Product Communities

Is it something like that possible if user would turn on journey/campaign?

Once Unified Experience is in place in our instance, are there any admin controls to change the icon menu view that users see? I see that Workfront Profile is now accessible from the account avatar. But the other menu icons and account links are very confusing and I would like to limit the user view to a lot of these. Is that possible? We tested with a non-admin user view in Unified Experience and the user sees a lot of information that isn't helpful to a non admin user.Thanks  

Hi, how can I create a rules based field in content fragment model. For example, there is a enum field called fuel type; if the fuel type is electric, then a new field, battery power, should pop up or should be populated. If the fuel type is any other, the battery power field couldn’t be populated or shown. How can I do this? Thank you.

I'm currently facing an issue with the AEP Web SDK Extension in Data Collection—it doesn't allow me to create the XDM Object Data Element needed to map variables to my schema. Has anyone face similar issue?

Hello, I would like to find a way to send out email reminders to update their project to designated groups, preferably one to me/my team and the one person/team that is currently assigned and working on the project. I would like to have this email be sent out 2 weeks before the expected due date on the project is. I was currently investigating and looking around to see if this is possible but failed in my research. Is this kind of process a possibility on workfront? Thank you for any help you can provide.

Hello Team,Here is a use case.There is a trigger campaign in Marketo which deletes the confidential data (the record which is selected as confidential in Salesforce end). The flow set is set as such it deletes from Marketo database but not in CRM.Can we also control the deleted records to be kept hidden in Salesforce? If yes, should it be done in Salesforce admin settings?Thoughts please?Thanks in Advance,Gayathiry

Hi Everyone, Current datastream config has analytics dataset (profile enabled) and AJO dataset (profile enabled). ECID and user ID is not getting stitched in profile if analytics dataset is selected as primary.  Could you please suggest what's recommended approach to make push notification working with analytics dataset as primary and why data is not stitching when analytics dataset selected as primary. Thanks

Before unified approvals became a thing, we used to be able run reports showing assigned approvals that any user could run for themselves using the $$USER.ID wild card. Now, the only place that assigned approvals are listed is the home page and I haven't been able to figure out how to create a report similar to the one we used to use. I would be willing to switch to using the home page but, as someone managing a team with assigned tasks, I can't filter tasks by working group on the home page. I'm left with having to use a custom dashboard / report to manage tasks and issues, and the home screen to manage approvals. Is there a way to create a report that could be added to my custom dashboard and list all of my assigned approvals?

Hi, I know you can create a parameter report to list all reports a field is being used on.  1. Does this mean the field is in the filter or the view (or column)? 2. Has anyone been able to create a report to list filters a field is being used on? I have tried combinations between an API call or even the Data Lake to see if I can pull data.  Curious if anyone got close to this?

Is anyone experiencing any issues with your users logging their time off?  Here is what our users are experiencing: User goes to put time in October 13-17, and then they go put time in December for 8-12. When they do that, the time the put in for October disappears?  

Hey Community. It is a bit complicated.I have issues/requests with documents attached.Approval processes are also added to the issues/requests.There are teams assigned to the approval processes. Besides other filters I want to show documents where the user is part of the approver team. But I don't get to the data via EXISTS statement. This is what I currently have:currentVersion:proofID_Mod=notblank EXISTS:A:$$OBJCODE=OPTASK EXISTS:A:ID=FIELD:opTaskID EXISTS:A:teamAssignment:teamID=$$USER.teamIDs EXISTS:A:teamAssignment:teamID_Mod=in opTask:status=CLS RLV opTask:status_Mod=notin OR:1:currentVersion:proofID_Mod=notblank OR:1:opTask:status=CLS RLV OR:1:opTask:status_Mod=notin OR:1:owner:homeTeamID=$$USER.teamIDs OR:1:owner:homeTeamID_Mod=inThe last OR filter for approver teams is missing because i don't know how.Last try was:OR:1:EXISTS:B:$$OBJCODE=OPTASK OR:1:EXISTS:B:ID=FIELD:opTaskID OR:1:EXISTS:B:approvalProcess:accessorIDs=$$USER.ID OR:1:EXISTS:B:approvalProcess:accessorID

Hi, Has anyone been able to use text mode to group by project name (or ID) on a baseline task report? I tried the below as a starting point, but it is zero value group.0.linkedname=task group.0.namekey=view.relatedcolumn group.0.namekeyargkey.0=task group.0.namekeyargkey.1=Project ID group.0.valuefield=task:Project ID group.0.valueformat=customDataLabelsAsString

A product capability suggestion - In my case, I created a metrics of revenue with tax, which added 2 existing metrics of revenue and tax.  I then would like to create a segment of visits that meet a threshold of the calculated metrics.  Currently, Adobe Analytics cannot create segments using calculated metrics.   It will be useful if segments can use calculated metrics.

Hi Folks,   Today, Adobe Workfront shared this announcement upon login:     We first learned of the upcoming change a couple of weeks ago (then, cited less precisely as "Sept 2025"), so have been working furiously to upgrade all of our solutions, and were delighted to make a similar announcement today in response:     As Workront's oldest partner, we had vestigial references going back to API v2.0 all the way up to current (v20.0), and as we tackled this upgrade, had to decide whether to:   use the "Latest" API by NOT specifying a version and instead "roll with it" whenever the official Latest version changes (so less maintenance, but more risk), or use the specific "v20.0" latest version to "lock in" that functionality, recognizing that someday the code will need to then be upgraded (deferred maintenance) We decided to go with the latter, and have teed up our tech stack to make future such transitions less onerous, but I am curious what others ar

Hi Everyone,    We have implemented the following business use case -  1. Send a request from AEM Publish to Runtime 2. Runtime action is able to generate the access token against the IMS to access the AEM Author instance 3A. Use cURL command to directly ping the author server with the payload -- Gives 200 OK works fine 3B Use the runtime action to generate the request to author instance -- gets blocked at CDN layer 4. The servlet at author takes the payload and does its own custom logic processing.   So locally and via curl the servlet worked fine but when invoked from Adobe I/O runtime it failed with 403 not allowed.   Conclusions -  1. Issue not in servlet, not in dispatcher rules as direct curl from local machine gives 200 OK The curl command when hit gives the below response -  rohan_garg@work hello-runtime % curl -X POST \"https://author-p123456-e1234567.adobeaemcloud.com/services/abc/save" \-H "Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJSUz..." \-H

I have a content fragment with a text box that has the “unique” option enabled. When the fragment loads, it triggers the unique field validation call (/mnt/overlay/dam/cfm/admin/components/authoring/validations/uniquefield.json), but it doesn’t return any response.In the Query Performance tool, I can see the following error:“The query read or traversed more than 100000 nodes. To avoid affecting other tasks, processing was stopped.”To fix this issue, I configured Lucene indexing for this query:/jcr:root/content/dam//element(*, dam:cfVariationNode)[(@location = 'market')] option (index tag fragments)I used the Oak Index Generator (https://thomasmueller.github.io/oakTools/indexDefGenerator.html to create the index definition. However, it didn’t work. After adding the configuration, the Content Fragment didn’t use the index. I tried restarting and reindexing, but there was no luck.\What could be the issue? { "/oak:index/damcfVariationNodeLucene-12-custom-1": { "async": [ "async",

Hi All, I am facing a weird issue where any clicks on Exit outbound link (different domain / social media) renders the rest of the setup not working.I have used Adobe Data collection to setup the tags and within it I am using extensions like Adobe Client Datalayer to trigger Rules based on datalayer pushes. However, in testing when I click on any social media outbound link or any other outbound click, after that any basic CTA or link tracking events on the man site are not being triggered.

Is there anyway to show the email address in a typeahead custom field instead of the user name?Even though when typing in a user, the email adress is visible, I need the populated field to show the email address, not the name in the submitted request form.Or, can this be done using calculated fields? 

Hi! Our department is looking to create a customizable project plan with Workfront. We cannot afford Workfront Planning. Has anyone successfully done this and if so, please share any tips and tricks you may have! Thank you!

Hi I am facing some issue with the Marketo Destination testing for LENS - 1.I have ingested data to AEP and it qualified for a segment and that segment we are trying to send to Marketo. - Which is success.  2. For the same record which reached at marketo end, when I am trying to send with Updated value for a Delta field (EBR) in my case, I am seeing a strange behaviour for the field 'sourceType' being 'Marketo' which ideally should be LENS since it is handled at mapping end.  Due to the above behaviour the updated profile is not getting qualified for 'segment' and not able to sent to Marketo through the destination.

Hi everyone, We are currently implementing an Adobe Commerce on Edge Delivery Services (EDS) storefront connected to AEM Sites as a Cloud Service. In our current setup, the file https://example.com/configs.json is publicly accessible from the browser. This file contains environment-related configurations and API endpoints required for the Drop-ins initialization. While this approach works functionally, it raises a security concern for production environments since the file is exposed and potentially reveals sensitive configuration details. I would like to know what Adobe recommends as the best practice for handling environment configs and secrets in EDS storefronts. Specifically: Should these values be managed through a secure service, such as Adobe App Builder runtime variables? Is there a supported mechanism to inject configuration dynamically without exposing it client-side? Would Adobe recommend using a CDN layer (Fastly/Cloudflare) or a

I have an OSGi service that uses the WorkflowService API to programmatically trigger the "Update Asset" workflow that's forever been found at:/var/workflow/models/dam/update_assetIt's missing in AEM Assets as a Cloud Service and I can't find clear documentation on triggering its equivalent. Does anyone here have advice on what needs to be done to trigger this or its equivalent from inside an OSGi service in Assets as a Cloud Service? Note: The workflow model still exists in the Quickstart Jar from Software Distribution, so everything works fine for me locally. For context: The reason why we're triggering the workflow is because we have custom OSGi code that pulls proprietary data from other systems and creates and updates both image Assets and Content Fragments. Updated images will create new Revisions of Assets through the AssetsManager API. The Update Asset workflow doesn't seem to fire the way it would if you manually made these same changes, so we're triggering the Update

Hello,I'm encountering a persistent issue when attempting to create a Dataflow in Adobe Experience Platform (AEP) via the Flow Service API.### Problem Description1.  API Response: The API call to create the Dataflow consistently returns a `500 Internal Error` with the following details:   ```json   {     "type": "https://ns.adobe.com/aep/errors/FLOW-1102-500",     "title": "Internal Error",     "status": 500,     "report": {       "detailed-message": "An internal error has occurred. Please try again. If the problem persists, please contact customer support.",       "request-id": "jRYpviErjYYlp5lIszoHrfdtUb3pQZ3B"     },     "errorMessage": "An internal error has occurred. Please try again. If the problem persists, please contact customer support.",     "errorDetails": "An internal error has occurred. Please try again.

Hi All, Can anyone please suggest what is the difference between between profile attributes saved via FAC Save profile feature and standard AEP Profile by data ingestion ? What are the limitations of using FAC Save profile ? Is it possible to use save profile for profiles that does not exist in AEP? Thankyou !

I see two main methods:1. getPropositions() - This API retrieves the previously fetched propositions, for the provided decision scopes, from the in-memory extension propositions cache.As I understand its not new request but it takes what is already in Cache? Does it also include capping?2. updatePropositionsWithCompletionHandler() - this one gets propositions if there is nothing in Cache?