Product Communities

The personal Time Off calendar would benefit from built-in approvals. Marking Time Off on a user's personal calendar should send an approval notification to their manager. Requests that are pending approval could have a different icons/colors on the personal calendar for visual distinction. Ideally, pending Time Off requests would also show up in the User's Home area, similar to other pending requests.Use Case:Like any organization, we require management approval for Time Off. As such, our users have to submit Time Off requests through a request queue, which appear on calendars once approved. We also require them to document Time Off on their personal calendars as this impacts project timelines. Implementing the above suggestion would allow us to consolidate these two processes into one while retaining the necessary approvals. And, we would be able to use the new Time Off Calendar featured in the 2019.3 release (https://vimeo.com/352816307/c9988ec54c)

The ability to add your own custom color palette is a great addition to a workspace. I think it would be great to make the color palette shareable within an organization so it can be easily accessed and applied by other teammates. 

Make Search Keywords, for Natural & Paid, native built in system variables (at least eVars) so that we can Classify them for Segmentation, Pathing, Fall Outs, Path Finder, etc.

Now that google has encryptet paid search keywords we get a lot of "not provided" in the paid keywords reports. Unfurtunately if you have linkedin your Adwords account with your Google Analytics account you still get the keyword data. For this we get a lot of push back from clients.Make it possible to add a Google Adwords account in the admin console so we get the same data in Analytics. I know that the Media Optimizer product allows for this but many are not ready to pay the price for this. Its a serious disadvantage for Analytics that will drive Google Analytics uptake, so please consider this asap.

From what I can tell, it seems like it is extremely rare for any suggestion to reach 45 votes. Perhaps we should lower the bar to a more achievable number of votes in order for a greater number of ideas to be assessed by the product team!!

At the moment, you can only have 30 resource managers. We need more as we have a large studio and many users need oversight of all projects - but have been advised that the limit is at 30 for speed/efficiency reasons. It would be great if we could have an increase in the number of resource managers we can have, without sacrificing the speed of the system.

Would love to be able to filter out fields while creating any report based on the group/sub-groups selected. We have many fields that are specific to a particular group and seeing all fields together might sometimes be confusing to the users.

Sending emails to recipients based on their time zone is a great new feature Marketo has delivered recently--and part of what makes it such a robust option is that it uses several fields and factors to calculate a recipient's time zone. That data would be incredibly useful if it was exposed to either the API or UI as a read-only field for calculating other actions on. Two that come to mind immediately would be smarter list segmentation and hooking into a technology integration (sending SMS messages at local times, rather than all at once.) Unfortunately, the system-calculated time zone is not available and thus users have to do their own time zone calculations today, making redundant work.

There is a Reviewing Proofs pdf that seems to be the go-to for Proof review/approval functionality training. There are a number of outdated links in the document, and it also shows viewing from Home, which an external user can't see. A concise (not 20pg) document which simply explains how to review static/motion etc. assets, comment and approve Proofs from an email link for an external user only is crucial. I have seen discussion on this, and it seems people have had to create their own documentation on this repeatedly, myself included. Thanks

Request that functionality be included in WF to enable users to include multiple views of data in a report. For example, I'd like to be able to have 2 Matrix Grouping tabs instead of just 1 on a report in order to make it easy to visualize data in multiple ways.

Great to have option for creating separate (customised) Issue / Tasks / Projects priority for Company / Group. Else have the facility to hide one of them for specific Company or Group.MvhKundan

Hi Experts, Client wants to personalize SFMC emails through Adobe Target. I have checked the help docs but didn't find the integration. I believe it is not introduced it. Please confirm.If no, do we have any other approach through which we can personalize SFMC emails using AT?

It would be helpful to get decision comments (i.e. when you make a decision and leave a comment - refer below) to appear in the update emails workfront sends out after a decision is made to proof owners. This will ensure convenience and ease for finding these comments.

We should to be able to run a report for the total number of submissions for each form for a given time period. If I could get really greedy, I would love to see the form name, and the number of total submissions *and* unique submissions for each form. But total submissions by each form name for a time frame would be incredibly valuable as a basic reporting/analytics report.    The landing page report is useless unless your forms are all hosted on Marketo landing pages.

We need a way to export all views to something that can be made static and distributed, such as an XLSX or a PDF. This goes for Reports, but I also need an exportable document from Resourcing. The Legacy Resource Planner allowed you to export to XLS but current tools don't offer any export features. Please add!!

This was available in Legacy Planner. The Workload Balancer only shows summary of hours of the task for that time period but we don't equally distribute hours across the task (some days are heavier). Please update!!

I would like to be able to filter for residents in Washington D.C., however since this is a federal district, and not a city, it doesn't show up in the dropdown menu for GeoSegmentation City, which is making it hard for me to filter the way I want. Does anyone know a work-around for this? The filter I'm using for other cities is:  GeoSegmentation City equals Milwaukeeand GeoSegmentation Region/States equals Wisconsin (United States)and Locale (CI 4) (prop4) equals Milwaukeeand Site Section equals WIIs there a way to do something like this for Washington D.C.? 

To implement use cases as described here, it would be very useful to have the ability to set advanced settings on A4T success metrics. 

Allow layout templates to determine where the user lands when in the Portfolio or Projects tabs. The Portfolio tab defaults to 'Portfolios I Own'. Would like to land on 'All Portfolios'.The Projects tab defaults to 'Projects I Own'. Would like to land on 'All Projects'. When in a Portfolio, it defaults to 'Active Projects'. Would like to land on 'All Projects'.

Farsi (Persian) Language Support As we start to do more business in the middle east it would be nice to have Farsi (Persian) language support for Forms 2.0  

We are having trouble with authorization issue, and if Adobe accept our suggestion, it will be a great help not only for us, but also those who want to grant authority user by user, differently. We suggest to change authorization system as follows:1 manage signal(including derived signal) by data sources, as trait and segment does.2 manage segment and trait folder by data sources, so that we can see folders only that we can access to.- we want to manage folder as same as we manage trait and segment, and suggest to include "choosing data sources" in the folder addition process. (we want to hide floders that users do not have access to.) - folder and folder trait are different now, so it makes us confusing.3 manage profile merge rule function by wild card permission.- also, if those who have no authority to access functions, we want to hide that tab from the menu bar.4 hide [payables] and [integrated accounts] tab from the menu bar, except for the administrator account.5 see da

When archiving a group of emails - it would be helpful to have a way to select multiple batch email programs and drag and drop them into an Archive folder.  Currently move all 2019 emails to an archive folder is a massive manual undertakeing and would be speeded up by selecting multiples at a time. Thansk.

It would be great if users had an option to auto-assign tasks for the duration of the project. Ideally, this would be an option after '6 weeks' in the schedule when only one project is showing that would dynamically set the number of weeks to match the project planned start and end dates. However, if it's a tick box on auto-assign that means I can't see the entire project and I have to scroll, so be it.Yes, if you have a project that spans years it might cause problems. I'd suggest you don't select that option or put it back to 6 weeks in that case.

At this moment as a consumer of Customer Attributes solution, we don't have a mechanism to verify data is synced to Adobe Analytics on the UI, an only possible way to manually validate the in Adobe Analytics, this is so bad from a customer experience point of view, why would a customer need to login every time to Adobe Analytics and verify the data, instead of that if customer attributes platform displays the status on the UI or send a communication to stakeholders really helpful

It would be helpful to allow requesters the ability to attach folders with content already in them to requests rather than attaching content piece by piece. Not only would it help save time, but it would keep pieces of content organized.