Product Communities

We would like to be able to have a notification sent to user/s when a new Company is entered into Workfront. This will notify our director that they need to assign an Account Manager to the account.

We generally send to three groups of recipients in Marketo - clients, prospects and internal contacts. We have our Communication Limits set and they work well for clients and prospects - who we do not want to over send to. However, we have many internal colleagues inside our organization that like to see everything we send out and they are constantly bumping up against the Comm Limits. It would be great if we could exclude emails sent to our Corporate Domain from the Comm Limits and only have them apply to the clients and prospects we send to.

With the investments in the group administrator functions, the ability to manage custom forms associated with each group from the group page would bring everything related to group administrator management into a single interface. This would further reinforce the ease of the group view from setup and would allow for group admins to manage all of their objects in a single interface.

In the standard email performance report, there is no direct way to determine the success of the emailer directly.  Success = how many people actually clicked on the main call to action/ took the expected action. This is available in a separate report that needs to be mapped with the main report and is cumbersome.  Hence, my idea submission is to add this success matrix to a standard email performance report.

Description -You can use updateConfiguration() of AEP Mobile SDK to switch RSIDs, but you cannot return to the initial value (the value of configureWithAppId()) after that configuration is made.I understand that I can switch back again by specifying the RSID I want to revert to and calling updateConfiguration(), but I would like to avoid that because it would mean double management of RSIDs in the code. Why is this feature important to you -In order to comply with the data protection laws of each country, the RS must be switched according to the user's selection. At the same time, we want the user to be able to cancel the previous choice and return to the default RS at will. How would you like the feature to work -I would like to have the function to erase the RSID set by updateConfiguration() and restore it to the value set by configureWithAppId(). Current Behaviour -

Currently, on project timelines, task dates will be calculated (when using constraints like ASAP) by taking the assignee's availability to acquire duration and then adding on any predecessor dates. Even if the predecessor pushes the start date to after the assignee is back in the office and available, it will still use the originally calculated duration to set the due date. Unfortunately, this means that tasks can be unnecessarily delayed or pushed out.For example, to use an extreme case, If an assignee on task with a 2 day duration has 2 weeks off, their task duration will be calculated as 2 weeks plus the 2 days. If that task, however, is dependent on a predecessor task, current calculations will add that predecessor task duration to the total. Where it gets tricky is if that predecessor task was 2 weeks long and now the assignee is back from vacation and available, it does NOT adjust the calculation, and still assumes 2 weeks and 2 days, pushing the task out 2 additional weeks u

Maybe I can't find this in current environment, but being able to export a billing record as single combined artifact (PDF) would be very helpful for us to provide back to a stakeholder.We are utilizing reports today to help compile billing records across multiple projects, et al, but a single export PDF for a single project will be a help.

We'd like to see an increase in the amount of IP ranges allowed for whitelisting. Large corporations tend to have many alliances and business partners where IP ranges need to be loaded. Increasing the limit would be very helpful as we quickly reach the limit

To be capable of creating proof with CSV filetype

Allow template to be built with tasks that will calculate due date based on the project start date and things like:Due on the first Friday of the month after the project start date Due on the first Friday in the first full week after the project start dateAnd so on

Please allow the endpoint to accept PMCF data when a program name is specified in the payload (which happens most of the time)   Thanks  

Description - We have multiple users on ACS and we are only allowing them to schedule single send email. However, there's a chance they schedule the email 5 days in advance which risk us violating ACMA SPAM ACT compliance Why is this feature important to you - As part of ACMA SPAM ACT Compliance, an opt-out request needs to be actioned within 5 business days. How would you like the feature to work -Subscription status to be refreshed at the time of send Current Behaviour - Current process is restricted that the consumer if they unsubscribe when email is  ‘scheduled’, the status is not reflective at the time when the email is sent. A manual process is set up that an email can’t be scheduled more than 4 days in advance.

Hello!We are facing the challenge of making our controlling even better with Workfront. When evaluating projects, the job levels (principal, senior, expert, junior, trainee) play a major role, since recorded hours have to be put in the right context.Unfortunately there are no job levels in the system. So we would have to create countless job roles, which of course would also have an impact on reports and many other areas.Is there anyone else facing this challenge? @Workfront Product Team: Is there anything on the roadmap?ThxStephan

The Sales Owner fields are shown in the Person's Info tab as Sales Owner. When leveraging these fields as tokens in emails, they are shown as Lead Owner instead of Sales Owner. If you are not aware of the fact these two things are the same, you can spend a good amount of time figuring out which token to use. Can these token names please be aligned with the naming of the fields in all other places?

Need to have a possibility to associate KANBAN WIP limit to # of hours/points instead of # of tasks/stories.

日本語の環境でMarketoを利用している状況で、プログラムインストールをする際に必要になるカスタムフィールドの作成を日本語名称でも作成を可能にしていただきたい。 現在は、プログラムインストールがすべて英語になっているため、カスタムフィールドも英語で作成が必要となり、日本語で作成してしまった場合、プログラムインストールができず、改めて英語でカスタムフィールドを作成する必要があります。カスタムフィールドを無駄に作成することになります。 日本語環境で使っているユーザーがもう少しプログラムインストールを利用しやすくなるために、改善していただければ幸いです。   よろしくお願いいたします。

The mapping names of the CSV Module are displayed as "Column undefined" rather than "Column 1". I'm seeing this when the output of the CSV Module is an input to a Data Store module but this may be occuring in other areas as well. This was submitted to support as Case Number 00287974. They reported that this behavior was "Working as Expected" and that a report should be filed in the Innovation Lab.I'd rather view this as "Column 1"

It is very useful when assigning work to be able to see and sort the unassigned work by the project priorities (ie portfolio priority field) so that the most important work gets assigned first and foremost. Thus it would be very useful to have the portfolio priority for the project displayed for the unassigned work with the capability to sort the unassigned work by the project's portfolio priority

Exporting a Report With About 11K Projects' Items to Excel xlsx Generates 504 Timeout Web Server Error. Many attempts can result in getting the same 504 error. Eventually, the export does complete.Performance is an issue with NWE. Here is another place where Development should improve the product.

it would be great if there was an option to change the color (colour) of bars in bar graphs when running SiteCatalyst, and subsequently when these reports are saved as bookmarks, reportlets in dashboards, emailed, exported in docs etc. In a stacked bar graph, this control would change the color of the first item.At present, I have a dashboard which contains many bar graphs, all of which are blue, making comprehension of individual reportlets difficult.6-10 well chose color options would be great.

PART 11 -- ELECTRONIC RECORDS; ELECTRONIC SIGNATURES Subpart C--Electronic Signatures Sec. 11.100 General requirements. (a) Each electronic signature shall be unique to one individual and shall not be reused by, or reassigned to, anyone else. (b) Before an organization establishes, assigns, certifies, or otherwise sanctions an individual's electronic signature, or any element of such electronic signature, the organization shall verify the identity of the individual. (c) Persons using electronic signatures shall, prior to or at the time of such use, certify to the agency that the electronic signatures in their system, used on or after August 20, 1997, are intended to be the legally binding equivalent of traditional handwritten signatures. (1) The certification shall be submitted in paper form and signed with a traditional handwritten signature, to the Office of Regional Operations (HFC-100), 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857. (2) Persons using electronic signatures shall, upon

I find it very unfortunate that events in the Activity History of a person are not arranged in logical order - if they have the same time stamp. See e.g. here:     The two Change Data Value events are the result/response of the "Call Webhook" event, yet they appear underneath it. I'd love to see that changed.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Add the ability to remove an asset from a Collection in more ways than just via the Remove button inside the Collection. Use-case: We have Collections with lots of assets and we need to regularly remove assets from Collections. Current/Experienced Behavior: If you have a Collection with a lot of assets, it is too difficult to scroll to the asset you want in order to remove it from the Collection -- due to lazy loading, it can take a very long time to scroll to the correct asset. Improved/Expected Behavior: The Remove button should also exist inside each asset and/or be accessible from a search for the asset. Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEM 6.5.8 Customer-name/Organization name: Securian Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):  

AEM documentation makes it clear that Hobbes.js is deprecated.  It says to use Selenium.  However, nowhere in the documentation can I find HOW to use Selenium within AEM and there are no examples.  When I look for examples of using Selenium, as example to test AEM Editor mode, I'm directed to Bobcat.  It seems like AEM should provide a tutorial if they suggest Selenium?

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: It would be good if there is an ability to filter assets within collections Use-case: Filtering collections within collections Current/Experienced Behavior: There is no way to filter assets now within collections Improved/Expected Behavior: It's going to be easier to find assets within the collections Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): AEMaCS Customer-name/Organization name: Proquire Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):