Explore product-specific spaces to ask questions, share insights, and learn best practices.
Recently active
Hi Everyone,I’ve configured a workflow launcher to automatically publish assets whenever their metadata is modified. However, it's not triggering the publish action as expected, even though the metadata changes are happening.I’ve attached my launcher configuration below. I also tried removing the condition to see if that would help, but unfortunately, it didn’t resolve the issue.My goal is to ensure that assets are published to multiple publishers whenever they are modified in the author instance. If anyone has encountered a similar issue or has any suggestions, I’d really appreciate your insights! ThanksNandheswara
Hi everyone,In the AEM project I'm working on, we've extended the default Rich Text Editor configuration. In addition to the standard formatting options like bold, italic, and underline, we added a custom "styles" dropdown. This lets authors apply specific font styles and sizes by assigning custom CSS classes to the text (e.g. notoSans-xxs-semiBold), defined within our client libraries.While everything works as expected on the published pages, in edit mode, the applied custom styles are not visible. The class is correctly added to the element, but the clientlib that defines the style doesn’t seem to be loaded at that point — which prevents the formatting from showing in the authoring environment.I've attached two screenshots:First: how the styled text appears correctly in published mode.Second: how the same styled text appears unstyled in edit mode, despite the class being present in the markup.Has anyone encountered this issue? Is there a recommended way to ensure that the requir
Hi Everyone, I'm working on an XDM schema for sending data to Customer Journey Analytics (CJA). The goal is to send the data just like existing Adobe Analytics data to CJA. I'm using the XDM Experience Event class and need help choosing the appropriate field group from these options: Adobe Analytics ExperienceEvent Full ExtensionAdobe Analytics ExperienceEvent TemplateAEP Web SDK ExperienceEventI'm confused about which field group will best to match my existing Adobe Analytics data in CJA.Could someone explain the differences between these field groups and when each should be used?Specifically, what field group is recommended for collecting data to CJA?
Hi,I see CJA workspace doesn't have a built-in Entry Page dimension, what is the best way to get a report for this? I just want to see how many times, A specific URL was used as an entry URL? Thanks!
Description - For all datasets, allow the ability to force lowercase all or certain fields. Why is this feature important to you - Currently, if the casing in matching keys doesn't match exactly, enhancement data from lookup and profile datasets isn't available in CJA. How would you like the feature to work - A toggle to force lowercase all fields in a dataset. Checkboxes to force lowercase certain fields Current Behavior - Attributes can be forced lowercase once ingested via data view component settings. However, this isn't possible before setting matching keys for lookup/profile datasets.
Is there any point to add ECID to IdentityMap ? Are there any benefits? Is it required?
Hi! I have created a User Group on IMS (on the Admin Console) and synced it with AEM (by adding myself as a user and then logging in AEM). It works well. Then, I had to rename the group (on IMS / Admin Console) and I don't understand how/when it is updated on AEM.I noticed that the new name is not immediately updated on AEM. After some operations (adding a new user and let him logging in), I saw that a new group with the new name is created. But it doesn't seem to work always like that. How can I sync the new User Group's name properly with AEM?
Hi everyone,I wanted to clarify a scenario related to cross-device/profile merge behavior in Adobe Target, specifically in an A/B test setup using A4T and CRM ID (cgrid) for identity stitching.Here’s the scenario I tested:On Desktop A, I logged in as a user (with CRM ID = xyz) and received the Variant experience. The ECID was 123.Then, on Desktop B, I visited the site anonymously (not logged in) and was assigned to the Control experience with ECID = 456.After browsing as anonymous on Desktop B, I logged in with the same CRM ID xyz.Adobe Target then switched the experience to Variant (aligning with the login history of Desktop A), but the ECID remained as 456 on Desktop B.This effectively means that the same user (CRM ID = xyz):Saw Control when anonymous (Desktop B)Saw Variant after login (Desktop B)Already had Variant history from another device (Desktop A)My Questions:Is this expected behavior in Adobe Target?Can this cause contamination in A/B test results, since one user is technica
Hi All,I am practising AJO to build an journey to send birthday mail,For that i created an Individual profile schema and ingest an data into dataset through HTTP source connector using streaming API ,then create an audience using Birth date(YYYY-MM-DD) attribute(build rule method) and i want to choose streaming as a evaluation method . but when i go to publish the audience AEP forced to choose Batch method only ,why AEP does that , like I am ingest an data through streaming API and the attributes that i am choosing for creating an audience should get qualify on same day (Birth date(YYYY-MM-DD)), if i choose batch it takes 24 hours to qualify the profile for audience. Please educated on that query.Thanks.
Hello. Does anyone use another asset sharing platform with AEM Cloud instead of Content HUB? I am researching alternatives to Content HUB as it may not have all the search and collection features we want to make available to our Distributors and internal employees. Thank you, Mark W. HolmesSenior Digital LibrarianHerbalife
Before I ping support, I thought I would throw this out to the community. I have two tasks in a project with predecessors that have been met, but the Can Start value is False. Why? Is there something hinky going on with that cross-project predecessor?
Hi All, I wanted to know if anyone has attempted to group a report by multiple typeahead fields? I have three user typeahead fields associated with a form. The report request I have been asked to produce would group the report by user. The kicker here is that they want, if the user is entered in either of these three fields, it would populate under that user in the grouping of the report. Not even sure if this is possible.
Hello,We are currently looking into the integration of our development tools and Adobe Cloud Manager, specifically to integrate 3rd party packages that are NOT available through public repositories. After checking the documentation, it seems there are 2 options :Integrate with a private password protected maven repositoryThis approach currently raises security concernsThe preferred integration pattern would be OIDCUse the file based local repositoryAccording to this explanation, we can basically store the artifacts in our GIT repo so that they are retrieved as any other code source and then used as a dependencyThis is not a my preferred option but we'll do it if we have toAm I listing all possible options here ? Are there any other possibilities ? We also scanned through the API doc but did not find anything to push artifacts into Cloud Manager. Thanks in advance for your answer !
Use this thread to ask any questions related to the Experience League LIVE session titled, "Don’t Wait… Collaborate! Introducing Real-Time CDP Collaboration." Experts are monitoring this thread to ensure your questions are answered. Thanks and we hope to hear from you!
Description - I would like to be able to report on which issues are submitted by an intake email address. Why is this feature important to you - This is another metric to identify where issues derive from, which can be helpful for analyzing requestor behavior. Additionally, requests received by email is a backup when nonusers need to use your request queue, which is increasingly a need due to the absence of autoprovisioning after migrating to the Admin Console, OR when traditional submission routes are borked for whatever reason. How would you like the feature to work - Create a native field to identify an issue as having been submitted to the system by an intake email address. Alternately, remove the topic path. Current Behaviour - Per conversation here, there is no way to identify requests that are submitted to a queue by way of an intake email address.
In our instance most Request Queues are available system wide but the requests are routed to a landing project that the team working on those requests have manage access along with contribute access for the individual that made the request.The requesters teams would like to see and contribute to any requests made by their team (except HR requests) in case someone is out or the like.What I would like to do is add contribute access to all requests made by a member of a particular team to their entire team. Does anyone know of a way to do this either direct in Workfront or via Fusion? Thank you in advance for any suggestions.Dawnmarie
Is there a way to "lock" or "freeze" allocations to the day/week/month in which they are assigned even if the dates shift? Think of it like using a "$" in an excel formula to lock something in place. As a resource manager, I allocate the hours based on discussion with my team member. As a project owner, I added planned hours, added other users, or I adjusted the dates of the task because others need to start work earlier or end later.The change made adjusts the allocation efforts the resource manager did. The resource manager set the allocations in the day/week/month specifically and does not want it to change. Can this be locked?
Our Group Admin no longer have the ability to add a user as a Planner (now Standard) although that is the access they have. I hadn't touched the access or updated anything so I'm not sure why they are no longer able to do this. I have reset one of the users but nothing changed. What am I missing? Any insight into this issue would be appreciated. Best,Dawnmarie
The Architect is preparing to deploy to AEM as a Cloud Service. The existing project uses a SAML 2.0 IDP. Where should the Architect configure the IMS in AEM as a Cloud Service? (A) SAML 2.0 Authentication Handler (B) Adobe IMS Configurations Console (C) Admin Console (D) Apache Sling Authentication Service @aanchal-sikka @EstebanBustamante @arunpatidar @Shashi_Mulugu @lukasz-m @Mahedi_Sabuj @kautuk_sahni @Sudheer_Sundalam@lukasz-m @Rohan_Garg
A customer is using AEM 6.4. The Architect is defining "daily" runbook tasks.Which task must be part of the list? (A) Version Cleanup (B) Offline Compaction (C) Audit Log Purge (D) Online Compaction @aanchal-sikka @EstebanBustamante @arunpatidar @Shashi_Mulugu @Pranay_M @Mahedi_Sabuj @DivrajSingh @Sudheer_Sundalam@lukasz-m @Rohan_Garg
I added the following metrics to the table shown in the screenshot: Bounce Rate (SPV/E), Bounce Rate (SPV/V), and Bounce Rate. As you can see, the different bounce rate metrics vary greatly, so we are looking for some expertise on which to use. Usually, we use SPV/E when looking at visits; however, we are seeing bounce rates greater than 100%. This is what prompted me to examine the other bounce rate metrics, but they vary so greatly that I am looking for some expertise. I know the difference in what they calculate. (Singe Page Visits/Entries vs Single Page Visits/Visits). If the goal here is to just see the page URLs with the highest bounce rate, which is the accurate one to use for my instance? Image attached.
Description - I spent several days and even posted to the community to try to figure out why Can Start was false on some follow-on tasks. Come to find out there is a sneaky little inconsistency in task status behavior. Why is this feature important to you - There are two reasons: We rely a fair amount on the Percent Complete field instead of status because it adds more context to work in progress. When we see Percent Complete is 100%, we assume that the task is complete. When a project has outstanding issues, we can't change the status to Complete. Therefore, any field that indicates a task is complete (or greatly implies) should follow the same behavior as a project because it's darn helpful for quality control. How would you like the feature to work - If a user tries to set Percent Complete to 100%, present them with an error message describing alerting the user that there are open issues and default the value to the previous value. Current Behaviour - A user can set Percent
Similar to Instagram - i would love to be able to save certain conversations or posts to my profile to reference later. Many times a need comes up and i search the content on experience league but i don't have time in the moment to research it. Would love to not forget what i was going to go and do / edit it by being able to save everything.
I know that we can use POST method to make normal GQL query and perform GQL Ops but I wanted to know how can we achieve the same for persisted query, when I make a POST call with variables, I get an error: When I copy URL which takes variables AEM gives URL which looks like this: https://<DOMAIN>/graphql/execute.json/GetArticlesByID;filterExpressions= and here's how my variable looks like: { "filterExpressions": {"_logOp":"OR","_expressions":[{"value":"422322","_operator":"EQUALS"},{"value":"422321","_operator":"EQUALS"}]} } when I pass it directly in filterExpressions, it gives me error saying: "Variable 'filterExpressions' has an invalid value : Expected type 'Map' but was 'String'. Variables for input objects must be an instance of type 'Map'." I am not sure why endpoint is designed the the way it is? Is it possible to pass in params in get call as query params or does it have to be in some other way?
I have just recently drafted an article outlining all of my knowledge on integrating a JS front end with AEM. I would appreciate if you could provide some feedback and whether it can be further improved for the benefit of the wider AEM community. The article is below: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/approaches-integrating-adobe-experience-manager-aem-front-pereira-rbmlc/
Already have an account? Login
Enter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.