Product Communities

The previous version of the debugger keeps all the requests open when changing tabs in the browser. The current version shows only the requests for the active tab.This creates extra steps in the workflow when working between two or more tabs and the debugger window. This is often required when validating variables in an Adobe Analytics workspace while testing a page. Leaving the tab also collapses the request so it has to be re-opened and then scrolled to the right to see the current hit.It would be better if the request would stay open, even when the active tab is changed. It would also be better if the focus remained on the most recent hit, rather than adding them outside the window so that they have to be scrolled to.

When including a hyperlink in a description (or other area within Workfront) it is not possible to mask (embed) the link to reduce the length of the URL. This takes up unnecessary space and can be problematic when viewing the description in certain views and/or reports. By allowing the links to be embedded within a word/phrase similar to email, or a word document you could have a better user experience when viewing the description field.

The process for resolving Marketo-Dynamics sync issues takes way too much time. First, we have to rely on indirect means to even spot when a sync issue is occurring. They never show up in the Notifications area! Our trick is to look for a Boolean field that triggers a Dynamics workflow and fails to reset to false as a sign that we have sync problems.   Once we identify the problem, we open a ticket with Marketo and it inevitably gets escalated to the tier 3 team, and sometimes even engineering has to get involved to provide log files with the necessary clues/details on the root cause. This can easily go on for weeks before we get the necessary eyes on the problem, and we’re trying to run a business in the meantime.   If Marketo would give admin users access to these error logs that tier 3/engineering have access to, and a real-time notifications feature (the existing Notifications area would be fine), then the users could troubleshoot on their own. It would be win-win. D

Currently if you have a rich text field in a report you can highlight words and insert a link. However, when you export that report to pdf, excel, etc. the links do not come through. However, if you print a dashboard with these reports on it the links DO come through! But as we all know dashboard printing is NOT great. I'm hopeful this will be fixed in reporting 2.0 but I'd love a fix before then!

It would be helpful to have a separate task preference for not allowing completed tasks to show up when a project is completed on a timesheet. Right now, there is the all or nothing option but we would like completed tasks to show up for active projects a week longer but not anything for completed projects.

Right now we have bulk exports for leads, activities, and custom objects, but nothing for company objects. Please give us a company bulk export just as there is a lead bulk export.

When adding a new project status, the new status appears by default at the bottom of the status list.This is also the default order as it appears to the end-user.The current workaround involves updating the order for each group, rather than an option to order at the master level (i.e. change default order for all groups).Our instance has 800+ groups, and we cannot re-order the status list one by one.There should be an option to order at a master level or at least set the order when you create a new status.

Sometimes you need to find where a prop, eVar or something is set inside a launch property. If a rule or data element is misnamed or documentation isn't up to date it can be very difficult to find.It would be amazing to have a "code search" feature so you can search for exactly which rules lead to the setting of a variable. You could also find how data elements are set much faster in a similar manner. Other tag managers have this feature and it can be a huge time saver for new starters or consultants getting up to speed on the analytics implementation.On top of this, when viewing data elements it would be extremely useful to be able to see every rule they are currently used in and vice-versa.

When using Visual Experience Composer it would be be incredibly helpful to add an "Insert Before" or "Insert After" function when a specific container is selected.Currently when a container is selected and you choose to edit the HTML, any changes that are made are made within the container that is selected, which can cause some ordering or styling issues if you want to add an additional element before or after the container that is selected.The work around for this is at present to "Expand Selection" and edit the HTML of the parent container, however this often involves updating the HTML for the main body container. If you edit the code for the main body container this will lock it's content, so any subsequent changes made outside of Target (i.e. through the CMS) won't show correctly which can create problems. Adding an "Insert Before" or "Insert After" option would allow us to quickly insert new elements into the page above or below current items without having to lock the code of the

Regular email notifications about upcoming maintenance windows and releases that will impact a user's ability to access Adobe Target.  This will allow Target users to prepare for such outages.

Similar to other objects, add the ability for the system administrator to control what access level can create, edit and delete teams. In addition, incorporate the ability to delegate control of the team to specific individuals. Currently, anyone on the team can edit the team settings or members, which can result in a breakdown in process when teams are used (default team in routing rules).

I created a filter awhile ago that allows me to select all roles with a specified cost per hour. Now whenever I select that filter name, which has the $ in it, the system locks the view and I have to manually resent my account. I was told that Workfront no longer allows special characters in views or filters. If that is the case, PLEASE set Workfront up so that it will throw an error if a special char is entered / don't allow the filter to be saved with a special char. Also - I can't delete the filter without selecting it, and if I selecting it, it locks up and I have to reset my account. This needs to be fixed.

Used to be able to use the Ctrl/Command + Enter hotkey (like in outlook/gmail/etc.) to post updates. Wanted to add this to the innovation lab in case other people miss that feature too. Would love to see it come back in a future release.

Hi, within the HubSpot platform you can drop in buttons into pages and emails which you can report click data on and add to campaigns. It'd be really useful if Marketo could do that in the future.

Would like the ability to create JSON offers via the target API

Description:I get a lot of emails like this: My name is XYZ and I was pointed in your direction to get help with accessing Adobe Analytics. I get the request all the time and every time I think “I wish there was a way to automate this”. I know Adobe can tap into a company directory, but we have a complicated system of profiles. The idea would be to have a link in the profile that the admin can copy/paste to the user. The admin can approve each registration or, as an option, the admin can auto-approve all users who use “COMPANY-NAME.com” as their registration email.  A cherry on a cake would be yet another option for the admin to put this registration link to this particular profile as the default “Register Now” link on Adobe login page, which effectively would 100% automate the process.Why is this feature important to you: it will save a ton of time.How would you like the feature to work: Described above, automate the entire processCurrent Behavior: Manual, slow, an

Custom fields of type "textfield with formatting" bring great value to reports - e.g. providing detailed updates and descriptions using formatting options like bullet points.However, when exporting reports which such fields (e.g. to .xlsx or .pdf), the format gets lost and the data more or less useless.Thus we would like to have the export including the set formats.

Currently in Adobe Launch - we see a blue button when an upgrade is available.  But this does not tell us what is being updating (why do we need to upgrade).  Can we add a version history to all extensions that says what were being changed?  Currently - we are just hitting upgrade and do not know what we need to test to verify it will work on our site.  This should be standard across all Adobe / third party owned extensions to ensure we, the client, know why we should push this change into the system.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Within Adobe Assets, we would like to request the ability to view and annotate on all pages of mulitpage files like PDFs, Word Docs, Excel Spreadsheets, PowerPoint Presentations and more. Currently, when a multipage document is added to a review task and/or workflow, and the user clicks "Payload" they can only see the first page of the document/PDF/Excel, etc. for annotation. We have tried to use the Sub-assets functionality, but it doesn't meet our business needs. Use-case: A user is attempting to review and annotate a PDF or other document/file with multiple pages. In AEM Assets, the user can only view and annotate on the first page of the asset. Current/Experienced Behavior: A user is notified that they have a review task in their inbox. They navigate to their inbox and open the task and click "Payload". A PDF file is opened in the viewer in Adobe Assets, and the user can only see and annotate the first page. The user has to down

Description - I think it would be useful to have an option to hide the date that appears in the top rigth of a panel in Adobe Workspace.Why is this feature important to you - The value in this is to avoid confusion when a user is looking at a dashboard that is using dates in the actual table, which override the date selector.For example, I have a dashboard using summary number and change scorecards that looks at KPI from last month compared to the month before. The data is coming from a table that is using two date range dimensions i.e. Last month and & two month ago.I don't think there is a need to also have the date appear in the top right of the panel as that date doesn't control the data that is displayed and could cause confusion to a user looking at it because they might think that the date range they see in the top right of the panel is the time frame of the data. How would you like the feature to work - A simple tick box inside the data selector to show/hideCurrent Beh

The current Workfront functionality intermixes Project level updates with those made on included tasks and issues. It includes even more breadth of topics at the Program level.This causes updates to the project or program record itself to be hidden in the noise.Please create an ability to filter down to just those updates for the object itself (none of its children/sub-items). This should be able to be toggled on/off by the user - similar to the system updates.

The team is struggling to communicate priority order of tasks submitted to requesters. They have a report with all the current request but they need a way to let them know the order in which they are completing the requests. We need a field that allows you to set an order to requests/issues, projects, tasks, etc. and when the #1 priority request is completed the field updates automatically to mark #2 as the new #1 issue in the queue.

When a user gets a notification, the object name and "See in Workfront" at the top take you to the object (project/task/issue) and not the actually comment that the notification is for.Only the "Comment" button at the bottom of the notification takes you to the actual comment the notification is for.It is misleading and not helpful.

We are in desperate need of a "like" button in Workfront Proof. We had this button in our previous system and it is the one thing ALL reviewers/approvers keep asking to bring back, especially our Leadership team.Reviewers leave comments in a proof but the decision to act upon the comment, or not, is dependent upon cross functional business partners as well as our VP's approval. When these folks are in a proof, if they agree with the requested change they click LIKE. That is the green light for the designers to move forward with the update.We've tried using the resolve button however that is used for other situations and it got way too confusing. I fear leadership will will start to challenge if WF is the right system for us. It may seem small and insignificant to many out there but it is essential to our process.

Request for Feature Enhancement (RFE) Summary: Hi Adobe team, Opening up an enhancement request to have the capabilities of flushing dispatcher cache for non-prod pipelines, similar to the production pipelines. This will greatly help us automate our build process. Use-case: Flushing dispatcher cache with client libs and content after some dev and qa builds Current/Experienced Behavior: Non prod pipeline does not have the capability to flush dispatcher cache like the prod pipeline Improved/Expected Behavior: Non prod pipeline have the capability to flush dispatcher cache, just like the prod pipeline (with the same UI options ideally) Environment Details (AEM version/service pack, any other specifics if applicable): Cloud Manager with AMS AEM Customer-name/Organization name: TD / Accenture Screenshot (if applicable):   Code package (if applicable):