have to manually drag and drop from local cache space to desktop app for uploading. The new file in the local cache is not even shown within the desktop app.A feature which can show som

Description - Enable proofing in the Workfront Sandbox Instances.  Why is this feature important to you - All other "add on features" that are integrated with Workfront like Scenario Planner, Resource Management Tools, Goals all are available in a sandbox so users can test out different scenarios without creating test data in production. Now that proof is integrated, it should follow the same path. Also, when trying to implement proof for the first time, the users will need longer than 1 week to do configuration and testing, making preview only useful for shorter testing  functionality. If we are forced to use preview that creates A LOT of extra work on implementation.